Casey Anthony

81

Over-Inflated Sense Of Self Worth wrote:

There should be an invention that weeds out idiots from getting jury selection letters.

it's called lawyers....they kick people off jury's all day long

Godfather.

catefrances wrote:

Godfather. wrote:

pandora wrote:

if karma is all we have here that sucks

this breaks my heart

who does this to a child? ... given IF it were an accident who throws a child away like trash
to save their own ass?

I don't pretend to know about this trial I have not followed mostly because all along it broke my heart.

I don't like the message this sends to people who could care less about their children
and those who are crazy like a fox.

don't worry Pandi,nobody gets off in the end.

Godfather.

if this woman has any ounce of humanity, she will be haunted by her actions til the day she dies.

assuming she is guilty yes, I still have a hard time believing her father is the Ward Cleaver he acted like on the stand.

Godfather.

catefrances

Godfather. wrote:

catefrances wrote:

if this woman has any ounce of humanity, she will be haunted by her actions til the day she dies.

assuming she is guilty yes, I still have a hard time believing her father is the Ward Cleaver he acted like on the stand.

Godfather.

assumption is a legal bitch isnt it?

gimmesometruth27

as i stated in the other thread, you can not prove murder in the first degree in a capital trial without a cause of death. the prosecution should have gone for manslaughter rather than murder one.

Godfather.

catefrances wrote:

Godfather. wrote:

catefrances wrote:

if this woman has any ounce of humanity, she will be haunted by her actions til the day she dies.

assuming she is guilty yes, I still have a hard time believing her father is the Ward Cleaver he acted like on the stand.

Godfather.

assumption is a legal bitch isnt it?

yea it's what makes the death penalty so popular and why innocent people go to prison or death row.
in the words of Al capone "you got nuthin" it's very scary to convict without an eye witness or hard evidence.

Godfather.

megatron

yup. although unbelievable...there is a possiblility she didn't do it.

SPEEDY MCCREADY

Not one bit of DNA evidence to link her to the murder...

Right???

Was there any DNA evidence whatsoever that could link her to the crime????

81

don't fret...oprah is going to interview her and get to the bottom of this

Electric_Delta

Wait until she gets a book deal....that is, if she knows how to write and form sentences.

SPEEDY MCCREADY

Electric_Delta wrote:

Wait until she gets a book deal....that is, if she knows how to write and form sentences.

Maybe Mr. Vedder will let her write some songs for him.....

Damien Elchols has to be THRILLED with this verdict......

Godfather.

isn't odd that just about the entire country believes she is guilty but the 12 in court fount her innocent..
no DNA no witness no confessions nothing to conect her to the crime other than she lied and didn't call the police for ...what / 30 day's ? no evidence to prove guilt so she can't be convicted but my gut tells me she knows moke than she has coped to and her parents know more too in my opinion but justis is not a conviction on a gut feeling right ?

Godfather.

know1

There simply wasn't enough evidence to convict her.

In that regard, justice was actually served. Due to the lack of evidence, there was still reasonable doubt.

drummerboy_73

I think she's guilty, but I can understand why she wasn't convicted of murder/manslaughter due to lack of direct evidence linking her to the scene or body. However, I think she at least should have been found guilty of the child abuse charges. Child abuse includes NEGLECT - and if not reporting your 2 year-old missing for weeks while out clubbing isn't neglect, I don't know what is.

ComeToTX

know1 wrote:

There simply wasn't enough evidence to convict her.

In that regard, justice was actually served. Due to the lack of evidence, there was still reasonable doubt.

the 31 days she spent clubbing before reporting her child missing and then lying to the cops about it is all the evidence i need.

fox_mulderX

Over-Inflated Sense Of Self Worth wrote:

So if Caylee was found with a hole drilled in her head and only one search was found on her computer for how to perform a labotomy that wouldn't be enough for you?

generally you wouldn't drill a hole in someones head for a lobotomy. it consists of using a device that looks like an icepick. you stick it up the individuals nose to cause devastation to the prefrontal cortex. also, that's not a good way to kill someone. although it sounds graphic, very few people (compared to the amount of lobotomy's performed) have died from them.

Godfather.

fox_mulderX wrote:

Over-Inflated Sense Of Self Worth wrote:

So if Caylee was found with a hole drilled in her head and only one search was found on her computer for how to perform a labotomy that wouldn't be enough for you?

generally you wouldn't drill a hole in someones head for a lobotomy. it consists of using a device that looks like an icepick. you stick it up the individuals nose to cause devastation to the prefrontal cortex. also, that's not a good way to kill someone. although it sounds graphic, very few people (compared to the amount of lobotomy's performed) have died from them.

wow !!awesome reply.

Godfather.

Jokertt14

i am happy for her she played her cards and won .

now shes getting Porn offers .

StillHere

i am left wondering

nearly convinced

that although i don't believe her family knew exactly what happened to Caylee in the beginning

that by the time they took the stand they surely DO KNOW

and someone should have the guts or conscious or something to tell the truth

she can't be tried twice

so yeah..like it was said above, wait for the book deal...someone will pen it for her at her dictation....she can't be tried twice....she can pull an OJ and write what she would have done IF she had killed her daughter

i hate to say it, cuz i KNOW these are grieving grandparents, but like GF said, i just don't see George, Casey's Dad, being as totally innocent and unknowing as he "seemed" to be (as much as I wanted to believe him, he was pretty darned evasive on the stand)

only time will tell

but the jury did the right thing....there just was not enough evidence..and as much of a liar as she is, you can't convict someone of capitol murder without a complete lack of doubt...and if i had been on that jury, there's no way that i would have been able to get past the doubt and lack of hard evidence...being a selfish and uncaring jerk is not actual evidence of murder, even if we think that in all likelihood she did it

know1

ComeToTX wrote:

know1 wrote:

There simply wasn't enough evidence to convict her.

In that regard, justice was actually served. Due to the lack of evidence, there was still reasonable doubt.

the 31 days she spent clubbing before reporting her child missing and then lying to the cops about it is all the evidence i need.

That is not proof that she murdered the child. Thank goodness you weren't on the jury.

Godfather.

tomorow the Judge will giver the max for the crimes she was found guilty of probably a maxium of 4 to 5 years and with time served she will get 1 to 2 years in the joint......and her dad will have won..again. ...just my gut feeling.


Godfather.