The Eddie Vedder LIE (WM3)

13

Comments

  • The Waiting Trophy Man
    The Waiting Trophy Man Niagara region, Ontario, Canada Posts: 12,158
    Blockhead, you need to get laid, dude. Bad.
    Another habit says it's in love with you
    Another habit says its long overdue
    Another habit like an unwanted friend
    I'm so happy with my righteous self
  • BinauralJam
    BinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    Blockhead wrote:
    BinauralJam wrote:
    Blockhead, have you ever been arrested?
    Huh?


    So? No then.
  • _
    _ Posts: 6,657
    Blockhead wrote:
    Then why does ED assume to know...
    It was the court documented time line, I think if it was false the defense would have went after it...
    I havent taken you seriously... You just posted that they did the luminol test "some two weeks after" when it was 5 days after...

    I can't believe you started ANOTHER thread about this.

    Ed does not ASSUME to know anything. He is so familiar with the facts of this case that he is actually part of the defense team. He knows stuff you don't know or understand.

    You are a random guy on a message board who has repeatedly lied about and misrepresented the facts. You have also demonstrated time & again that you do not fully read or understand the documents you are posting.

    The fact is, the document you posted does not indicate how or when things ended with Jessie that day. It does NOT indicate that he went home at the end of the document or even that the interrogation did not continue. You are posting a document that does not support your claims.

    I'm not going to address anything else except the topic of this thread - the supposed lie that Ed told about the length of the interrogation. (You haven't even proven, by the way, that he ever said this on his playbill.) If you want to discuss the other facts of the case, please return to the other thread where that discussion is already in progress - where nearly everything you have claimed has already been clearly disproven with documented evidence.
  • _
    _ Posts: 6,657
    Blockhead wrote:
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Blockhead wrote:
    Or you could just read what I posted and see that It was a LIE...

    Kat wrote:
    If you wish to speak with Ed about what you're calling his "lying," you'll need to contact him elsewhere. It's not ok to come here and make abusive comments
    Thats not why it was locked.
    Also, letter has already been sent to the fan club.
    I am not expecting a response.

    :lol: I'd love to read that letter if you're willing to post it.
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    ComeToTX wrote:
    i've been reading about the case since i was 16. i'm 31 now. and i can't argue with someone who thinks rain would wash away an enormous amount of blood in such a short time.
    You studied the case for 15 years?
    They were raped?
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    Smellyman wrote:
    man blockhead....


    i am embarrassed for you


    hopefully you never serve on a jury.
    What in the OP is embarrassing for me?
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    The Waiting Trophy Man wrote:
    Blockhead, you need to get laid, dude. Bad.
    You need to get a brain, bad...
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    BinauralJam wrote:
    Blockhead wrote:
    BinauralJam wrote:
    Blockhead, have you ever been arrested?
    Huh?


    So? No then.
    Yes I have.
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    _ wrote:
    I can't believe you started ANOTHER thread about this.

    Ed does not ASSUME to know anything. He is so familiar with the facts of this case that he is actually part of the defense team. He knows stuff you don't know or understand.

    You are a random guy on a message board who has repeatedly lied about and misrepresented the facts. You have also demonstrated time & again that you do not fully read or understand the documents you are posting.

    The fact is, the document you posted does not indicate how or when things ended with Jessie that day. It does NOT indicate that he went home at the end of the document or even that the interrogation did not continue. You are posting a document that does not support your claims.
    Then how does eddie know its 12 hours then?
    I'm not going to address anything else except the topic of this thread - the supposed lie that Ed told about the length of the interrogation. (You haven't even proven, by the way, that he ever said this on his playbill.) If you want to discuss the other facts of the case, please return to the other thread where that discussion is already in progress - where nearly everything you have claimed has already been clearly disproven with documented evidence.
    Do I need to take a picture?
    Nothing I have said has been disproven...
    Nothing will convince you...
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,962
    I would think as long as you are still in the interrogation room you would still be considered 'under interrogation' even if not being asked direct questions. so from 9:00 am to 9:00 pm would be 12 hours. i guess you have to define what interrogation means. by the definition of being in the interrogation room (which i don't know to be a fact but seems to be indicated by what you posted here) 12 hours seems about right UNDER THAT DEFINITION. i think a reasonable person could argue that 12 hours is correct under those terms.
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    Its sad that because hes Eddie Vedder of PJ, no one can acknowledge that he lied for a cause he supports...
  • _
    _ Posts: 6,657
    Blockhead wrote:
    _ wrote:
    I can't believe you started ANOTHER thread about this.

    Ed does not ASSUME to know anything. He is so familiar with the facts of this case that he is actually part of the defense team. He knows stuff you don't know or understand.

    You are a random guy on a message board who has repeatedly lied about and misrepresented the facts. You have also demonstrated time & again that you do not fully read or understand the documents you are posting.

