Long overdue. Israel needs to preemptively strike Iran

12467

Comments

  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,431
    :?

    why sign up to fight when it is easier to sit on the sideline and say.....

    "GIMME AN I

    GIMME AN S

    GIMME AN R

    GIMME AN A

    GIMME AN E

    GIMME AN L

    WHAT'S THAT SPELL??!!!"


    onehit-13-toni-basil-590x350.jpg
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • MookiesLaw
    MookiesLaw Posts: 158
    edited February 2012
    MK1980 wrote:
    Iran & imparticular the Ayatollah's & Armadinajad have always maintained that 'Israel' should not exist & is deliberatly inflaming the situation in the middle east re: it's own nuclear program. While Iran maintains that the enriched uranium is 'just' for electricity it is obv imho that they want to destroy isreal.

    Obvious to whom? Certainly not obvious according to the intelligence assessment Israeli officials have obtained. In spite of all their calls for war, Israel still aren't convinced that Iran has even made the decision to build a nuclear weapon. Coupled with the fact that US SecDef Leon Panetta said, and I quote, "Are they [Iran] trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No," only goes to show that the US and its allies are blatantly lying about Iran's nuclear program (in the context that Iran was trying to attain nukes).

    There is no conclusive evidence that they are building a nuclear weapon.

    http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israel-iran-still-mulling-whether-to-build-nuclear-bomb-1.407866

    Oh and has Israel signed the NPT yet? Anyone calling for a trumped up war without evidence is an effing hypocrite.
    Post edited by MookiesLaw on
  • EZ1221C
    EZ1221C Posts: 2,645
    hey war is OK as long as the rich get richer, right? gotta protect those oil profits, or defense contracts.
    PLAY THE SOUTH
  • usamamasan1
    usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    Occupy Iran!
  • MookiesLaw
    MookiesLaw Posts: 158
    usamamasan1 wrote:
    In Tuesday's State of the Union address, Mr. Obama said: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."
    Signed,
    President hope and change you can choke on.

    Ironically this might be one of the rare times this hopeLESS President might actually practice what he preaches. He's been a miserable failure in the past.
  • MookiesLaw
    MookiesLaw Posts: 158
    usamamasan1 wrote:
    Occupy Iran!
    Thoughts on the Haaretz article?
  • SweetChildofMine
    SweetChildofMine Posts: 842
    EZ1221C wrote:
    hey war is OK as long as the rich get richer, right? gotta protect those oil profits, or defense contracts.

    right , we have the military complex plus private corporate "armies"


    doesnt matter either way either its run by government or its run by corporations or both
  • SweetChildofMine
    SweetChildofMine Posts: 842
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    :?

    why sign up to fight when it is easier to sit on the sideline and say.....

    "GIMME AN I

    GIMME AN S

    GIMME AN R

    GIMME AN A

    GIMME AN E

    GIMME AN L

    WHAT'S THAT SPELL??!!!"


    onehit-13-toni-basil-590x350.jpg
    What your not going to sing a round of Mickey for us?
  • usamamasan1
    usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    MookiesLaw wrote:
    usamamasan1 wrote:
    Occupy Iran!
    Thoughts on the Haaretz article?

    my thought on the article is that it is not relevant if they have actualy assembled the bike. If it's wrapped up in a box under the tree with all the components, it will be easy to assemble later in the day. No need to stay up all night Christmas eve.
  • SweetChildofMine
    SweetChildofMine Posts: 842
    The mess of corporations and armies and destruction. No Iran should not have nukes.China shouldnt have nukes. Russia shouldnt have nukes, The USA should not have nukes. Neither French or North Korea. Nobody should have nukes. We keep perpetuating the myth nuclear proliferation is a deterrent. Its just a bunch of babies with guns. Man to live past this fucking nightmare of our nuclear age is 4.5 billion to one. Im just beginning to think its just male phallic symbol he who has the biggest bomb wins.
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Why has a thread calling for bombs to be dropped on a country - a country that has never attacked America and has never threatened to attack America - not yet been locked?
  • usamamasan1
    usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    Open your mind.
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,675
    SweetChildofMine wrote:
    The mess of corporations and armies and destruction. No Iran should not have nukes.China shouldnt have nukes. Russia shouldnt have nukes, The USA should not have nukes. Neither French or North Korea. Nobody should have nukes. We keep perpetuating the myth nuclear proliferation is a deterrent. Its just a bunch of babies with guns. Man to live past this fucking nightmare of our nuclear age is 4.5 billion to one. Im just beginning to think its just male phallic symbol he who has the biggest bomb wins.
    Back in the days when I was teaching I watched an eleven year old kid (a boy might I add) write this statement:

    "Bombs are phallic symbols of death- big dicks that kill things rather than create life."

    A wise young lad!
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • MookiesLaw
    MookiesLaw Posts: 158
    usamamasan1 wrote:
    MookiesLaw wrote:
    usamamasan1 wrote:
    Occupy Iran!
    Thoughts on the Haaretz article?

    my thought on the article is that it is not relevant if they have actualy assembled the bike. If it's wrapped up in a box under the tree with all the components, it will be easy to assemble later in the day. No need to stay up all night Christmas eve.
    If you are seriously discussing about bombing and invading a country, you better have serious evidence that that Country is guilty. The implications with any error in judgement are going to be significant to both Israel, Iran and the rest of us. Whichever way it goes. As long as you understand that.

    And who's going to pay for this? You know, budget deficit, economic decline and all that?

    Let's borrow from China.
  • usamamasan1
    usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    MookiesLaw wrote:
    And who's going to pay for this?

    Same people who pay for everything. the top 10%. Besides, this is about ISRAEL striking Iran right?

    We just will get involved after Iran tries to stop the oil flow.....
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,431
    usamamasan1 wrote:
    MookiesLaw wrote:
    And who's going to pay for this?

    Same people who pay for everything. the top 10%.
    :lol:
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • MookiesLaw
    MookiesLaw Posts: 158
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Why has a thread calling for bombs to be dropped on a country - a country that has never attacked America and has never threatened to attack America - not yet been locked?
    It's a US based message board.

    Frequented mostly by residents of a Country which still remains the only Country in the world to have deployed Nuclear weapons creating mass devastation and loss of lives, not one but twice. It's obviously not a big deal to some of them. It's how they roll. Some of them see nothing wrong with it.
  • usamamasan1
    usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    Gimmy, you said yesterday "add for button pressed"
    What gives?
  • MookiesLaw
    MookiesLaw Posts: 158
    usamamasan1 wrote:
    MookiesLaw wrote:
    Besides, this is about ISRAEL striking Iran right?
    Only a fool would support Israel striking Iran after i've just shown you that Israel still aren't convinced that Iran has even made the decision to build a nuclear weapon.
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,675
    MookiesLaw wrote:
    And who's going to pay for this?

    And what about the non-monetary costs? What if a preemptive strike of this nature led to wide spread war, especially wide spread nuclear war? This sounds to me like some crazy members of our species wanting to end civilization. If that has to be done, can't we at the very least find a way to do ourselves in without taking most of the rest of life on earth with us?

    But better yet, what about focusing our energies on peace... or has everyone become too cynical about that word any more?
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

This discussion has been closed.

Categories