Burqa ban in france

2

Comments

  • SmellymanSmellyman Asia Posts: 4,524
    Godfather. wrote:
    sorry guy's I still don't see a real problem here, I'll admit that it is a inconvenience to the women that wear the burqa but they did leave their country to find safety or a better living elsewhere so they should abide by that country's laws.

    Godfather.

    or they could be French.....
  • ShimmyMommyShimmyMommy Posts: 7,505
    Smellyman wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    sorry guy's I still don't see a real problem here, I'll admit that it is a inconvenience to the women that wear the burqa but they did leave their country to find safety or a better living elsewhere so they should abide by that country's laws.

    Godfather.

    or they could be French.....

    ouch :oops:
    Lots of love, light and hugs to you all!
  • guypjfreakguypjfreak Posts: 2,281
    thanks for your views im glad this didn't course any arguments even some humor .
  • Whatever people's different views on whether hijab is a personal choice of religious expression, or representative of oppression of women, (and it seems that even Muslims - and particularly Muslim women - are divided on that), I think that an unquestioning blanket ban is a short-sighted and unconstructive solution that can only lead to a greater sense of division and victimisation, whether real or imagined. You cannot apply a generic response to a deeply nuanced issue, deliberately, wilfully and needlessly ignoring the sensitivities of the matter, and expect it to be effective. Forcing your beliefs and values on others can never be as effective as educating people of them. In fact, it's far more likely to be counter-productive, to make people reject them.
    93: Slane
    96: Cork, Dublin
    00: Dublin
    06: London, Dublin
    07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
    09: Manchester, London
    10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
    11: San José
    12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    This is a perfect example of government going way beyond its bounds to interfere with personal freedom.

    As others have said, there are too many holes in this for it to be truly enforceable. Kind of like the stupid laws that ban texting while driving.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,158
    Are there tons of women in France walking around fully concealed in their garbs?
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • Jason P wrote:
    Are there tons of women in France walking around fully concealed in their garbs?

    From what I've read, there are between 350 and 2,000 women out of a total Muslim population of 4-6 million who wear face-covering veils. So you're talking about creating all this fuss for a law that applies to, at most, 1 in a thousand Muslim women, and about one in 30,000 French people.
    93: Slane
    96: Cork, Dublin
    00: Dublin
    06: London, Dublin
    07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
    09: Manchester, London
    10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
    11: San José
    12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
  • ShimmyMommyShimmyMommy Posts: 7,505
    Jason P wrote:
    Are there tons of women in France walking around fully concealed in their garbs?

    From what I've read, there are between 350 and 2,000 women out of a total Muslim population of 4-6 million who wear face-covering veils. So you're talking about creating all this fuss for a law that applies to, at most, 1 in a thousand Muslim women, and about one in 30,000 French people.

    see, that ban has no point then...it's just based out of fear. ridiculous, really.

    good math work wolfamongwolves :thumbup:
    Lots of love, light and hugs to you all!
  • IdrisIdris Posts: 2,317
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/04/ ... 3081.shtml

    (AP) PARIS - A woman has been ticketed in a suburban Paris shopping center for wearing a face veil, in the first reported sanction under a new ban on the garments, police said Tuesday.
    Another woman in another Paris suburb was stopped for wearing a veil, but was let go with a warning.
    ----
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    MrAbraham wrote:
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/04/12/501364/main20053081.shtml

    (AP) PARIS - A woman has been ticketed in a suburban Paris shopping center for wearing a face veil, in the first reported sanction under a new ban on the garments, police said Tuesday.
    Another woman in another Paris suburb was stopped for wearing a veil, but was let go with a warning.
    ----

    what did they think was going to happen ?

