yeah, this is my situation too. i have a turntable and decent speakers, but i haven't bothered to hook them up since i moved recently b/c i really just don't have a chance to listen to music as a primary activity when i'm in my house.
I was in a similar situation until a couple of months ago. I had a record player for a long time with my dad's old record collection. Great stuff, all the classics you could every want, and they were all in great condition other than a bit of dust (which we all know is easy enough to fix). The stylus on my record player was busted since the thing had been through 3 or 4 moves and hadn't been used in about 10 years. A few months ago I finally got around to ordering a stylus and I've been listening to a record or two on an almost daily basis now.
I had a similar point of view before listening to vinyl. I thought "hey, there is no way vinyl can sound better than a digitally remastered CD from the 21st century." But man, was I wrong. It truly is something that can't be appreciated until you listen to a record in good quality speakers. Everyone describes it as a warmer sound, and it really is. It seems fuller, more balanced, and really is inviting.
One of the other reasons I love vinyl so much is that it forces you to be more of an active listener. I'm always listening to music, whether I'm riding the train to work, going for a run or driving. But when I listen to vinyl it really is an event. I have to pick out the album, put it on, and sit on the couch in the living room. I find myself just listening, rather than doing something else while the music is on. And of course you have to sit there and flip the record halfway through. This amount of focus/involvement might not be for some people. But I personally love it.
To the OP, it sounds like you might not have the time/space to be able to sit down and listen to an album on your couch, and that's fine. But if you do, I suggest you give it a try. I think you will be pleasantly surprised.
5/28/06 - Camden, NJ 5/30/06 - Washington, DC 6/22/08 - Washington, DC 10/31/09 - Philadelphia, PA 8/5/16 - Fenway Park Temple of the Dog - 11/5/2016 - Philadelphia, PA 7/1/2018 - Prague 7/3/2018 - Kraków 7/5/2018 - Berlin
[quote="DS114969
I'd like to invest in a nice turntable setup, but unfortunately it looks to be quite expensive to set up. Is there a good system I can get for around 200 - 300? I've always loved record though. Just the look/feel of them..bigger artwork/packaging etc...[/quote]
Bump. I've been interested in getting a setup for a while now but don't know where/how to get started. I would need everything (turntable, speakers, amp/preamp, receiver). Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
2003: San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Seattle; 2005: Monterrey; 2006: Chicago 1 & 2, Grand Rapids, Cleveland, Detroit; 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa; 2009: Austin, LA 3 & 4, San Diego; 2010: Kansas City, St. Louis, Columbus, Indianapolis; 2011: PJ20 1 & 2; 2012: Missoula; 2013: Dallas, Oklahoma City, Seattle; 2014: Tulsa; 2016: Columbia, New York City 1 & 2; 2018: London, Seattle 1 & 2; 2021: Ohana; 2022: Oklahoma City
I'd like to invest in a nice turntable setup, but unfortunately it looks to be quite expensive to set up. Is there a good system I can get for around 200 - 300? I've always loved record though. Just the look/feel of them..bigger artwork/packaging etc...
Bump. I've been interested in getting a setup for a while now but don't know where/how to get started. I would need everything (turntable, speakers, amp/preamp, receiver). Any advice would be greatly appreciated
Post edited by Better Dan on
2003: San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Seattle; 2005: Monterrey; 2006: Chicago 1 & 2, Grand Rapids, Cleveland, Detroit; 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa; 2009: Austin, LA 3 & 4, San Diego; 2010: Kansas City, St. Louis, Columbus, Indianapolis; 2011: PJ20 1 & 2; 2012: Missoula; 2013: Dallas, Oklahoma City, Seattle; 2014: Tulsa; 2016: Columbia, New York City 1 & 2; 2018: London, Seattle 1 & 2; 2021: Ohana; 2022: Oklahoma City
thanks for the replies everybody, you've all convinced me to set up my gear in the basement and do a side by side of the vinyl vs cd of Backspacer once it comes out. I already planned on buying the 10c and Target versions on CD, what's one more, right?
Why would you want to buy music on vinyl, other than the nostalgia of it? The sound quality is poor compared to digital, and it's not as convenient to listen to. I had a hell of a time hooking up my turntable in my car.
