Sandy Hook Truthers

JimmyV

JC29856 wrote:

is this a conspiracy theory:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... nipulation

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... b-plot-fbi

If someone approached me and offered to show me how to blow up a bridge, I would be on the phone to the police.

JC29856

JimmyV wrote:

JC29856 wrote:

is this a conspiracy theory:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... nipulation

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... b-plot-fbi

If someone approached me and offered to show me how to blow up a bridge, I would be on the phone to the police.

profound insight! thank you!!!

JimmyV

JC29856 wrote:

ok would it have been considered conspiracy theory or not???

BRIDGE THE GAP
Information on the alleged plot to kill off protesters appears on page 61 of the trove of documents obtained recently by a FOIA request filed by the Partnership For Civil Justice Fund. On the page in question, marked “SECRET,” the FBI acknowledges:

An identified [redacted] of October planned to engage in sniper attacks against protesters in Houston, Texas, if deemed necessary. An identified [redacted] had received intelligence that indicated the protesters in New York and Seattle planned similar protests in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and Austin, Texas. [Redacted] planned to gather intelligence against the leaders of the protest groups and obtain photographs then formulate a plan to kill the leadership via suppressed sniper rifles.

Absolutely a conspiracy theory. Where is there any evidence that the government was planning these sniper attacks?

JimmyV

JC29856 wrote:

JimmyV wrote:

JC29856 wrote:

is this a conspiracy theory:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... nipulation

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... b-plot-fbi

If someone approached me and offered to show me how to blow up a bridge, I would be on the phone to the police.

profound insight! thank you!!!

What else is there to say? These self-proclaimed anarchists were approached and offered insight on how to blow up a bridge. There response to this was to move in with the person offering this information. Now we are supposed to view them as victims who were entrapped? Please.

fear4freedom

What is a conspiracy theory called if it becomes true or proven? What is the opposite of a conspiracy theory?

Over time, what is the percentage of conspiracy theories proven to be true? anyone?

JimmyV

fear4freedom wrote:

What is a conspiracy theory called if it becomes true or proven? What is the opposite of a conspiracy theory?

Over time, what is the percentage of conspiracy theories proven to be true? anyone?

I'm not sure we can come up with a percentage since the sheer number of them is so large. How about examples of specific conspiracy theories that were proven to be true? That might at least give us a place to start.

JimmyV

JimmyV wrote:

fear4freedom wrote:

What is a conspiracy theory called if it becomes true or proven? What is the opposite of a conspiracy theory?

Over time, what is the percentage of conspiracy theories proven to be true? anyone?

I'm not sure we can come up with a percentage since the sheer number of them is so large. How about examples of specific conspiracy theories that were proven to be true? That might at least give us a place to start.

How about one?

JC29856

JimmyV wrote:

JimmyV wrote:

fear4freedom wrote:

What is a conspiracy theory called if it becomes true or proven? What is the opposite of a conspiracy theory?

Over time, what is the percentage of conspiracy theories proven to be true? anyone?

I'm not sure we can come up with a percentage since the sheer number of them is so large. How about examples of specific conspiracy theories that were proven to be true? That might at least give us a place to start.

How about one?

i gave you the OWS above, where private security firms worked with at least 5 govt agencies to thwart dissent.
heres a bonus MKULTRA...

funny that you require answers to your questions..

JimmyV

JC29856 wrote:

JimmyV wrote:

How about one?

i gave you the OWS above, where private security firms worked with at least 5 govt agencies to thwart dissent.
heres a bonus MKULTRA...

funny that you require answers to your questions..

The one where you alleged the government was assassinating OWS activists? Sorry, that one is far from proven.

JC29856

OWS protesters were targeted by government agencies and private security firms hired by private companies and that these agencies were working together to infiltrate, information gather and possibly assassinate OWS leaders

are you saying that this isnt true? i should prove this? these documents came from the govt which they fought to keep secret. the names were redacted, obviously i cant prove it!
who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat, who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????

yes your right i cant prove that the govt wanted to kill OWS leaders, I cant prove that the govt killed JFK, I cant prove that the govt killed MLK, i cant prove that the govt didnt kill etc etc etc (soon to be assange)

JC29856

ill ask it again since im sure you will either not answer or say "i dont know"

who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat, who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????

