MLB 2025 World Series
Comments
-
Jesus. You're older than I thought.Wobbie said:The Juggler said:
I'd just like to take this opportunity to point out how old Rob is.Wobbie said:
back in the day, those things sometimes wrapped up in under TWO hours. three hour baseball games were rare in the 1960s.The Juggler said:To clarify my stance---yeah, I like home runs. Sure, they are fun.......but, to me, a 1-0 gem of a pitchers duel that takes just under 3 hours is more interesting and fun than a 4 hour plus 10-7 slugfest.
Thank you. Thank you.
I remember my dad taking me to games at Ebbets Field when I was in my 20's
www.myspace.com0 -
The Marlins were on such a roll. Now their bats are cold. Had the bases loaded a few times this week and couldn't buy a hit.
I miss igotid880 -
HesCalledDyer said:Wob, your backup team just got Verlander.
that's good, but I'm kinda afraid they've lost their early season mojo.If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
Whey they had mojo they were referred to as "we." After losing mojo they are "they."Wobbie said:HesCalledDyer said:Wob, your backup team just got Verlander.
that's good, but I'm kinda afraid they've lost their early season mojo.www.myspace.com0 -
freudian slip.The Juggler said:
Whey they had mojo they were referred to as "we." After losing mojo they are "they."Wobbie said:HesCalledDyer said:Wob, your backup team just got Verlander.
that's good, but I'm kinda afraid they've lost their early season mojo.
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
stanton has ELEVEN intentional walks this year.
bonds had ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY in 2004. I'm calling bullshit if stanton gets "the real record."
fucking bullshit.
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
the SI Cover Jinx is real!
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
Fuck BondsWobbie said:stanton has ELEVEN intentional walks this year.
bonds had ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY in 2004. I'm calling bullshit if stanton gets "the real record."
fucking bullshit.www.myspace.com0 -
Headline news... Boston cheats. Who knew?0 -
I've never considered this cheating. Hide the damn signs better or maybe add 2 to what number you throw up? Too hard a concept?mrussel1 said:
Headline news... Boston cheats. Who knew?0 -
Using technology is explicitly against the rules, if I'm not mistaken. Stealing signs the old fashion way (picking them from 2nd base or watching the 3rd base coach) is not against the rules.tempo_n_groove said:
I've never considered this cheating. Hide the damn signs better or maybe add 2 to what number you throw up? Too hard a concept?mrussel1 said:
Headline news... Boston cheats. Who knew?0 -
They used an Apple Watch. Isn't there a delay in the signal?mrussel1 said:
Using technology is explicitly against the rules, if I'm not mistaken. Stealing signs the old fashion way (picking them from 2nd base or watching the 3rd base coach) is not against the rules.tempo_n_groove said:
I've never considered this cheating. Hide the damn signs better or maybe add 2 to what number you throw up? Too hard a concept?mrussel1 said:
Headline news... Boston cheats. Who knew?
I'll be curious to how this pans out...0 -
What they were doing is having someone in the box decrypting the signals, texting it to the bench coaches, who would relay the signs being used to the runners on based. Then the runners on base now know the signals, and can send a message to the batter. That's my understanding. The Yankees were super suspicious about how high of a BA the Sox have had with runners on base. That's straight up cheating in my book.tempo_n_groove said:
They used an Apple Watch. Isn't there a delay in the signal?mrussel1 said:
Using technology is explicitly against the rules, if I'm not mistaken. Stealing signs the old fashion way (picking them from 2nd base or watching the 3rd base coach) is not against the rules.tempo_n_groove said:
I've never considered this cheating. Hide the damn signs better or maybe add 2 to what number you throw up? Too hard a concept?mrussel1 said:
Headline news... Boston cheats. Who knew?
I'll be curious to how this pans out...0 -
I agree. They should be contracted.mrussel1 said:
What they were doing is having someone in the box decrypting the signals, texting it to the bench coaches, who would relay the signs being used to the runners on based. Then the runners on base now know the signals, and can send a message to the batter. That's my understanding. The Yankees were super suspicious about how high of a BA the Sox have had with runners on base. That's straight up cheating in my book.tempo_n_groove said:
They used an Apple Watch. Isn't there a delay in the signal?mrussel1 said:
Using technology is explicitly against the rules, if I'm not mistaken. Stealing signs the old fashion way (picking them from 2nd base or watching the 3rd base coach) is not against the rules.tempo_n_groove said:
I've never considered this cheating. Hide the damn signs better or maybe add 2 to what number you throw up? Too hard a concept?mrussel1 said:
Headline news... Boston cheats. Who knew?
