Rejection of Keystone XL not yet secured.
Comments
-
Both are evil, but if we say "no" in the US we are setting a precedent of saying we are not allowing that dirty stuff here no more? Yes?
Then we all go up to Canada and protest. J/k
We already have one part of the pipeline running though from Canada to Illinois.
Doesn't matter dirty is dirty is dirty. Ecocide at its finest.
Im trying avoid at all cost to be reborn back into this place.0 -
Drowned Out wrote:btw....I don't know if we should be holding the US up as a place with effective rules and regulations... You guys have had a couple of minor problems down there in recent memory, no?
Oh......only about 48 or so oil spills since 1969:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oil_spills
Think about the costs of the clean-ups.0 -
Why not just build refineries in Alberta and sell the oil to the U.S.? It creates Canadian jobs and will boost the overall Canadian economy while turning the country into a oil superpower. There is already an existing pipeline running oil to the U.S., so it's not like it's just sitting there and I'm sure it would not be hard to find investors.
:think:
Who the hell if running things up there, the McKenzie brothers? :crazy: Somebody in leadership needs a good shaking. :geek:Be Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0 -
Jason P wrote:Why not just build refineries in Alberta and sell the oil to the U.S.? It creates Canadian jobs and will boost the overall Canadian economy while turning the country into a oil superpower. There is already an existing pipeline running oil to the U.S., so it's not like it's just sitting there and I'm sure it would not be hard to find investors.
:think:
that's what i'm wonderingJason P wrote:Who the hell if running things up there, the McKenzie brothers? :crazy: Somebody in leadership needs a good shaking. :geek:
hosers0 -
Jason P wrote:Why not just build refineries in Alberta and sell the oil to the U.S.? It creates Canadian jobs and will boost the overall Canadian economy while turning the country into a oil superpower. There is already an existing pipeline running oil to the U.S., so it's not like it's just sitting there and I'm sure it would not be hard to find investors.
:think:
Who the hell if running things up there, the McKenzie brothers? :crazy: Somebody in leadership needs a good shaking. :geek:
pure speculation:
the cost to build refineries is extremely expensive ... factor in a somewhat more regulated environmental standard vs. the US ... it is probably cheaper and more profitable to build a pipeline ... once the oil hits the US - it is subject to US laws which are significantly more lax from pollution to safety ...0 -
polaris_x wrote:Jason P wrote:Why not just build refineries in Alberta and sell the oil to the U.S.? It creates Canadian jobs and will boost the overall Canadian economy while turning the country into a oil superpower. There is already an existing pipeline running oil to the U.S., so it's not like it's just sitting there and I'm sure it would not be hard to find investors.
:think:
Who the hell if running things up there, the McKenzie brothers? :crazy: Somebody in leadership needs a good shaking. :geek:
pure speculation:
the cost to build refineries is extremely expensive ... factor in a somewhat more regulated environmental standard vs. the US ... it is probably cheaper and more profitable to build a pipeline ... once the oil hits the US - it is subject to US laws which are significantly more lax from pollution to safety ...
And air permits in the US are very strict as I've found out first hand. All I hear about is loose US regulations but the only thing getting loose is my rectum from all the rules and regulations that get crammed up it. But I guess I can't complain too much because environmental regulations were one of the few things to work on during the recession. If it wasn't for EPA regulations and the projects they required, I probably would have been laid-off.Be Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0 -
Jason P wrote:Why not just build refineries in Alberta and sell the oil to the U.S.? It creates Canadian jobs and will boost the overall Canadian economy while turning the country into a oil superpower. There is already an existing pipeline running oil to the U.S., so it's not like it's just sitting there and I'm sure it would not be hard to find investors.
:think:
Who the hell if running things up there, the McKenzie brothers? :crazy: Somebody in leadership needs a good shaking. :geek:
We used to have a national oil company, we dismantled it. There are very few countries left that exert that kind of control over their resources...and the ones that do are maligned and basically in danger of military action for exactly that reason (hello, Hugo)....
