neutral face? we do not need this. ---GET RID OF IT---

The Juggler

:arrow:

i see no need for the neutral face. he serves no purpose. if one is neutral on a subject, there is no need to inject one of these emoticon faces into the post. i can see if you're really happy and going with the smiley dude. or if you're pissed, tossing this guy in the mix: :x . you know, something to express your true emotions.......but if you are ambivalent? why go through the trouble of using an emoticon? seems a tad hypocritical to me. i don't like it. and i don't want any of you utilizing this option anymore.


kat---alright, let's go ahead and remove this from the emoticon options. i require this to be completed by sundown...on monday. so, what's that? about 5pm? let's just say 6pm? would 6pm work for you? i'm okay with it if you are.

kat, you have until 6pm EST on monday, february 14th, to remove the neutral emoticon face. or else.

thank you for your time.

norm

:-|

The Juggler

norm wrote:

:-|

GOD DAMN IT NORM! WHAT DID I SAY??

if there was an emoticon for slamming one's hand on the table, you bet your ass i would put that in riiiiiight here :arrow: _________________.



kat! :x

DaveyG

Personally, I like the neutral emotocon.

Thoughts_Arrive

:geek:

mixedcarton

:arrow:

pjfan31

It's like smsing one of those polls that cost 55c saying you're undecided. Why vote and waste the money dickhead?

A thought, there should be a dickhead emoticon.

comebackgirl

I'm completely neutral on this topic



You can't be neutral on a moving train


Awww...come on...I feel bad for the little guy and rumor has it that he's one of the few guys in town willing to conduct business with a white male between the ages of 20 and 39

FenwayFaithful

jimed14

stargirl69

comebackgirl wrote:

I'm completely neutral on this topic



You can't be neutral on a moving train


Awww...come on...I feel bad for the little guy

and rumor has it that he's one of the few guys in town willing to conduct business with a white male between the ages of 20 and 39

PilateOfTheStorm

I like it
Sometimes when one is bored, one feels the need to post but does not feel a particular way about the topic. So one uses this instead to show that one is interested, but one does not care

Claireack

OMG!! I just put neutral in the search on bing, clicked images and the third picture in the list was a cartoon of a lady receiving a visitor in both her front and back bottoms. I certainly didn't look like the neutral smily when I saw that.

More like;

The Juggler

comebackgirl wrote:

I'm completely neutral on this topic



You can't be neutral on a moving train


Awww...come on...I feel bad for the little guy and rumor has it that he's one of the few guys in town willing to conduct business with a white male between the ages of 20 and 39

....ah, you're looking for a "zing" there aren't ya?

well played. well played.

The Juggler

Claireack wrote:

OMG!! I just put neutral in the search on bing, clicked images and the third picture in the list was a cartoon of a lady receiving a visitor in both her front and back bottoms. I certainly didn't look like the neutral smily when I saw that.

More like;

oh my god. i just saw that with a google image search of "neutral face." what's neutral about that?!

mickeyrat

:think: :think: :think: :problem: :eh: :lolno:

Claireack

The Juggler wrote:

oh my god. i just saw that with a google image search of "neutral face." what's neutral about that?!

Would have been more appropriate under 'may not be able to sit down afterwards'.

The Juggler

Claireack wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

oh my god. i just saw that with a google image search of "neutral face." what's neutral about that?!

Would have been more appropriate under 'may not be able to sit down afterwards'.

...or walk

81

:lolno:

rollings

.

rollings

The Juggler wrote:

kat, you have until 6pm EST on monday, feb 14th, to remove the neutral emoticon face. or else.

fixed. see? necessary.

justam

The Juggler wrote:

:arrow:

i see no need for the neutral face. he serves no purpose. if one is neutral on a subject, there is no need to inject one of these emoticon faces into the post. i can see if you're really happy and going with the smiley dude. or if you're pissed, tossing this guy in the mix: :x . you know, something to express your true emotions.......but if you are ambivalent? why go through the trouble of using an emoticon? seems a tad hypocritical to me. i don't like it. and i don't want any of you utilizing this option anymore.


kat---alright, let's go ahead and remove this from the emoticon options. i require this to be completed by sundown...on monday. so, what's that? about 5pm? let's just say 6pm? would 6pm work for you? i'm okay with it if you are.

kat, you have until 6pm EST on monday, february 14th, to remove the neutral emoticon face. or else.

thank you for your time.

I think it's a sad face. I like it. It's not as comical as the crying face ( ) so I use it more!

Don't take away the face!

mysticweed

pjfan31 wrote:

It's like smsing one of those polls that cost 55c saying you're undecided. Why vote and waste the money dickhead?

A thought, there should be a dickhead emoticon.

norm

we need emoticons to rate the importance of our posts

comebackgirl

The Juggler wrote:

comebackgirl wrote:

I'm completely neutral on this topic



You can't be neutral on a moving train


Awww...come on...I feel bad for the little guy and rumor has it that he's one of the few guys in town willing to conduct business with a white male between the ages of 20 and 39

....ah, you're looking for a "zing" there aren't ya?

well played. well played.

depends on what you mean by zing

Awwww...look it's the juggler all ready to go to work

The Juggler

comebackgirl

The Juggler wrote:

The Juggler

comebackgirl wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

dunkman

The Juggler wrote:

kat---alright, let's go ahead and remove this from the emoticon options. i require this to be completed by sundown...on monday. so, what's that? about 5pm? let's just say 6pm? would 6pm work for you? i'm okay with it if you are.

kat, you have until 6pm EST on monday, february 14th, to remove the neutral emoticon face. or else.

thank you for your time.

Kat has read your request but doesn't not want to deal with a white male aged between 25-39. Thanks for your co-operation.

The Juggler

dunkman wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

kat---alright, let's go ahead and remove this from the emoticon options. i require this to be completed by sundown...on monday. so, what's that? about 5pm? let's just say 6pm? would 6pm work for you? i'm okay with it if you are.

kat, you have until 6pm EST on monday, february 14th, to remove the neutral emoticon face. or else.

thank you for your time.

Kat has read your request but doesn't not want to deal with a white male aged between 25-39. Thanks for your co-operation.

the longer she ignores me the more likely the odds are of me taking a hostage. my balls are in kat's court.

dunkman

pffft... you couldn't close a deal with a customer in a profession you are an expert in so why would Kat be scared of your hostage threats? It would be the least successful hostage taking since the Munich olympics.