Why Hitler Failed

ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
edited November 2009 in A Moving Train
Very good article here in the Guardian:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/se ... -collapsed

Why Hitler's grand plan during the second world war collapsed

Richard J Evans - The Guardian, Tuesday 8 September 2009

Two key factors undermined Germany's campaign: US involvement boosted the allies' arms-producing capabilities, while sheer Soviet manpower led to catastrophic defeat in Russia

'Two years into the war, in September 1941, German arms seemed to be carrying all before them. Western Europe had been decisively conquered, and there were few signs of any serious resistance to German rule. The failure of the Italians to establish Mussolini's much-vaunted new Roman empire in the Mediterranean had been made good by German intervention. German forces had overrun Greece, and subjugated Yugoslavia. In north Africa, Rommel's brilliant generalship was pushing the British and allied forces eastwards towards Egypt and threatening the Suez canal. Above all, the invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941 had reaped stunning rewards, with Leningrad (the present-day St Petersburg) besieged by German and Finnish troops, Smolensk and Kiev taken, and millions of Red Army troops killed or captured in a series of vast encircling operations that brought the German armed forces within reach of Moscow. Surrounded by a girdle of allies, from Vichy France and Finland to Romania and Hungary, and with the more or less benevolent neutrality of countries such as Sweden and Switzerland posing no serious threat, the Greater German Reich seemed to be unstoppable in its drive for supremacy in Europe.

Yet in retrospect this proved to be the high point of German success. The fundamental problem facing Hitler was that Germany simply did not have the resources to fight on so many different fronts at the same time. Leading economic managers such as Fritz Todt had already begun to realise this. When Todt was killed in a plane clash on 8 February 1942, his place as armaments minister was taken by Hitler's personal architect, the young Albert Speer. Imbued with an unquestioning faith in Hitler and his will to win, Speer restructured and rationalised the arms production system, building on reforms already begun by Todt. His methods helped increase dramatically the number of planes and tanks manufactured in German plants, and boosted the supply of ammunition to the troops.

US military might

But by the end of 1941 the Reich had to contend not only with the arms production of the British empire and the Soviet Union but also with the rapidly growing military might of the world's economic superpower, the United States. Throughout 1941, rightly fearing the consequences of total German domination of Europe for America's position in the world, US President Franklin D Roosevelt had begun supplying Britain with growing quantities of arms and equipment, guaranteed through a system of "lend-lease" and formalised in August by the Atlantic Charter. When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in early December, Hitler saw the opportunity to attack American convoys without inhibition, and declared war on the US in the belief that Roosevelt would be too preoccupied with countering the Japanese advance in the Pacific to trouble overmuch with events in Europe.

Yet such was the economic might of the Americans that they could pour increasing resources into the conflict in both theatres of war. Germany produced 15,000 new combat aircraft in 1942, 26,000 in 1943, and 40,000 in 1944. In the US, the figures were 48,000, 86,000 and 114,000 respectively. Added to these were the aircraft produced in the Soviet Union – 37,000 in 1943, for example – and the UK: 35,000 in 1943 and 47,000 in 1944. It was the same story with tanks, where 6,000 made in Germany each year had to face the same number produced annually in Britain and the Dominions, and three times as many in the Soviet Union. In 1943 the combined allied production of machine-guns exceeded 1 million, compared with Germany's 165,000. Nor did Germany's commandeering of the economies of other European countries do much to redress the balance. The Germans' ruthless requisitioning of fuel, industrial facilities and labour from France and other countries reduced the economies of the subjugated parts of Europe to such a state that they were unable – and, with their workers becoming ever more refractory, unwilling – to contribute significantly to German war production.

