Please Pearl Jam, consider a VINYL Benaroya Hall re-issue!

Options
1…125126128130131…170

Comments

  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,253
    mfc2006 said:
    Please make this happen!!

    I hope so. *crossing fingers
  • 1ThoughtKnown
    1ThoughtKnown Posts: 6,155
    demetrios said:
    Sad to see folks paying $100+ US for those unofficial bootleg vinyl copies. 
     The cd is $15, and that is exactly what you are listening to on the bootleg. 
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,253
    1ThoughtKnown said:
    demetrios said:
    Sad to see folks paying $100+ US for those unofficial bootleg vinyl copies. 
     The cd is $15, and that is exactly what you are listening to on the bootleg. 

    Pretty much. There is a 24Bit Flac HD rip of the original pressed vinyl being shared. The ones who are released these inferior bootleg vinyl could be using this source then using the CD. 
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,253

  • PB11041
    PB11041 Earth Posts: 2,845
    releasing things we do not have would be so much cooler than reissuing things just for the sake of having it on vinyl.
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • BlackCircle
    BlackCircle Charlotte, NC Posts: 371
    I haven't read this whole thread... 'cause it's 85 pages long... so I'm not sure if the Bootleg Benny has been covered.  
    If not... 

    I bought one. 
    It's copied from a digital source and it has "skips". 
    These aren't imperfections in the vinyl itself, it's digital skips.  
    A friend of mine said he saw one for $75 sealed. 

    If you run across a SEALED one... and you want to purchase it... you should ask about the "digital" skips.  

    It's fun to have on vinyl... even with the skips... but it doesn't compare to the original. 

    I have a bootleg copy of Lost Dogs as well as an Official copy and playing the bootleg feels wrong for some reason. 

    I'm like a tab
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,253
    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0TdeXdCe8jAySMBFhhrocivMKciKtv6KiJ1RYmEwbFUwQVExigZE58yfcsNR6aUpjl&id=100063621490552&mibextid=Nif5oz



  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,253
    PB11041 said:
    releasing things we do not have would be so much cooler than reissuing things just for the sake of having it on vinyl.

    Agreed.
  • ultrapig
    ultrapig South Dakota Posts: 172
    PB11041 said:
    releasing things we do not have would be so much cooler than reissuing things just for the sake of having it on vinyl.

  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,253
    ultrapig said:
    PB11041 said:
    releasing things we do not have would be so much cooler than reissuing things just for the sake of having it on vinyl.


    If they can both, that would be pretty freaking sweet. 

  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,253

  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,253

  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,253

  • CH81124
    CH81124 Posts: 56
    I'll back this!
    Seattle '96, Tampa '00, Jones Beach I '00, Jones Beach II '00, Toronto '00, Penn State '03, MSG I '03, MSG II '03, Holmdel '03, Philadelphia '05, Chicago I '06, ERU I '06, ERU II '06, MSG I '08, MSG II '08, Philadelphia III '09, Newark '10, MSG I '10, MSG II '10, Brooklyn '13, Hartford '13, Ft. Lauderdale '16, Miami '16, MSG I '16, MSG II '16, Seattle I '18, Seattle II '18, Fenway I '18
  • PJammer4life
    PJammer4life Los Angeles Posts: 2,669
    Maybe it’s Stone’s fault. Doesn’t want his Thin Air mistake pressed again.
    Bridge Benefit 1994, San Francisco 1995, San Diego 1995 1 & 2, Missoula 1998, Los Angeles 2000, San Diego 2000, Eddie Vedder/Beck 2/26/2002, Santa Barbara 2003, Irvine 2003, San Diego 2003, Vancouver 2005, Gorge 2005, San Diego 2006, Los Angeles 2006 1 & 2, Santa Barbara 2006, Eddie Vedder 4/10/08, Eddie Vedder 4/12/08, Eddie Vedder 4/15/08, 7/12/2008, SF 8/28/09, LA 9/30/09, LA 10/1/09, LA 10/06/09, LA 10/07/09, San Diego 10/09/09, Eddie Vedder 7/6/2011, Eddie Vedder 7/8/2011, PJ20 9/3/2011, PJ20 9/4/2011, Vancouver 9/25/2011, San Diego 11/21/13, LA 11/24/13, Ohana 9/25/21, Ohana 9/26/21, Ohana 10/1/21, EV 2/17/22, LA Forum 5/6/22, LA Forum 5/7/22, EV 10/1/22, EV 9/30/23
  • RS65573
    RS65573 Posts: 2,499
    PJammer4life said:
    Maybe it’s Stone’s fault. Doesn’t want his Thin Air mistake pressed again.
    Hahahaha, awesome.
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,253
    Please reissue this vinyl, this year. 
  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,491
    Please?
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • Lost In Ohio
    Lost In Ohio Posts: 7,245
    demetrios said:
    1ThoughtKnown said:
    demetrios said:
    Sad to see folks paying $100+ US for those unofficial bootleg vinyl copies. 
     The cd is $15, and that is exactly what you are listening to on the bootleg. 

    Pretty much. There is a 24Bit Flac HD rip of the original pressed vinyl being shared. The ones who are released these inferior bootleg vinyl could be using this source then using the CD. 


    And even that's a digital file.

    (As most people know, the best records are analog all the way into the groove which is the actual sound wave.)
    Presidential Advice from President-Elect Mike McCready: "Are you getting something out of this all encompassing trip?"
  • Zod
    Zod Posts: 10,889
    Lost In Ohio said:
    demetrios said:
    1ThoughtKnown said:
    demetrios said:
    Sad to see folks paying $100+ US for those unofficial bootleg vinyl copies. 
     The cd is $15, and that is exactly what you are listening to on the bootleg. 

    Pretty much. There is a 24Bit Flac HD rip of the original pressed vinyl being shared. The ones who are released these inferior bootleg vinyl could be using this source then using the CD. 


    And even that's a digital file.

    (As most people know, the best records are analog all the way into the groove which is the actual sound wave.)

    That's true, but I don't think many records are all analog anymore.   I think many of them get pressed from high res digital source :(

Categories