Pedophilia Officially Classified
aerial
Posts: 2,319
Pedophilia Officially Classified as Sexual Orientation by American Psychiatric Association
A shocking announcement made by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in its latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders caused an uproar among pro-family organizations and many others, as the APA states it now classifies pedophilia as a sexual orientation or preference instead of a disorder.
Sandy Rios, cultural expert and talk show host on the American Family Radio network, has issued a statement on behalf of the American Family Association in response to the APA’s position on pedophilia:
"Just as the APA declared homosexuality an ‘orientation’ under tremendous pressure from homosexual activists in the mid-'70s, now, under pressure from pedophile activists, they have declared the desire for sex with children an ‘orientation,’ too. It's not hard to see where this will lead. More children will become sexual prey.
"Sanity will never return to this culture until truth is reclaimed. It is not now, nor has it ever been acceptable for men or women to desire sex with children. Any who struggle with this must at least know that it is wrong before they can combat it and seek change."
Correction: A previous version of this article referred to the American Psychological Association. The correct organization is the American Psychiatric Association.
http://www.charismanews.com/us/41571-pedophilia-officially-classified-as-sexual-orientation-by-american-psychology-association
WOW I really thought beastieality would be called normal first.
A shocking announcement made by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in its latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders caused an uproar among pro-family organizations and many others, as the APA states it now classifies pedophilia as a sexual orientation or preference instead of a disorder.
Sandy Rios, cultural expert and talk show host on the American Family Radio network, has issued a statement on behalf of the American Family Association in response to the APA’s position on pedophilia:
"Just as the APA declared homosexuality an ‘orientation’ under tremendous pressure from homosexual activists in the mid-'70s, now, under pressure from pedophile activists, they have declared the desire for sex with children an ‘orientation,’ too. It's not hard to see where this will lead. More children will become sexual prey.
"Sanity will never return to this culture until truth is reclaimed. It is not now, nor has it ever been acceptable for men or women to desire sex with children. Any who struggle with this must at least know that it is wrong before they can combat it and seek change."
Correction: A previous version of this article referred to the American Psychological Association. The correct organization is the American Psychiatric Association.
http://www.charismanews.com/us/41571-pedophilia-officially-classified-as-sexual-orientation-by-american-psychology-association
WOW I really thought beastieality would be called normal first.
“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Under pressure from pedophile activists?
This ideology marks yet another portion of society's fabric coming apart. Lending support for those that seek to have sex with kids?
Have we completely lost our fucking minds?
I am guessing that would be North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).
Further, let’s not also forget that their favorite form of entertainment was watching people get torn to shreds by lions, hacked to death, and burned alive. Now days this correlates to watching death,and murder on the internet.
Recognizing sexual ‘orientation’ is walking a razor’s edge. Unlike gay-oriented legislation, pedophilia has victims who must be protected.
We don’t put pedophiles in prison to make them stop being pedophiles; we put them there because they threaten the safety of the most vulnerable people in a society.
Most of this is a quote from another site.
This is what happens in a society where anything goes......Now our society
children deserve every square inch of protection they can get to be purely innocent as they can be. these nasty sick fuckers will forever be monster trash in my world. when they suffer i am celebrating even for 2 seconds i can smile as they slip away into cold darkness
it should be sport to hunt them down, yes/no?
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
Nonsense! :evil:
(and what a strange term - being a vocal proponent for the fucking of and with children)
Pedophelia, from what I know (and have experienced), it's more nurture vs nature. Much different than homosexuality.
I don't think the classification will lead to more children being harmed...that, unfortunately, will continue on as it has. I'm more concerned with what penalties will be affected by this.
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
badbrains, I've always wondered about the castration aspect. Does it get rid of the need itself, or eliminate just one of many means of satisfying that need?
None, I imagine. They still define acting upon such desires as a disorder, and as it stands there is no law against being a pedophile anyway, just acting on it.
i mean seriously... these twisted freaks go after it all.
