14 years and counting...
Options
Comments
-
What is the hell is this thread about now anyway?
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
I forgot. lolbrianlux said:What is the hell is this thread about now anyway?0 -
https://www.google.ca/search?client=safari&channel=iphone_bm&source=hp&ei=XSgwW-HeGPTi9AOb9YjwAQ&q=all+or+nothing&gs_ssp=eJzj4tFP1zcsNM2qykjPMjZgBAAhggQ0&oq=all+or+norhung&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-hp.1.0.46i13j0i13l4.2409.12381..15784...15....123.2683.16j12......0....1.......3..0j46j35i39j46i131j0i131j46i39j0i10j46i10j0i3.6DaCMZ8mwg4%3Dbrianlux said:What is the hell is this thread about now anyway?
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Too many doobies will do that.LongestRoad said:
I forgot. lolbrianlux said:What is the hell is this thread about now anyway?
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
Did you say Doobies??!!brianlux said:
Too many doobies will do that.LongestRoad said:
I forgot. lolbrianlux said:What is the hell is this thread about now anyway?
https://youtu.be/i9_e0rRvyz8
Post edited by Bentleyspop on0 -
LOL. Yep, Dooooooooobies!Bentleyspop said:
Did you say Doobies??!!brianlux said:
Too many doobies will do that.LongestRoad said:
I forgot. lolbrianlux said:What is the hell is this thread about now anyway?https://youtu.be/i9_e0rRvyz8
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
lol, No doobies or anything else for that matter. I can't deny a drunk text once or twice in my lifetime but I'm really just a social drinker. This thread has taken a few twists and turns from the original topic.brianlux said:
Too many doobies will do that.LongestRoad said:
I forgot. lolbrianlux said:What is the hell is this thread about now anyway?Post edited by LongestRoad on0 -
You stick to convincing yourself that's what you are doing and know that you aren't fooling anyone but yourself.LongestRoad said:
Thank you. I'll pray for yours too. Like I already said I only fear God. And what hatred? I gave my opinion. You seem to be defending the very people the immigrants are fleeing their countries from??? You got some friends on the inside you feel you need to bat for? Sorry, I'll stick to defending the rights of the immigrants seeking help and citizens of this country.rgambs said:
I can't imagine living inside a mind so filled with fear and hatred.LongestRoad said:
HaHa No but if you f'n liberals stopped fighting for the rights of convicted scumbag murdering rapist drug dealing gang members then maybe it would be harder for them to get back out on the streets.And sanother thing, stop making their time in prison comfortable.rgambs said:
Question:LongestRoad said:
You are also twisting my words. Are you saying there are only criminal American citizens?? There has never been a criminal from south of the border come into this country? Stop trying to focus on twisting my words to sound like I think the majority of immigrants coming into this country are criminals. But you can bet your ass I don't want any of the drug dealing rapist gang members coming into this country no matter how small a percentage there is of them. Not one of those scumbags should be able to sneak in. Not only for the people that are already here but also for the immigrants that those low lifes try to prey on. Are the liberals able to comprehend that without twisting my words? I have a hunch not. loloftenreading said:LongestRoad said:the response above is twisting my words
No, it isn't. Your words weren't even used, let alone twisted. H2TM was responding to your comment concerning perceived criminality among immigrants.
Do you think our scumbag drug dealing rapist gang murderers are inherently better than the ones from south of the border?
I will pray for your soul.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Not if you believe in private property rights.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Would there be a difference between not serving someone because they happen to homosexual, or not serve a group of nazis?LongestRoad said:
I was talking about the response about "bake the cake. Serve the dinner".brianlux said:LongestRoad said:
The limits seem to be only what liberals feel should be the limits and they can change them to fit their agenda at any time.brianlux said:unsung said:Oh btw, now you all support private property rights!
Bake the cake! Serve the dinner!Within limits. First of all, no one owns land. Land belongs to the earth. The earth will reclaim its own in due time. Secondly, those who do "own" land on paper have an obligation to treat it with respect. Abuse your land base and you put yourself (either individually or as a species) at risk. Abuse your land base, and the earth will reclaim its own all that much sooner.This, of course, is a biocentric viewpoint. An anthropocentric viewpoint will probably see it differently. But as always, earth bats last.What in the holy fuck does basic environmental science have to do with anyone being a "liberal" and of what "agenda" do you speak?Oh well. I'm glad you're here to keep us amused.