Above all, the Reich was short of fuel. Romania and Hungary supplied a large proportion of Germany's needs. But this was not enough to satisfy the appetite of the Wehrmacht's gas-guzzling tanks and fighter planes. Rommel's eastward push across northern Africa was designed not just to cut off Britain's supply route through the Suez canal but above all to break through to the Middle East and gain control over the region's vast reserves of oil. In mid-1942 he captured the key seaport of Tobruk. But when he resumed his advance, he was met with massive defensive positions prepared by the meticulous British general Bernard Montgomery at El Alamein. Over 12 days he failed to break through the British lines and was forced into a headlong retreat across the desert. To complete the rout, the allies landed an expeditionary force further west, in Morocco and Algeria. A quarter of a million German and Italian troops surrendered in May 1943. Rommel had already returned to Germany on sick leave. "The war in north Africa," he concluded bitterly, "was decided by the weight of Anglo-American material." If he had been provided with "more motorised formations", and a more secure supply line, he believed, he could still have driven through to the oilfields of the Middle East. But it was not to be.

By the time of Montgomery's victory, it had become clear that the Germans' attempt to compensate for their lower levels of arms production by stopping American supplies and munitions from reaching Britain across the Atlantic had also failed. In the course of 1942, a determined construction campaign increased the number of U-boats active in the Atlantic and the Arctic from just over 20 to more than 100; in November 1942 alone they sank 860,000 tonnes of allied shipping, aided by the Germans' ability to decipher British radio traffic while keeping their own secret.

Battle of the Atlantic

But from December 1942, the British could decode German ciphers once more and steer their convoys away from the waiting wolf-packs of U-boats. Small aircraft carriers began to accompany allied convoys, using spotter planes to locate the German submarines, which had to spend most of their time on the surface in order to move with any reasonable speed and locate the enemy's ships. By May 1943 the allies were building more ship tonnage than the Germans were sinking, while one U-boat was being sunk by allied warships and planes on average every day. On 24 May 1943 the commander of the U-boat fleet, Admiral Karl Dönitz, conceded defeat and moved his submarines out of the north Atlantic. The battle of the Atlantic was over.

The most dramatic and most significant reversal of German fortunes came, however, on the eastern front. The sheer scale of the conflict between the Wehrmacht and the Red Army dwarfed anything seen anywhere else during the second world war. From 22 June 1941, the day of the German invasion, there was never a point at which less than two-thirds of the German armed forces were engaged on the eastern front. Deaths on the eastern front numbered more than in all the other theatres of war put together, including the Pacific. Hitler had expected the Soviet Union, which he regarded as an unstable state, ruled by a clique of "Jewish Bolsheviks" (a bizarre idea, given the fact that Stalin himself was an antisemite), exploiting a vast mass of racially inferior and disorganised peasants, to crumble as soon as it was attacked.

But it did not. On the contrary, Stalin's patriotic appeals to his people helped rally them to fight in the "great patriotic war", spurred on by horror at the murderous brutality of the German occupation. More than three million Soviet prisoners of war were deliberately left to die of starvation and disease in makeshift camps. Civilians were drafted into forced labour, villages were burned to the ground, towns reduced to rubble. More than one million people died in the siege of Leningrad; but it did not fall. Soviet reserves of manpower and resources were seemingly inexhaustible. In a vast effort, major arms and munitions factories had been dismantled and transported to safety east of the Urals. Here they began to pour out increasing quantities of military hardware, including the terrifying "Stalin organ", the Katyusha rocket-launcher. In the longer run, the Germans were unable to match any of this; even if some of their hardware, notably the Tiger and Panther tanks, was better than anything the Russians could produce, they simply could not get them off the production lines in sufficient quantities to make a decisive difference.

War in the snow

Already in December 1941, Japan's entry into the war, and its consequent preoccupation with campaigns in the Pacific, allowed Stalin to move large quantities of men and equipment to the west, where they brought the German advance to a halt before Moscow. Unprepared for a winter war, poorly clad, and exhausted from months of rapid advance and bitter fighting, the German forces had to abandon the idea of taking the Russian capital. A whole string of generals succumbed to heart attacks or nervous exhaustion, and were replaced; Hitler himself took over as commander-in-chief of the army.

