Penn State Scandal

josevolution

http://news.yahoo.com/catholic-bishop-g ... 23009.html

Evrybody cuts deals this shit is sickening they should have capital punishement for these fucks , and the preist who was the perv is in Jail awating trial so tell me why the fuck is Sandusky not sitting in a cell wtf ...

JK_Livin

The Feds need to come in on this cluster.
Bottom line.

Bronx Bombers

An Arizona man claims he was sexually abused 30 years ago by a Penn State professor — and the university refused to investigate his claims.

Paul McLaughlin, now of Phoenix, says the abuse began when he was just 11 and lasted from 1977-81, with an education professor and two other predators targeting him.

The victim told ABC News that he made audiotapes in 2001 of conversations where Prof. Jack Neisworth admitted performing oral sex on him.

In late 2001 and early 2002, McLaughlin said he sent copies of the tapes to university officials in an effort to launch an investigation — but was roundly ignored.

Neisworth was indicted for child sexual abuse in 2005 in Maryland, although the charges were dismissed for lack of evidence.

In 2006, the professor — without admitting any wrongdoing — reached an out-of-court settlement with McLaughlin in a lawsuit filed by the purported victim.


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... e-1.978374

EdsonNascimento

unlost dogs wrote:

McQueary says he halted assault in ’02
By Mark Scolforo, Maryclaire Dale and Genaro C. Armas
Associated Press / November 16, 2011

“I did stop it, not physically . . . but made sure it was stopped when I left that locker room . .



How did he not run up and beat the shit out of Sandusky then and there?

I wish these headlines would stop saying he stopped it. He mads sure it stopped. That could range from - ok, he's done, time to go - to actually doing something. He admits not physically doing anything. So, the conclusion would be the same - he did nothing to stop it. He just knows it stopped before he left. I'd like to know how he knows it stopped and his rationalization for not making sure the kid was safe (even after the fact - he keeps talking about he 30-45 seconds - what about after when he ran to his daddy? Not enough time to think - hey, maybe I could still do more to make sure that boy is safe.)

comebackgirl

EmBleve wrote:

comebackgirl wrote:

[
he report is very telling. The stories are so similar. And there are at least 2 eye witnesses to actual assaults and a bunch of witnesses to some other sketchy interactions.

lowlife. What is his defense? Towel snapping and leg touching and horse play is normal?? :roll:

Apparently McQueary mistakenly thought them snapping towels and sliding in the showers was anal rape :roll: I could see how he would be confused.

EmBleve

comebackgirl wrote:

EmBleve wrote:

comebackgirl wrote:

[
he report is very telling. The stories are so similar. And there are at least 2 eye witnesses to actual assaults and a bunch of witnesses to some other sketchy interactions.

lowlife. What is his defense? Towel snapping and leg touching and horse play is normal?? :roll:

Apparently McQueary mistakenly thought them snapping towels and sliding in the showers was anal rape :roll: I could see how he would be confused.

yes, easily.

Ledbetterman10

NoCode416 wrote:

Ledbetterman10 wrote:

"8 year olds, Dude"

easy, easy

You can only blame yourself for having to spend six months in Chino

Monster Rain

A report on si.com says that the Second Mile raised over $1,400 for Judge Leslie Duchtot in 2007 when she was running for office. Sandusky was still with the organization at that time. If you don't know, that's the judge who freed the creep on unsecured bail (which means he never had to pay any money and won't unless he fails to show up for court). It had already been reported that she was a volunteer for the organization, which was bad enough. This revelation makes it much worse for her. I really hope she's removed from the bench and disbarred for ethics violations because of this. I still don't understand why she thought this wasn't a conflict of interest or whey she thought it wouldn't come out with all the media attention the case is getting. It's just one more disgusting thing to add to the pile.

http://tracking.si.com/2011/11/16/the-s ... ured-bail/

RKCNDY

I haven't commented on this because it sickens me so much...anyway, didn't see this posted. Sorry if it already has been: http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/dish/20 ... s-eyebrows

So, did she know?

mfc2006

RKCNDY wrote:

I haven't commented on this because it sickens me so much...anyway, didn't see this posted. Sorry if it already has been: http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/dish/20 ... s-eyebrows

So, did she know?

yeah, i heard that on ESPN radio this morning....

seems fishy as hell to me. every single day there's a new wrinkle in this case....and yet, Sandusky is still out on bail. unbelievable.

RKCNDY

mfc2006 wrote:

RKCNDY wrote:

I haven't commented on this because it sickens me so much...anyway, didn't see this posted. Sorry if it already has been: http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/dish/20 ... s-eyebrows

So, did she know?

yeah, i heard that on ESPN radio this morning....

seems fishy as hell to me. every single day there's a new wrinkle in this case....and yet, Sandusky is still out on bail. unbelievable.

I've learned that cases like this are "who you know" or "how much money you have"

usually people that should be locked up know certain people, or just have enough money to stay out. Really sad.

polaris_x

$500k a year pension!?? ... and people gripe about hippies in tents ... :shock:

Ledbetterman10

polaris_x wrote:

$500k a year pension!?? ... and people gripe about hippies in tents ... :shock:

Well he has worked the same very well paying job for like 60 years....so I guess he deserves that pension.

The Fixer

EdsonNascimento wrote:

unlost dogs wrote:

McQueary says he halted assault in ’02
By Mark Scolforo, Maryclaire Dale and Genaro C. Armas
Associated Press / November 16, 2011

“I did stop it, not physically . . . but made sure it was stopped when I left that locker room . .



