Bill Clinton aka Slick Willie

pandora

Better Dan wrote:

ComeToTX wrote:

Pandora,

You seem to think Clinton deserves no credit for the prosperous economy we had with him. At the same time you heap a lot of blame on Obama for the last 4 years. Please explain.

Easy. She's a partisan republican.

I am an Independent and undecided who I am voting for... are you always this misinformed? :fp:

Moonpig

pandora wrote:

Moonpig wrote:

pandora wrote:

28 minutes over, typical ... just as I said, massively self centered ... :fp:

Remember now, that's your opinion, which from time to time, does not always marry up with fact. Another explanation could be that, given the current state of the nation, a lot needed to get said. Not saying it as fact, just merely offering up another perspective, which is important in debates like this.

No I thought it was your opinion do we need to hash over again that what I say is my
opinion? ... same as you ... same as everyone :fp:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsMaBta4SxI

Johnny Abruzzo

pandora wrote:

I am an Independent and undecided who I am voting for... are you always this misinformed? :fp:

Who has eaten up every GOP argument and defended Todd Akin's rape comments and the Paul Ryan speech vociferously. And calls our president a "failed president."

"undecided"

pandora

ComeToTX wrote:

Pandora,

You seem to think Clinton deserves no credit for the prosperous economy we had with him. At the same time you heap a lot of blame on Obama for the last 4 years. Please explain.

The booming 1990's has much to do with other goings on. The Federal Reserve, Congress, IT
and productivity. As far as no credit for Clinton, I have not said that nor have I blamed
our current President entirely for where the country is currently,
both would be way to narrow thinking for me and sounds very partisan
which is not how Independents think.

I like President Obama, something I have said often.
What I am wanting to hear is what his new strategy will be, the goals and expected results.

I do not think us personally or our business is markedly better than four years ago.
I also believe a President's term should be six years, we would rarely ever have a second term,
if so.

I mentioned before this is a hard decision for me,
the hardest in my voting history of helping both Democrats and Republicans
into office.

pandora

Johnny Abruzzo wrote:

pandora wrote:

I am an Independent and undecided who I am voting for... are you always this misinformed? :fp:

Who has eaten up every GOP argument and defended Todd Akin's rape comments and the Paul Ryan speech vociferously. And calls our president a "failed president."

"undecided"

Do you not comprehend understanding?

Do you not comprehend independent thinking?

I guess not :fp:

As far as failed President, like most, maybe even you if you were honest ...
wish he had done more, even think he could do more.

And no we personally or our business are not better
off than four years ago.
When that is true it is a failure to those living it.

BUT that does not mean I will not give him four more.

josevolution

pandora wrote:

ComeToTX wrote:

Pandora,

You seem to think Clinton deserves no credit for the prosperous economy we had with him. At the same time you heap a lot of blame on Obama for the last 4 years. Please explain.

The booming 1990's has much to do with other goings on. The Federal Reserve, Congress, IT
and productivity. As far as no credit for Clinton, I have not said that nor have I blamed
our current President entirely for where the country is currently,
both would be way to narrow thinking for me and sounds very partisan
which is not how Independents think.

I like President Obama, something I have said often.
What I am wanting to hear is what his new strategy will be, the goals and expected results.

I do not think us personally or our business is markedly better than four years ago.
I also believe a President's term should be six years, we would rarely ever have a second term,
if so.

I mentioned before this is a hard decision for me,
the hardest in my voting history of helping both Democrats and Republicans
into office.

Will see tonight if Obama can spell it out for the country as to wich way is the best way to get this country on a better path then it has been , i'm sure it will be better than what Willard gave in hi's speech wich was nothing on how he would fix things ...

mickeyrat

Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd another thread turned toward or about a particular poster.

Are we not seeing a trend yet folks?

MayDay10

mickeyrat wrote:

Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd another thread turned toward or about a particular poster.

Are we not seeing a trend yet folks?

every single thread it seems.

It is tiresome.

pandora

josevolution wrote:

pandora wrote:

ComeToTX wrote:

Pandora,

You seem to think Clinton deserves no credit for the prosperous economy we had with him. At the same time you heap a lot of blame on Obama for the last 4 years. Please explain.

The booming 1990's has much to do with other goings on. The Federal Reserve, Congress, IT
and productivity. As far as no credit for Clinton, I have not said that nor have I blamed
our current President entirely for where the country is currently,
both would be way to narrow thinking for me and sounds very partisan
which is not how Independents think.

I like President Obama, something I have said often.
What I am wanting to hear is what his new strategy will be, the goals and expected results.

I do not think us personally or our business is markedly better than four years ago.
I also believe a President's term should be six years, we would rarely ever have a second term,
if so.

I mentioned before this is a hard decision for me,
the hardest in my voting history of helping both Democrats and Republicans
into office.

Will see tonight if Obama can spell it out for the country as to wich way is the best way to get this country on a better path then it has been , i'm sure it will be better than what Willard gave in hi's speech wich was nothing on how he would fix things ...

this is how I feel too ...
I was at lunch, on the radio they were talking to a GA representative who said he looked forward to our President being eloquent and articulate, when asked how he would do as a followup to Clintons speech.

I know our President will give a wonderful speech, I love his speeches
but I need more than eloquent and articulate,
I need to know exactly what is going to be done so I know I will be able to say in four years...
I am way better off now than I was four years ago.

I'm on the brink of losing faith in all that goes with politics and US government.

pandora

mickeyrat wrote:

Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd another thread turned toward or about a particular poster.

Are we not seeing a trend yet folks?

Who's that?

and why?

and do you read said poster posts?

pandora

MayDay10 wrote:

mickeyrat wrote:

Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd another thread turned toward or about a particular poster.

Are we not seeing a trend yet folks?

every single thread it seems.

It is tiresome.

Please spell out tiresome and who's fault that exactly is...
well if you can keep within posting guidelines ...if not
maybe consider canning it?