Hitler had already weakened the thrust towards Moscow by diverting forces to take the grainfields of the Ukraine and push on to the Crimea. For much of 1942, this tactic seemed to be succeeding. German forces took the Crimea and advanced towards the oilfields of the Caucasus. Here again, acquiring new supplies of fuel to replenish Germany's dwindling stocks was the imperative. But Soviet generals had begun to learn how to co-ordinate tanks, infantry and air power and to avoid encirclement by tactical withdrawals. German losses mounted. The German forces were already dangerously short of reserves and supplies when they reached the city of Stalingrad on the river Volga, in August 1942.

Three months later, they had still not taken the city. Stalingrad became the object of a titanic struggle between the Germans and the Soviets, less because of its strategic importance than because of its name. When the Germans moved their best troops into the city, leaving the rear to be guarded by weaker Romanian and Italian forces, the Soviet generals saw their chance, broke through the rearguard and surrounded the besieging forces. Short of fuel and ammunition, the Germans under General Paulus were unable to break out. As one airfield after another was captured by the Red Army, supplies ran out and the German troops began to starve to death. On 31 January 1943, refusing the invitation to commit suicide that came with Hitler's gift of a field marshal's baton, Paulus surrendered. Some 235,000 German and allied troops were captured; more than 200,000 had been killed. It was the turning point of the war.

Last great counter-attack

From this moment on, the German armies were more or less continuously in retreat on the eastern front. The Red Army around Stalingrad was threatening to cut off the German forces in the Caucasus, so they were forced to withdraw, abandoning their attempt to secure the region's oil reserves. In early July 1943 came the last great German counter-attack, at Kursk. This was the greatest land battle in history, involving more than four million troops, 13,000 tanks and self-propelled guns, and 12,000 combat aircraft. Warned of the attack in advance, the Red Army had prepared defences in depth, which the Germans only managed partially to penetrate. A tragi-comic incident happened when an advancing Soviet tank force fell into its own side's defensive ditches; nearly 200 tanks were wrecked, or destroyed by the incredulous Waffen-SS forces waiting for them on the other side. The local party commissar, Nikita Khrushchev, covered up this disaster by persuading Stalin that they had been destroyed in a huge battle that had eliminated more than 400 German tanks and won a heroic victory. The legend of "the greatest tank battle in history" was born.

In fact it was nothing of the kind. So enormous were the Russian reserves that the loss of the tanks made little difference in the end, as fresh troops and armour were moved in to rescue the situation. More than one million soldiers, 3,200 tanks and self-propelled guns, and nearly 4,000 combat aircraft entered the fray on the Soviet side and began a series of successful counter-offensives. The Germans were forced to retreat. The missing German tanks had not been destroyed; they had been pulled out by Hitler to deal with a rapidly deteriorating situation in Italy. After the war, German generals claimed bitterly they could have won at Kursk had Hitler not stopped the action. In reality, however, the Soviet superiority in men and resources was overwhelming.

And the tanks really were needed in Italy. Following their victory in north Africa, the allies had landed in Sicily on 10 July 1943 to be greeted in Palermo by Italian citizens waving white flags. A fortnight later, reflecting the evaporation of Italy's will to fight on, the Fascist Grand Coalition deposed Mussolini and began to sue for peace. On 3 September an armistice was signed, and allied forces landed on the Italian mainland. German troops had already invaded from the north, taking over the entire peninsula. Following the armistice, they seized 650,000 Italian soldiers and shipped them off to Germany as forced labourers to join millions of others drafted in from Poland and the Soviet Union to replace German workers sent to the front to replenish the Wehrmacht's rapidly diminishing manpower. In a daring commando raid on the Alpine hotel where Mussolini was being held prisoner, SS paratroopers liberated the former dictator, who was put in charge of a puppet regime based on the town of Salò. But as the allied armies made their way slowly northwards towards Rome, nothing could disguise the fact that Germany's principal ally had now been defeated.