JimmyV

JC29856 wrote:

OWS protesters were targeted by government agencies and private security firms hired by private companies and that these agencies were working together to infiltrate, information gather and possibly assassinate OWS leaders

are you saying that this isnt true? i should prove this? these documents came from the govt which they fought to keep secret. the names were redacted, obviously i cant prove it!
who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat, who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????

yes your right i cant prove that the govt wanted to kill OWS leaders, I cant prove that the govt killed JFK, I cant prove that the govt killed MLK, i cant prove that the govt didnt kill etc etc etc (soon to be assange)

You pointed to a quote from the government that in no way indicates the government was planning to assassinate anyone and called it proof. The document indicates that someone, somewhere, may have been planning sniper attacks against OWS members. Why are we supposed to be believe it was a government operative who was doing this? Why are we supposed to believe this threat was any more real than the poor innocent anarchists you don't think should be in jail for plotting to blow up a bridge? Why is the government intelligence supposed to be so infallible this time but completely wrong last time?

JimmyV

JC29856 wrote:

ill ask it again since im sure you will either not answer or say "i dont know"

who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat,

I'm sure a great many people considered these ramshackle and illegal camp dwellings popping up in the heart of their cities to be a potential threat.

JC29856 wrote:

who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????

Who was OWS protesting? I thought it was Wall Street, not the government.

JC29856

JimmyV wrote:

JC29856 wrote:

OWS protesters were targeted by government agencies and private security firms hired by private companies and that these agencies were working together to infiltrate, information gather and possibly assassinate OWS leaders

are you saying that this isnt true? i should prove this? these documents came from the govt which they fought to keep secret. the names were redacted, obviously i cant prove it!
who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat, who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????

yes your right i cant prove that the govt wanted to kill OWS leaders, I cant prove that the govt killed JFK, I cant prove that the govt killed MLK, i cant prove that the govt didnt kill etc etc etc (soon to be assange)

You pointed to a quote from the government that in no way indicates the government was planning to assassinate anyone and called it proof. The document indicates that someone, somewhere, may have been planning sniper attacks against OWS members. Why are we supposed to be believe it was a government operative who was doing this? Why are we supposed to believe this threat was any more real than the poor innocent anarchists you don't think should be in jail for plotting to blow up a bridge? Why is the government intelligence supposed to be so infallible this time but completely wrong last time?

i didnt say the govt i said the govt and private security firms...to answer your other questions... i have no proof....thank you good night

JimmyV

JC29856 wrote:

JimmyV wrote:

JC29856 wrote:

OWS protesters were targeted by government agencies and private security firms hired by private companies and that these agencies were working together to infiltrate, information gather and possibly assassinate OWS leaders

are you saying that this isnt true? i should prove this? these documents came from the govt which they fought to keep secret. the names were redacted, obviously i cant prove it!
who do you think considered those "iphone carry hipsters that needed to go get a job" a threat, who do you think wanted to kill its leaders? the 10 club, the american library association, AARP????

yes your right i cant prove that the govt wanted to kill OWS leaders, I cant prove that the govt killed JFK, I cant prove that the govt killed MLK, i cant prove that the govt didnt kill etc etc etc (soon to be assange)

You pointed to a quote from the government that in no way indicates the government was planning to assassinate anyone and called it proof. The document indicates that someone, somewhere, may have been planning sniper attacks against OWS members. Why are we supposed to be believe it was a government operative who was doing this? Why are we supposed to believe this threat was any more real than the poor innocent anarchists you don't think should be in jail for plotting to blow up a bridge? Why is the government intelligence supposed to be so infallible this time but completely wrong last time?

i didnt say the govt i said the govt and private security firms...to answer your other questions... i have no proof....thank you good night

OK. So the question remains: Can anyone think of a single conspiracy theory that has been proven true?

JC29856

no.... thank you good night

JimmyV

JC29856 wrote:

no.... thank you good night

:?:

Sleep tight?

blackredyellow

JimmyV wrote:

JC29856 wrote:

no.... thank you good night

:?:

Sleep tight?

Easy for you to say... how can you sleep tight when they're out to get you?!?!?!

Hugh Freaking Dillon

cincybearcat wrote:

I hate people.

fucking assholes

fear4freedom

Ok so do we not have answers cause the conspiracy theory is crazy? or is it cause the govt. is that good in hiding the truth?

Ill begin to look and see what I find