What would it take to form a Tyrannical Govt in the USA?

JonnyPistachioJonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
edited December 2012 in A Moving Train
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." ---Thomas Jefferson

Just curious, of the folks who take this literally, if you are really preparing for this, how do you see it unfolding?

Could it really come to a point that me and my neighbor need to ban up with our personal arsenals to keep ourselves free?

I'm not being a smartass here, I'm really trying to envision how this would evolve from where we are today, that we would need to stand up and physically fight them off. Does Obama convince Biden and congress that people should be forced to give up certain rights under violent threat to his people? And then they order the military to place us in FEMA camps? and the military does this without asking any questions? How does this evolution exactly take place?
Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • rush limbaugh in the white house...HELLO??!?!???!
    if you think what I believe is stupid, bizarre, ridiculous or outrageous.....it's ok, I think I had a brain tumor when I wrote that.
  • JonnyPistachioJonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    rush limbaugh in the white house...HELLO??!?!???!

    :lol: ok besides that?
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    A real financial crisis would start it, one where there was a run on the banks and that lead to runaway inflation.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." ---Thomas Jefferson

    Just curious, of the folks who take this literally, if you are really preparing for this, how do you see it unfolding?

    Could it really come to a point that me and my neighbor need to ban up with our personal arsenals to keep ourselves free?

    I'm not being a smartass here, I'm really trying to envision how this would evolve from where we are today, that we would need to stand up and physically fight them off. Does Obama convince Biden and congress that people should be forced to give up certain rights under violent threat to his people? And then they order the military to place us in FEMA camps? and the military does this without asking any questions? How does this evolution exactly take place?
    apparently it happened when a guy with the last name obama became commander in chief, and the sane among us had out heads in the sand and missed it...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    It started long before that.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    unsung wrote:
    It started long before that.
    how are you personally being oppressed?

    serious question.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    Excessive taxation, lost wealth through inflation, lost wealth through quantitative easing. Same as you.
  • fifefife Posts: 3,327
    op·pres·sion

    Prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control.
    The state of being subject to such treatment or control.

    just want to put out the definition of oppression for people.

    is taxation cruel or unjust treatment or is it a fact of living in a country?
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    unsung wrote:
    Excessive taxation, lost wealth through inflation, lost wealth through quantitative easing. Same as you.
    i don't agree with anything you are saying in this post. i do not think my taxes are excessive. and i don't view everything in regard to wealth, or lost wealth. so i do not feel oppressed. maybe if you didn't see things the way you choose to view them then you would not come off as being so paranoid of a boogeyman government.

    life is too short to waste time worrying about things that are out of my control.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    fife wrote:
    op·pres·sion

    Prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control.
    The state of being subject to such treatment or control.

    just want to put out the definition of oppression for people.

    is taxation cruel or unjust treatment or is it a fact of living in a country?
    some on here view taxation as illegal, so yeah...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487

    life is too short to waste time worrying about things that are out of my control.


    Life is too short not to. Do you always simply accept things that seem out of your control? Do you never work to try to fix them?
  • fifefife Posts: 3,327
    fife wrote:
    op·pres·sion

    Prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control.
    The state of being subject to such treatment or control.

    just want to put out the definition of oppression for people.

    is taxation cruel or unjust treatment or is it a fact of living in a country?
    some on here view taxation as illegal, so yeah...

    fair enough, i think i bit of prospective is needed in many places.
  • MoonpigMoonpig Posts: 659
    Some of you here are real kooks, dishonest at best, terrified fanatics at worst. The real worrying thing is that the most paranoid on these boards, themselves own fire arms.

    Horrifying

    I remember dunkman once saying all you gun nuts head off to Idaho with your guns and have it out with each other. I laughed back then, I now think it might be one of the most reasonable plans put forth on here
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    Moonpig wrote:
    Some of you here are real kooks, dishonest at best, terrified fanatics at worst. The real worrying thing is that the most paranoid on these boards, themselves own fire arms.

    Horrifying

    I remember dunkman once saying all you gun nuts head off to Idaho with your guns and have it out with each other. I laughed back then, I now think it might be one of the most reasonable plans put forth on here
    Your negative statements are outrageous broad sweeping generalizations
    towards people in another country. :?
    Where do you come off with such a superior attitude and act like you personally
    know anyone here? You don't.
    Are the anti gun people also anti people who own guns, people?
    This with great judgement. Not a bit of understanding just a broad brush of bias
    that they will not even see nor understand the individual in us all.

    I guess I could draw conclusion about foreigners too from just this.
    But I won't, I've come to love many. Love any gun owners lately?