But seriously, what am I missing?
You're missing the fact that it depends on the mastering. Vinyl sounds better when it's mastered better. Some vinyl is essential, others are worthless.
Others touched on this already, but I dig the subject so please forgive the long post. It's not really the difference between records vs. CDs, it's the difference between analog vs. digital recording. A digital mastering will never sound better than a quality analog recording because it's essentially breaking true sound into bits/bytes. You're losing sound. That why a good analog recording played on an analog medium (needle to groove) is the truest sound you'll ever hear. Listen to your Hendrix CDs, then play the exact same songs on an old record and tell me you don't hear more. I've always made the argument that buying new records is pointless - if you're arguing for better sound - since analog recording doesn't take place in the states anymore. Unless you're going for the aesthetics (which is another cool part of records) you may as well buy it on CD. I don't buy new music on vinyl, but am a regular at garage sales and used record shops building my record collection. Vinyl/analog = the best it's ever been. CDs/digital = one of the biggest scams ever pulled on the consumer. MP3 and other digital files = unfortunate to say the least.
I'd like to invest in a nice turntable setup, but unfortunately it looks to be quite expensive to set up. Is there a good system I can get for around 200 - 300? I've always loved record though. Just the look/feel of them..bigger artwork/packaging etc...
Bump. I've been interested in getting a setup for a while now but don't know where/how to get started. I would need everything (turntable, speakers, amp/preamp, receiver). Any advice would be greatly appreciated
start with the receiver. make sure it has a phono selection and all you need is a stereo receiver, not 5.1, 7.1, or 7.2 if it has a phono selection you won't need to worry about a preamp and then can always add an amp later on if you see fit.
getting only a stereo reciever (2.0) will allow you to spend more money on the power and sound quality of the receiver rather than bells and whistles that you'll never use.
turntable invest around 300-400 on your first, get either a direct drive, or belt driven with pitch control.
also invest in a nice cartridge....shure makes quality/affordable needles
Speakers are up to you, they won't have a direct effect on how your vinyl sounds when compared to a CD.
I'd like to invest in a nice turntable setup, but unfortunately it looks to be quite expensive to set up. Is there a good system I can get for around 200 - 300? I've always loved record though. Just the look/feel of them..bigger artwork/packaging etc...
Bump. I've been interested in getting a setup for a while now but don't know where/how to get started. I would need everything (turntable, speakers, amp/preamp, receiver). Any advice would be greatly appreciated
start with the receiver. make sure it has a phono selection and all you need is a stereo receiver, not 5.1, 7.1, or 7.2 if it has a phono selection you won't need to worry about a preamp and then can always add an amp later on if you see fit.
getting only a stereo reciever (2.0) will allow you to spend more money on the power and sound quality of the receiver rather than bells and whistles that you'll never use.
turntable invest around 300-400 on your first, get either a direct drive, or belt driven with pitch control.
also invest in a nice cartridge....shure makes quality/affordable needles
Speakers are up to you, they won't have a direct effect on how your vinyl sounds when compared to a CD.
I recommend Music Hall as a great turntable brand. Quality is excellent, price is not outrageous.
CDs sound great, no doubt about that, but you don't realise how much compression plays a part on CDs. Compare a new (mint) vinyl on a quality player against the CD recording of any album and you'll see how much warmer vinyl sounds.
There is no point on getting your dads old copy of led zepplin IV out the basement dusting it off and expecting it to sound better than the CD remasters. But listen to Off He Goes for example, on CD then on vinyl and you'll see the difference.
It's similar kind of difference between CDs and mp3s. Mp3s are even more compressed than CD quality.
I do have the records as well, but personally I'm a CD man. Consistent, good quality.
