Selling my stuff

harpmaplesweet

Take a look at my post in Lost Dogs.
I'm selling all my PJ posters & vinyl to save up for a trip.

SHoot me a PM if you're interested.

Thanks !

Boxes&Books

Bump... Good luck man.

harpmaplesweet

tonifig8 wrote:

Bump... Good luck man.

Thank you.

javis el errante

Post the link to your thread on LD in this OP... and bump!

harpmaplesweet

http://s1263.photobucket.com/albums/ii6 ... aplesweet/

harpmaplesweet

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=183611&p=4256080#p4256080

harpmaplesweet

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=183862

harpmaplesweet

These are still available.

harpmaplesweet wrote:

http://forums.pearljam.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=183862

100 Pacer

harpmaplesweet wrote:

http://s1263.photobucket.com/albums/ii638/harpmaplesweet/

Did you sell/trade the signed photograph?

I'm curious because it's a fake signature.

harpmaplesweet

Sorry bud ... not sure where you come off saying that but it's not true.

100 Pacer wrote:

harpmaplesweet wrote:

http://s1263.photobucket.com/albums/ii638/harpmaplesweet/

Did you sell/trade the signed photograph?

I'm curious because it's a fake signature.

PJStatTracker

100 Pacer wrote:

harpmaplesweet wrote:

http://s1263.photobucket.com/albums/ii638/harpmaplesweet/

I'm curious because it's a fake signature.

Out of curiosity, why do you say it's fake?

100 Pacer

harpmaplesweet wrote:

Sorry bud ... not sure where you come off saying that but it's not true.

100 Pacer wrote:

harpmaplesweet wrote:

http://s1263.photobucket.com/albums/ii638/harpmaplesweet/

Did you sell/trade the signed photograph?

I'm curious because it's a fake signature.

No offense intended, but it is most certainly a fake. Can I ask how you acquired it? The tell-tale signs are there, the most noticeable being the incorrect "V". But don't take my word for it - 10C will tell you the same if you contact them for verification.

elwayvedder

Pacer, EV's signature has changed over the past 20+ years...are you sure you aren't just comparing it to what you may know as his current style? Just curious as I have no clue if its indeed real or not
-EV

Wilds

harpmaplesweet wrote:

Sorry bud ... not sure where you come off saying that but it's not true.

100 Pacer wrote:

harpmaplesweet wrote:

http://s1263.photobucket.com/albums/ii638/harpmaplesweet/

Did you sell/trade the signed photograph?

I'm curious because it's a fake signature.

I'd also be curious about how this piece was obtained?


Thanks,


Nate

Boxes&Books

100 Pacer wrote:

No offense intended, but it is most certainly a fake. Can I ask how you acquired it? The tell-tale signs are there, the most noticeable being the incorrect "V". But don't take my word for it - 10C will tell you the same if you contact them for verification.

I have to agree with pacer .... I didn't want to post anything related to the signature, however since there is now a discussion on it, I thought I'd chime in... I was originally interested in the signed item, but after I sow the image I had to back down.
The V looks off and also the "E" following the "V" ... Although there are authentic signatures with a loop on the bottom of the "V", this one just doesn't flow correctly especially that little hook on top of the V...There are two other small features on this that don't seem to flow correctly either. The provenance is key to this...because Ed was only signing like that during a certain period.... I rather not give out to much information because it helps those who forge sigs create better timelines..... This piece, in my opinion, is not legit... But I'm no expert so don't take my word for it. I just personally wouldn't invest in it...

No disrespect to the OP intended....

100 Pacer and Paul are two well informed individuals who are very active on this board, I'd consult with one of those guys if you have questions related to signatures...

best of luck with your sale.

harpmaplesweet

Thanks for everyones forensic expertise.
I think it's funny because I'm not even selling the photo. I decided to keep it
seeing that it was worth a considerable amount more than the $100 I was asking for it.
I'm selling posters and vinyl.
Rest assured, the autograph is authentic.

tonifig8 wrote:

100 Pacer wrote:

No offense intended, but it is most certainly a fake. Can I ask how you acquired it? The tell-tale signs are there, the most noticeable being the incorrect "V". But don't take my word for it - 10C will tell you the same if you contact them for verification.

I have to agree with pacer .... I didn't want to post anything related to the signature, however since there is now a discussion on it, I thought I'd chime in... I was originally interested in the signed item, but after I sow the image I had to back down.
The V looks off and also the "E" following the "V" ... Although there are authentic signatures with a loop on the bottom of the "V", this one just doesn't flow correctly especially that little hook on top of the V...There are two other small features on this that don't seem to flow correctly either. The provenance is key to this...because Ed was only signing like that during a certain period.... I rather not give out to much information because it helps those who forge sigs create better timelines..... This piece, in my opinion, is not legit... But I'm no expert so don't take my word for it. I just personally wouldn't invest in it...

No disrespect to the OP intended....

100 Pacer and Paul are two well informed individuals who are very active on this board, I'd consult with one of those guys if you have questions related to signatures...

best of luck with your sale.

pdalowsky

harpmaplesweet wrote:

Thanks for everyones forensic expertise.
I think it's funny because I'm not even selling the photo. I decided to keep it
seeing that it was worth a considerable amount more than the $100 I was asking for it.
I'm selling posters and vinyl.
Rest assured, the autograph is authentic.

tonifig8 wrote:

100 Pacer wrote:

No offense intended, but it is most certainly a fake. Can I ask how you acquired it? The tell-tale signs are there, the most noticeable being the incorrect "V". But don't take my word for it - 10C will tell you the same if you contact them for verification.

I have to agree with pacer .... I didn't want to post anything related to the signature, however since there is now a discussion on it, I thought I'd chime in... I was originally interested in the signed item, but after I sow the image I had to back down.
The V looks off and also the "E" following the "V" ... Although there are authentic signatures with a loop on the bottom of the "V", this one just doesn't flow correctly especially that little hook on top of the V...There are two other small features on this that don't seem to flow correctly either. The provenance is key to this...because Ed was only signing like that during a certain period.... I rather not give out to much information because it helps those who forge sigs create better timelines..... This piece, in my opinion, is not legit... But I'm no expert so don't take my word for it. I just personally wouldn't invest in it...

No disrespect to the OP intended....

100 Pacer and Paul are two well informed individuals who are very active on this board, I'd consult with one of those guys if you have questions related to signatures...

best of luck with your sale.

No one is trying to rain on anyones parade, but can you confirm why you so vehemently insist it is authentic....a little info would go a long way. Youve heard why it doesnt seem so, now would be a good time to spill ....