*** 1948 * 1949 * 1960 * 2017 * 2024...YOUR SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS: THE PHILADELPHIA EAGLES ***

1…268269271273274…551

Comments

  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    Yo juggler how about that MNF game?  70% passes and 10 of the 41 runs were by the QBs.  Yup still gotta have balance :rofl:
    Ah, yes. Because an anomaly shootout featuring two of the best passing offenses in recent history, with zero defense played, is a good way for every team to base their offense on. (emoticon)
    nah best to base them on the 1980s model of football :rock_on:
    The Rams have a 55/45 pass/run ratio this year. But, yeah....better to cherry pick a shootout to boost your argument. That's like Trump congratulating himself on reaching 50% in the latest Rasmussen poll. 
    www.myspace.com
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,911
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    Yo juggler how about that MNF game?  70% passes and 10 of the 41 runs were by the QBs.  Yup still gotta have balance :rofl:
    Ah, yes. Because an anomaly shootout featuring two of the best passing offenses in recent history, with zero defense played, is a good way for every team to base their offense on. (emoticon)
    nah best to base them on the 1980s model of football :rock_on:
    The Rams have a 55/45 pass/run ratio this year. But, yeah....better to cherry pick a shootout to boost your argument. That's like Trump congratulating himself on reaching 50% in the latest Rasmussen poll. 
    yea but how many of their runs come when they are leading and killing the clock?  I imagine when the games are close they're passing is at a much higher percentage. 
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    Yo juggler how about that MNF game?  70% passes and 10 of the 41 runs were by the QBs.  Yup still gotta have balance :rofl:
    Ah, yes. Because an anomaly shootout featuring two of the best passing offenses in recent history, with zero defense played, is a good way for every team to base their offense on. (emoticon)
    nah best to base them on the 1980s model of football :rock_on:
    The Rams have a 55/45 pass/run ratio this year. But, yeah....better to cherry pick a shootout to boost your argument. That's like Trump congratulating himself on reaching 50% in the latest Rasmussen poll. 
    yea but how many of their runs come when they are leading and killing the clock?  I imagine when the games are close they're passing is at a much higher percentage. 
    They've played 8 games decided by two scores or less. At quick glance, here are the pass/run ratios in those games:
    P/R
    52/48
    64/36
    56/44
    44/64
    54/46
    71/29
    66/34
    72/28

    On avg, about a 60/40 split which is right where I've always said good teams end up (and this has been true ever since you suggested the Eagles throw the ball 70%+ of the time with Michael Vick).
    www.myspace.com
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,911
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    Yo juggler how about that MNF game?  70% passes and 10 of the 41 runs were by the QBs.  Yup still gotta have balance :rofl:
    Ah, yes. Because an anomaly shootout featuring two of the best passing offenses in recent history, with zero defense played, is a good way for every team to base their offense on. (emoticon)
    nah best to base them on the 1980s model of football :rock_on:
    The Rams have a 55/45 pass/run ratio this year. But, yeah....better to cherry pick a shootout to boost your argument. That's like Trump congratulating himself on reaching 50% in the latest Rasmussen poll. 
    yea but how many of their runs come when they are leading and killing the clock?  I imagine when the games are close they're passing is at a much higher percentage. 
    They've played 8 games decided by two scores or less. At quick glance, here are the pass/run ratios in those games:
    P/R
    52/48
    64/36
    56/44
    44/64
    54/46
    71/29
    66/34
    72/28

    On avg, about a 60/40 split which is right where I've always said good teams end up (and this has been true ever since you suggested the Eagles throw the ball 70%+ of the time with Michael Vick).
    without seeing 4th quarter numbers those numbers still might be a lie.  and it was actually 80% :)
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    Yo juggler how about that MNF game?  70% passes and 10 of the 41 runs were by the QBs.  Yup still gotta have balance :rofl:
    Ah, yes. Because an anomaly shootout featuring two of the best passing offenses in recent history, with zero defense played, is a good way for every team to base their offense on. (emoticon)
    nah best to base them on the 1980s model of football :rock_on:
    The Rams have a 55/45 pass/run ratio this year. But, yeah....better to cherry pick a shootout to boost your argument. That's like Trump congratulating himself on reaching 50% in the latest Rasmussen poll. 
    yea but how many of their runs come when they are leading and killing the clock?  I imagine when the games are close they're passing is at a much higher percentage. 
    They've played 8 games decided by two scores or less. At quick glance, here are the pass/run ratios in those games:
    P/R
    52/48
    64/36
    56/44
    44/64
    54/46
    71/29
    66/34
    72/28