German morale

These events had a devastating effect on German morale at home. In particular the catastrophe of Stalingrad began to convince many Germans that the war could not be won. Worse was to come. Meeting at Casablanca in January 1943, Churchill and Roosevelt decided on a sustained campaign of bombing German cities. A series of massive raids on the industrial area of the Ruhr followed, backed up by the destruction of key dams by the famous "bouncing bombs" on 16 May 1943. Arms production was severely affected. And in late July and early August 1943, the centre of Hamburg was almost completely destroyed in a firestorm created by intensive incendiary bombing that killed up to 40,000 people, injured a further 125,000, many of them seriously, and made 900,000 homeless. Refugees from the devastated city spread a sense of shock and foreboding all across Germany. In Hamburg itself, anger at the Nazis' failure to defend the city led to crowds tearing party badges off officials' coats amid cries of "murderer!" The chief of staff of the German airforce committed suicide. German air defences were still able to inflict serious losses on allied bombing expeditions, but they were not strong enough to prevent the devastation continuing.

By the end of 1943, German forces were retreating all along the line in the east and in Italy. The spectacle of German defeat and the brutal requisitioning of millions of forced labourers from occupied countries fuelled the rise of resistance movements right across Europe. The Reich had lost command of the skies and the seas. Ever more devastating bombing raids on a growing range of towns and cities were making people's lives unbearable. Ordinary Germans knew by the end of 1943 that the war was lost. Terror began to replace commitment as a means of keeping people fighting on. More than 20,000 German troops were executed by courts-martial during the war for varieties of defeatism. At home, people faced a similar escalation of terror from the Nazi party and the SS. Retreating into their private and family worlds, they began to focus increasingly on simply staying alive and waiting for the end.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • Byrnzie wrote:
    Two key factors undermined Germany's campaign: US involvement boosted the allies' arms-producing capabilities....

    Hitler knew what we could produce, GE was selling the Nazis munitions before and AFTER we entered the war
    don't compete; coexist

    what are you but my reflection? who am i to judge or strike you down?

    "I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama

    when you told me 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
    i was thinkin 'death before dishonor'
  • i just thought his dickheadness was a sign of inevitable failure
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Politics versus military skills. Hitler failed to listen to this military experts... the Generals and field commanders.
    Should have stayed on track against Britian and kept up the initial plan to bomb DeHaviland and other aircraft factories and RAF Air Fields instead of going after civilian populations in London. We was so enraged that English Lancaster bombers hit Berlin, that he ordered that change in direction. This allowed the extremely resourceful British to move their manufacturing and rebuild their air fields.
    And the Russian Front. That was the downfall. Too many resources spent on trying to win an un-winable situation. The cruel Russian Winters and the never ending waves of Soviet fighters and T-34 tanks was way too much for the split German forces. This commanders wanted to secure Western Europe and deal with the Soviets after the war.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Cosmo wrote:
    Politics versus military skills. Hitler failed to listen to this military experts... the Generals and field commanders.
    Should have stayed on track against Britian and kept up the initial plan to bomb DeHaviland and other aircraft factories and RAF Air Fields instead of going after civilian populations in London. We was so enraged that English Lancaster bombers hit Berlin, that he ordered that change in direction. This allowed the extremely resourceful British to move their manufacturing and rebuild their air fields.
    And the Russian Front. That was the downfall. Too many resources spent on trying to win an un-winable situation. The cruel Russian Winters and the never ending waves of Soviet fighters and T-34 tanks was way too much for the split German forces. This commanders wanted to secure Western Europe and deal with the Soviets after the war.

    The above article mentions nothing about Russian winters. Though It does mention the fact that the Russians had re-organized and that their manufacturing output had been put into over-drive beyond the Ural mountains.
    Another factor was Stalin finally giving control to his Generals - in particular Zhukov - and from this point on the Germans were fucked. The Russians decided to use the Germans own tactics of Blitzkrieg, and encirclement, and conducted a massive counter-attacking pincer movement on their weakened flanks at Stalingrad. This was the turning point.
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Cosmo wrote:
    Politics versus military skills. Hitler failed to listen to this military experts... the Generals and field commanders.
    Should have stayed on track against Britian and kept up the initial plan to bomb DeHaviland and other aircraft factories and RAF Air Fields instead of going after civilian populations in London. We was so enraged that English Lancaster bombers hit Berlin, that he ordered that change in direction. This allowed the extremely resourceful British to move their manufacturing and rebuild their air fields.
    And the Russian Front. That was the downfall. Too many resources spent on trying to win an un-winable situation. The cruel Russian Winters and the never ending waves of Soviet fighters and T-34 tanks was way too much for the split German forces. This commanders wanted to secure Western Europe and deal with the Soviets after the war.