In other words, I can't figure it outI've been trying to look into that question for a while, but man...there is so much conflicting info on this shit - the oil industry pays astronomical amounts of money to sponsor studies to support their side of the business, and environmental groups tend to ignore the economic side of things because they don't want to be seen as promoting ANYTHING that will result in more oil use...But that question is not asked often enough up here Bennyorr's statements earlier in the thread is an example of just how effectively our govt's campaign of pushin the tarsands works - people up here think we NEED investment in the tarsands to keep jobs flowing....but it's a sham; the world needs our oil and we've given it up for pennies a barrel, to be controlled by foreign, private companies.
0 -
norm wrote:Jason P wrote:Why not just build refineries in Alberta and sell the oil to the U.S.? It creates Canadian jobs and will boost the overall Canadian economy while turning the country into a oil superpower. There is already an existing pipeline running oil to the U.S., so it's not like it's just sitting there and I'm sure it would not be hard to find investors.
:think:
that's what i'm wonderingJason P wrote:Who the hell if running things up there, the McKenzie brothers? :crazy: Somebody in leadership needs a good shaking. :geek:
hosers
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/09/21 ... 73936.html
Most recently, a number of Canadian celebrities have come out against the pipeline and thrown their weight behind the protests, notably Dave Thomas of SCTV fame. That follows a similar theme seen in the U.S., where actresses Margot Kidder and Darryl Hannah were both arrested at the White House protests.0 -
Drowned Out wrote:Most recently, a number of Canadian celebrities have come out against the pipeline and thrown their weight behind the protests, notably Dave Thomas of SCTV fame.
That is awesome! I wonder if he released a jar of moths to ruin the project.
Hmm ... I have the hinkering for some back-bacon and kokanee for whatever reasonBe Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0 -
Still can't get over the disappointment that they shelved a Bob n Doug comeback :(0 -
now i want a jelly donut0
-
norm wrote:now i want a jelly donut0
-
Drowned Out wrote:norm wrote:now i want a jelly donut
i don't care how it's spelled, just get me one! :P0 -
Blah. Some earthquakes are caused by fracking. It couldnt be because there are these huge 3 story jackhammers pounding at the earth's crust 2-3 miles deep. They will get enough shaking up there soon enough. So what if the earth becomes an asteroid belt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U01EK76Sy4A0 -
SweetChildofMine wrote:Blah. Some earthquakes are caused by fracking. It couldnt be because there are these huge 3 story jackhammers pounding at the earth's crust 2-3 miles deep. They will get enough shaking up there soon enough. So what if the earth becomes an asteroid belt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U01EK76Sy4A"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
norm wrote:Drowned Out wrote:norm wrote:now i want a jelly donut
i don't care how it's spelled, just get me one! :P0 -
brianlux wrote:SweetChildofMine wrote:Blah. Some earthquakes are caused by fracking. It couldnt be because there are these huge 3 story jackhammers pounding at the earth's crust 2-3 miles deep. They will get enough shaking up there soon enough. So what if the earth becomes an asteroid belt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U01EK76Sy4ABut splitting the geode called earth is possible. Dont worry Brian no matter what happens youre coming with us.
Post edited by SweetChildofMine on0 -
SweetChildofMine wrote:brianlux wrote:SweetChildofMine wrote:Blah. Some earthquakes are caused by fracking. It couldnt be because there are these huge 3 story jackhammers pounding at the earth's crust 2-3 miles deep. They will get enough shaking up there soon enough. So what if the earth becomes an asteroid belt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U01EK76Sy4ABut splitting the geode called earth is possible. Dont worry Brian no matter what happens youre coming with us.
:-D
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16884061
China alone has invested 16 Billion in this pipeline. *raises eyebrows* sooooo.... make any connnection you want from this point.0 -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... zIj_EdQdM#!
Tar Nation: Garth Lenz @ TEDxVictoria
Talks about what the tar sands destruction. At one point this man is in tears.
This is sanity?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help