Critical time for the War Resister support campaign
Comments
-
ONCE DEVIDED wrote:lot easier to hide things when noone will document it.
and I say again I
I stand behind my signiture. behind my word.
IOf you dont have the will dont sign on, easy isnt it. oh but to many saw it as an easy earner. then SEPT 11 happened. So they were sent to work"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
ONCE DEVIDED wrote:lot easier to hide things when noone will document it.
and I say again I
I stand behind my signiture. behind my word.
IOf you dont have the will dont sign on, easy isnt it. oh but to many saw it as an easy earner. then SEPT 11 happened. So they were sent to work
most of these people signed up after 9/11 ... thinking they were protecting their country ...
seriously, you think soldiers should stay even tho they are doing what is morally wrong to them and potentially die for it? ...
a soldier should risk his life just so corporations like haliburton can make huge amounts of money and potentially leave behind is wife, children and family?
i can see the tombstone ... died in the name of economic greed, leaves behind wife and son ...0 -
Does anyone have any idea how many Americans have went AWOL into the great white north? My wild guess would be around 100.Be Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0
-
again I would stand by my signiture, my word
thats what I would do.
cause to me it means somthing
yeah you allsay it dosnt . but thats sad that you cannot take a person by their word, by their signiture, by their commitmentAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE0 -
please dont argue the case of the iraq war with me, as im your side to the whole iraq war.
and those who say that the solders are to blame should be ashamed. soldiers do as they are ordered to do.
sure there is a minority who commit crimes. but the majority do the right thingAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE0 -
you missing the point.
they're are the ones in breach of contract, the elite, not the individuals refusing to serve.
above that dotted line nowhere does it say, yes i will risk my life for corporations in the name of empire.
and soldiers didn't sign up to kill iraqis, they never did anything to any of us.0 -
you sign on the line to follw orders.
what??? do you join for the retirement pension.
for the goood holidaysAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE0 -
every time you support those who ran away because they didnt want to serve corporations you rub into the dirt those who did not run, who served as they were asked to serve.
they stand behind their names. they did as they were ordered
blame those who make the decisions , not those who follow those orders.AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE0 -
ONCE DEVIDED wrote:you sign on the line to follw orders.
what??? do you join for the retirement pension.
for the goood holidays
this is anecdotal, but some of those i have gotten to know either had no options out of high school, or gotten married or had kids at a very young age and they needed a stable job to support that family. they did not think they would be dropping bombs on the heads of innocent people in iraq..."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
ONCE DEVIDED wrote:catefrances wrote:ONCE DEVIDED wrote:does the US have conscription
NO
well then those who signed on the line do waht they signed on for.
If there was a draft thats a different kettle of fish. but there aint
sp man up
im confused by your post.
Oh ok
the original is about suuport for canada to house war resistors is that correct.
If so seeing as though their is no current drafting of civilians into the military well those resisting going to war are those who have signed on the line to join the services.
my point is their should not be protection for them. they signed on. man up to their commitments.
if their was a draft I would support such a thing
I thought they signed up to defend America? Therefore, when a bunch of crooks like the Bush Administration decide to invade Iraq, how does that constitute defending America? People in the armed forces are perfectly right to go awol when the U.S government has been hijacked by a bunch of gangsters.0 -
Jason P wrote:Does anyone have any idea how many Americans have went AWOL into the great white north? My wild guess would be around 100.
Your wild guess is fairly close, I've heard the number 200 thrown around at the talks I have attended.
Clearly the Canadian government is worried about the precedent this would set going forward. I use the reference "Canadian government" loosely as I don't believe they are acting as a sovereign nation.
Man where is our Trudeau?0 -
ONCE DEVIDED wrote:lot easier to hide things when noone will document it.
and I say again I
I stand behind my signiture. behind my word.
IOf you dont have the will dont sign on, easy isnt it. oh but to many saw it as an easy earner. then SEPT 11 happened. So they were sent to work
"its the American in me says its an honor to die in a war that's just a politician's lie..."live pearl jam is best pearl jam0 -
ONCE DEVIDED wrote:again I would stand by my signiture, my word
thats what I would do.
cause to me it means somthing
yeah you allsay it dosnt . but thats sad that you cannot take a person by their word, by their signiture, by their commitment
What is sad about these comments is that it is unfortunate that the country in question (the US) does not have this commitment to their soldiers.
