ill ask it again since im sure you will either not answer or say "i dont know"
who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat, who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????
OWS protesters were targeted by government agencies and private security firms hired by private companies and that these agencies were working together to infiltrate, information gather and possibly assassinate OWS leaders
are you saying that this isnt true? i should prove this? these documents came from the govt which they fought to keep secret. the names were redacted, obviously i cant prove it! who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat, who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????
yes your right i cant prove that the govt wanted to kill OWS leaders, I cant prove that the govt killed JFK, I cant prove that the govt killed MLK, i cant prove that the govt didnt kill etc etc etc (soon to be assange)
You pointed to a quote from the government that in no way indicates the government was planning to assassinate anyone and called it proof. The document indicates that someone, somewhere, may have been planning sniper attacks against OWS members. Why are we supposed to be believe it was a government operative who was doing this? Why are we supposed to believe this threat was any more real than the poor innocent anarchists you don't think should be in jail for plotting to blow up a bridge? Why is the government intelligence supposed to be so infallible this time but completely wrong last time?
OWS protesters were targeted by government agencies and private security firms hired by private companies and that these agencies were working together to infiltrate, information gather and possibly assassinate OWS leaders
are you saying that this isnt true? i should prove this? these documents came from the govt which they fought to keep secret. the names were redacted, obviously i cant prove it! who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat, who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????
yes your right i cant prove that the govt wanted to kill OWS leaders, I cant prove that the govt killed JFK, I cant prove that the govt killed MLK, i cant prove that the govt didnt kill etc etc etc (soon to be assange)
You pointed to a quote from the government that in no way indicates the government was planning to assassinate anyone and called it proof. The document indicates that someone, somewhere, may have been planning sniper attacks against OWS members. Why are we supposed to be believe it was a government operative who was doing this? Why are we supposed to believe this threat was any more real than the poor innocent anarchists you don't think should be in jail for plotting to blow up a bridge? Why is the government intelligence supposed to be so infallible this time but completely wrong last time?
i didnt say the govt i said the govt and private security firms...to answer your other questions... i have no proof....thank you good night
OWS protesters were targeted by government agencies and private security firms hired by private companies and that these agencies were working together to infiltrate, information gather and possibly assassinate OWS leaders
are you saying that this isnt true? i should prove this? these documents came from the govt which they fought to keep secret. the names were redacted, obviously i cant prove it! who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat, who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????
yes your right i cant prove that the govt wanted to kill OWS leaders, I cant prove that the govt killed JFK, I cant prove that the govt killed MLK, i cant prove that the govt didnt kill etc etc etc (soon to be assange)
You pointed to a quote from the government that in no way indicates the government was planning to assassinate anyone and called it proof. The document indicates that someone, somewhere, may have been planning sniper attacks against OWS members. Why are we supposed to be believe it was a government operative who was doing this? Why are we supposed to believe this threat was any more real than the poor innocent anarchists you don't think should be in jail for plotting to blow up a bridge? Why is the government intelligence supposed to be so infallible this time but completely wrong last time?
i didnt say the govt i said the govt and private security firms...to answer your other questions... i have no proof....thank you good night
OK. So the question remains: Can anyone think of a single conspiracy theory that has been proven true?
Easy for you to say... how can you sleep tight when they're out to get you?!?!?!
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
the people in this country who think that this is some grand conspiracy and are accusing that old man who took care of those kids of being an actor in a conspiracy are fucking disgraceful. they make the 9/11 truthers look like sane and rational people.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
the people in this country who think that this is some grand conspiracy and are accusing that old man who took care of those kids of being an actor in a conspiracy are fucking disgraceful. they make the 9/11 truthers look like sane and rational people.
My original point exactly. If you are interested in details we do not know yet that is one thing. But if you are pushing the idea that this is all a hoax to hurt the gun industry then you are just a terrible person. Those kids are dead and all you are worried about is your politics.
I'd rather stayon my toes not trust power
it hasn't looked like it has my back its about money and none
keep sheep well
herded with no power.It is getting more like slaveand slave owner masses living on smidgeons given by the government control under the guise of good forall
conspiracy is based infact
justhave to say if ridding the sheep of their own protectionsa plan these tragedies areworking in their favor
but sheep can betricky especially bighorn
I'd rather stayon my toes not trust power
it hasn't looked like it has my back its about money and none
keep sheep well
herded with no power.It is getting more like slaveand slave owner masses living on smidgeons given by the government control under the guise of good forall
conspiracy is based infact
justhave to say if ridding the sheep of their own protectionsa plan these tragedies areworking in their favor
but sheep can betricky especially bighorn
Again, the issue is not asking questions. The issue is conspiracy mongering for the sake of getting attention and making money. Blindly following someone like that makes someone no less "a sheep".