    The above article mentions nothing about Russian winters. Though It does mention the fact that the Russians had re-organized and that their manufacturing output had been put into over-drive beyond the Ural mountains.
    Another factor was Stalin finally giving control to his Generals - in particular Zhukov - and from this point on the Germans were fucked. The Russians decided to use the Germans own tactics of Blitzkrieg, and encirclement, and conducted a massive counter-attacking pincer movement on their weakened flanks at Stalingrad. This was the turning point.
    ...
    The Russian Winters are fierce. The weather along with the massive number of Russian troops and T-34 tanks stopped the Germans... cold.
    And they were able to move their manufacturing deep into the Urals. A couple of reasons... Hitler made some real terrible decisions regarding German aircraft roles... one being converting the Me-262 to Germany's latest bomber when it was designed as a high altitude interceptor to knock out B-17, B-24 and Lancaster bombers... and the decision to forgo the development/manufacturing of the Fw-200 into a long range bomber. Hitler felt the Blitzkrieg type of warfare could take land in short hops with no requirement for long range bombers. The Russians moved their manufacturing out of the range of German Medium Bombers.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    hitler failed because he tried to spread his message with violence. people don't like that. world leaders, even todays presidents would do well to learn from teh MLK's and the Ghandi's.....nonviolence may be the only way enact social progress.
  • I think I read somewhere that Hitler would have probably lost either way. I mean if he hadn't gone after Russia and had been more successful in western Europe, it would have been more likely that the atomic bomb would have been dropped on Germany, since they were developing their own bomb and would have been considered a much bigger threat.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Georgy Zhukov was the real hero of the war. Not only was he in charge of the counter attack at Stalingrad, but he was in charge of the battles of Moscow, and Kursk, and the capture of Berlin. He's also the reason why the Russian army was able to move considerable numbers from the Pacific rim into the war with Germany in the West. It was Zhukov who was in command at the Battle of Khalkhin Gol (sometimes referred to as the Nomonhan Incident) in Manchuria in 1939 which saw the Russians annihilate the Japanese, and which convinced the Japanese never to attack the Russians again.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khalkhin_Gol
    '...Although this engagement is little-known in the West, it had profound implications on the conduct of World War II. It may be said to be the first decisive battle of World War II, because it determined that the two principal Axis Powers, Germany and Japan, would never geographically link up their areas of control through Russia. The defeat convinced the Imperial General Staff in Tokyo that the policy of the North Strike Group, favoured by the army, which wanted to seize Siberia as far as Lake Baikal for its resources, was untenable. Instead the South Strike Group, favored by the navy, which wanted to seize the resources of Southeast Asia, especially the petroleum and mineral-rich Dutch East Indies, gained the ascendancy, leading directly to the attack on Pearl Harbor two and a half years later in December 1941. The Japanese would never make an offensive movement towards Russia again. In 1941, the two countries signed agreements respecting the borders of Mongolia and Manchukuo[22] and pledging neutrality towards each other.[23] They remained at peace until the Soviet conquest of Manchuria in August 1945, in the final weeks of the war.

    It was the first victory for the soon-to-be-famous Soviet general Georgy Zhukov, earning him the first of his four Hero of the Soviet Union awards...
    A year after flinging the Germans back from the capital, Zhukov planned and executed the Red Army's offensive at the Battle of Stalingrad, using a technique very similar to Khalkhin Gol, in which the Soviet forces held the enemy fixed in the center, built up a mass of force in the area undetected, and launched a pincer attack on the wings to trap the enemy army. A pincer attack as such is as old as Cannae, but Zhukov has considerable merit in knowing when to do it and especially how to get it done, on the massive thus logistically demanding scale in question.'
  • I haven't been in here for a while and the first thread I see is about Hitler. :?
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    I haven't been in here for a while and the first thread I see is about Hitler. :?