    Oh in case you're coming back with me being another
    kooky, dishonest, terrified, fanatical, paranoid gun owner, I am not...
    do you listen to how you treat others? Isn't it written somewhere about casting stones?
    You got a barrel of 'em,
    look out upon leaving this world you will feel each and everyone you threw.
    Ouch!
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    pandora wrote:
    Your negative statements are outrageous broad sweeping generalizations
    towards people in another country. :?
    Where do you come off with such a superior attitude and act like you personally
    know anyone here? You don't.
    Are the anti gun people also anti people who own guns, people?
    This with great judgement. Not a bit of understanding just a broad brush of bias
    that they will not even see nor understand the individual in us all.

    I guess I could draw conclusion about foreigners too from just this.
    But I won't, I've come to love many. Love any gun owners lately?

    Oh in case you're coming back with me being another
    kooky, dishonest, terrified, fanatical, paranoid gun owner, I am not...
    do you listen to how you treat others? Isn't it written somewhere about casting stones?
    You got a barrel of 'em,
    look out upon leaving this world you will feel each and everyone you threw.
    Ouch!

    pot meet kettle...

    ;)
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    pandora wrote:
    Your negative statements are outrageous broad sweeping generalizations
    towards people in another country. :?
    Where do you come off with such a superior attitude and act like you personally
    know anyone here? You don't.
    Are the anti gun people also anti people who own guns, people?
    This with great judgement. Not a bit of understanding just a broad brush of bias
    that they will not even see nor understand the individual in us all.

    I guess I could draw conclusion about foreigners too from just this.
    But I won't, I've come to love many. Love any gun owners lately?

    Oh in case you're coming back with me being another
    kooky, dishonest, terrified, fanatical, paranoid gun owner, I am not...
    do you listen to how you treat others? Isn't it written somewhere about casting stones?
    You got a barrel of 'em,
    look out upon leaving this world you will feel each and everyone you threw.
    Ouch!

    pot meet kettle...

    ;)
    At least I try to be positive and avoid name calling... you too right?
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    unsung wrote:
    A real financial crisis would start it, one where there was a run on the banks and that lead to runaway inflation.
    ...
    We had one of those... in 1929.
    We survived as a nation.
    ...
    Personally... i am NOT going to kill people just because my 401K tanks. I believe America is a better nation than that.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • riotgrlriotgrl LOUISVILLE Posts: 1,895
    unsung wrote:
    A real financial crisis would start it, one where there was a run on the banks and that lead to runaway inflation.

    Hasn't that already happened? Maybe our current way of living is the real problem. Maybe creating a capitalist world in which money is king is the problem....
    Are we getting something out of this all-encompassing trip?

    Seems my preconceptions are what should have been burned...

    I AM MINE
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,717
    riotgrl wrote:
    unsung wrote:
    A real financial crisis would start it, one where there was a run on the banks and that lead to runaway inflation.

    Hasn't that already happened? Maybe our current way of living is the real problem. Maybe creating a capitalist world in which money is king is the problem....
    master and we as slave.

    Money is a means to an end. NOT the end all be all.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    pandora wrote:
    At least I try to be positive and avoid name calling... you too right?
    no you don't.

    you derail a majority of threads by making it about you, and you take it into a spiritual discussion all while passively aggressively taking jabs at people, but you make it ok by adding one of these ;)

    countless locked threads will show that.

    this is why i only read your posts where you quote me or speak directly to me.

    now back on topic.

    what tyrannical government is everyone so afraid of??
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 15,950

    what tyrannical government is everyone so afraid of??

    Well, the government that takes away property rights. The government that taxes 80 % of our income. What happens when the debt is 25 -30 trillion, 70% of the population needs government entitlements, and the government can't make the payments? The riots in Europe will be nothing compared to what happens if the US government cannot reign in spending.

    Does anyone expect the current government to slow down spending or decrease the debt? Not going to happen. The USA is spiraling to bankruptcy and hyper inflation. What the government does at that point is what we fear. Those that rely on government will probably like it, those that are used to supporting themselves will not.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303

    what tyrannical government is everyone so afraid of??

    Well, the government that takes away property rights. The government that taxes 80 % of our income. What happens when the debt is 25 -30 trillion, 70% of the population needs government entitlements, and the government can't make the payments? The riots in Europe will be nothing compared to what happens if the US government cannot reign in spending.

    Does anyone expect the current government to slow down spending or decrease the debt? Not going to happen. The USA is spiraling to bankruptcy and hyper inflation. What the government does at that point is what we fear. Those that rely on government will probably like it, those that are used to supporting themselves will not.
    you are not describing tyranny or even oppression.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 15,950

    what tyrannical government is everyone so afraid of??

