Casey Anthony

Ledbetterman10

Keep smiling, dumbass

RedMosquito22

you mean other than

1) internet searches on her computer 84 times on "how to make chloroform"

2) having chloroform residue in her car?

3) Four days after Caylee Anthony disappeared – and the defense claims that she accidentally drowned – Casey Anthony participated in a hot body contest at an Orlando club. Prosecutors introduced photos of a happy-looking Anthony partying, smiling with her boyfriend, drinking and grinding against another girl.

4) lying to police officers

5) a strand of Caylee's hair that was showing signs of decomposition



I guess from here on out, if murders can't be found on youtube, there is no need to prosecute.

Ledbetterman10

Over-Inflated Sense Of Self Worth wrote:

you mean other than

1) internet searches on her computer 84 times on "how to make chloroform"

See you obviously didn't follow the case closely because the defense successfully proved flaws in the computer search evidence in their closing statement. The first search of the computer (with established software) brought back only ONE search for chloroform. Since that wasn't enough for the prosecution, they had another study done (using new, faulty software) that came back with 84 searches for chloroform but all the other searches that came up with the established software didn't come back with the new one.

That said, I know she did it. But you can't convict her on the prosecution's crappy case.

RedMosquito22

Ledbetterman10 wrote:

Over-Inflated Sense Of Self Worth wrote:

you mean other than

1) internet searches on her computer 84 times on "how to make chloroform"

See you obviously didn't follow the case closely because the defense successfully proved flaws in the computer search evidence in their closing statement. The first search of the computer (with established software) brought back only ONE search for chloroform. Since that wasn't enough for the prosecution, they had another study done (using new, faulty software) that came back with 84 searches for chloroform but all the other searches that came up with the established software didn't come back with the new one.

That said, I know she did it. But you can't convict her on the prosecution's crappy case.

One search is all that should be needed in this case.

So if Caylee was found with a hole drilled in her head and only one search was found on her computer for how to perform a labotomy that wouldn't be enough for you?

Ledbetterman10

Over-Inflated Sense Of Self Worth wrote:

Ledbetterman10 wrote:

Over-Inflated Sense Of Self Worth wrote:

you mean other than

1) internet searches on her computer 84 times on "how to make chloroform"

See you obviously didn't follow the case closely because the defense successfully proved flaws in the computer search evidence in their closing statement. The first search of the computer (with established software) brought back only ONE search for chloroform. Since that wasn't enough for the prosecution, they had another study done (using new, faulty software) that came back with 84 searches for chloroform but all the other searches that came up with the established software didn't come back with the new one.

That said, I know she did it. But you can't convict her on the prosecution's crappy case.

One search is all that should be needed in this case.

But stuff like that makes you question the prosecution's case. Just like their botched autopsy. Besides, the prosecution changed their tune from chloroform to duct-tape as the cause of death. Like Jose Baez said, they were just throwing everything out there and seeing what stuck.

RedMosquito22

I don't care what was botched. There is enough to convict her. There should be an invention that weeds out idiots from getting jury selection letters.

Ledbetterman10

Over-Inflated Sense Of Self Worth wrote:

I don't care what was botched. There is enough to convict her. There should be an invention that weeds out idiots from getting jury selection letters.

The jurors weren't idiots. In fact, I bet most of them THINK she did it. Hell, I THINK she did it. But you gotta prove facts and the state didn't do that.

drummerboy_73

I smell a BAD reality show in her future...

Whether or not she did it, she's just the kind of scumbag to exploit it.

StillHere

exactly

its a shame that the prosecution didn't have any direct proof linking her to caylee's death

because her attitude and behavior make us "think" she did it

but that means nothing when it comes right down to a conviction....legally

and i think that the jury did the right thing

karma will find her in the end

blondieblue227

i agree Jo.


who has the worse judicial system? us or italy? free amanda knox!

Godfather.

drummerboy_73 wrote:

I smell a BAD reality show in her future...

Whether or not she did it, she's just the kind of scumbag to exploit it.

can't she and her parent's still be charged with accery (help ! spelling and gramer police) to murder after the fact ? I just don't see this ending with no conviction.

Godfather.

StillHere

Godfather. wrote:

drummerboy_73 wrote:

I smell a BAD reality show in her future...

Whether or not she did it, she's just the kind of scumbag to exploit it.

can't she and her parent's still be charged with accery (help ! spelling and gramer police) to murder after the fact ? I just don't see this ending with no conviction.

Godfather.

that's exactly what i was thinking GF. When the jury handed down that Not Guilty across the board for Casey I immediately thought...uh oh...next comes George.

Its all so suspicious..and if you listen to the family's own hired detectives and search teams, the whole thing is more than just a little bit off kilter. I tried not to get so caught up in this....but its hard to ignore it all when their own private detectives and equi-search is saying that George and Cindy told them exactly where to look..etc....It's so hard to know what's going on. But I don't think its the end of this either.

pandora

if karma is all we have here that sucks

this breaks my heart

who does this to a child? ... given IF it were an accident who throws a child away like trash
to save their own ass?