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
I can see it being used in a defense. This just wrong.
98 CAA
00 Virginia Beach;Camden I; Jones Beach III
05 Borgata Night I; Wachovia Center
06 Letterman Show; Webcast (guy in blue shirt), Camden I; DC
08 Camden I; Camden II; DC
09 Phillie III
10 MSG II
13 Wrigley Field
16 Phillie II
You know, maybe hedonist and Chadwick are right, maybe castrating wouldn't stop it. Mite even make them more aggressive/violent. We should just get rid of them PERIOD. Any harm to any kids is a fucken NO NO!
As an individual who just two months ago discovered a close associate had my daughter as a target of his, I have spent countless hours mulling over exactly what "tripped" in his brain/ mind that he felt compelled to target young girls between the ages of 6-12. I agree, it may be wrong to classify it as sexual orientation, but how else do you classify it? This friend of mine, and yes, when the police detectives informed us of his preferences (sexual), I was floored. More so when I found out my daughter was on his list and he had been working the list most diligently. Yet I am as confused as ever, because he was so close, so hunting him down..........just can't piece that one together and as far as castration, does that work? Removing he organ, yet my thots are if the brain is the house of the personality and inside resides the desires and not, then maybe this truly is an orientation, or just simply wrong wiring and if he were a Hittite, Roman, then he'd be alive today and no issues. Just don't think the sexual organs are at fault here. I can't blame the bullet for the man who pulled the trigger. It's just a vehicle. I don't know. Maybe culture evolves, maybe we are tricked into believing it does and are sadly brought to earth that we haven't changed all that much since living in caves. I hadn't ever thot I'd be personally reading and learning about pedophilia. Not in a million years. Yet here is my life unfolding and it is part of it. Period!
this monster was a serial child predator & he harmed countless boys decade after decade. why wasn't he put down?
how is it even possible that a marijuana dealer would serve more prison time than a guy like this dangerous freak?
pot dealer didn't pay his drug tax. that is why, yes/no?
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
by, Saeed Kamali Dehghan | The Guardian
Parliamentarians in Iran have passed a bill to protect the rights of children which includes a clause that allows a man to marry his adopted daughter and while she is as young as 13 years.
Activists have expressed alarm that the bill, approved by parliament on Sunday, opens the door for the caretaker of a family to marry his or her adopted child if a court rules it is in the interests of the individual child.
Iran’s Guardian Council, a body of clerics and jurists which vets all parliamentary bills before the constitution and the Islamic law, has yet to issue its verdict on the controversial legislation.
To the dismay of rights campaigners, girls in the Islamic republic can marry as young as 13 provided they have the permission of their father. Boys can marry after the age of 15.
In Iran, a girl under the age of 13 can still marry, but needs the permission of a judge. At present, however, marrying stepchildren is forbidden under any circumstances.
As many as 42,000 children aged between 10 and 14 were married in 2010, according to the Iranian news website Tabnak. At least 75 children under the age of 10 were wed in Tehran alone.
Shadi Sadr, a human rights lawyer with the London-based group Justice for Iran, told the Guardian she feared the council would feel safe to put its stamp of approval on the bill while Iran’s moderate president, Hassan Rouhani, draws the attention of the press during his UN visit to New York.
“This bill is legalising paedophilia,” she warned. “It’s not part of the Iranian culture to marry your adopted child. Obviously incest exists in Iran more or less as it happens in other countries across the world, but this bill is legalising paedophilia and is endangering our children and normalising this crime in our culture.”
She added: “You should not be able to marry your adopted children, full stop. If a father marries his adopted daughter who is a minor and has sex, that’s rape.”
According to Sadr, officials in Iran have tried to play down the sexual part of such marriages, saying it is in the bill to solve the issue of hijab [head scarf] complications when a child is adopted.
An adopted daughter is expected to wear the hijab in front of her father, and a mother should wear it in front of her adopted son if he is old enough, Sadr said.