    On avg, about a 60/40 split which is right where I've always said good teams end up (and this has been true ever since you suggested the Eagles throw the ball 70%+ of the time with Michael Vick).
    without seeing 4th quarter numbers those numbers still might be a lie.  and it was actually 80% :)
    If you're scoring at home, this marks the 8th year in row hawks has revived this dumb argument of his.
    www.myspace.com
  • F Me In The Brain
    F Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,809
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    Yo juggler how about that MNF game?  70% passes and 10 of the 41 runs were by the QBs.  Yup still gotta have balance :rofl:
    Ah, yes. Because an anomaly shootout featuring two of the best passing offenses in recent history, with zero defense played, is a good way for every team to base their offense on. (emoticon)
    nah best to base them on the 1980s model of football :rock_on:
    The Rams have a 55/45 pass/run ratio this year. But, yeah....better to cherry pick a shootout to boost your argument. That's like Trump congratulating himself on reaching 50% in the latest Rasmussen poll. 
    yea but how many of their runs come when they are leading and killing the clock?  I imagine when the games are close they're passing is at a much higher percentage. 
    They've played 8 games decided by two scores or less. At quick glance, here are the pass/run ratios in those games:
    P/R
    52/48
    64/36
    56/44
    44/64
    54/46
    71/29
    66/34
    72/28

    On avg, about a 60/40 split which is right where I've always said good teams end up (and this has been true ever since you suggested the Eagles throw the ball 70%+ of the time with Michael Vick).
    without seeing 4th quarter numbers those numbers still might be a lie.  and it was actually 80% :)
    If you're scoring at home, this marks the 8th year in row hawks has revived this dumb argument of his.
    Scoring at home?

    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • F Me In The Brain
    F Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,809
    Never stand between The Big Donkey and scoring at home
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,911
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    Yo juggler how about that MNF game?  70% passes and 10 of the 41 runs were by the QBs.  Yup still gotta have balance :rofl:
    Ah, yes. Because an anomaly shootout featuring two of the best passing offenses in recent history, with zero defense played, is a good way for every team to base their offense on. (emoticon)
    nah best to base them on the 1980s model of football :rock_on:
    The Rams have a 55/45 pass/run ratio this year. But, yeah....better to cherry pick a shootout to boost your argument. That's like Trump congratulating himself on reaching 50% in the latest Rasmussen poll. 
    yea but how many of their runs come when they are leading and killing the clock?  I imagine when the games are close they're passing is at a much higher percentage. 
    They've played 8 games decided by two scores or less. At quick glance, here are the pass/run ratios in those games:
    P/R
    52/48
    64/36
    56/44
    44/64
    54/46
    71/29
    66/34
    72/28

    On avg, about a 60/40 split which is right where I've always said good teams end up (and this has been true ever since you suggested the Eagles throw the ball 70%+ of the time with Michael Vick).
    without seeing 4th quarter numbers those numbers still might be a lie.  and it was actually 80% :)
    If you're scoring at home, this marks the 8th year in row hawks has revived this dumb argument of his.
    if you are scoring at home it's the 8th year in a row running the ball in the NFL gets less and less important. 
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited November 2018
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjhawks said:
    Yo juggler how about that MNF game?  70% passes and 10 of the 41 runs were by the QBs.  Yup still gotta have balance :rofl:
    Ah, yes. Because an anomaly shootout featuring two of the best passing offenses in recent history, with zero defense played, is a good way for every team to base their offense on. (emoticon)
    nah best to base them on the 1980s model of football :rock_on:
    The Rams have a 55/45 pass/run ratio this year. But, yeah....better to cherry pick a shootout to boost your argument. That's like Trump congratulating himself on reaching 50% in the latest Rasmussen poll. 
    yea but how many of their runs come when they are leading and killing the clock?  I imagine when the games are close they're passing is at a much higher percentage. 
    They've played 8 games decided by two scores or less. At quick glance, here are the pass/run ratios in those games:
    P/R
    52/48
    64/36
    56/44
    44/64
    54/46
    71/29
    66/34
    72/28

    On avg, about a 60/40 split which is right where I've always said good teams end up (and this has been true ever since you suggested the Eagles throw the ball 70%+ of the time with Michael Vick).
    without seeing 4th quarter numbers those numbers still might be a lie.  and it was actually 80% :)
    If you're scoring at home, this marks the 8th year in row hawks has revived this dumb argument of his.
    if you are scoring at home it's the 8th year in a row running the ball in the NFL gets less and less important. 
    And for the 8th straight year, passing the ball 80% of the time with a qb of Michael Vick's stature, still makes about as much sense as it did in 2010. Looking forward year number nine though. Always exciting!