London 29-10-96, London 29/30-5-00, London 20-4-06, Reading 27-8-06, London 18-6-07, London 11-8-09, London 18-8-09, London 25-6-10, Berlin 30-6-10 / PJ20 3/4-9-11, Manchester 20-6-12, Amsterdam 26/27-6-12, EV-London 30/31-7-12, EV-Orlando 27-11-12
Others touched on this already, but I dig the subject so please forgive the long post. It's not really the difference between records vs. CDs, it's the difference between analog vs. digital recording. A digital mastering will never sound better than a quality analog recording because it's essentially breaking true sound into bits/bytes. You're losing sound. That why a good analog recording played on an analog medium (needle to groove) is the truest sound you'll ever hear. Listen to your Hendrix CDs, then play the exact same songs on an old record and tell me you don't hear more. I've always made the argument that buying new records is pointless - if you're arguing for better sound - since analog recording doesn't take place in the states anymore. Unless you're going for the aesthetics (which is another cool part of records) you may as well buy it on CD. I don't buy new music on vinyl, but am a regular at garage sales and used record shops building my record collection. Vinyl/analog = the best it's ever been. CDs/digital = one of the biggest scams ever pulled on the consumer. MP3 and other digital files = unfortunate to say the least.
I thought I had read that some PJ records were mastered differently (specifically for vinyl) Is this true?
2003: San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Seattle; 2005: Monterrey; 2006: Chicago 1 & 2, Grand Rapids, Cleveland, Detroit; 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa; 2009: Austin, LA 3 & 4, San Diego; 2010: Kansas City, St. Louis, Columbus, Indianapolis; 2011: PJ20 1 & 2; 2012: Missoula; 2013: Dallas, Oklahoma City, Seattle; 2014: Tulsa; 2016: Columbia, New York City 1 & 2; 2018: London, Seattle 1 & 2; 2021: Ohana; 2022: Oklahoma City
I'd like to invest in a nice turntable setup, but unfortunately it looks to be quite expensive to set up. Is there a good system I can get for around 200 - 300? I've always loved record though. Just the look/feel of them..bigger artwork/packaging etc...
Bump. I've been interested in getting a setup for a while now but don't know where/how to get started. I would need everything (turntable, speakers, amp/preamp, receiver). Any advice would be greatly appreciated
start with the receiver. make sure it has a phono selection and all you need is a stereo receiver, not 5.1, 7.1, or 7.2 if it has a phono selection you won't need to worry about a preamp and then can always add an amp later on if you see fit.
getting only a stereo reciever (2.0) will allow you to spend more money on the power and sound quality of the receiver rather than bells and whistles that you'll never use.
turntable invest around 300-400 on your first, get either a direct drive, or belt driven with pitch control.
also invest in a nice cartridge....shure makes quality/affordable needles
Speakers are up to you, they won't have a direct effect on how your vinyl sounds when compared to a CD.
Thanks to you and S.O. for the help. I've been putting this off for too long
2003: San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Seattle; 2005: Monterrey; 2006: Chicago 1 & 2, Grand Rapids, Cleveland, Detroit; 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa; 2009: Austin, LA 3 & 4, San Diego; 2010: Kansas City, St. Louis, Columbus, Indianapolis; 2011: PJ20 1 & 2; 2012: Missoula; 2013: Dallas, Oklahoma City, Seattle; 2014: Tulsa; 2016: Columbia, New York City 1 & 2; 2018: London, Seattle 1 & 2; 2021: Ohana; 2022: Oklahoma City
Others touched on this already, but I dig the subject so please forgive the long post. It's not really the difference between records vs. CDs, it's the difference between analog vs. digital recording. A digital mastering will never sound better than a quality analog recording because it's essentially breaking true sound into bits/bytes. You're losing sound. That why a good analog recording played on an analog medium (needle to groove) is the truest sound you'll ever hear. Listen to your Hendrix CDs, then play the exact same songs on an old record and tell me you don't hear more. I've always made the argument that buying new records is pointless - if you're arguing for better sound - since analog recording doesn't take place in the states anymore. Unless you're going for the aesthetics (which is another cool part of records) you may as well buy it on CD. I don't buy new music on vinyl, but am a regular at garage sales and used record shops building my record collection. Vinyl/analog = the best it's ever been. CDs/digital = one of the biggest scams ever pulled on the consumer. MP3 and other digital files = unfortunate to say the least.
I thought I had read that some PJ records were mastered differently (specifically for vinyl) Is this true?
