Whether or not she did it, she's just the kind of scumbag to exploit it.
can't she and her parent's still be charged with accery (help ! spelling and gramer police) to murder after the fact ? I just don't see this ending with no conviction.
Whether or not she did it, she's just the kind of scumbag to exploit it.
can't she and her parent's still be charged with accery (help ! spelling and gramer police) to murder after the fact ? I just don't see this ending with no conviction.
Godfather.
that's exactly what i was thinking GF. When the jury handed down that Not Guilty across the board for Casey I immediately thought...uh oh...next comes George.
Its all so suspicious..and if you listen to the family's own hired detectives and search teams, the whole thing is more than just a little bit off kilter. I tried not to get so caught up in this....but its hard to ignore it all when their own private detectives and equi-search is saying that George and Cindy told them exactly where to look..etc....It's so hard to know what's going on. But I don't think its the end of this either.
peace,
jo
http://www.Etsy.com/Shop/SimpleEarthCreations
"How I choose to feel is how I am." ~ EV/MMc
"Some people hear their own inner voices with great clearness and they live by what they hear. Such people become crazy, or they become legends." ~ One Stab ~
Whether or not she did it, she's just the kind of scumbag to exploit it.
can't she and her parent's still be charged with accery (help ! spelling and gramer police) to murder after the fact ? I just don't see this ending with no conviction.
Godfather.
The Florida laws are here if you want to check them out:
She might have done it, but that sad fact is, the media spun her as being guilty even though the evidence didn't support it.
I'll trust what the jurors decided. I was on a three week trial once and it was no carnival. I will pass no judgement on her, but if she did do it, she will have to live with that.
I don't know all of the details of the case, but when we start letting the crazed towns people making the decisions over that of fair trials, we are in trouble.
Whether or not she did it, she's just the kind of scumbag to exploit it.
can't she and her parent's still be charged with accery (help ! spelling and gramer police) to murder after the fact ? I just don't see this ending with no conviction.
Godfather.
The Florida laws are here if you want to check them out:
so then can't they come back at her with this one ?
Godfather.
(1)(a) Any person not standing in the relation of husband or wife, parent or grandparent, child or grandchild, brother or sister, by consanguinity or affinity to the offender, who maintains or assists the principal or accessory before the fact, or gives the offender any other aid, knowing that the offender had committed a felony or been accessory thereto before the fact, with intent that the offender avoids or escapes detection, arrest, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
(b) Any person, regardless of the relation to the offender, who maintains or assists the principal or accessory before the fact, or gives the offender any other aid, knowing that the offender had committed the offense of child abuse, neglect of a child, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child under 18 years of age, or murder of a child under 18 years of age, or had been accessory thereto before the fact, with the intent that the offender avoids or escapes detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, is an accessory after the fact unless the court finds that the person is a victim of domestic violence.
(2)(a) If the felony offense committed is a capital felony, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(b) If the felony offense committed is a life felony or a felony of the first degree, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(c) If the felony offense committed is a felony of the second degree or a felony of the third degree ranked in level 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(d) If the felony offense committed is a felony of the third degree ranked in level 1 or level 2 under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023, the offense of accessory after the fact is a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in s. 921.0022, for purposes of sentencing under chapter 921 and determining incentive gain-time eligibility under chapter 944, the offense of accessory after the fact is ranked two levels below the ranking under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023 of the felony offense committed.
She might have done it, but that sad fact is, the media spun her as being guilty even though the evidence didn't support it.
I'll trust what the jurors decided. I was on a three week trial once and it was no carnival. I will pass no judgement on her, but if she did do it, she will have to live with that.
I don't know all of the details of the case, but when we start letting the crazed towns people making the decisions over that of fair trials, we are in trouble.
this dosn't fit into my redneck way of thinking... but is still the best post on this subject I have read yet
great call Gob !
Morning news said when asked a year ago what she will do if she is acquitted she said...
have another child.
I'm sorry,
but I am not understanding why someone is not accountable for trashing Cali's body...
if like the defense has said she drowned,
then someone treated her like garbage to save themselves
from any neglect charges... why is no one punished for that?
That has got to be against the law.
This is so beyond wrong and says to those who want to commit heinous crimes...
just be sure you hide the body well enough ... long enough so cause of death can not be made.
Casey showed no remorse at anytime for her daughter ... she's is all about herself.
She has no guilt nor conscious.
I just can not see how a jury could let her off scot-free....
seems to me they were unreasonable about the reasonable doubt.
0
81
Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
as i stated in the other thread, you can not prove murder in the first degree in a capital trial without a cause of death. the prosecution should have gone for manslaughter rather than murder one.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
if this woman has any ounce of humanity, she will be haunted by her actions til the day she dies.
assuming she is guilty yes, I still have a hard time believing her father is the Ward Cleaver he acted like on the stand.