    Edit--by the way, the league average this year is 60/40 pass run ratio (55% in 1st qtr, 59% 4th qtr). It was 58/42 last year, and 59/41 in 2016. See you next year. 
    Post edited by The Juggler on
    www.myspace.com
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited November 2018
    Here is the Eagles’ pass run ratio's per quarter last year:
    55/45 in the 1st
    60/40 in the 2nd
    59/41 in the 3rd
    49/51 in the 4th




    Post edited by The Juggler on
    www.myspace.com
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    Are the Eagles going to be able to field a enough players in the secondary tomorrow?
    www.myspace.com
  • Thoughts_Arrive
    Thoughts_Arrive Melbourne, Australia Posts: 15,165
    The Juggler said:
    Are the Eagles going to be able to field a enough players in the secondary tomorrow?
    yay.
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • eeriepadave
    eeriepadave West Chester, PA Posts: 43,182
    Still alive, defense turned it around in the second half and the run game showed up. :clap:
    8/28/98- Camden, NJ
    10/31/09- Philly
    5/21/10- NYC
    9/2/12- Philly, PA
    7/19/13- Wrigley
    10/19/13- Brooklyn, NY
    10/21/13- Philly, PA
    10/22/13- Philly, PA
    10/27/13- Baltimore, MD
    4/28/16- Philly, PA
    4/29/16- Philly, PA
    5/1/16- NYC
    5/2/16- NYC
    9/2/18- Boston, MA
    9/4/18- Boston, MA
    9/14/22- Camden, NJ
    9/7/24- Philly, PA
    9/9/24- Philly, PA
    Tres Mts.- 3/23/11- Philly. PA
    Eddie Vedder- 6/25/11- Philly, PA
    RNDM- 3/9/16- Philly, PA
  • igotid88
    igotid88 Posts: 28,630
    eeriepadave said:
    Still alive, defense turned it around in the second half and the run game showed up. :clap:
    Giants suck at stopping the run
    I miss igotid88
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,911
    thankfully the Giants stink and are just a bit dumber than the Eagles were today.
  • JK_Livin
    JK_Livin South Jersey Posts: 7,365
    I was so close to leaving that game in the 1st half yesterday but I knew that had it the whole time!
    Alright, alright, alright!
    Tom O.
    "I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
    -The Writer
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited November 2018
    First time they've stuck to the run since the London game (their last win). Thankfully the Giant's abandoned theirs in the second half. Kudo's to Doug for the game plan (and sticking with it) and not letting this team give up.

    Ugly, ugly, ugly.....but, hey- You win next week and they could find themselves in a three way tie for first in this poop division. Go Birds


    ps---leave it to Eli to force an interception at a crucial time against this secondary! Oh, how I love thee, Eli Manning. 
    Post edited by The Juggler on
    www.myspace.com
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    The Juggler said:
    First time they've stuck to the run since the London game (their last win). Thankfully the Giant's abandoned theirs in the second half. Kudo's to Doug for the game plan (and sticking with it) and not letting this team give up.

    Ugly, ugly, ugly.....but, hey- You win next week and they could find themselves in a three way tie for first in this poop division. Go Birds


    ps---leave it to Eli to force an interception at a crucial time against this secondary! Oh, how I love thee, Eli Manning. 
    Nope.  No tie this week.
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,911
    Cowboys win last night is devastating to the Eagles.  With the Rams and Texans on the schedule along with the Division games it's looking highly unlikely the Eagles can get enough wins to win this division.  hard to believe harry
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited December 2018
    Yeah. It's not impossible but.... the odds aren't the best. 
    Birds schedule:
    Skins
    @Cowboys
    @Rams
    Texans
    @Skins
    Assuming a loss to the Rams, they have to win the rest. Texans are not world beaters plus it's at home. Just stick to what works, Doug, and let the chips fall where they may. 

    Cowboys schedule:
    Eagles
    @Colts
    Bucs
    @Giants

    They need to lose to the Colts. And I am not just giving them the Giants game. They always play each other tough and it could be the going away party for Eli so I can see that team being more up than usual. Dallas D is quite good right now though....


    Post edited by The Juggler on
    www.myspace.com

Categories