    Godfather.
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,158
    I have to agree that this ban is just a bunch of political B.S., but I am intrigued by the irony of what's to come. There is going to be a lawsuit arguing that the religious right to indoctrinate a women into giving up her women's rights has been violated.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • ShimmyMommyShimmyMommy Posts: 7,505
    Jason P wrote:
    I have to agree that this ban is just a bunch of political B.S., but I am intrigued by the irony of what's to come. There is going to be a lawsuit arguing that the religious right to indoctrinate a women into giving up her women's rights has been violated.

    yes, this is going to be real mess :?
    Lots of love, light and hugs to you all!
  • Kel VarnsenKel Varnsen Posts: 1,952
    MrAbraham wrote:
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/04/12/501364/main20053081.shtml

    (AP) PARIS - A woman has been ticketed in a suburban Paris shopping center for wearing a face veil, in the first reported sanction under a new ban on the garments, police said Tuesday.
    Another woman in another Paris suburb was stopped for wearing a veil, but was let go with a warning.
    ----

    Did they make her remove the veil so they could write her a ticketr. Otherwise how could they prove her identity. That said I don't see the issue wearing a veil in a suburban shopping mall to begin with.
  • IdrisIdris Posts: 2,317
    MrAbraham wrote:
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/04/12/501364/main20053081.shtml

    (AP) PARIS - A woman has been ticketed in a suburban Paris shopping center for wearing a face veil, in the first reported sanction under a new ban on the garments, police said Tuesday.
    Another woman in another Paris suburb was stopped for wearing a veil, but was let go with a warning.
    ----

    Did they make her remove the veil so they could write her a ticketr. Otherwise how could they prove her identity. That said I don't see the issue wearing a veil in a suburban shopping mall to begin with.

    Maybe they used a retinal scanner to ID her? :lol:
  • ShimmyMommyShimmyMommy Posts: 7,505
    MrAbraham wrote:
    Maybe they used a retinal scanner to ID her? :lol:

    maybe a retinal scanner is what they should be spending their money on instead of civil rights-robbing legislature... :think:

    or even better...

    http://www.dnaindia.com/health/report_h ... st_1192247

    ...but then people would still have the right to refuse both of those methods based on civil rights...and does that make them automatically guilty in the eyes of law enforcement...much like choosing to continue to wear the burqa makes you guilty by religious association? :think:

    I am open to those ideas...I got nothing to hide :mrgreen:
    Lots of love, light and hugs to you all!
  • RiverrunnerRiverrunner Posts: 2,419
    When I first heard about the legislation I liked it. My thoughts were that these women were being made to wear burquas by their husbands or their religion and the law forbidding it would allow them some measure of equal rights - the right to be seen in public. Of course, that also means her right to wear burqua has been taken away, assuming she actually had a choice whether to wear one or not in the first place. I still think it is better to be prohibited from wearing one than it is to be made to wear one.
    The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way it treats its animals. Ghandi
  • ShimmyMommyShimmyMommy Posts: 7,505
    When I first heard about the legislation I liked it. My thoughts were that these women were being made to wear burquas by their husbands or their religion and the law forbidding it would allow them some measure of equal rights - the right to be seen in public. Of course, that also means her right to wear burqua has been taken away, assuming she actually had a choice whether to wear one or not in the first place. I still think it is better to be prohibited from wearing one than it is to be made to wear one.

    I think this were the problem lies...government (or you or me) doesn't really know if she is actually choosing the burqa or not, so how do they have the right to take away her civil rights to wear one? KWIM?
    Lots of love, light and hugs to you all!
  • pjfan31pjfan31 Posts: 7,335
    haffajappa wrote:
    redrock wrote:
    It's a ban on ALL face covering - for security issues, though it does seem to target some more than others! There was a huge thread about it a while back. Lots of different views.
    well i can't think of too many different religions that make women cover their face
    i usually have mixed feelings on this topic.

    personally i think its backwards and stupid that women have to cover their faces, but i understand peoples rights to religion.

    Actually it is a choice to wear the Burqa. It is not forced on by their religion I think but has just evolved from that. Maybe someone with more knowledge can comment further but that is my understanding. A lot of these women choose to wear them and feel comfortable in them.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ap ... nza-drider

    You hear people often commenting about how it is awful that women are oppressed etc but it really wasn't until recently that women in the western world achieved equal rights and there is still a big debate on how 'equal' women really are.

