Wembley sound quality
mook
Posts: 78
Please have a look at the poll on this link. I just got back from the show and i cant help but think that the sound quality at the Wembley show was very bad. I was extremely excited about this show, but I found myself wishing at times that they would finish the set with slow accoustic songs or just stop alltogether. Ed was quite pissed off about it at several occations.
Please click the link below to vote on my poll. I'd like to know what you made of the show.
http://mookiepics.blogspot.com/2006/11/pearl-jam-in-praha.html
Please don't be too negative on this post. I think the setlist was brilliant, but there was times when it would not have made a difference whether Mike was even there or not. I could not hear him in some songs.
Please click the link below to vote on my poll. I'd like to know what you made of the show.
http://mookiepics.blogspot.com/2006/11/pearl-jam-in-praha.html
Please don't be too negative on this post. I think the setlist was brilliant, but there was times when it would not have made a difference whether Mike was even there or not. I could not hear him in some songs.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Have you got any examples of when Ed was pissed off at the sound quality? Without them it's a kinda baseless comment.
Thank you for making me feel slightly better about missing the show.
Edit: Although someone else has posted that they've been to 36 shows and Wembley was top 3. :(
Mike’s stage amps seem to get smaller and fewer every tour.
Three Fish
July 1996 San Francisco
June 1999 Chicago
And the only time Eddie seemed disappointed was when he asked the tech to do something for his acoustic guitar before No More...
Standing about 1/2 way to 3/4 of the way back, directly in front of Mike most of the time. Sound was very muddled, i found it hard to pick out either Stone or Mike alot of the time.
the problems didn't bother me that much, but i couldn't hear anything jeff played in indifference and that was a real disappointment. did anyone else had that problem?
btw, just checked your blog, i am the guy with dreads who was next to you in the que
30.09.2006 Athens | 18.06.2007 London | 18.08.2009 London | 05.07.2014 Werchter | 17.07.2018 London | 08.07.2022 London
Sounded fine. I was actually pleased there wasn't too much top solo.
As has already been said from the point of view of hearing something new, 10/10 but the sound was quite bad with a lot of echo and boom bouncing off the high roof and back wall.
I thought the performance was average for the guys, by no means as strong as the performance from last years Reading fest, anyone who says different mightbe in denial.
Please don't flail me for any negatives, the show was the tits!.....but not as good as other performances I've attended.
I'm giving Ed nine thumbs up.
I was thinking that you would be quite happy when they started playing indefference
There were stages when his voice sounded so drowned out by distortion and that incredibly high pitched sound that overshadowed the room at times, that i just stood there in disbelief. one of the things i enjoyed at Reading was the best concert audio I had ever heard, and now this. It was my fourth time at Wembley, and all the other act's sound was good or perfect.
I was about 3/4 from the front, on Stone's side. Even the crowd noise, had this high pitch over it, so maybe it was out of the band's control.
I'm very worried as I have this loud ringing in my ears that wont go away and I have never had it before.
Sorry for the rambling guys, I love PJ just as much as all of you, but I just need to get this out of my system.
this was my 3rd show. first one was Reading. audio could not have been better, ever.
second one was Prague, and people sad then that the band, and many of the fans were not happy with the sound there.
i now find myself trying to cling on to the memory of the first two shows.
i think those little soft earplugs will help.
very interesting. thanks for helping me to get over the dissapointment. if they ever play Wmebley again, i'll either stand as far back as I can or get seated tickets along the side somewhere.
I was at reading and i saw them the last three times they played at wembley.
The sound probably wasn't great but every gig i go to someone complains about the sound so, i just don't pay attention to it any more. It certainly didn't ruin the gig for me.
I think being to close to the front though means your not going to hear it as well because the speakers are not pointed at you.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
I can't stand near the front anymore as my ear drum really doesn't like being to close to those way to loud speakers. Back for me always, just to save my hearing so i can still listen to music when i hit 90.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
I think you're reading too much into what you saw though... You often see bands gesturing at the tech people, and you could speculate forever on what they may have been doing.
An outdoor festival is a whole different kettle of fish, you don't have room acoustics to contend with at all.
I've had a high pitched ringing in my ears after more concerts than I can remember. It's just the volume.
I could not always here mike's guitar clearly during the solos but I 've always found that being at the front close to one of the sides that happens-it becuase the stage amp at which side your on drowns out a portion of the PA at the side of the stage. As far as I'm concerned the PA should always run in mono so you can hear everything together as opposed to the PA being a representation of the stereo sound on stage.
I couldn't really here Jeff's bass in indifference either.
The band wouldn't know how the sound sounded in the whole arena anyway though-they only hear the sound from the monitors/ear peices-the whole sound could get cut in the arena and the band would just keep playing unawares-they may have had a bad monitor mix.
I didn't think any of the band looked pissed off at all myself-I don't think Ed is going to get overly pissed off that his microphone cord got snagged when he went for a wander-thats a bit prima donnarish for him don't you think.
Overall a great night-ace setlist with loads of rarities (for me) and stuff I've never heard live before (I wanted you are though, and don't gimme no lip would have been cool.
can you all feel the light.........shinin'
Cardiff 2000, San Antonio 2003, Houston 2003, New Orleans 2003, Astoria 2006, Jools Holland 2006, Reading 2006, Zagreb 2006, London 2007, Sheppards Bush 2009, Manchester 2009, London O2 2009, Hyde Park London 2010, Alpine Valley 2011
i think being so close to the stage, and the speakers helped alot for me.
I wave to all my Friends... Yeah!
I'm sure the official bootleg will change my memory of the show. I was convinced for a while that I'll see something like "no audio available for London due to technical problems" on the download site, but I guess it was just me getting upset with the sound I heard from that particular spot.
It was kind of strange to me that the opening band sounded absolutely great from where I was.
The second song when they really opened up the sound was a complete shambles. Just a jumble. The desk got hold of it by the third song and tightened it up, but lost it again in other places throughout. Stone's guitar seemed much louder than Mike's throughout the whole thing, really, and Eddie's vocals were frequently lost. With a lot of the newer songs they played (not so much the last album which I've played loads recently) which I don't know as well as the older stuff, it took me a while to work out what they were playing because I just couldn't hear what Ed was singing.
I thought they did seem to be having a good time tho. I assumed the poor sound was just because I was halfway back in the Arena, so in a way relieved to hear it was all over. But the seats we had were fan bloody tastic for the view. Really was right over the heads of the standing clear front on to the stage. Absolutely brilliant. Best view I've ever had in Wembley and I do usually prefer standing, but being a bit short, often end up just craning my neck all the time to try to see the stage, so this was ace. Leaning forward a bit on the rail brought you closer to the standing guys and a bit more of the atmos. I was standing next to a bunch of fans (girl and guy with bandannas and a guy with a trilby, was it?) and we danced about. It was ace. Couldn't quite believe all the guys in standing were 10C tho. The ones at the back just didn't seem the type. I don't know. Maybe there isn't a type. There was a bloke, 50ish near me, spent most of the time sitting down. Didn't really see him react at all. How was he in there? (Perhaps he was a Dad accompanying a younger 10Cber.)
Still brilliant though!
I think we're a bit spoiled with top quality bootlegs - professional mixed, post performance and then mastered to CD quality. It never sounds as good when you're actually there.
You might have read my post on the sound issues at the Wembley show. If so, please go and have a look at my blog. I posted a few photos and a few things from the show that I scanned. There is a few messages to people I met there and a request for photos of the show (my camera was confiscated).
http://mookiepics.blogspot.com/
Thanks