“With this bill, you can be a paedophile and get your bait in the pretext of adopting children,” Sadr said. Some experts believe the new bill is contradictory to Islamic beliefs and would not pass the Guardian Council.
An initial draft of the bill, which had completely banned marriage with adopted children, was not approved by the council and it is feared that MPs introduced the condition for marriage to satisfy the jurists and clergymen. This is why Sadr fears it can pass the council this time.
The bill has prompted backlash in Iran with the reformist newspaper, Shargh, publishing an article warning about its consequences. “How can someone be looking after you and at the same time be your husband?” the article asked.
Shiva Dolatabadi, head of Iran’s society for protecting children’s rights, has also warned that the bill implies that the parliament is legalising incest. “You cannot open a way in which the role of a father or a mother can be mixed with that of an spouse,” she said, according to Shargh. “Children can’t be safe in such a family.”
Execution of juvenile offenders in Iran has also been in spotlight in recent years amid confusion between the age of majority – when minors cease to be legally considered children – and the minimum age of criminal responsibility, which is 15 for boys and nine for girls under Iranian law.
source: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/s ... d-adopted-
If this isn't some kind of joke or falsified piece of information, it's totally wrong because it's unfair to kids!!! :shock:
:evil: :evil: :evil:
http://www.charismanews.com/us/41597-pe ... a-mistaken
The American Family Association (AFA) sounded an alarm on Wednesday, pointing to a shocking announcement from the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in its latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). But was the report accurate?
Charisma News started digging a little deeper on Thursday morning into the AFA’s claims that the APA now classifies pedophilia as a sexual orientation or preference instead of a disorder.
The AFA’s Cindy Roberts told Charisma News that its public relations firm, Hamilton Strategies, conducted the initial research on its claim. The PR firm has not responded to our requests for more information.
Further research reveals the American Spectator incited more fervor on the topic, pulling from a University of Southern California report indicating that “the American Psychiatric Association (APA) drew a very distinct line between pedophilia and pedophilic disorder. Pedophilia refers to a sexual orientation or profession of sexual preference devoid of consummation, whereas pedophilic disorder is defined as a compulsion and is used in reference to individuals who act on their sexuality.”
But Dr. Greg Popcak, director of the Pastoral Solutions Institute, an organization dedicated to helping Catholics find faith-filled solutions to marriage, family and personal problems, says the DSM criteria for pedophilic disorder shouldn’t bother anyone.
“The name of the disorder did change in the DSM V from Pedophilia to Pedophilic Disorder to keep the nomenclature consistent with other categories,” he writes. “But that was an editorial change, not a clinical one and it has no significance for diagnosis of treatment of the disorder.”
Stand by. The APA is sending Charisma News an official statement in the next hour.
Correction: This article corrects issues in an Oct. 30 article based on an AFA report. Click here to read the original article.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Some kind of twisted, distortion of fact in a right-wing publication to get people riled up!
The AFA's atttempt to link homosexuality and pedophilia in their statement, before they even got to complaining about the issue they are supposedly up in arms about should probably have been a clue.
Frankly, it WAS.
That's a Bad Touch
since the media does not seem to fact check anything anymore... and Web Loggers NEVER fact check anything...
And Forum Readers take everything that is SPAM-Mailed to their mail boxes by their looney Aunt Thelma as true facts...
...
It is probably a good idea for us... US as in 'us individual people'... who fail to swallow up every kooky thing we see pop up in front of us... it is probably a good idea to FACT CHECK things for ourselves.
...
I think that is why God invented our minds for us... to THINK FOR OURSELVES... rather than filling it with other people's shit. We all have a brain... we should really try to use it more often than we do.
Hail, Hail!!!
Well thats what www.crazyshittopostonforums.com said.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
I had to give myself one of these: :fp: for biting on one of this forum's most notorious posters of nonsense.
I'm hating myself right now. Just hating myself.
But I have this to say to this OP: Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.