    I'm not going to read the whole thread, but I am glad someone clarified this. It is such a common misconception that the Islamic religion forces its women to wear burqas. It is a choice. I think this highlights the need for everyone to be more educated. This isn't a criticism of the haffajappa, but if we educate ourselves more about others religions, traditions, culture and their beliefs we would be better off. If we do not educate ourselves, we face the risk of stereotyping everyone.

    As the scholar Chantelle Crozette says 'we need to embrace difference, rather than suppress it'
    Sydney 11/02/2003
    Sydney 14/02/2003
    Sydney 07/11/2006
    Sydney 18/11/2006
    Sydney 22/11/2009
    EV Sydney 18/03/2011
    EV Sydney 19/03/2011
    EV Sydney 20/03/2011
    Melbourne 24/01/2014
    Sydney 26/01/2014
    EV Sydney 13/02/2014
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    pjfan31 wrote:
    .....
    Actually it is a choice to wear the Burqa. It is not forced on by their religion I think but has just evolved from that. ....
    ...It is such a common misconception that the Islamic religion forces its women to wear burqas. It is a choice...

    It's a choice without being one. Islam does not require women to cover all but it is interpreted that way by some. Without making a whole big discourse as I discussed this in the previous thread, I have worked with oppressed women/women victims of domestic abuse, mainly muslim ones. Being fully covered was not their personal choice but they did it because of 'third party' pressure. Though I do agree that some women will fully cover themselves by their own choice, from what I have seen, it's not the majority.
  • pjfan31pjfan31 Posts: 7,335
    redrock wrote:
    pjfan31 wrote:
    .....
    Actually it is a choice to wear the Burqa. It is not forced on by their religion I think but has just evolved from that. ....
    ...It is such a common misconception that the Islamic religion forces its women to wear burqas. It is a choice...

    It's a choice without being one. Islam does not require women to cover all but it is interpreted that way by some. Without making a whole big discourse as I discussed this in the previous thread, I have worked with oppressed women/women victims of domestic abuse, mainly muslim ones. Being fully covered was not their personal choice but they did it because of 'third party' pressure. Though I do agree that some women will fully cover themselves by their own choice, from what I have seen, it's not the majority.


    But the same can be said for anything.... Marrying a strictly Christian man who forces you to wear full arm sleeves and skirts passed your knee.

    Of course there are exceptions, I am not denying it.
    Sydney 11/02/2003
    Sydney 14/02/2003
    Sydney 07/11/2006
    Sydney 18/11/2006
    Sydney 22/11/2009
    EV Sydney 18/03/2011
    EV Sydney 19/03/2011
    EV Sydney 20/03/2011
    Melbourne 24/01/2014
    Sydney 26/01/2014
    EV Sydney 13/02/2014
  • Hub.Hub. Posts: 1,990
    redrock wrote:
    It's a choice without being one. Islam does not require women to cover all but it is interpreted that way by some. Without making a whole big discourse as I discussed this in the previous thread, I have worked with oppressed women/women victims of domestic abuse, mainly muslim ones. Being fully covered was not their personal choice but they did it because of 'third party' pressure. Though I do agree that some women will fully cover themselves by their own choice, from what I have seen, it's not the majority.

