c-section vs. natural birth
pickupyourwill
Posts: 3,135
does anyone believe that one is harder than the other?--and why? I had one the natural way but with an epidural--so technically still not 100% natural.
does anyone feel that those having only c-sections are missing out on something? of course, most the time it is beyond the mother's control anyway. the doctor calls most of the shots.
it just seems that so many women today are having c-sections. so hundreds of years ago, what would these women and doctors have done then? would these be some of the women that died in childbirth or had stillborns? I've never really read up on the subject. I think its a great marvel that modern medical science has made it possible for every woman to deliver without losing the mother or baby. I guess I just wish that natural birth was the majority, but it doesn't seem that way anymore. I have no statistics on it, though. anyone else agree or disagree?
does anyone feel that those having only c-sections are missing out on something? of course, most the time it is beyond the mother's control anyway. the doctor calls most of the shots.
it just seems that so many women today are having c-sections. so hundreds of years ago, what would these women and doctors have done then? would these be some of the women that died in childbirth or had stillborns? I've never really read up on the subject. I think its a great marvel that modern medical science has made it possible for every woman to deliver without losing the mother or baby. I guess I just wish that natural birth was the majority, but it doesn't seem that way anymore. I have no statistics on it, though. anyone else agree or disagree?
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
modern medical science has NOT accomplished that, not even close. more than likely, that will never be possible. have the scientific/medical community made great strides in improving #s for materal and infant mortality? sure. but there still are many, many women who die during childbirth....and many children that are lost as well.
as to your Q: firstly, i have never given birth so i obviously cannot speak from personal experience, only observations and readings. i know a good # of women who have had both c-sections and vaginal deliveries, and overall....most preferred the vaginal. it may hurt more at the time, but it IS the way nature intended, and thus afterwards, better recovery. most with c-sections had a longer recovery period, and with a newborn to take care of, just added to it. that said, all were medically necessary, so you do what ya gotta do.
i have read that c-sections are very much on the rise, and many questions about the medical necessity of them. idk enough about it either way to have a truly formed opinion, but it is curious and i am always interested in more information. that said, i do believe that vaginal births are still the most numerous, and medically desired, form of childbirth.
Let's just breathe...
I am myself like you somehow
I had a natural delivery with my son, it was painful but I got through it. I also know a lot of people that have had c-sections. One of my friends had both her children by c-section, both were necessary because she is tiny and has a small pelvis, the first was done as an emergency, the second was planned due to the difficulties with the first birth. Unfortunately, the anaestetic didn't work for the second and despite repeatedly telling the surgeons nothing was done - an inquiry followed.
I guess in my opinion if you can possibly have a natural delivery go for it, but there are cases where a surgical intervention is needed. I do think that having a planned c-section for non-medical grounds isn't a good idea, recovery time etc but sometimes when all else fails it can prevent tragic outcomes.
How did c-sections get such a negative connotation? i mean, I understand that there are few women who choose to have a c-section out of vanity, convenience or whatever, but the VAST majority of them are for medical reasons.
The idea that having a c-section means that you are "missing out on something" makes absolutely no sense to me at all... It seems to me like an elitist attitude that some women have to put themselves above other women.
I don't know if it's insecurity or competition on whatever, but there seems to be a natural tendency for mothers to find any reason to put down other mothers and to elevate themselves some way or another.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
I had an last minute c-section after 2 hours of pushing. It was the worst experience of my life. How anyone can choose major abdominal surgery over something that happens naturally (not to mention healing is speedier) is beyond me. I had terrible side effects and a long and painful recovery. Sorry, guys, but I think you really need to be a woman to understand this subject fully.
Not everyone's like that though, you can only control what happens at the birth to a certain degree. With me, right after I had him I did feel pretty proud of actually managing to give birth so I probably did harp on about it for a while, and in a way I did kind of feel like I was the only who had ever given birth (even though I was on a ward with other women who had too).
Breastfeeding is perhaps just as controversial, if not more. I only managed it for three days due to pain/scabs/baby puking blood, and I did feel like some people looked down on me for giving up. But again it's personal choice, you do what you can.
