Why should I vote for Romney...?

gimmesometruth27

usamamasan1 wrote:

government can help to create an environment conducive to job creation. Obama has done the opposite.

BECAUSE THE HOUSE WILL NOT BRING ANY SORT OF JOBS BILL TO THE FLOOR TO BE DEBATED OR VOTED ON....

it is easy to blame one guy when one party doesn't even give him a chance to try to fix things....

EdsonNascimento

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

usamamasan1 wrote:

government can help to create an environment conducive to job creation. Obama has done the opposite.

BECAUSE THE HOUSE WILL NOT BRING ANY SORT OF JOBS BILL TO THE FLOOR TO BE DEBATED OR VOTED ON....

it is easy to blame one guy when one party doesn't even give him a chance to try to fix things....

So, a leader who can't lead is going to use the fact that he can't lead as a battle cry? That's ALMOST worse than using raising taxes as a campaign platform.

gimmesometruth27

EdsonNascimento wrote:

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

usamamasan1 wrote:

government can help to create an environment conducive to job creation. Obama has done the opposite.

BECAUSE THE HOUSE WILL NOT BRING ANY SORT OF JOBS BILL TO THE FLOOR TO BE DEBATED OR VOTED ON....

it is easy to blame one guy when one party doesn't even give him a chance to try to fix things....

So, a leader who can't lead is going to use the fact that he can't lead as a battle cry? That's ALMOST worse than using raising taxes as a campaign platform.

just how can the president force the speaker of the house that is from a hostile party to bring legislation to the floor to be debated and voted? he is not a king, and the system does not work that way...

EdsonNascimento

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

EdsonNascimento wrote:

So, a leader who can't lead is going to use the fact that he can't lead as a battle cry? That's ALMOST worse than using raising taxes as a campaign platform.

just how can the president force the speaker of the house that is from a hostile party to bring legislation to the floor to be debated and voted? he is not a king, and the system does not work that way...

How did every other President that did not have control of EITHER house for most of the last 50 years do it?

EdsonNascimento

EdsonNascimento wrote:

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

EdsonNascimento wrote:

So, a leader who can't lead is going to use the fact that he can't lead as a battle cry? That's ALMOST worse than using raising taxes as a campaign platform.

just how can the president force the speaker of the house that is from a hostile party to bring legislation to the floor to be debated and voted? he is not a king, and the system does not work that way...

How did every other President that did not have control of EITHER house for most of the last 50 years do it?

Why didn't the Senate leader bring bring legislation that the House approved 33 times to debate or vote?

EDIT: Forgot to add - that the President and said Senate leader didn't allow anyone to read the original bill that related to before voting on? Perhaps that leads to skepticism by the "hostile party" and answers your original question.

gimmesometruth27

EdsonNascimento wrote:

How did every other President that did not have control of EITHER house for most of the last 50 years do it?

because every other president did not do that.

this is 2012, and it is unprecedented in american history that the minority leader in the senate on the day after the president took over said that his whole goal is to make obama a one term president. no president in american history has had one house of congress refuse to work with him on day one, and then had the speaker of the house vow to not work with him after the mid term elections...

Godfather.

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

unbiased source there i see

the other side ?
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c3#/vi ... cer-ad.cnn

Godfather.

EdsonNascimento

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

EdsonNascimento wrote:

How did every other President that did not have control of EITHER house for most of the last 50 years do it?

because every other president did not do that.

this is 2012, and it is unprecedented in american history that the minority leader in the senate on the day after the president took over said that his whole goal is to make obama a one term president. no president in american history has had one house of congress refuse to work with him on day one, and then had the house of congress vow to not work with him after the mid term elections...

Poor Obama. He's the first President ever to face opposition. Poor, poor Obama.

So, we should re-elect him b/c he'll be that much more successful in ramming through legislation - but only when he controls everything, doesn't allow anyone to read it and its harmful in just about every way and if a Republican had offered it, the debate would be totally turned on its head.



That's a complete joke. Every President faces significant opposition and the Congress is almost always held by the opposing party. It's one of the beautiful things of our system of government. And, yet others have found a way to get things through.

You sound like the proverbial grandparent who walked to school both ways up hill with snow on the ground in summer in Florida. Everyone always has it tougher.

gimmesometruth27

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-A09a_gHJc

gimmesometruth27

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FirI3_G_ ... re=related

usamamasan1

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

why do you constantly post soundbytes? can you think for yourself?...

cincybearcat

usamamasan1 wrote:

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

why do you constantly post soundbytes? can you think for yourself?...

That's funny.

Prince Of Dorkness

EdsonNascimento wrote:

So, a leader who can't lead is going to use the fact that he can't lead as a battle cry? That's ALMOST worse than using raising taxes as a campaign platform.

Do you understand how American politics work?

The Republicans would have to table a jobs bill for him to support it and try to get it passed.

All they've done is defund planned parenthood, block anti-bullying legislation, insist that the Bush Tax cuts get extended and apologize to BP that the president got mad at them for killing all that gulf wildlife... can you think of anything else?

Byrnzie

cincybearcat wrote:

usamamasan1 wrote:

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

why do you constantly post soundbytes? can you think for yourself?...

That's funny.

Great contribution there.

Newch91

ComeToTX wrote:

usamamasan1 wrote:

The first 100 days:

Romney will immediately approve the Keystone Pipeline on day one creating thousands of jobs, American ones.

Or
Barack Hussein Obama will double down on the failed energy policies that have led to higher prices and fewer jobs

Romney will begin the process of repealing and replacing obamacare on the first day of his glorious Presidency
Or
Barack Hussein Obama's Care will begin to hit the economy, raising taxes and stifling growth, like all his shit does.

Romney will impose a "regulatory cap" on federal agencies and require offsets for new regulations.

Or
Barack Hussein Obama will push through job-destroying regulations that he has delayed until after the election

Romney will send congress a bill slashing discretionary spending by five percent across the board
Or
Barack Hussein Obama will continue pushing policies that result inTrillions of dollars in new debt and deficits.

Romney will pursue fundamental tax reform- cutting taxes acros the board and stopping the federal government from picking winners and losers.
Or
Barack Hussein Obama will pursue the biggest tax increase in HISTORY

Romney will stand up to chinas unfair trade practices - protecting American workers And businesses
Or
Barack Hussein Obama will continue to resist labeling china as a currency manipulator.



Easy peasy

inmytree wrote:

Serious question: Why Should I Vote for Romney...?

We can't afford four more years of failed policy and weak leadership.

woot

why don't you use mitt's middle name? is this your way of telling us you think he's a muslim?

I wonder why he won't use his first name: Willard.

gimmesometruth27

Byrnzie wrote:

cincybearcat wrote:

usamamasan1 wrote:

That's funny.

Great contribution there.

yeah that's pretty typical...

gimmesometruth27

gimmesometruth27

gimmesometruth27

Byrnzie

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

Funny...but true.