I would rather see Pearl Jam ONCE than 100 Ed Solo Shows

13»

Comments

  • jordn6971
    jordn6971 Posts: 675
    muppet wrote:
    pearl jam are nothin but a backing band!!!

    eddie is always what this band has been about :):)

    I WOULD SELL MY POSSESIONS FOR YOU EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDIE

    Blasphemy. I hope you are kidding.
    "There was a band playing in my head, and I felt like getting high"
  • halszka123
    halszka123 Posts: 1,109
    Hmmm... Well i couldn't see Ed solo, and i saw already PJ llive, but i guess i agree.
    PJ is first:)
    Not 10c member? Have sth to say? write to me - I'll put it on the forum
    halszka123@op.pl
  • Vedderlution_Baby
    Vedderlution_Baby Posts: 2,535
    I read that the props and background played some kind of roll in the show.

    Anyone wanna clarify?
  • CantKeepmedown
    CantKeepmedown Portland, Maine Posts: 3,123
    One PJ show would be over in, well, one night.

    100 Ed shows would get you about 5 months, give or take.

    Give me Ed solo.
  • Vedderlution_Baby
    Vedderlution_Baby Posts: 2,535
    Capricorn Sister wrote:
    One of my friends felt cheated as described by this statement.

    His Pearl Jam fandom got him riled up. The way PJ crowds fuel the band is great. He assumed that would happen at the concerts for which he had tickets. The band not only stood in the exact same spots - they also sang the exact duplicate songs, the second night! He paid $150.00 for each show - expecting a variety of change-ups, banter and encores. The second $150 was a painful lesson learned. He will never do that again - it was a costly mistake.


    Was this a PJ show?

Categories