Godfather.
assumption is a legal bitch isnt it?
yea it's what makes the death penalty so popular and why innocent people go to prison or death row.
in the words of Al capone "you got nuthin" it's very scary to convict without an eye witness or hard evidence.
isn't odd that just about the entire country believes she is guilty but the 12 in court fount her innocent..
no DNA no witness no confessions nothing to conect her to the crime other than she lied and didn't call the police for ...what / 30 day's ? no evidence to prove guilt so she can't be convicted but my gut tells me she knows moke than she has coped to and her parents know more too in my opinion but justis is not a conviction on a gut feeling right ?
I think she's guilty, but I can understand why she wasn't convicted of murder/manslaughter due to lack of direct evidence linking her to the scene or body. However, I think she at least should have been found guilty of the child abuse charges. Child abuse includes NEGLECT - and if not reporting your 2 year-old missing for weeks while out clubbing isn't neglect, I don't know what is.
Osaka, Japan (2/21/95), San Diego (7/10/98), Las Vegas (10/22/00), San Diego (10/25/00), Las Vegas (6/6/03), Las Vegas (7/6/06), Los Angeles (7/9/06), VH1 Rock Honors (7/12/08), Ed Solo (7/8/11), Ed Solo (11/1/12), Los Angeles (11/23/13)
So if Caylee was found with a hole drilled in her head and only one search was found on her computer for how to perform a labotomy that wouldn't be enough for you?
generally you wouldn't drill a hole in someones head for a lobotomy. it consists of using a device that looks like an icepick. you stick it up the individuals nose to cause devastation to the prefrontal cortex. also, that's not a good way to kill someone. although it sounds graphic, very few people (compared to the amount of lobotomy's performed) have died from them.
So if Caylee was found with a hole drilled in her head and only one search was found on her computer for how to perform a labotomy that wouldn't be enough for you?
generally you wouldn't drill a hole in someones head for a lobotomy. it consists of using a device that looks like an icepick. you stick it up the individuals nose to cause devastation to the prefrontal cortex. also, that's not a good way to kill someone. although it sounds graphic, very few people (compared to the amount of lobotomy's performed) have died from them.
that although i don't believe her family knew exactly what happened to Caylee in the beginning
that by the time they took the stand they surely DO KNOW
and someone should have the guts or conscious or something to tell the truth
she can't be tried twice
so yeah..like it was said above, wait for the book deal...someone will pen it for her at her dictation....she can't be tried twice....she can pull an OJ and write what she would have done IF she had killed her daughter
i hate to say it, cuz i KNOW these are grieving grandparents, but like GF said, i just don't see George, Casey's Dad, being as totally innocent and unknowing as he "seemed" to be (as much as I wanted to believe him, he was pretty darned evasive on the stand)
only time will tell
but the jury did the right thing....there just was not enough evidence..and as much of a liar as she is, you can't convict someone of capitol murder without a complete lack of doubt...and if i had been on that jury, there's no way that i would have been able to get past the doubt and lack of hard evidence...being a selfish and uncaring jerk is not actual evidence of murder, even if we think that in all likelihood she did it
peace,
jo
http://www.Etsy.com/Shop/SimpleEarthCreations
"How I choose to feel is how I am." ~ EV/MMc
"Some people hear their own inner voices with great clearness and they live by what they hear. Such people become crazy, or they become legends." ~ One Stab ~
tomorow the Judge will giver the max for the crimes she was found guilty of probably a maxium of 4 to 5 years and with time served she will get 1 to 2 years in the joint......and her dad will have won..again. ...just my gut feeling.
Comments
can't she and her parent's still be charged with accery (help ! spelling and gramer police) to murder after the fact ? I just don't see this ending with no conviction.
Godfather.
that's exactly what i was thinking GF. When the jury handed down that Not Guilty across the board for Casey I immediately thought...uh oh...next comes George.
Its all so suspicious..and if you listen to the family's own hired detectives and search teams, the whole thing is more than just a little bit off kilter. I tried not to get so caught up in this....but its hard to ignore it all when their own private detectives and equi-search is saying that George and Cindy told them exactly where to look..etc....It's so hard to know what's going on. But I don't think its the end of this either.
jo
http://www.Etsy.com/Shop/SimpleEarthCreations
"How I choose to feel is how I am." ~ EV/MMc
"Some people hear their own inner voices with great clearness and they live by what they hear. Such people become crazy, or they become legends." ~ One Stab ~
this breaks my heart
who does this to a child? ... given IF it were an accident who throws a child away like trash
to save their own ass?
I don't pretend to know about this trial I have not followed mostly because all along it broke my heart.
I don't like the message this sends to people who could care less about their children
and those who are crazy like a fox.
don't worry Pandi,nobody gets off in the end.
Godfather.
The Florida laws are here if you want to check them out:
http://law.justia.com/codes/florida/200 ... h0777.html
2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
2017: RRHoF 4/7 2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4 2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18
2022: MSG 9/11 2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
2025: Pittsburgh 5/16+5/18
I'll trust what the jurors decided. I was on a three week trial once and it was no carnival. I will pass no judgement on her, but if she did do it, she will have to live with that.