    The fact is, the document you posted does not indicate how or when things ended with Jessie that day. It does NOT indicate that he went home at the end of the document or even that the interrogation did not continue. You are posting a document that does not support your claims.
    Then how does eddie know its 12 hours then?
    I'm not going to address anything else except the topic of this thread - the supposed lie that Ed told about the length of the interrogation. (You haven't even proven, by the way, that he ever said this on his playbill.) If you want to discuss the other facts of the case, please return to the other thread where that discussion is already in progress - where nearly everything you have claimed has already been clearly disproven with documented evidence.
    Do I need to take a picture?
    Nothing I have said has been disproven...
    Nothing will convince you...

    He is part of the defense team. He knows more about it than you do.

    Wow, it's like you're delusional or something. Like you think if you say something enough times - and start a new thread about it to detract from the documentation that you're full of shit - then people will believe you.
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,962
    Blockhead wrote:
    Its sad that because hes Eddie Vedder of PJ, no one can acknowledge that he lied for a cause he supports...

    see what i posted about. unless you have evidence that says the 'interrogation' was over at 5:00, what you listed could be construed as he was interrogated for 12 hours. i will state that i really don't know what went on there for sure just presenting the case here.
  • Vedda11
    Vedda11 Posts: 35
    Blockhead wrote:
    Its sad that because hes Eddie Vedder of PJ, no one can acknowledge that he lied for a cause he supports...


    http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... e-20110901


    sooo did rolling stone lie too....their article also references the "questionable" 12 HOUR interrogation... :cry: you gonna start threads calling them liars too. Eddie has done a wonderful job supporting a cause that he believes in. nuff said
    Nothing said what a waste :)
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    pjhawks wrote:
    Blockhead wrote:
    Its sad that because hes Eddie Vedder of PJ, no one can acknowledge that he lied for a cause he supports...

    see what i posted about. unless you have evidence that says the 'interrogation' was over at 5:00, what you listed could be construed as he was interrogated for 12 hours. i will state that i really don't know what went on there for sure just presenting the case here.
    Read the OP, the was not asked anything after 5pm.
    And he already CONFESSED at 3:18...
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,431
    Wow...another wm3 thread bitching about eds involvement...this is just like the people who are threatening Casey Anthony. Get on with your lives people. Instead of griping about ed and retrying the case on amt why not work on finding the real killers....

    I could not for the life of me imagine myself supporting any artist that I so vehemently disagree with....but hey that's just me...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • UpSideDown
    UpSideDown Posts: 1,966
    What legally defines interrogation?

    Somebody answer this and cite your source.

    Otherwise this thread is the equivalent of 'tards humping a doorknob.
  • ComeToTX
    ComeToTX Austin Posts: 8,073
    That is originally what the police believed and you seem to think they did a great job. I should have clarified what I meant.

    If you truly believe that Eddie helped to free 3 murderers then I hope you never listen to PJ again. If I believed that I know I wouldn't be able to support them.
    Blockhead wrote:
    ComeToTX wrote:
    i've been reading about the case since i was 16. i'm 31 now. and i can't argue with someone who thinks rain would wash away an enormous amount of blood in such a short time.
    You studied the case for 15 years?
    They were raped?
    This show, another show, a show here and a show there.
  • Blockhead
    Blockhead Posts: 1,538
    ComeToTX wrote:
    That is originally what the police believed and you seem to think they did a great job. I should have clarified what I meant.

    If you truly believe that Eddie helped to free 3 murderers then I hope you never listen to PJ again. If I believed that I know I wouldn't be able to support them.
    Blockhead wrote:
    ComeToTX wrote:
    i've been reading about the case since i was 16. i'm 31 now. and i can't argue with someone who thinks rain would wash away an enormous amount of blood in such a short time.
    You studied the case for 15 years?
    They were raped?
    Really... now your backpedaling...
    Autopsy were done on the 7th, death form released on the 10th. (4 days after)
    None of those documents refer to rape...
  • SatansFuton
    SatansFuton Posts: 5,399
    You know Blockhead, I haven't followed this case all that closely, nor do I really care. There are plenty of people locked up right here in my home state (some allegedly innocent) and all over the country/world that I don't really give a shit about one case in Arkansas just because it is a pet project of every musician/celebrity under the sun. I don't know whether they are guilty or innocent, though as with many things I've heard Ed talk about in the past, I'm sure it's not nearly as simple as makes it out to be. I don't know if he "lied", if he just doesn't know any better, or if he's right. Don't know, don't care.

    I don't mind that Ed got involved, and I certainly don't mind that some people disagree with him (I only agree with about half of what he says myself) on this issue and that amidst the celebration some people have their own questions and opinions on the subject. There are some people here who think they are innocent simply because the Almighty Ed said so, some that did their own research and came to the same conclusion as Ed, and some that have researched the matter and think these guys were guilty.

    But having said that, you've got to relax bud. Being passionate about an issue is one thing, but you're something else entirely. If you want to have a meaningful conversation on the matter, there has to be give and take, and not this hardline stance of "Ed is a liar" and "you're all wrong" etc. I think you'll find that the titles of your threads alone are enough to make people dislike you before they even read what you have to say.
    "See a broad to get dat booty yak 'em, leg 'er down, a smack 'em yak 'em!"

Categories