Let's be fair either you agree everyone gets served or you can pick and choose who you as the owner or manager want to serve. What's it gonna be?0 -
You think you know what's in my heart? I mean afterall you are a powerful man and intuitrgambs said:
You stick to convincing yourself that's what you are doing and know that you aren't fooling anyone but yourself.LongestRoad said:
Thank you. I'll pray for yours too. Like I already said I only fear God. And what hatred? I gave my opinion. You seem to be defending the very people the immigrants are fleeing their countries from??? You got some friends on the inside you feel you need to bat for? Sorry, I'll stick to defending the rights of the immigrants seeking help and citizens of this country.rgambs said:
I can't imagine living inside a mind so filled with fear and hatred.LongestRoad said:
HaHa No but if you f'n liberals stopped fighting for the rights of convicted scumbag murdering rapist drug dealing gang members then maybe it would be harder for them to get back out on the streets.And sanother thing, stop making their time in prison comfortable.rgambs said:
Question:LongestRoad said:
You are also twisting my words. Are you saying there are only criminal American citizens?? There has never been a criminal from south of the border come into this country? Stop trying to focus on twisting my words to sound like I think the majority of immigrants coming into this country are criminals. But you can bet your ass I don't want any of the drug dealing rapist gang members coming into this country no matter how small a percentage there is of them. Not one of those scumbags should be able to sneak in. Not only for the people that are already here but also for the immigrants that those low lifes try to prey on. Are the liberals able to comprehend that without twisting my words? I have a hunch not. loloftenreading said:LongestRoad said:the response above is twisting my words
No, it isn't. Your words weren't even used, let alone twisted. H2TM was responding to your comment concerning perceived criminality among immigrants.
Do you think our scumbag drug dealing rapist gang murderers are inherently better than the ones from south of the border?
I will pray for your soul.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/megalomaniac
0 -
Your words speak for themselves.LongestRoad said:
You think you know what's in my heart? I mean afterall you are a powerful man and intuitrgambs said:
You stick to convincing yourself that's what you are doing and know that you aren't fooling anyone but yourself.LongestRoad said:
Thank you. I'll pray for yours too. Like I already said I only fear God. And what hatred? I gave my opinion. You seem to be defending the very people the immigrants are fleeing their countries from??? You got some friends on the inside you feel you need to bat for? Sorry, I'll stick to defending the rights of the immigrants seeking help and citizens of this country.rgambs said:
I can't imagine living inside a mind so filled with fear and hatred.LongestRoad said:
HaHa No but if you f'n liberals stopped fighting for the rights of convicted scumbag murdering rapist drug dealing gang members then maybe it would be harder for them to get back out on the streets.And sanother thing, stop making their time in prison comfortable.rgambs said:
Question:LongestRoad said:
You are also twisting my words. Are you saying there are only criminal American citizens?? There has never been a criminal from south of the border come into this country? Stop trying to focus on twisting my words to sound like I think the majority of immigrants coming into this country are criminals. But you can bet your ass I don't want any of the drug dealing rapist gang members coming into this country no matter how small a percentage there is of them. Not one of those scumbags should be able to sneak in. Not only for the people that are already here but also for the immigrants that those low lifes try to prey on. Are the liberals able to comprehend that without twisting my words? I have a hunch not. loloftenreading said:LongestRoad said:the response above is twisting my words
No, it isn't. Your words weren't even used, let alone twisted. H2TM was responding to your comment concerning perceived criminality among immigrants.
Do you think our scumbag drug dealing rapist gang murderers are inherently better than the ones from south of the border?