    look a few threads down and you'll see another thread saying that America is worse then Hitler and the 3rd Reich. only on AMT.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I haven't been in here for a while and the first thread I see is about Hitler. :?

    look a few threads down and you'll see another thread saying that America is worse then Hitler and the 3rd Reich. only on AMT.

    did you also notice that most other people understood the context of the thread and had a discussion? ... yet - that is all you focused on ...
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    polaris_x wrote:
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I haven't been in here for a while and the first thread I see is about Hitler. :?

    look a few threads down and you'll see another thread saying that America is worse then Hitler and the 3rd Reich. only on AMT.

    did you also notice that most other people understood the context of the thread and had a discussion? ... yet - that is all you focused on ...

    there is no contextual discussion going on. just the same ole hate speech by commy.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    jlew24asu wrote:
    there is no contextual discussion going on. just the same ole hate speech by commy.

    c'mon dude ... look at the thread up until the point you joined in ...
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    I see someone is trying to derail this thread because the subject being discussed doesn't show America as being a sole beacon of light and freedom in the world and the one country responsible for defeating Nazi Germany, as many Americans ignorantly choose to believe.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I see someone is trying to derail this thread because the subject being discussed doesn't show America as being a sole beacon of light and freedom in the world and the one country responsible for defeating Nazi Germany, as many Americans ignorantly choose to believe.

    no Americans believe we were the one country responsible for defeating the Nazis. none.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    I've never heard an American say "We saved your ass in WWII!", never, not once, ever.
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    edited September 2009
    polaris_x wrote:
    jlew24asu wrote:
    look a few threads down and you'll see another thread saying that America is worse then Hitler and the 3rd Reich. only on AMT.

    did you also notice that most other people understood the context of the thread and had a discussion? ... yet - that is all you focused on ...

    there is no contextual discussion going on. just the same ole hate speech by commy.


    you can repeat the conventional ideology that is being repeated on every mainstream media channel...or you can say something true about the reality of life in the American empire- and sound like your from neptune. and to you i probably sound like i'm from neptune. that doesn't mean i'm wrong.
    Post edited by Commy on
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    jlew24asu wrote:
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I see someone is trying to derail this thread because the subject being discussed doesn't show America as being a sole beacon of light and freedom in the world and the one country responsible for defeating Nazi Germany, as many Americans ignorantly choose to believe.

    no Americans believe we were the one country responsible for defeating the Nazis. none.
    in other news, jlew has the power to know what 300,000,000+ people don't believe.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    _outlaw wrote:
    in other news, jlew has the power to know what 300,000,000+ people don't believe.

    :P
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I see someone is trying to derail this thread because the subject being discussed doesn't show America as being a sole beacon of light and freedom in the world and the one country responsible for defeating Nazi Germany, as many Americans ignorantly choose to believe.

    no Americans believe we were the one country responsible for defeating the Nazis. none.

    WHAT??? Seriously???? I have heard that belief be passionately defended and repeated tons of times,.... I heard it as early as grade school, and all through college and continuously by republican politicians and supporters. "If it wasnt for the US, you'd be speaking German right now" I bet the vast majority of Americans cannot name the allied forces in WW2....and if you asked them what side Russia was on, you would be shocked. LET ALONE how Germany was defeated.....
    Formally known as Tackalac before being formally known as Vedderwt,,,,....release my old name and posts....

    I saw a wino eating grapes, I said, "Dude, you have to wait"
  • Vedderwt wrote:
    jlew24asu wrote:
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I see someone is trying to derail this thread because the subject being discussed doesn't show America as being a sole beacon of light and freedom in the world and the one country responsible for defeating Nazi Germany, as many Americans ignorantly choose to believe.

    no Americans believe we were the one country responsible for defeating the Nazis. none.

    WHAT??? Seriously???? I have heard that belief be passionately defended and repeated tons of times,.... I heard it as early as grade school, and all through college and continuously by republican politicians and supporters. "If it wasnt for the US, you'd be speaking German right now" I bet the vast majority of Americans cannot name the allied forces in WW2....and if you asked them what side Russia was on, you would be shocked. LET ALONE how Germany was defeated.....

    get your very own bumper sticker!

    bd110a-300x78.jpg
  • get your very own bumper sticker!

    bd110a-300x78.jpg[/quote]

    My favorite bumper sticker of all time......