I don't know all of the details of the case, but when we start letting the crazed towns people making the decisions over that of fair trials, we are in trouble.
so then can't they come back at her with this one ?
Godfather.
(1)(a) Any person not standing in the relation of husband or wife, parent or grandparent, child or grandchild, brother or sister, by consanguinity or affinity to the offender, who maintains or assists the principal or accessory before the fact, or gives the offender any other aid, knowing that the offender had committed a felony or been accessory thereto before the fact, with intent that the offender avoids or escapes detection, arrest, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
(b) Any person, regardless of the relation to the offender, who maintains or assists the principal or accessory before the fact, or gives the offender any other aid, knowing that the offender had committed the offense of child abuse, neglect of a child, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child under 18 years of age, or murder of a child under 18 years of age, or had been accessory thereto before the fact, with the intent that the offender avoids or escapes detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, is an accessory after the fact unless the court finds that the person is a victim of domestic violence.
(2)(a) If the felony offense committed is a capital felony, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(b) If the felony offense committed is a life felony or a felony of the first degree, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(c) If the felony offense committed is a felony of the second degree or a felony of the third degree ranked in level 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(d) If the felony offense committed is a felony of the third degree ranked in level 1 or level 2 under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023, the offense of accessory after the fact is a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in s. 921.0022, for purposes of sentencing under chapter 921 and determining incentive gain-time eligibility under chapter 944, the offense of accessory after the fact is ranked two levels below the ranking under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023 of the felony offense committed.
this dosn't fit into my redneck way of thinking...
great call Gob !
Godfather.
if this woman has any ounce of humanity, she will be haunted by her actions til the day she dies.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
have another child.
I'm sorry,
but I am not understanding why someone is not accountable for trashing Cali's body...
if like the defense has said she drowned,
then someone treated her like garbage to save themselves
from any neglect charges... why is no one punished for that?
That has got to be against the law.
This is so beyond wrong and says to those who want to commit heinous crimes...
just be sure you hide the body well enough ... long enough so cause of death can not be made.
Casey showed no remorse at anytime for her daughter ... she's is all about herself.
She has no guilt nor conscious.
I just can not see how a jury could let her off scot-free....
seems to me they were unreasonable about the reasonable doubt.
it's called lawyers....they kick people off jury's all day long
assuming she is guilty yes, I still have a hard time believing her father is the Ward Cleaver he acted like on the stand.
Godfather.
assumption is a legal bitch isnt it?
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
in the words of Al capone "you got nuthin" it's very scary to convict without an eye witness or hard evidence.
Godfather.
Right???
Was there any DNA evidence whatsoever that could link her to the crime????
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
Damien Elchols has to be THRILLED with this verdict......
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
no DNA no witness no confessions nothing to conect her to the crime other than she lied and didn't call the police for ...what / 30 day's ? no evidence to prove guilt so she can't be convicted but my gut tells me she knows moke than she has coped to and her parents know more too in my opinion but justis is not a conviction on a gut feeling right ?
Godfather.
In that regard, justice was actually served. Due to the lack of evidence, there was still reasonable doubt.
...are those who've helped us.
Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
the 31 days she spent clubbing before reporting her child missing and then lying to the cops about it is all the evidence i need.
generally you wouldn't drill a hole in someones head for a lobotomy. it consists of using a device that looks like an icepick. you stick it up the individuals nose to cause devastation to the prefrontal cortex. also, that's not a good way to kill someone. although it sounds graphic, very few people (compared to the amount of lobotomy's performed) have died from them.
wow !!awesome reply.
Godfather.
now shes getting Porn offers .
nearly convinced
that although i don't believe her family knew exactly what happened to Caylee in the beginning
that by the time they took the stand they surely DO KNOW
and someone should have the guts or conscious or something to tell the truth
she can't be tried twice
so yeah..like it was said above, wait for the book deal...someone will pen it for her at her dictation....she can't be tried twice....she can pull an OJ and write what she would have done IF she had killed her daughter
i hate to say it, cuz i KNOW these are grieving grandparents, but like GF said, i just don't see George, Casey's Dad, being as totally innocent and unknowing as he "seemed" to be (as much as I wanted to believe him, he was pretty darned evasive on the stand)
only time will tell
but the jury did the right thing....there just was not enough evidence..and as much of a liar as she is, you can't convict someone of capitol murder without a complete lack of doubt...and if i had been on that jury, there's no way that i would have been able to get past the doubt and lack of hard evidence...being a selfish and uncaring jerk is not actual evidence of murder, even if we think that in all likelihood she did it
jo
http://www.Etsy.com/Shop/SimpleEarthCreations
"How I choose to feel is how I am." ~ EV/MMc
"Some people hear their own inner voices with great clearness and they live by what they hear. Such people become crazy, or they become legends." ~ One Stab ~
That is not proof that she murdered the child. Thank goodness you weren't on the jury.
...are those who've helped us.
Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
Godfather.