I'm honestly not sure. But, I think they are recorded digitally now because there aren't analog studio still in business in America which, in my opinion, defeats the purpose of owning vinyl. To speak to the other post about compression, I completely agree. That's why digitally remastering something, technically, is a fancy way to say we're taking an old recording and eliminating some of the sound just to make it cleaner. I don't agree, however, that you won't get a better sound by dusting off your dad's old Zeppelin records. There are CDs I grew up on that I feel I never really "heard" until I acquired them on vinyl - most of the time old, dusty, basement copies. An analog recording played on an analog medium can't be improved upon digitally.
CDs sound great, no doubt about that, but you don't realise how much compression plays a part on CDs. Compare a new (mint) vinyl on a quality player against the CD recording of any album and you'll see how much warmer vinyl sounds.
There is no point on getting your dads old copy of led zepplin IV out the basement dusting it off and expecting it to sound better than the CD remasters. But listen to Off He Goes for example, on CD then on vinyl and you'll see the difference.
It's similar kind of difference between CDs and mp3s. Mp3s are even more compressed than CD quality.
I do have the records as well, but personally I'm a CD man. Consistent, good quality.
compression occurs in the mixing/mastering process not during physical production, CDs actually have more dynamic range capabilities than vinyl.
I could not agree more Vinyl is so pointless. I hate how the ten club gives you these holiday singles on vinyl I have never played one of them they take up space and when I'm tired of looking at them I throw them away! People try being cool by saying oh I have that on vinyl I think to myself why? When can you ever even play it?
it's an honest question, you could just answer it as opposed to being a smartass.[/u]
this song goes out to the Bastard who married my mama....Eddie Vedder Better Man
Didn't you realize that the probability of getting a Jack ass response was 2-5 here..
pretty sad..
I agree..the album is cool but it's not the 70's anymore...as collectors cool..but please play nice in the sand box or he is taking his shovel and going home!!!
CDs sound great, no doubt about that, but you don't realise how much compression plays a part on CDs. Compare a new (mint) vinyl on a quality player against the CD recording of any album and you'll see how much warmer vinyl sounds.
There is no point on getting your dads old copy of led zepplin IV out the basement dusting it off and expecting it to sound better than the CD remasters. But listen to Off He Goes for example, on CD then on vinyl and you'll see the difference.
It's similar kind of difference between CDs and mp3s. Mp3s are even more compressed than CD quality.
I do have the records as well, but personally I'm a CD man. Consistent, good quality.
compression occurs in the mixing/mastering process not during physical production, CDs actually have more dynamic range capabilities than vinyl.
Not true.
Cd's can only handle so much high and so much low....so it cuts it out.
That is why Vinyl is almost always a fuller sound
2006/05/25 - Boston
2008/06/30 - Mansfield
2009/10/31 - Philadelphia
2010/05/17 - Boston
2011/06/15 - Providence (Eddie Vedder)
2012/09/02 - Made in America
2013/10/17 - Worcester
2013/10/25 - Hartford
2015/09/26 - Global Citizen Festival
2016/08/05 - Fenway
2016/08/07 - Fenway
I've always made the argument that buying new records is pointless - if you're arguing for better sound - since analog recording doesn't take place in the states anymore. Unless you're going for the aesthetics (which is another cool part of records) you may as well buy it on CD. I don't buy new music on vinyl, but am a regular at garage sales and used record shops building my record collection. Vinyl/analog = the best it's ever been. CDs/digital = one of the biggest scams ever pulled on the consumer. MP3 and other digital files = unfortunate to say the least.
Don't forget that the digital recording is much higher quality (bit depth, sampling rate) than CD. Would you agree that if you sample fast enough, with enough bits that digital can not be distinguished from analog? This is what I believe, although exactly what those limits are is harder to say. Many people say that SACD/DVD-A are closer to the vinyl sound than CD.
Anyway, my point is that even modern digital recordings on vinyl can sound better than the equivalent CD.
I could not agree more Vinyl is so pointless. I hate how the ten club gives you these holiday singles on vinyl I have never played one of them they take up space and when I'm tired of looking at them I throw them away! People try being cool by saying oh I have that on vinyl I think to myself why? When can you ever even play it?