I will pray for your soul.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/megalomaniacMonkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
so locking people inside a burning building puts out the fire?unsung said:
No, but it would be a huge start.mrussel1 said:
So.. control of the border will create peace in Central America? You think the SW border is the only way drugs can get into the US?unsung said:
Then you don't understand the problem.oftenreading said:
I disagree that the violence in those countries stems from the state of the American border, or that it would be fixed by a more “secure” borderunsung said:
Do you factor in that the violence exists because our border is not secure?oftenreading said:
Do you factor in that most of these individuals and families are fleeing violence severe enough that facing these potential consequences seems like the better option?unsung said:
Don't blame me, blame the parents. I did not bring them to a place where there are consequences.mrussel1 said:
So you have no moral or ethical opinion on the subject? You can blame the parents all you want, but then children are hurt. Is that okay with you because it's the parents' fault?unsung said:Again, I assign the blame on the parents. The US govt is responsible as far as allowing incentives to be handed out to the people illegally coming here.
My sympathy with the children is that they are being used as political pawns.
GENIUSHugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
I have admittedly gone back and forth on this. while I don't necessarily agree it's the same in terms of ethics, refusing service to someone based on personal politics is considered discrimination. unless huckabee did something specific to this restaurant owner, it could be given a pass, but it appears she only ejected her because of her political affiliation.unsung said:Oh btw, now you all support private property rights!
Bake the cake! Serve the dinner!unsung said:Oh btw, now you all support private property rights!
Bake the cake! Serve the dinner!
that being said,i think SHS is a vile piece of garbage. but she still should have been allowed to have a meal.Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
https://www.google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/trump-administration-holding-more-immigrant-children-shelters-ever-949099%3famp=1
That’s a lot of kids
I'm like an opening band for your mom.0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
And now loonybin Maxine Waters has issued demands to step up the harassment. Someone is going to get killed because of this.HughFreakingDillon said:
I have admittedly gone back and forth on this. while I don't necessarily agree it's the same in terms of ethics, refusing service to someone based on personal politics is considered discrimination. unless huckabee did something specific to this restaurant owner, it could be given a pass, but it appears she only ejected her because of her political affiliation.unsung said:Oh btw, now you all support private property rights!
Bake the cake! Serve the dinner!unsung said:Oh btw, now you all support private property rights!
Bake the cake! Serve the dinner!
that being said,i think SHS is a vile piece of garbage. but she still should have been allowed to have a meal.0 -
I have to say, I didn't see the video, but I saw the quotes, and I was unnerved by it. I don't think harassment is the right way to go at ALL. It needs to be respectful and peaceful. otherwise you just create an even bigger monster in your adversary.unsung said:
And now loonybin Maxine Waters has issued demands to step up the harassment. Someone is going to get killed because of this.HughFreakingDillon said:
I have admittedly gone back and forth on this. while I don't necessarily agree it's the same in terms of ethics, refusing service to someone based on personal politics is considered discrimination. unless huckabee did something specific to this restaurant owner, it could be given a pass, but it appears she only ejected her because of her political affiliation.unsung said:Oh btw, now you all support private property rights!
Bake the cake! Serve the dinner!unsung said:Oh btw, now you all support private property rights!
Bake the cake! Serve the dinner!
that being said,i think SHS is a vile piece of garbage. but she still should have been allowed to have a meal.Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
No what you do is you send in the people that are trained to put out the fire. I totally afree with this We need to send the military in and extinguish the scum that's causing the problems for the good people that just want to live their lives without corruption.HughFreakingDillon said:
so locking people inside a burning building puts out the fire?unsung said:
No, but it would be a huge start.mrussel1 said:
So.. control of the border will create peace in Central America? You think the SW border is the only way drugs can get into the US?unsung said:
Then you don't understand the problem.oftenreading said:
I disagree that the violence in those countries stems from the state of the American border, or that it would be fixed by a more “secure” borderunsung said:
Do you factor in that the violence exists because our border is not secure?oftenreading said:
Do you factor in that most of these individuals and families are fleeing violence severe enough that facing these potential consequences seems like the better option?unsung said:
Don't blame me, blame the parents. I did not bring them to a place where there are consequences.mrussel1 said:
So you have no moral or ethical opinion on the subject? You can blame the parents all you want, but then children are hurt. Is that okay with you because it's the parents' fault?unsung said:Again, I assign the blame on the parents. The US govt is responsible as far as allowing incentives to be handed out to the people illegally coming here.
My sympathy with the children is that they are being used as political pawns.