    Well, the government that takes away property rights. The government that taxes 80 % of our income. What happens when the debt is 25 -30 trillion, 70% of the population needs government entitlements, and the government can't make the payments? The riots in Europe will be nothing compared to what happens if the US government cannot reign in spending.

    Does anyone expect the current government to slow down spending or decrease the debt? Not going to happen. The USA is spiraling to bankruptcy and hyper inflation. What the government does at that point is what we fear. Those that rely on government will probably like it, those that are used to supporting themselves will not.
    you are not describing tyranny or even oppression.

    Is government seizing property and taxing almost all income not tyranny? When we are left to rely only on government, I would say that is tyranny or just as bad.

    I said in my post that some people will like it because they have always relied on government, so I am not surprised that people on this board do not fear it. They want government to control everything.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    Is government seizing property and taxing almost all income not tyranny? When we are left to rely only on government, I would say that is tyranny or just as bad.

    I said in my post that some people will like it because they have always relied on government, so I am not surprised that people on this board do not fear it. They want government to control everything.
    can we please be realistic here? you said "taxing almost all income". you know that this is not the case. not even close to the case. even if obama gets his way, this will not be the case and you know it.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 15,950
    Is government seizing property and taxing almost all income not tyranny? When we are left to rely only on government, I would say that is tyranny or just as bad.

    I said in my post that some people will like it because they have always relied on government, so I am not surprised that people on this board do not fear it. They want government to control everything.
    can we please be realistic here? you said "taxing almost all income". you know that this is not the case. not even close to the case. even if obama gets his way, this will not be the case and you know it.

    Well, the country has had marginal rates in the 90% bracket in the last century, so there is precedent.

    In 2013, Some Californians will be paying a combined 55% fed and state income tax rate which does not include sales tax, payroll tax, gas tax, excise tax, property tax, etc...

    We just had a president elected with his main campaign platform to raise taxes!

    What happens when the 46% that receive benefits from the government turn into 60 or 70%. They voted to raise taxes on rich people when they hadn't even seen their benefits decrease. What happens whenthe government cuts benefits in ten years when the country is broke? They will be SCREAMING for higher taxes on the wealthy.

    The country has seized property under eminent domain.

    I think it is realistic that the country goes bankrupt, if not inevitable. So what the government does to combat that is anyone's guess.

    The current tax increases will not bring the annual deficit to a surplus, so the debt will continue to increase. So when te current tax rates don't fix the debt, the voting public is now supporting of tax increases on the wealthy so why aren't they going to vote for higher and higher taxes?
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    Premptive war, international terrorism, extra-judicial killings, rendition, torture, illegal weaponry, embargoes leading to the death of hundreds of thousands, corporations killing and buying their way to control of natural resources-food supplies-WATER...People and their environments destroyed while the arms industry profits from the resistance...Austerity eroding whats left of social safety nets, for-profit medicine, tiered healthcare, warrantless wiretapping, loss of habeas corpus, eminent domain, excessive taxation, the biggest per-capita prison population in the world, banks collecting tax payer handouts and a cut from every other racket, UN dominance via veto, the ace in the hole that is nuclear supremacy, revolving doors between lobby groups, think tanks, and government.....and a compliant/owned media ignoring it all.....


    So....define tyranny.


    tell me, 'constitutionalists', gun advocates, civil liberty warriors......what are you waiting for? None of those crimes are worth defending yourselves against? When is this armed rebellion going to happen? Ignoring the domestic issues is one thing - at this point, it's mostly inconvenience....But to suggest (as has been done here) that the US government will only become tyrannical after an economic collapse, after your property and belongings are infringed upon, is narcissism at it's finest. As long as the drones are coming for someone else, right? mr. santanna is correct. this shit manifests in ways we dread to see at home, and ignore or justify abroad.
  • MoonpigMoonpig Posts: 659
    pandora wrote:
    Moonpig wrote:
    Some of you here are real kooks, dishonest at best, terrified fanatics at worst. The real worrying thing is that the most paranoid on these boards, themselves own fire arms.

    Horrifying

    I remember dunkman once saying all you gun nuts head off to Idaho with your guns and have it out with each other. I laughed back then, I now think it might be one of the most reasonable plans put forth on here
    Your negative statements are outrageous broad sweeping generalizations
    towards people in another country. :?
    Where do you come off with such a superior attitude and act like you personally
    know anyone here? You don't.
    Are the anti gun people also anti people who own guns, people?
    This with great judgement. Not a bit of understanding just a broad brush of bias
    that they will not even see nor understand the individual in us all.

    I guess I could draw conclusion about foreigners too from just this.
    But I won't, I've come to love many. Love any gun owners lately?