You can play them if you have a record player, dummy. :roll:
Like previously said, you get yourself a decent $200 player, decent receiver, and some great speakers and that vinyl will sound better than your ipod. Until they can recreate the warmth of vinyl on mp3 i'm sold on my records. I listen to cds mostly but anytime i'm at my place or any of my buddies we're spinning records.
couple quick examples..
Riot Act has seems to be a little more bass heavy and overall better to me on record as opposed to the cd....if you listen to a cd recording of early thrash or metal and compare it to some vinyl you'll definitely hear the difference. I've got origianl pressings of metallica's first four ablubms and the mp3's and cd's just don't compare.
Like previously said, you get yourself a decent $200 player, decent receiver, and some great speakers and that vinyl will sound better than your ipod. Until they can recreate the warmth of vinyl on mp3 i'm sold on my records. I listen to cds mostly but anytime i'm at my place or any of my buddies we're spinning records.
couple quick examples..
Riot Act has seems to be a little more bass heavy and overall better to me on record as opposed to the cd....if you listen to a cd recording of early thrash or metal and compare it to some vinyl you'll definitely hear the difference. I've got origianl pressings of metallica's first four ablubms and the mp3's and cd's just don't compare.
the Riot Act bass opinion is either in your head or is based on the cartridge your using, there's no difference in bass in digital vs. analog because the sound waves are so huge and verrrrryyyyy easy to replicate.
the Metallica comparison is spot on because CD's from the 80's and throughout the 90's were all rushed to the market without really caring about the preservation of sound, which is why in early CD's you always see that warning that the sound is compromised when going from an analog to digital transfer.
I like having both digital and vinyl.. I think putting on a vinyl is just more of a ritual.. nothing like slipping it out of the sleeve, laying it on the record player, and putting the needled over top.... So yeah, thats why i like vinyl, i like the ritual of it all
A warm sound... Digital sounds harsher... I have Vitalogy on tape, CD and record (yeah, yeah bought the album 3x); record is the best...
hmmm, don't get that, but to each his own i guess. i would say digital sounds clearer.
I don't know about clearer as my LP's are as clear as a bell (for the non scratched ones that is). Digital actually compresses and chops off the real highs and real lows. Giving digital a little colder of sound. Analog has all it's highs and lows in tact and that tends to give analog a more warmer sound.
Now this really only comes into play with albums that are recorded in analog. If it is recorded in digital, then there is no real difference between the CD and LP in sound quality. Then yeah,it comes down to pure nostalgia.
And don't knock nostalgia either. There is something to be said for playing the music format of my childhood.
But yeah, having said that, obviously there is a time and a place for LP's, CD'S, MP3's, FLAC's, and so on and so forth.
Like previously said, you get yourself a decent $200 player, decent receiver, and some great speakers and that vinyl will sound better than your ipod. Until they can recreate the warmth of vinyl on mp3 i'm sold on my records. I listen to cds mostly but anytime i'm at my place or any of my buddies we're spinning records.
Yeah, this is pretty much how I roll. CDs in the car, iPod at work, but I definitely try to play records more often than not when I'm home. At least when I'm chillin' in the man cave. Another positive about vinyl is it can be a very cheap, and fun, way to build a huge music collection. Unless you're a real collector who only wants originals, you should be able to find all the rock artists from the 60s and 70s, typically for $10 and under. And, as I've stated before, these records - as long as they were originally taken care of and you have good record cleaner and a good stylus - will usually provide a much more satisfying experience than the coldness of digital. I understand there are a lot of younger fans here though, and to most people I know under 30, the notion of physically collecting music seems weird. Y'all got me with this thread!! :P
I've always made the argument that buying new records is pointless - if you're arguing for better sound - since analog recording doesn't take place in the states anymore. Unless you're going for the aesthetics (which is another cool part of records) you may as well buy it on CD. I don't buy new music on vinyl, but am a regular at garage sales and used record shops building my record collection. Vinyl/analog = the best it's ever been. CDs/digital = one of the biggest scams ever pulled on the consumer. MP3 and other digital files = unfortunate to say the least.
Don't forget that the digital recording is much higher quality (bit depth, sampling rate) than CD. Would you agree that if you sample fast enough, with enough bits that digital can not be distinguished from analog? This is what I believe, although exactly what those limits are is harder to say. Many people say that SACD/DVD-A are closer to the vinyl sound than CD.