I'd rather stayon my toes not trust power
it hasn't looked like it has my back its about money and none
keep sheep well
herded with no power.It is getting more like slaveand slave owner masses living on smidgeons given by the government control under the guise of good forall
conspiracy is based infact
justhave to say if ridding the sheep of their own protectionsa plan these tragedies areworking in their favor
but sheep can betricky especially bighorn
Me thinks you know nothing about being a slave, so probably not the best analogy to be using. Critical thinking is what will usually win the day, but then perhaps that might also relate back to my first sentence.
I'd rather stayon my toes not trust power
it hasn't looked like it has my back its about money and none
keep sheep well
herded with no power.It is getting more like slaveand slave owner masses living on smidgeons given by the government control under the guise of good forall
conspiracy is based infact
justhave to say if ridding the sheep of their own protectionsa plan these tragedies areworking in their favor
but sheep can betricky especially bighorn
This type of paranoia and distrust, if widespread, should be very concerning for so many reasons.
Where does this entrenched disposition come from? There are no people from any other country on this forum that talk like this about their government.
A major issue or crisis should have the effect of galvanizing the country as they bond together to deal with it... yet on this issue, people have become more polarized. It will be interesting how your leadership responds today and, in turn, how the public reacts to this response.
I'd rather stayon my toes not trust power
it hasn't looked like it has my back its about money and none
keep sheep well
herded with no power.It is getting more like slaveand slave owner masses living on smidgeons given by the government control under the guise of good forall
conspiracy is based infact
justhave to say if ridding the sheep of their own protectionsa plan these tragedies areworking in their favor
but sheep can betricky especially bighorn
Me thinks you know nothing about being a slave, so probably not the best analogy to be using. Critical thinking is what will usually win the day, but then perhaps that might also relate back to my first sentence.
notgonna find out either
methinks methinks i hearith uppitytone
I'd rather stayon my toes not trust power
it hasn't looked like it has my back its about money and none
keep sheep well
herded with no power.It is getting more like slaveand slave owner masses living on smidgeons given by the government control under the guise of good forall
conspiracy is based infact
justhave to say if ridding the sheep of their own protectionsa plan these tragedies areworking in their favor
but sheep can betricky especially bighorn
Me thinks you know nothing about being a slave, so probably not the best analogy to be using. Critical thinking is what will usually win the day, but then perhaps that might also relate back to my first sentence.
notgonna find out either
methinks methinks i hearith uppitytone
I whole heartily agree you won't find out, as it is a daft statement to make in the first place, say the least.
As for my uppity tone, I apologize for using proper punctuation and sentence structure. woulditbebetterifitypedlikethis?
I'd rather stayon my toes not trust power
it hasn't looked like it has my back its about money and none
keep sheep well
herded with no power.It is getting more like slaveand slave owner masses living on smidgeons given by the government control under the guise of good forall
conspiracy is based infact
justhave to say if ridding the sheep of their own protectionsa plan these tragedies areworking in their favor
but sheep can betricky especially bighorn
Again, the issue is not asking questions. The issue is conspiracy mongering for the sake of getting attention and making money. Blindly following someone like that makes someone no less "a sheep".
yeahmaking money not so cool but you can'tbe so sure of allthe motives
keep your mind opentoo Obamahas an agenda.Not to help angry youngsick men with
suicidal tendencies
otr protect our children during schoolhours
no its to
takeaway guns. Demorcats know this
and they dishonestlyhide it. They say it is for safetybut it is not.They wantguns gone.
Iwant
abortion gone. That will be the nextagenda saving a childa life every26 seconds.
If the Democrats caredso much about protecting life and children they would gladly
join the cause and protectunborn life.
I'd rather stayon my toes not trust power
it hasn't looked like it has my back its about money and none
keep sheep well
herded with no power.It is getting more like slaveand slave owner masses living on smidgeons given by the government control under the guise of good forall
conspiracy is based infact
justhave to say if ridding the sheep of their own protectionsa plan these tragedies areworking in their favor
but sheep can betricky especially bighorn
This type of paranoia and distrust, if widespread, should be very concerning for so many reasons.
Where does this entrenched disposition come from? There are no people from any other country on this forum that talk like this about their government.