Incidentally, I have never met a woman who has delivered naturally that has described it a truely spiritual experience, although I have heard of these people. So anyone having a c-section doesn't have to worry about that one.
My youngest is 31, so I am guessing c-sections are even easier these days. Looking back, and if it was my choice, I would have c-sections again.
It helps so the baby don't end up with a weird shaped head and it helps in protecting against a lot that can happen during regular childbirth. You don't get stretched out too!!
It is major surgery however, so its something to be concerned about. I think its safe. They do them so often. But that can be a problem. Like driving, with time we get careless, cuz it becomes so instinctual.
My scar is one that goes up and down. Now your scar will be left to right and below the bikini line.
I am okay with the scar. No one ever notices it unless I point it out and I had to have 2 other abdominal surgeries thru the years and they were able to use that scar to make the new incisions, instead of creating additional scars. I have had a total of 4 abdominal surgeries, but only one scar, that is very faded and just blends in.
My 2 cents. LOL!
Am I the only one that thinks it's funny that you started by saying his statement's not accurate and then offered a few examples that completely back up what he said?
Sigh. Fine. We can never talk about birth, and you can never talk about the male biological imperative to spread one's seed to as many fertile women as possible because you don't have a penis. So stop whining when we cheat, you just don't understand the subject fully.
Medical condition (such as Placenta Previa): C-Section
Ability to have safe/normal delivery: Vaginal delivery
Yeah I know, I'm a bit contrary.
Not everyones like that though.
As a professional she says the biggest problem is that hospitals and doctors choose to perform waaaaaayyyyy more C-sections than they should. Why? Insurance money and convenience.
When a C-section is performed it is quick and easy and covered by insurance to the tune of a higher profit.
Woman pushes for a couple hours, the Dr. says that's enough and they go to C-section.
With that said C-Section is a wonderful thing, it saves the lives of woman and newborns. It is just a shame that an unnecessary surgery is performed when it is not always needed.
My sister delivered natural and aside from what she thought at the time as "total bull shit", is proud of her experience. My hair dresser had her first two via c-section - both were premature, issues with her blood levels being toxic and baby in distress. With the medical agreement from her doctor, she opted for natural with her third, believing she truly missed out on an experience. 10hrs of pushing and they had to take her 10lb son via c-section. She thought the natural experience was ridiculous, no need for it, can't believe why women would want to put their bodies and their unborn child through it. Her recovery from all three c-sections were, according to her, a breeze. Another friend was unable to finish naturally with her first child, her recovery after pushing then the c-section was terrible. Her 2nd child, because of her first experience as well as her physical make-up, was a planned c-section. Her 2nd recovery much easier than her first. Two other friends had planned c-sections as their children were breach. Both surgeries were performed by the same doctor. Their recoveries were vastly different based on their own personalities.....some women whimper about a paper cut, others are capable of cutting out their own staples.
My point is that it is a personal decision and I don't think anyone can speak to someone else's experience or judge their decision. Every woman has a horrific birthing story and a wonderful one. Who am I to say they were wrong to choose, ie natural when they complained about ripping, tearing and stitches afterwards? Whether the c-section was medically necessary, for personal or vanity reasons, who am I to say? It is really for no one else to judge but the woman and her doctor.
I have eaten so much gold I crapped excellence - drtyfrnk29
Life is either a daring adventure or nothing at all!
I do think now that they are given for liability purposes. Because they seem to happen more often.
I’ve often wondered if some where in the future will they’ll be a generation that doesn’t know how to / want to delivery naturally if c-sections become more common.
I know women that beat themselves up for having a c-section. They want to have had that experience. They think they’re less of a woman for having a c-section. That they didn’t do their womanly duty.
If doctors keep an eye on the mom and the baby’s heart rate during the delivery I don’t see what the big deal is.
I was born in 79. My mother had a rough/bad delivery. No c-section. In a hospital.
I have Cerebral Palsy.
So to me, I’m all for c-sections. But of course I would be considering my story.
My younger brother also had a hard time being born. My mom had a c-section with him. he was fine, no CP.