    +1

    Its not the majority. Besides, among those who claim they wear it out of choice, a great part say so because they're afraid of what could happen if their family circle (especially men) was to discover what they really think of it.
  • kenny olavkenny olav Posts: 3,319
    Did anyone see the discussion about this on Bill Maher's show on Friday night? Bill, despite being anti-religion, took the stance that the ban was wrong, and that there's all kinds of other silly things people wear that are not banned by the government, nor should they be. That makes sense to me. One of his guests was a Muslim and was actually in favor of the ban. I suppose it should be noted that she is a very liberal Muslim, and is in fact a lesbian - first I've heard of a lesbian Muslim. So I think because of her very strong stance against the oppressive male chauvinistic form of Islam, she favored it. I'm pretty sure the French don't care about civil or religious rights in this instance. They just don't want conservative Muslims in their country. I personally don't want any religion anywhere in the world. However, I'm not sure how we to get to that kind of world.
  • 8181 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    if you want to cover your face, cover your face. big friggen deal.
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • ShimmyMommyShimmyMommy Posts: 7,505
    81 wrote:
    if you want to cover your face, cover your face. big friggen deal.

    same feeling I have...if they are going to do something to hurt people, they will find a way, face covered or not.
    Lots of love, light and hugs to you all!
  • It's important to note that Sarkozy has never exactly been secretive about wanting to eradicate all the Arabs, Blacks, and Gypsies from France..

    He's already going after the Gypsies by bulldozing their homes. One can reasonably assume this ban is his way of going after the Arabs. I can't imagine what tactic he'd use for the Blacks.. :|
  • IdrisIdris Posts: 2,317
    kenny olav wrote:
    I personally don't want any religion anywhere in the world. However, I'm not sure how we to get to that kind of world.

    Ignorance and ego are the greatest threats to mankind. That's the world we should be aiming for, a world free from such chains.

    You can take all the religion out of this world, out of peoples minds, but as long as ego,greed,ignorance and these kinds of things exists in ourselves, we will never be able to live in peace.

    Our egos,our negative ways is whats preventing us from harmony.
  • kenny olavkenny olav Posts: 3,319
    MrAbraham wrote:
    kenny olav wrote:
    I personally don't want any religion anywhere in the world. However, I'm not sure how we to get to that kind of world.

    Ignorance and ego are the greatest threats to mankind. That's the world we should be aiming for, a world free from such chains.

    You can take all the religion out of this world, out of peoples minds, but as long as ego,greed,ignorance and these kinds of things exists in ourselves, we will never be able to live in peace.

    Our egos,our negative ways is whats preventing us from harmony.

    Religion has a funny way of either destroying the ego, or emboldening it. Neither should be allowed to happen.

    The best cure for egotistical behavior, from what I can reckon, is honesty - Being honest with yourself, and maybe even more importantly, being honest with others.

    First two things I think too many of us are not honest about are:

    We don't why we are all here.

    We are all here together. and we won't know peace in this world until we figure out how to share it.



    Dammit, I didn't want to sound preachy.
  • IdrisIdris Posts: 2,317
    kenny olav wrote:
    MrAbraham wrote:
    kenny olav wrote:
    I personally don't want any religion anywhere in the world. However, I'm not sure how we to get to that kind of world.

    Ignorance and ego are the greatest threats to mankind. That's the world we should be aiming for, a world free from such chains.

    You can take all the religion out of this world, out of peoples minds, but as long as ego,greed,ignorance and these kinds of things exists in ourselves, we will never be able to live in peace.

    Our egos,our negative ways is whats preventing us from harmony.

    Religion has a funny way of either destroying the ego, or emboldening it. Neither should be allowed to happen.

    The best cure for egotistical behavior, from what I can reckon, is honesty - Being honest with yourself, and maybe even more importantly, being honest with others.

    First two things I think too many of us are not honest about are:

    We don't why we are all here.

    We are all here together. and we won't know peace in this world until we figure out how to share it.



    Dammit, I didn't want to sound preachy.

    I'm going to end up sounding even more preachy in a second :D

    If we want peace, we should be honest, tell the truth. Don't lie to others, don't lie to yourself. A lie is a negative energy and that throws the balance off. Truth is positive, so it helps the positive harmony of life.
  • Thoughts_ArriveThoughts_Arrive Melbourne, Australia Posts: 15,165
    I applaud this law.
    If only our weak government here in Australia would enforce the same law.
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
Sign In or Register to comment.