It has been documented numerous times that the US gov't is avoiding treating soldier ailments (in particular mental health). The suicide rate for US Military personnel has been climbing month by month, last article I read it was up to 1,100. US vets are not receiving any assistance with reintegrating into society which is clearly seen by the surge of homelessness amongst this group.
Regardless of what has been signed, I would choose based on my beliefs and convictions... I would leave my country and face the threat of incarceration vs. the likely outcomes listed above and the mental anguish of participating in an illegal war.0 -
gimmesometruth27 wrote:ONCE DEVIDED wrote:you sign on the line to follw orders.
what??? do you join for the retirement pension.
for the goood holidays
this is anecdotal, but some of those i have gotten to know either had no options out of high school, or gotten married or had kids at a very young age and they needed a stable job to support that family. they did not think they would be dropping bombs on the heads of innocent people in iraq...
regardless I stand behind my name my sigAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE0 -
I thought they signed up to defend America? Therefore, when a bunch of crooks like the Bush Administration decide to invade Iraq, how does that constitute defending America? People in the armed forces are perfectly right to go awol when the U.S government has been hijacked by a bunch of gangsters.[/quote]
blame those who sent them
Not those sentAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE0 -
What is sad about these comments is that it is unfortunate that the country in question (the US) does not have this commitment to their soldiers.
It has been documented numerous times that the US gov't is avoiding treating soldier ailments (in particular mental health). The suicide rate for US Military personnel has been climbing month by month, last article I read it was up to 1,100. US vets are not receiving any assistance with reintegrating into society which is clearly seen by the surge of homelessness amongst this group.
your very right there They deserve so much moreAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE0 -
In your workplace do you have the right to choose what jobs you do???
or are you told what needs to be doneAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE0 -
ONCE DEVIDED wrote:In your workplace do you have the right to choose what jobs you do???
or are you told what needs to be done"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
ONCE DEVIDED wrote:gimmesometruth27 wrote:ONCE DEVIDED wrote:you sign on the line to follw orders.
what??? do you join for the retirement pension.
for the goood holidays
this is anecdotal, but some of those i have gotten to know either had no options out of high school, or gotten married or had kids at a very young age and they needed a stable job to support that family. they did not think they would be dropping bombs on the heads of innocent people in iraq...
regardless I stand behind my name my sig"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
ONCE DEVIDED wrote:same boat as me . I did join for the coin, I was unemployed . couldnt get a job.
regardless I stand behind my name my sig
Why do you keep pretending that as soon as anyone enlists they have to do whatever they're told? If your superior ordered you to massacre a bunch of women and children would you do it?
If your leaders engage in a criminal war of occupation then you have every right to refuse to participate. Joining the military does not mean that you sign away your conscience, your morals, and your backbone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_O ... nd_against
This "Superior Orders" defense is still used with the following rationale in the following scenario: An "order" may come from one's superior at the level of national law. But according to Nuremberg Principle IV, such an order is sometimes "unlawful" according to international law. Such an "unlawful order" presents a legal dilemma from which there is no legal escape: On one hand, a person who refuses such an unlawful order faces the possibility of legal punishment at the national level for refusing orders. On the other hand, a person who accepts such an unlawful order faces the possibility of legal punishment at the international level (e.g. Nuremberg Trials) for committing unlawful acts. Therefore this is a Catch-22 legal dilemma.
Nuremberg Principle II responds to that dilemma by stating: "The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law."[29]
The above scenario might present a legal dilemma, but Nuremberg Principle IV speaks of "a moral choice" as being just as important as "legal" decisions: It states: "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him".
In "moral choices" or ethical dilemmas an ethical decision is often made by appealing to a "higher ethic" such as ethics in religion or secular ethics. One such "higher ethic," which is found in many religions and also in secular ethics, is the "ethic of reciprocity," or the Golden Rule. It states that one has a right to just treatment, and therefore has a reciprocal responsibility to ensure justice for others. "Higher ethics," such as those, could be used by an individual to solve the legal dilemma presented by the "Superior Orders" defense.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help