Just something to think about......
everything I've just now edited is all irrelevant.
peace & love
cheers to you all!
Ina May's Guide to Childbirth
http://www.amazon.com/Ina-Mays-Guide-Childbirth-Gaskin/dp/0553381156
http://www.inamay.com/
c-sections are great in real emergencies!
but with a competent doula or midwife what a doctor thinks is an emergency may not be. frequently they don't want to wait past two hours and suggest there is a problem. much ignorance by the 'experts' we are trained to trust in this area. there is nothing unusual with a birth taking over 12 hours.
in washington state the 'experts' are a bit more knowledgeable on the subject with the influence of a strong doula/midwifery community here and it is acceptable to have your doula/midwife with you in the hospital at the time of birth. (if you choose a hospital birth)
if someone is having a baby the knowledge of what actually goes on inside her body combined with contemplation/meditation on the coming moment is very beneficial. staying calm. . . . .not starting to push until your body is ready.
Push me, pull me... push me, or pull me out
http://www.childbirthconnection.org/article.asp?ck=10164
http://www.marchofdimes.com/peristats/default.aspx
Some food for thought:
- The WHO recommends that, for the best outcomes for mothers and babies, populations not have c-section rates higher than 10-15%. Yet the US has a c-section rate of over 30% and private hospitals in Brazil have a c-section rate of over 90%.
- As the rates of c-sections (both primay & repeat) are increasing, the rates of vaginal births after cesarean (VBAC) are decreasing. There are parts of the country where hospitals won't allow women to have vaginal births if they have had a prior c-section, or if they are pregnant with twins or their baby is breech. This is likely due to a lot of things, including lack of trained providers, fear of malpractice lawsuits if something goes wrong, the medicalization of childbirth, etc. The region where you live (see 2nd link above), the location where you deliver, the doctor or midwife you choose, and the type of practice s/he is with can all significantly impact the kind of birth a woman has. (My bias is toward Family Medicine docs for prenatal care & childbirth.)
-C-sections are major surgery with major risk, including death, injury, infecton, longer recovery time, poor outcomes for the baby, and riskier future pregnancies. American women are 2-3 more times likely to die from childbirth if they have c-sections vs. vaginal deliveries. Worldwide, it increases to as much as 10 times more likely. This is all based on population data, of course, and c-sections can be life- and health-saving for some women and babies based on their particular circumstance.
- There's a push to change the language to "cesarean birth" or "abdominal delivery" or some such language that removes the implication of failure that some women may feel if they were not able to give birth naturally.
Very interesting topic!
The book is full of what should be Common Sense, knowledge that the last 2 or 3 generations of women have missed out on in this country. It includes some eye-opening statistics about how medical interference often causes a worse outcome. There are some 'art therapy' type of projects that most readers won't be interested in. But the text was an amazing read.
I bought the book 2 years ago when my sister was having her first child. She is a complex mix of conventional and natural approaches, so I gave her the book to influence in any small way I could. (She never mentioned the book, ever, so I guess it had little effect! One of the women in her 'pregnancy yoga' class had her baby almost killed when his skull was pulled off of his brain by a vacuum delivery device. I was horrified, but my sister poo-pooed the event........)
Well said....
I have a "friend" who actually posted on Facebook the first month of her pregnancy that she was going to make her doctor give her a c-section because she was too afraid of vaginal birth?
WTF?
What doctor would actually do that?
Be careful what you ask for because her baby tried going into pre-mature labor. She has been stuck in bed with IV's and is miserable. I feel bad for her. She will most certainly have a c-section at this point. I guess she gets what she wanted.
I had my naturally (w/ drugs)
It's not a choice, it's usually because something is going wrong.