    Oh in case you're coming back with me being another
    kooky, dishonest, terrified, fanatical, paranoid gun owner, I am not...
    do you listen to how you treat others? Isn't it written somewhere about casting stones?
    You got a barrel of 'em,
    look out upon leaving this world you will feel each and everyone you threw.
    Ouch!

    Lol, offence is yours to be taken. And hey I have no issues with people generalising where I am from, here let me help you out; drunks, micks, paddies, brawlers, terrorists, crooks, gobshites, (insert here any I have missed).

    In light of the many many deaths that have taken place as a direct result of an individuals need to own a firearm, I don't really give a shit what any gun nut has to say, innocent children's safety trumps it all.

    Now I would prefer not to converse with you on this or any matter going forward as I am more than used to your tactics on these boards.
  • groovemegrooveme Posts: 353
    I'm fairly liberal in most of my views, but I believe that Thomas Jefferson had it right, as he had so many things right.

    We are living in dangerous times in terms of personal freedom with the Patriot Act, which was renewed by Obama. But it has happened, many times and in many places. As for how a government becomes tyrannical, it doesn't happen overnight. Just ask those who were alive when Hitler and the Nazi's controlled much of Europe. I am sure the Jewish people and other groups targeted by Hitler never thought it could happen to them. If they had access to weapons, might things have gone differently? At least they could have fought back.

    Also, just because the US has not in modern history ever been invaded by a foreign country doesn't mean it could never happen. They might still succeed, but not without significant losses, since much of the population could fight back (especially here in Texas).

    Should there be reasonable restrictions/bans on assault weapons, kevlar, and restrictions on ammunition purchases? Probably! However, outside of an outright ban, which would be unconstitutional, guns are here to stay. And I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing. As long as guns are here to stay, law abiding citizens should be able to protect themselves.

    The desire to increase "safety" is a good thing, but there is no way to prevent a single individual who has the desire to kill a lot of people from doing these things. The desire for a false sense of security should not make us willing to give up our constitutional freedoms.

    “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
    ― Benjamin Franklin
  • JonnyPistachioJonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    grooveme wrote:
    I'm fairly liberal in most of my views, but I believe that Thomas Jefferson had it right, as he had so many things right.

    We are living in dangerous times in terms of personal freedom with the Patriot Act, which was renewed by Obama. But it has happened, many times and in many places. As for how a government becomes tyrannical, it doesn't happen overnight. Just ask those who were alive when Hitler and the Nazi's controlled much of Europe. I am sure the Jewish people and other groups targeted by Hitler never thought it could happen to them. If they had access to weapons, might things have gone differently? At least they could have fought back.

    Also, just because the US has not in modern history ever been invaded by a foreign country doesn't mean it could never happen. They might still succeed, but not without significant losses, since much of the population could fight back (especially here in Texas).

    Should there be reasonable restrictions/bans on assault weapons, kevlar, and restrictions on ammunition purchases? Probably! However, outside of an outright ban, which would be unconstitutional, guns are here to stay. And I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing. As long as guns are here to stay, law abiding citizens should be able to protect themselves.

    The desire to increase "safety" is a good thing, but there is no way to prevent a single individual who has the desire to kill a lot of people from doing these things. The desire for a false sense of security should not make us willing to give up our constitutional freedoms.

    “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
    ― Benjamin Franklin

    Good post Grooveme, thanks. I see those concerns. I also think it would be silly to do a universal ban on guns.
    I see a few good responses to the original question in this thread, but none that get detailed enough for me to envision the point where, not just a few people, but the people of the USA have to take up their guns against the government. I really just cant imagine the actual evolution to the point that I'm holed up in my basement clutching my AR-15 and trying to get a hold of my neighbor to get some backup as a tank rolls through Clematis Street downtown West Palm Beach rounding us up for FEMA camps. Again, not trying to be an ass -- I see some insanity in Egypt, Syria, etc...but I just cant imagine it here.
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • You know... if things get so bad that you feel that the government is becoming a tyranny, there are these silly little things that our founding fathers put into place to combat that (no, not the 2nd amendment)... they are called elections.

    If a majority of the people believe that the government is becoming a tyrannical regime, they will vote out the tyrants. Until then, it stands to reason that the majority of them people don't feel that way yet, so you are outnumbered. You can say things like "these people are destroying America", but what you really mean, is that these people disagree with how the government should operate. That is the price of living in a representative democracy.

    If you feel that the nation is going in a direction well outside of what you think is acceptable, you can either rally enough support to vote the current politicians out, or there are about 200 other countries in the world that you can look at moving too.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
Sign In or Register to comment.