Anyway, my point is that even modern digital recordings on vinyl can sound better than the equivalent CD.
Comments
i just mean i like to turn up PJ's "rockers", ie, not the slow ones, as loud as i can legally. even when i'm wearing headphones.
I was in a similar situation until a couple of months ago. I had a record player for a long time with my dad's old record collection. Great stuff, all the classics you could every want, and they were all in great condition other than a bit of dust (which we all know is easy enough to fix). The stylus on my record player was busted since the thing had been through 3 or 4 moves and hadn't been used in about 10 years. A few months ago I finally got around to ordering a stylus and I've been listening to a record or two on an almost daily basis now.
I had a similar point of view before listening to vinyl. I thought "hey, there is no way vinyl can sound better than a digitally remastered CD from the 21st century." But man, was I wrong. It truly is something that can't be appreciated until you listen to a record in good quality speakers. Everyone describes it as a warmer sound, and it really is. It seems fuller, more balanced, and really is inviting.
One of the other reasons I love vinyl so much is that it forces you to be more of an active listener. I'm always listening to music, whether I'm riding the train to work, going for a run or driving. But when I listen to vinyl it really is an event. I have to pick out the album, put it on, and sit on the couch in the living room. I find myself just listening, rather than doing something else while the music is on. And of course you have to sit there and flip the record halfway through. This amount of focus/involvement might not be for some people. But I personally love it.
To the OP, it sounds like you might not have the time/space to be able to sit down and listen to an album on your couch, and that's fine. But if you do, I suggest you give it a try. I think you will be pleasantly surprised.
5/30/06 - Washington, DC
6/22/08 - Washington, DC
10/31/09 - Philadelphia, PA
8/5/16 - Fenway Park
Temple of the Dog - 11/5/2016 - Philadelphia, PA
7/1/2018 - Prague
7/3/2018 - Kraków
7/5/2018 - Berlin
I'd like to invest in a nice turntable setup, but unfortunately it looks to be quite expensive to set up. Is there a good system I can get for around 200 - 300? I've always loved record though. Just the look/feel of them..bigger artwork/packaging etc...[/quote]
Bump. I've been interested in getting a setup for a while now but don't know where/how to get started. I would need everything (turntable, speakers, amp/preamp, receiver). Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Bump. I've been interested in getting a setup for a while now but don't know where/how to get started. I would need everything (turntable, speakers, amp/preamp, receiver). Any advice would be greatly appreciated
You're missing the fact that it depends on the mastering. Vinyl sounds better when it's mastered better. Some vinyl is essential, others are worthless.
start with the receiver. make sure it has a phono selection and all you need is a stereo receiver, not 5.1, 7.1, or 7.2 if it has a phono selection you won't need to worry about a preamp and then can always add an amp later on if you see fit.
getting only a stereo reciever (2.0) will allow you to spend more money on the power and sound quality of the receiver rather than bells and whistles that you'll never use.
turntable invest around 300-400 on your first, get either a direct drive, or belt driven with pitch control.
also invest in a nice cartridge....shure makes quality/affordable needles
Speakers are up to you, they won't have a direct effect on how your vinyl sounds when compared to a CD.
I recommend Music Hall as a great turntable brand. Quality is excellent, price is not outrageous.
CDs sound great, no doubt about that, but you don't realise how much compression plays a part on CDs. Compare a new (mint) vinyl on a quality player against the CD recording of any album and you'll see how much warmer vinyl sounds.
There is no point on getting your dads old copy of led zepplin IV out the basement dusting it off and expecting it to sound better than the CD remasters. But listen to Off He Goes for example, on CD then on vinyl and you'll see the difference.
It's similar kind of difference between CDs and mp3s. Mp3s are even more compressed than CD quality.
I do have the records as well, but personally I'm a CD man. Consistent, good quality.
I thought I had read that some PJ records were mastered differently (specifically for vinyl) Is this true?