GENIUS0 -
just so we're clear:LongestRoad said:
No what you do is you send in the people that are trained to put out the fire. I totally afree with this We need to send the military in and extinguish the scum that's causing the problems for the good people that just want to live their lives without corruption.HughFreakingDillon said:
so locking people inside a burning building puts out the fire?unsung said:
No, but it would be a huge start.mrussel1 said:
So.. control of the border will create peace in Central America? You think the SW border is the only way drugs can get into the US?unsung said:
Then you don't understand the problem.oftenreading said:
I disagree that the violence in those countries stems from the state of the American border, or that it would be fixed by a more “secure” borderunsung said:
Do you factor in that the violence exists because our border is not secure?oftenreading said:
Do you factor in that most of these individuals and families are fleeing violence severe enough that facing these potential consequences seems like the better option?unsung said:
Don't blame me, blame the parents. I did not bring them to a place where there are consequences.mrussel1 said:
So you have no moral or ethical opinion on the subject? You can blame the parents all you want, but then children are hurt. Is that okay with you because it's the parents' fault?unsung said:Again, I assign the blame on the parents. The US govt is responsible as far as allowing incentives to be handed out to the people illegally coming here.
My sympathy with the children is that they are being used as political pawns.
GENIUS
you are suggesting/advocating for starting a war/invading Mexico?Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
And several other central and South American countries?HughFreakingDillon said:
just so we're clear:LongestRoad said:
No what you do is you send in the people that are trained to put out the fire. I totally afree with this We need to send the military in and extinguish the scum that's causing the problems for the good people that just want to live their lives without corruption.HughFreakingDillon said:
so locking people inside a burning building puts out the fire?unsung said:
No, but it would be a huge start.mrussel1 said:
So.. control of the border will create peace in Central America? You think the SW border is the only way drugs can get into the US?unsung said:
Then you don't understand the problem.oftenreading said:
I disagree that the violence in those countries stems from the state of the American border, or that it would be fixed by a more “secure” borderunsung said:
Do you factor in that the violence exists because our border is not secure?oftenreading said:
Do you factor in that most of these individuals and families are fleeing violence severe enough that facing these potential consequences seems like the better option?unsung said:
Don't blame me, blame the parents. I did not bring them to a place where there are consequences.mrussel1 said:
So you have no moral or ethical opinion on the subject? You can blame the parents all you want, but then children are hurt. Is that okay with you because it's the parents' fault?unsung said:Again, I assign the blame on the parents. The US govt is responsible as far as allowing incentives to be handed out to the people illegally coming here.
My sympathy with the children is that they are being used as political pawns.
GENIUS
you are suggesting/advocating for starting a war/invading Mexico?
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Yes, I think this restaurant was even worse.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Would there be a difference between not serving someone because they happen to homosexual, or not serve a group of nazis?LongestRoad said:
I was talking about the response about "bake the cake. Serve the dinner".brianlux said:LongestRoad said:
The limits seem to be only what liberals feel should be the limits and they can change them to fit their agenda at any time.brianlux said:unsung said:Oh btw, now you all support private property rights!
Bake the cake! Serve the dinner!Within limits. First of all, no one owns land. Land belongs to the earth. The earth will reclaim its own in due time. Secondly, those who do "own" land on paper have an obligation to treat it with respect. Abuse your land base and you put yourself (either individually or as a species) at risk. Abuse your land base, and the earth will reclaim its own all that much sooner.This, of course, is a biocentric viewpoint. An anthropocentric viewpoint will probably see it differently. But as always, earth bats last.What in the holy fuck does basic environmental science have to do with anyone being a "liberal" and of what "agenda" do you speak?Oh well. I'm glad you're here to keep us amused.
Let's be fair either you agree everyone gets served or you can pick and choose who you as the owner or manager want to serve. What's it gonna be?
Agree with the baker or not, they had a specific reason of religious beliefs. They were also willing to serve the gay community, just not a specific event that went against the belief. That being said, I think they should have just done it.
Sanders was refused service for no reason other than they just don’t like her based on her political views. To me that seems far more extreme, no real reason. What if this was an Obamacare staffer that was refused service because the owner didn’t agree with Obamacare?
Do you really want to open up that window to discriminate against people you just done agree with?
Im surprised at everyone supporting this restaurant owner.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 273 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.6K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help