A major issue or crisis should have the effect of galvanizing the country as they bond together to deal with it... yet on this issue, people have become more polarized. It will be interesting how your leadership responds today and, in turn, how the public reacts to this response.
historyhas taught us not to trust power do you trust American govrnment
all ive
heard is
the bad stuffwe do bypeopleof other countries this issueso many issues like abortion too time for the liberals toc come aroundand show us they respectlife
andallow the unborn the basicright to life
i'mwaiting to hear whatwill be done about the real causeof the shootings, economicsocial changes
thewhy people need guns to live safely mentalhealth properly protectingour schoolchildren
notholding my breath
I'd rather stayon my toes not trust power
it hasn't looked like it has my back its about money and none
keep sheep well
herded with no power.It is getting more like slaveand slave owner masses living on smidgeons given by the government control under the guise of good forall
conspiracy is based infact
justhave to say if ridding the sheep of their own protectionsa plan these tragedies areworking in their favor
but sheep can betricky especially bighorn
This type of paranoia and distrust, if widespread, should be very concerning for so many reasons.
Where does this entrenched disposition come from? There are no people from any other country on this forum that talk like this about their government.
A major issue or crisis should have the effect of galvanizing the country as they bond together to deal with it... yet on this issue, people have become more polarized. It will be interesting how your leadership responds today and, in turn, how the public reacts to this response.
historyhas taught us not to trust power do you trust American govrnment
all ive
heard is
the bad stuffwe do bypeopleof other countries this issueso many issues like abortion too time for the liberals toc come aroundand show us they respectlife
andallow the unborn the basicright to life
i'mwaiting to hear whatwill be done about the real causeof the shootings, economicsocial changes
thewhy people need guns to live safely mentalhealth properly protectingour schoolchildren
notholding my breath
Communication breakdown. I'm sorry. I appreciate you responded to my post, but I can't spend the time I do trying to interpret what it is you are saying.
historyhas taught us not to trust power do you trust American govrnment
all ive
heard is
the bad stuffwe do bypeopleof other countries this issueso many issues like abortion too time for the liberals toc come aroundand show us they respectlife
andallow the unborn the basicright to life
i'mwaiting to hear whatwill be done about the real causeof the shootings, economicsocial changes
thewhy people need guns to live safely mentalhealth properly protectingour schoolchildren
notholding my breath
I apologize in advance if English is not your first language, or if you are under the age of 10, but if neither of those things are true, then please take a minute to proof read what you type. It's pretty much unreadable/incomprehensible.
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
This type of paranoia and distrust, if widespread, should be very concerning for so many reasons.
Where does this entrenched disposition come from? There are no people from any other country on this forum that talk like this about their government.
A major issue or crisis should have the effect of galvanizing the country as they bond together to deal with it... yet on this issue, people have become more polarized. It will be interesting how your leadership responds today and, in turn, how the public reacts to this response.
historyhas taught us not to trust power do you trust American govrnment
all ive
heard is
the bad stuffwe do bypeopleof other countries this issueso many issues like abortion too time for the liberals toc come aroundand show us they respectlife
andallow the unborn the basicright to life
i'mwaiting to hear whatwill be done about the real causeof the shootings, economicsocial changes
thewhy people need guns to live safely mentalhealth properly protectingour schoolchildren
notholding my breath
Communication breakdown. I'm sorry. I appreciate you responded to my post, but I can't spend the time I do trying to interpret what it is you are saying.
ohin a hurry to nowherei get it lifecan be a challenge keep it easyman
historyhas taught us not to trust power do you trust American govrnment
all ive
heard is
the bad stuffwe do bypeopleof other countries this issueso many issues like abortion too time for the liberals toc come aroundand show us they respectlife
andallow the unborn the basicright to life
i'mwaiting to hear whatwill be done about the real causeof the shootings, economicsocial changes
thewhy people need guns to live safely mentalhealth properly protectingour schoolchildren
notholding my breath
I apologize in advance if English is not your first language, or if you are under the age of 10, but if neither of those things are true, then please take a minute to proof read what you type. It's pretty much unreadable/incomprehensible.
wowuppity is theword of the hour don'thurt yourself now
historyhas taught us not to trust power do you trust American govrnment
all ive
heard is
the bad stuffwe do bypeopleof other countries this issueso many issues like abortion too time for the liberals toc come aroundand show us they respectlife
andallow the unborn the basicright to life
i'mwaiting to hear whatwill be done about the real causeof the shootings, economicsocial changes
thewhy people need guns to live safely mentalhealth properly protectingour schoolchildren
notholding my breath
I apologize in advance if English is not your first language, or if you are under the age of 10, but if neither of those things are true, then please take a minute to proof read what you type. It's pretty much unreadable/incomprehensible.
wowuppity is theword of the hour don'thurt yourself now
Comments
who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat, who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????