Thanks to you and S.O. for the help. I've been putting this off for too long
I'm honestly not sure. But, I think they are recorded digitally now because there aren't analog studio still in business in America which, in my opinion, defeats the purpose of owning vinyl. To speak to the other post about compression, I completely agree. That's why digitally remastering something, technically, is a fancy way to say we're taking an old recording and eliminating some of the sound just to make it cleaner. I don't agree, however, that you won't get a better sound by dusting off your dad's old Zeppelin records. There are CDs I grew up on that I feel I never really "heard" until I acquired them on vinyl - most of the time old, dusty, basement copies. An analog recording played on an analog medium can't be improved upon digitally.
compression occurs in the mixing/mastering process not during physical production, CDs actually have more dynamic range capabilities than vinyl.
that being said be ready to spend well over 500 to get the right equipment (the mid-low range of it)
Cd's are more convenient, records are just better and a bigger pain in the ass to keep nice
by csickels » 02 Sep 2009 15:56
ledvedderman wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A
it's an honest question, you could just answer it as opposed to being a smartass.[/u]
this song goes out to the Bastard who married my mama....Eddie Vedder Better Man
Didn't you realize that the probability of getting a Jack ass response was 2-5 here..
pretty sad..
I agree..the album is cool but it's not the 70's anymore...as collectors cool..but please play nice in the sand box or he is taking his shovel and going home!!!
• 2003-07-05• 2004-10-01
• 2005-10-03• 2006-05-27
• 2008-06-19• 2009-10-27 2009-10-28 •2009-10-30
• 2009-10-31
*Tres Mts 2011-03-23
*Eddie Vedder 2011-06-25
- 2013-10-21
- 2013=10-22
-2016 -04-28
-2016 -04-29
Not true.
Cd's can only handle so much high and so much low....so it cuts it out.
That is why Vinyl is almost always a fuller sound
2008/06/30 - Mansfield
2009/10/31 - Philadelphia
2010/05/17 - Boston
2011/06/15 - Providence (Eddie Vedder)
2012/09/02 - Made in America
2013/10/17 - Worcester
2013/10/25 - Hartford
2015/09/26 - Global Citizen Festival
2016/08/05 - Fenway
2016/08/07 - Fenway
the lows are equal, and the high notes that would actually cause distortion on CD very rarely come into play with rock music
Anyway, my point is that even modern digital recordings on vinyl can sound better than the equivalent CD.
You can play them if you have a record player, dummy. :roll:
Its all a matter of preference with modern recordings.
couple quick examples..
Riot Act has seems to be a little more bass heavy and overall better to me on record as opposed to the cd....if you listen to a cd recording of early thrash or metal and compare it to some vinyl you'll definitely hear the difference. I've got origianl pressings of metallica's first four ablubms and the mp3's and cd's just don't compare.
the Riot Act bass opinion is either in your head or is based on the cartridge your using, there's no difference in bass in digital vs. analog because the sound waves are so huge and verrrrryyyyy easy to replicate.
the Metallica comparison is spot on because CD's from the 80's and throughout the 90's were all rushed to the market without really caring about the preservation of sound, which is why in early CD's you always see that warning that the sound is compromised when going from an analog to digital transfer.
Now this really only comes into play with albums that are recorded in analog. If it is recorded in digital, then there is no real difference between the CD and LP in sound quality. Then yeah,it comes down to pure nostalgia.
And don't knock nostalgia either. There is something to be said for playing the music format of my childhood.
But yeah, having said that, obviously there is a time and a place for LP's, CD'S, MP3's, FLAC's, and so on and so forth.
Yeah, this is pretty much how I roll. CDs in the car, iPod at work, but I definitely try to play records more often than not when I'm home. At least when I'm chillin' in the man cave. Another positive about vinyl is it can be a very cheap, and fun, way to build a huge music collection. Unless you're a real collector who only wants originals, you should be able to find all the rock artists from the 60s and 70s, typically for $10 and under. And, as I've stated before, these records - as long as they were originally taken care of and you have good record cleaner and a good stylus - will usually provide a much more satisfying experience than the coldness of digital. I understand there are a lot of younger fans here though, and to most people I know under 30, the notion of physically collecting music seems weird. Y'all got me with this thread!! :P
Good point. Thanks for the input.
j/k