I don't pretend to know about this trial I have not followed mostly because all along it broke my heart.

I don't like the message this sends to people who could care less about their children
and those who are crazy like a fox.

Godfather.

pandora wrote:

if karma is all we have here that sucks

this breaks my heart

who does this to a child? ... given IF it were an accident who throws a child away like trash
to save their own ass?

I don't pretend to know about this trial I have not followed mostly because all along it broke my heart.

I don't like the message this sends to people who could care less about their children
and those who are crazy like a fox.

don't worry Pandi,nobody gets off in the end.

Godfather.

SVRDhand13

Godfather. wrote:

drummerboy_73 wrote:

I smell a BAD reality show in her future...

Whether or not she did it, she's just the kind of scumbag to exploit it.

can't she and her parent's still be charged with accery (help ! spelling and gramer police) to murder after the fact ? I just don't see this ending with no conviction.

Godfather.

The Florida laws are here if you want to check them out:

http://law.justia.com/codes/florida/200 ... h0777.html

LikeAnOcean

She might have done it, but that sad fact is, the media spun her as being guilty even though the evidence didn't support it.


I'll trust what the jurors decided. I was on a three week trial once and it was no carnival. I will pass no judgement on her, but if she did do it, she will have to live with that.



I don't know all of the details of the case, but when we start letting the crazed towns people making the decisions over that of fair trials, we are in trouble.

Godfather.

SVRDhand13 wrote:

Godfather. wrote:

drummerboy_73 wrote:

I smell a BAD reality show in her future...

Whether or not she did it, she's just the kind of scumbag to exploit it.

can't she and her parent's still be charged with accery (help ! spelling and gramer police) to murder after the fact ? I just don't see this ending with no conviction.

Godfather.

The Florida laws are here if you want to check them out:

http://law.justia.com/codes/florida/200 ... h0777.html

so then can't they come back at her with this one ?

Godfather.



(1)(a) Any person not standing in the relation of husband or wife, parent or grandparent, child or grandchild, brother or sister, by consanguinity or affinity to the offender, who maintains or assists the principal or accessory before the fact, or gives the offender any other aid, knowing that the offender had committed a felony or been accessory thereto before the fact, with intent that the offender avoids or escapes detection, arrest, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

(b) Any person, regardless of the relation to the offender, who maintains or assists the principal or accessory before the fact, or gives the offender any other aid, knowing that the offender had committed the offense of child abuse, neglect of a child, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child under 18 years of age, or murder of a child under 18 years of age, or had been accessory thereto before the fact, with the intent that the offender avoids or escapes detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, is an accessory after the fact unless the court finds that the person is a victim of domestic violence.

(2)(a) If the felony offense committed is a capital felony, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(b) If the felony offense committed is a life felony or a felony of the first degree, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(c) If the felony offense committed is a felony of the second degree or a felony of the third degree ranked in level 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(d) If the felony offense committed is a felony of the third degree ranked in level 1 or level 2 under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023, the offense of accessory after the fact is a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(3) Except as otherwise provided in s. 921.0022, for purposes of sentencing under chapter 921 and determining incentive gain-time eligibility under chapter 944, the offense of accessory after the fact is ranked two levels below the ranking under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023 of the felony offense committed.

Godfather.

Gob wrote:

She might have done it, but that sad fact is, the media spun her as being guilty even though the evidence didn't support it.


I'll trust what the jurors decided. I was on a three week trial once and it was no carnival. I will pass no judgement on her, but if she did do it, she will have to live with that.



I don't know all of the details of the case, but when we start letting the crazed towns people making the decisions over that of fair trials, we are in trouble.

this dosn't fit into my redneck way of thinking... but is still the best post on this subject I have read yet
great call Gob !

Godfather.

catefrances

Godfather. wrote:

pandora wrote:

if karma is all we have here that sucks

this breaks my heart

who does this to a child? ... given IF it were an accident who throws a child away like trash
to save their own ass?

I don't pretend to know about this trial I have not followed mostly because all along it broke my heart.

I don't like the message this sends to people who could care less about their children
and those who are crazy like a fox.

don't worry Pandi,nobody gets off in the end.

Godfather.

if this woman has any ounce of humanity, she will be haunted by her actions til the day she dies.

pandora

Morning news said when asked a year ago what she will do if she is acquitted she said...
have another child.

I'm sorry,
but I am not understanding why someone is not accountable for trashing Cali's body...
if like the defense has said she drowned,
then someone treated her like garbage to save themselves
from any neglect charges... why is no one punished for that?
That has got to be against the law.

This is so beyond wrong and says to those who want to commit heinous crimes...
just be sure you hide the body well enough ... long enough so cause of death can not be made.

Casey showed no remorse at anytime for her daughter ... she's is all about herself.
She has no guilt nor conscious.

I just can not see how a jury could let her off scot-free....
seems to me they were unreasonable about the reasonable doubt.