    The Rapture is not an Exit Strategy
    Formally known as Tackalac before being formally known as Vedderwt,,,,....release my old name and posts....

    I saw a wino eating grapes, I said, "Dude, you have to wait"
  • We never got to WW2 in grade school... The school year always ended before then. In highschool it was briefly mentioned. From what I remember, I was told that the US basically won the war for the allies because of its manufacturing abilities. Without it, Britian and Japan would be speaking Russian right now. (Not German)
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    _outlaw wrote:
    jlew24asu wrote:
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I see someone is trying to derail this thread because the subject being discussed doesn't show America as being a sole beacon of light and freedom in the world and the one country responsible for defeating Nazi Germany, as many Americans ignorantly choose to believe.

    no Americans believe we were the one country responsible for defeating the Nazis. none.
    in other news, jlew has the power to know what 300,000,000+ people don't believe.

    yup I do. Americans have always been taught that WWII was won by America and its Allies. the ignorant asinine assertion was Americans believe we are the "one country" responsible for Nazi defeat. no Americans believe that because its common knowledge that it was, you know, a WORLD war. :roll: there will always tbe human scum who believe America had little role in the outcome I suppose. and piss on the graves of all the brave souls who died.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    if america wasnt invloved... what do you think would have happened?

    germany was having her way with europe... Hitler's insanity lead him into Russia, and the Russian winter, which was the fatal blow... but if not for america's intervention, there is no doubt the outcome could have been drastically different
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    my2hands wrote:
    germany was having her way with europe... Hitler's insanity lead him into Russia, and the Russian winter, which was the fatal blow... but if not for america's intervention, there is no doubt the outcome could have been drastically different

    Did you read the original article at the top of this thread?


    You think Germany lost the war because of the Russian winter? Funny then that we don't all celebrate V.E day by building snowmen. :?
  • Don't forget after VE, NOBODY helped us beat Japan period.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    In response to more bullshit:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_War

    Pacific War

    Major Allied Combatants


    Republic of China
    United States
    Philipine Commonwealth
    United Kingdom
    British India
    Australia
    Netherlands
    Dutch East Indies
    New Zealand
    Canada
    Soviet Union


    Allied offensives in Burma, 1944–45

    The British launched a series of offensive operations back into Burma during late 1944 and the first half of 1945...

    While the Japanese were distracted by events at Meiktila, XXXIII Corps had renewed its attack on Mandalay. It fell to Indian 19th Division on March 20, though the Japanese held the former citadel of Fort Dufferin for another week.

    On May 1, a Gurkha parachute battalion was dropped on Elephant Point, which cleared Japanese rearguards from the mouth of the Rangoon River. The Indian 26th Infantry Division landed the next day and took over Rangoon, which had seen an orgy of looting and lawlessness similar to the last days of the British in the city in 1942. Following the capture of Rangoon, there were still Japanese forces to take care of in Burma, but it was largely a mopping up operation.'


    Liberation of Borneo

    'The Borneo Campaign of 1945 was the last major campaign in the South West Pacific Area. In a series of amphibious assaults between May 1 and July 21, the Australian I Corps, under General Leslie Morshead, attacked Japanese forces occupying the island...'

    Atomic bomb and the Soviet invasion

    'On February 3 1945, the Soviet Union agreed with Roosevelt to enter the Pacific conflict. It promised to act 90 days after the war ended in Europe and did so exactly on schedule on August 9, by invading Manchuria. A battle-hardened, one million-strong Soviet force, transferred from Europe attacked Japanese forces in Manchuria and quickly defeated the Japanese Kantōgun (Kwantung Army group)'
  • Byrnzie, why do you hate America so much?
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    jbalicki10 wrote:
    Byrnzie, why do you hate America so much?

    envy most likely. everyone likes to hate the best. usually starts with being picked on as a child.
Sign In or Register to comment.