How did he not run up and beat the shit out of Sandusky then and there?

I wish these headlines would stop saying he stopped it. He mads sure it stopped. That could range from - ok, he's done, time to go - to actually doing something. He admits not physically doing anything. So, the conclusion would be the same - he did nothing to stop it. He just knows it stopped before he left. I'd like to know how he knows it stopped and his rationalization for not making sure the kid was safe (even after the fact - he keeps talking about he 30-45 seconds - what about after when he ran to his daddy? Not enough time to think - hey, maybe I could still do more to make sure that boy is safe.)

I agree. McQuery loses credibility every time he speaks. I think he's trying to improve his image so he can keep his job as a coach at PSU. He deserves to be taken out with the rest of the trash.

josevolution

The Fixer wrote:

EdsonNascimento wrote:

unlost dogs wrote:

McQueary says he halted assault in ’02
By Mark Scolforo, Maryclaire Dale and Genaro C. Armas
Associated Press / November 16, 2011

“I did stop it, not physically . . . but made sure it was stopped when I left that locker room . .



How did he not run up and beat the shit out of Sandusky then and there?

I wish these headlines would stop saying he stopped it. He mads sure it stopped. That could range from - ok, he's done, time to go - to actually doing something. He admits not physically doing anything. So, the conclusion would be the same - he did nothing to stop it. He just knows it stopped before he left. I'd like to know how he knows it stopped and his rationalization for not making sure the kid was safe (even after the fact - he keeps talking about he 30-45 seconds - what about after when he ran to his daddy? Not enough time to think - hey, maybe I could still do more to make sure that boy is safe.)

I agree. McQuery loses credibility every time he speaks. I think he's trying to improve his image so he can keep his job as a coach at PSU. He deserves to be taken out with the rest of the trash.

Agreed there is no way this guy sets foot on the PSU football feild as part of the coaching staff ever again no way i mean how could they let him , they need to just get rid of everybody involved in this mess ...
That's the only way they can move forward and away from this ...

The Fixer

josevolution wrote:

The Fixer wrote:

EdsonNascimento wrote:

I wish these headlines would stop saying he stopped it. He mads sure it stopped. That could range from - ok, he's done, time to go - to actually doing something. He admits not physically doing anything. So, the conclusion would be the same - he did nothing to stop it. He just knows it stopped before he left. I'd like to know how he knows it stopped and his rationalization for not making sure the kid was safe (even after the fact - he keeps talking about he 30-45 seconds - what about after when he ran to his daddy? Not enough time to think - hey, maybe I could still do more to make sure that boy is safe.)

I agree. McQuery loses credibility every time he speaks. I think he's trying to improve his image so he can keep his job as a coach at PSU. He deserves to be taken out with the rest of the trash.

Agreed there is no way this guy sets foot on the PSU football feild as part of the coaching staff ever again no way i mean how could they let him , they need to just get rid of everybody involved in this mess ...
That's the only way they can move forward and away from this ...

Apparently PSU can't leagally fire McQuery as he is protected by some whistleblower law. I don't understand how that works since mcquery just brought the incident to his supervisor, which is the EXACT same thing paterno did.

doesn't make sense to me how one can legally get fired and the other cannot.

polaris_x

Ledbetterman10 wrote:

polaris_x wrote:

$500k a year pension!?? ... and people gripe about hippies in tents ... :shock:

Well he has worked the same very well paying job for like 60 years....so I guess he deserves that pension.

well ... i'm not gonna derail this thread ... i'll just say that i disagree with "deserves" ...

Monster Rain

I think the difference is that McQueary is the one who reported it first and he gave Paterno a very detailed description of the incident and could have reasonably expected that the police would be notified of the incident after he told his boss. When Paterno passed it along he allegedly didn't give the same detailed description that McQueary gave him. I think the Board of Trustees also understands that Paterno was running the show at the school when it came to anything related to athletics regardless of who had the Athletic Director title, so he had the power to keep things quiet in order to protect his image and the image of his football program and he also had the power to make sure that the issue was reported to the police if that's what he wanted. At the very least, Paterno should have made sure that Sandusky never set foot on the Penn State campus again after the 1998 investigation that led to Sandusky "retiring" at a time when he was considered to be Paterno's eventual successor and that alone is reason enough to fire him. I wouldn't be surprised if the trials of Sandusky and the Penn State officials reveal that Paterno was more involved in the cover-up of this story than he'd like us to believe.

The Fixer wrote:

Apparently PSU can't leagally fire McQuery as he is protected by some whistleblower law. I don't understand how that works since mcquery just brought the incident to his supervisor, which is the EXACT same thing paterno did.

doesn't make sense to me how one can legally get fired and the other cannot.

dcfaithful

This whole thing is a fucking mess. I read the indictment yesterday. :shock:

Sandusky is a bonafide predator and needs to be put away. The thought of the guy disgusts me.

norm

Also Wednesday, a central Pennsylvania police chief said his department did not receive reports from a then-Penn State graduate assistant who said he saw Sandusky raping a boy on campus in 2002.

The assistant, Mike McQueary, wrote in an email to a friend that was made available to The Associated Press that he had discussions with police about what he saw. In the email, McQueary did not specify which police department he spoke to.

State College borough police chief Tom King said McQueary didn't make a report to his department.

The university also has its own police force. Penn State administrators said they were looking into whether McQueary contacted campus police.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/ ... 6-15-58-17