If a c-section is medically indicated--you or the baby are in big trouble--for godsakes don't think twice--go for it! But, if you're doing it so Aunt Tilly can be there for the delivery, because Big Bubba, your husband/boyfriend thinks you'll be "all stretched out" vaginally if you don't (I recommend stretching his brain to something larger than a size X-small), etc., then I think those are bad, bad reasons to have you and your child go through something which carries such risks when you don't have to.
fast forward to 1997 when my son was born and i being older decided that this was my show and wed be doing it how i wanted. i opted for no pain killers of any kind and spent my labour walking the halls of the labour ward.i was even admonished for not telling the nursing staff when my water broke .. cause i knew what that would mean for me and i knew that there was no danger in them not knowing anyways. in 1999 whilst pregnant with my youngest daughter i thought giving birth at home would be the way to go. when the time came i wasnt in a good place psychologically and so had her in hospital. but like my son it was a drug free birth and i stayed at home until the last possible moment. finally i got it right.
3 years ago whilst my daughter gave birth to my grandchild i stood by her side and watched as they cut her open layer by layer to deliver the baby by caesarian. un necessarily imo. it was shocking to me. and i couldnt think of anything worse.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
R.i.p. My Dad - May 28, 2007
R.i.p. Black Tail (cat) - Sept. 20, 2008
Not only recovering from major surgery, and perhaps depression, BUT having to care for a newborn while you are trying to get better is a bit much!!
My 1st was a medical necessity. The 2nd was questionable. There is a danger in delivering vaginally after having c-section(s). I chose to be safe and had my second child c-section because of that risk. My second was a breeze compared to the first, but way worse than vaginal delivery. My daughter had her second vaginal birth a year ago and within 1/2 hour she and I snuck outside to smoke a cigarette. With a c-section, you ain't going anywhere!!
When I was born in '81I was born breach, came out feet first. And the best of it all?? They didn't/wouldn't call the doctor because he was in church. (it was Palm Sunday, oh, and I was born in a suburb of Minneapolis, so not some rural town hospital or anything)
I ended up getting stuck, and the umbilical chord was wrapped around my neck. Apparently I ended up having to stay in the hospital about a week. Or maybe it was a couple extra days? Also, I guess I 'ripped' up my mom pretty good, and since I was the youngest of 3 boys, I can now claim I broke the mold!
Anyway, so yeah, I probably should have been born via emergency C-Section, but they messed up. But yeah, the whole 'I fear the pain of delivering a baby vaginally', or the 'I don't want to be stretched/disfigured down there' are NOT, and SHOULD not be acceptable reasons for a C-Section.
Granted, what do I know? I'll just be the sperm donor in any kids I ever have.
That's an interesing perspective and just goes to show how our experience informs our beliefs. Today, it's standard practice to do c-sections for breech babies (as you mentioned) or twins. But in 1976, my sister and I were not only twins (and still are
Obviously I don't remember any of my birth, and I don't have any lingering complications from it, so most of my perspective is from my mother's opinion on the situation.
She was a nurse at the time, and I believe it was some years after I was born that she worked in the Neonatal Intensive-Care Unit, at the same hospital I was born at.
So I can't say for sure if at the time I was born she felt that way, or if it was after working in the NICU that made her form that opinion. But I assume since she had been involved with many delivers while working there that her views on C-Sections would be based on a if you will 'professional' experiences, rather than just a personal bias.
I think that's just why we need professional opinions... because otherwise all we have is our own personal bias. Of course professional opinions are still just opinions, but they're based in medical facts and tons more experience. That's why I think its important to find a doctor you trust and whose philosophy is similar to your own, but who still has tons of experience, knowledge, and good judgement.
wasn't Caesar born this way? hence the name... but i hear that's debated.
but if true, then hundreds of years ago the method was available - though (i assume) a lot of mothers wouldnt have survived.
both my brother and i were born c-section. my brother was a 10 lb baby and my mom wasn't able to have him naturally, when i came along i was smaller and she tried to have me naturally but she couldn't, her pelvis or birth canal still wasn't wide enough for me either
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarean_section
At the same time, the thought of voluntarily letting a doctor slice open your abdomen muscles and everything just seems WRONG unless it's medically necessary. My niece was born via emergency C-section, and would have died otherwise....so I completely understand that there are times when it HAS to be done, and that's OK.
It just seems that the healing issues alone from a C-section are far more complicated, and are much more difficult to bounce back from. Plus, isn't there some sort of health benefit from the child being born vaginally? Something to do with fluids?
Whatever you are, be a good one --Lincoln