I'll be curious to how this pans out...0 -
That makes more sense now because when a man was on 2nd they hit for a better average.mrussel1 said:
What they were doing is having someone in the box decrypting the signals, texting it to the bench coaches, who would relay the signs being used to the runners on based. Then the runners on base now know the signals, and can send a message to the batter. That's my understanding. The Yankees were super suspicious about how high of a BA the Sox have had with runners on base. That's straight up cheating in my book.tempo_n_groove said:
They used an Apple Watch. Isn't there a delay in the signal?mrussel1 said:
Using technology is explicitly against the rules, if I'm not mistaken. Stealing signs the old fashion way (picking them from 2nd base or watching the 3rd base coach) is not against the rules.tempo_n_groove said:
I've never considered this cheating. Hide the damn signs better or maybe add 2 to what number you throw up? Too hard a concept?mrussel1 said:
Headline news... Boston cheats. Who knew?
I'll be curious to how this pans out...
If what you say indeed happened then I agree it is cheating.0 -
Most specifically egregious, to me, is that the initial spotter reading the signs isn't even in uniform. In other words, it's not a player or coach, rather a front office type person. That's a bridge too far.tempo_n_groove said:
That makes more sense now because when a man was on 2nd they hit for a better average.mrussel1 said:
What they were doing is having someone in the box decrypting the signals, texting it to the bench coaches, who would relay the signs being used to the runners on based. Then the runners on base now know the signals, and can send a message to the batter. That's my understanding. The Yankees were super suspicious about how high of a BA the Sox have had with runners on base. That's straight up cheating in my book.tempo_n_groove said:
They used an Apple Watch. Isn't there a delay in the signal?mrussel1 said:
Using technology is explicitly against the rules, if I'm not mistaken. Stealing signs the old fashion way (picking them from 2nd base or watching the 3rd base coach) is not against the rules.tempo_n_groove said:
I've never considered this cheating. Hide the damn signs better or maybe add 2 to what number you throw up? Too hard a concept?mrussel1 said:
Headline news... Boston cheats. Who knew?
I'll be curious to how this pans out...
If what you say indeed happened then I agree it is cheating.0 -
Let's not get crazy. Just suspend them for the playoffs (while awarding them to the division) and advance the Tribe directly to the ALCS. Problem solved.Cliffy6745 said:
I agree. They should be contracted.mrussel1 said:
What they were doing is having someone in the box decrypting the signals, texting it to the bench coaches, who would relay the signs being used to the runners on based. Then the runners on base now know the signals, and can send a message to the batter. That's my understanding. The Yankees were super suspicious about how high of a BA the Sox have had with runners on base. That's straight up cheating in my book.tempo_n_groove said:
They used an Apple Watch. Isn't there a delay in the signal?mrussel1 said:
Using technology is explicitly against the rules, if I'm not mistaken. Stealing signs the old fashion way (picking them from 2nd base or watching the 3rd base coach) is not against the rules.tempo_n_groove said:
I've never considered this cheating. Hide the damn signs better or maybe add 2 to what number you throw up? Too hard a concept?mrussel1 said:
Headline news... Boston cheats. Who knew?
I'll be curious to how this pans out...0 -
I'm good with that.mrussel1 said:
Let's not get crazy. Just suspend them for the playoffs (while awarding them to the division) and advance the Tribe directly to the ALCS. Problem solved.Cliffy6745 said:
I agree. They should be contracted.mrussel1 said:
What they were doing is having someone in the box decrypting the signals, texting it to the bench coaches, who would relay the signs being used to the runners on based. Then the runners on base now know the signals, and can send a message to the batter. That's my understanding. The Yankees were super suspicious about how high of a BA the Sox have had with runners on base. That's straight up cheating in my book.tempo_n_groove said:
They used an Apple Watch. Isn't there a delay in the signal?mrussel1 said:
Using technology is explicitly against the rules, if I'm not mistaken. Stealing signs the old fashion way (picking them from 2nd base or watching the 3rd base coach) is not against the rules.tempo_n_groove said:
I've never considered this cheating. Hide the damn signs better or maybe add 2 to what number you throw up? Too hard a concept?mrussel1 said:
Headline news... Boston cheats. Who knew?
I'll be curious to how this pans out...
Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help