You pointed to a quote from the government that in no way indicates the government was planning to assassinate anyone and called it proof. The document indicates that someone, somewhere, may have been planning sniper attacks against OWS members. Why are we supposed to be believe it was a government operative who was doing this? Why are we supposed to believe this threat was any more real than the poor innocent anarchists you don't think should be in jail for plotting to blow up a bridge? Why is the government intelligence supposed to be so infallible this time but completely wrong last time?
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
I'm sure a great many people considered these ramshackle and illegal camp dwellings popping up in the heart of their cities to be a potential threat.
Who was OWS protesting? I thought it was Wall Street, not the government.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
i didnt say the govt i said the govt and private security firms...to answer your other questions... i have no proof....thank you good night
OK. So the question remains: Can anyone think of a single conspiracy theory that has been proven true?
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
:?:
Sleep tight?
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Easy for you to say... how can you sleep tight when they're out to get you?!?!?!
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
fucking assholes
Fargo 2003
Winnipeg 2005
Winnipeg 2011
St. Paul 2014
Ill begin to look and see what I find
A man that stands for nothing....will fall for anything!
All people need to do more on every level!
Fargo 2003
Winnipeg 2005
Winnipeg 2011
St. Paul 2014
there are many!
http://www.phibetaiota.net/2012/02/owl- ... l-feature/
A man that stands for nothing....will fall for anything!
All people need to do more on every level!
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
My original point exactly. If you are interested in details we do not know yet that is one thing. But if you are pushing the idea that this is all a hoax to hurt the gun industry then you are just a terrible person. Those kids are dead and all you are worried about is your politics.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
I'd rather stayon my toes not trust power
it hasn't looked like it has my back its about money and none
keep sheep well
herded with no power.It is getting more like slaveand slave owner masses living on smidgeons given by the government control under the guise of good forall
conspiracy is based infact
justhave to say if ridding the sheep of their own protectionsa plan these tragedies areworking in their favor
but sheep can betricky especially bighorn
Again, the issue is not asking questions. The issue is conspiracy mongering for the sake of getting attention and making money. Blindly following someone like that makes someone no less "a sheep".
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Me thinks you know nothing about being a slave, so probably not the best analogy to be using. Critical thinking is what will usually win the day, but then perhaps that might also relate back to my first sentence.
This type of paranoia and distrust, if widespread, should be very concerning for so many reasons.
Where does this entrenched disposition come from? There are no people from any other country on this forum that talk like this about their government.
A major issue or crisis should have the effect of galvanizing the country as they bond together to deal with it... yet on this issue, people have become more polarized. It will be interesting how your leadership responds today and, in turn, how the public reacts to this response.
methinks
I whole heartily agree you won't find out, as it is a daft statement to make in the first place, say the least.
As for my uppity tone, I apologize for using proper punctuation and sentence structure. woulditbebetterifitypedlikethis?
keep your mind opentoo Obamahas an agenda.Not to help angry youngsick men with
suicidal tendencies
otr protect our children during schoolhours
no its to
takeaway guns. Demorcats know this
and they dishonestlyhide it. They say it is for safetybut it is not.They wantguns gone.
Iwant
abortion gone. That will be the nextagenda saving a childa life every26 seconds.
If the Democrats caredso much about protecting life and children they would gladly
join the cause and protectunborn life.
Ok I am stumped, from now on I shall attempt to communicate to you through other means - perhaps this way:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4Kgzn3tDQU
all ive
heard is
the bad stuffwe do bypeopleof other countries this issueso many issues like abortion too time for the liberals toc come aroundand show us they respectlife
andallow the unborn the basicright to life
i'mwaiting to hear whatwill be done about the real causeof the shootings, economicsocial changes
thewhy people need guns to live safely mentalhealth properly protectingour schoolchildren
notholding my breath
Communication breakdown. I'm sorry. I appreciate you responded to my post, but I can't spend the time I do trying to interpret what it is you are saying.
I apologize in advance if English is not your first language, or if you are under the age of 10, but if neither of those things are true, then please take a minute to proof read what you type. It's pretty much unreadable/incomprehensible.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Are you typing on a phone? ...(not being uppity)