Play.com got the Track List

2

Comments

  • rriversrrivers Posts: 3,698
    drsluggo wrote:
    RiotAct10 wrote:
    I know someone who know works for the company manufacturing the cd and they told me that that photo is going to be the album cover, for reals.
    Now that I just can't believe... they've never done anything close to a band photo for a cover for just about anything.

    Except their first and biggest selling album.
    "We're fixed good, lamp-wise."
  • tcaporaletcaporale Posts: 1,577
    That wasn't a straight-up publicity shot, though.

    Still, they're obviously not using that as the cover.
  • Who fucking cares about the album cover, the song titles or what they're wearing! It's a new PJ album! Jesus lord with the complainers....
  • tcaporale wrote:
    Wow, they really are naming songs "Supersonic" and "Speed of Sound". Ouch. So cliche.
    Who cares.


    Anyone who cares about the bands integrity?
  • tcaporaletcaporale Posts: 1,577
    tcaporale wrote:
    Wow, they really are naming songs "Supersonic" and "Speed of Sound". Ouch. So cliche.
    Who cares.


    Anyone who cares about the bands integrity?
    They're fucking song titles.
  • [

    Anyone who cares about the bands integrity?[/quote]
    They're fucking song titles.[/quote]

    That is not a point in your favor.
  • tcaporaletcaporale Posts: 1,577
    [

    Anyone who cares about the bands integrity?
    They're fucking song titles.[/quote]

    That is not a point in your favor.[/quote]
    :lol:

    Are you this stupid? Really?

    Pearl Jam aren't exactly known for mindblowing song titles, most of them are actually one word long, so if anything, they're being pretty damn consistent.

    And even if the song titles do suck, I'd like to know what that has to do with integrity.
  • tcaporale wrote:
    [

    Anyone who cares about the bands integrity?
    They're fucking song titles.

    That is not a point in your favor.[/quote]
    :lol:

    Are you this stupid? Really?

    Pearl Jam aren't exactly known for mindblowing song titles, most of them are actually one word long, so if anything, they're being pretty damn consistent.

    And even if the song titles do suck, I'd like to know what that has to do with integrity.[/quote]


    Anger issues huh? If they named a song "Shemale love" would you care? How about "Snot rock". The idea of using 15 year old alt rock cliche's as song titles being a terrible idea apparently is beyond your grasp. It is annoyingly simple, which is why you don't see it as an issue.


    I take that back, actually "Shemale Love", sounds hot! So that was a bad example.
  • tcaporaletcaporale Posts: 1,577
    None of them are as intentionally hilarious as "Snot Rock". "Supersonic" isn't exactly amazing, but it's not like it's offensive. I mean, really, this is a band with song titles such as (I'll use two examples) "Get Right" and "Gone", two rather unassuming, generic titles. The point is that the title is not really any indication of the actual quality of the song.

    Sorry if I'm coming across as angry, I'm not. The word "fucking" just happens to pop into my posts every once in a while.
  • bigbadbillbigbadbill Posts: 1,758
    Elderly Woman Behind the Counter in a Small Town
    11/6/95, 11/18/97, 7/13/98, 7/14/98, 10/24/00, 10/25/00, 10/28/00, 6/2/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 7/6/06, 7/7/06, 7/9/06, 7/10/06, 7/13/06, 7/15/06, 7/16/06, 7/18/06, 10/21/06, 4/10/08, 4/13/08, 9/30/09, 10/1/09, 10/6/09, 10/7/09, 10/9/09
  • bigbadbillbigbadbill Posts: 1,758
    Wow, they really are naming songs "Supersonic" and "Speed of Sound". Ouch. So cliche.

    I'm no scientist, but aren't they the same thing?
    11/6/95, 11/18/97, 7/13/98, 7/14/98, 10/24/00, 10/25/00, 10/28/00, 6/2/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 7/6/06, 7/7/06, 7/9/06, 7/10/06, 7/13/06, 7/15/06, 7/16/06, 7/18/06, 10/21/06, 4/10/08, 4/13/08, 9/30/09, 10/1/09, 10/6/09, 10/7/09, 10/9/09
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    tcaporale wrote:
    Wow, they really are naming songs "Supersonic" and "Speed of Sound". Ouch. So cliche.
    Who cares.


    Anyone who cares about the bands integrity?

    Song titles? Integrity? Wow.... how far fetched! PJ lost their integrity because they have a song called Supersonic? Well... I guess the loss of integrity/sell out business revolving around Target is a bit of old news so one had to come up with something else......

    It is a funny (even if quite ridiculous) statement.... :mrgreen:
  • JimNasticsJimNastics Posts: 679
    bigbadbill wrote:
    Wow, they really are naming songs "Supersonic" and "Speed of Sound". Ouch. So cliche.

    I'm no scientist, but aren't they the same thing?

    Isn't supersonic faster than the speed of sound? So maybe "Supersonic" is the same song as "Speed of Sound", but played faster. Man, can you imagine the moaning on this forum then :mrgreen:
  • nice jacket!...Stone is putting the Stone back in Stone-wash.... :mrgreen::mrgreen:
  • wolfamongwolveswolfamongwolves Posts: 2,414
    I gotta agree that most of those song titles are terrible
    93: Slane
    96: Cork, Dublin
    00: Dublin
    06: London, Dublin
    07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
    09: Manchester, London
    10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
    11: San José
    12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
  • The most interesting thing on Play.com is the separate listing for a "limited edition gatefold sleeve" version of the Backspacer CD.

    http://www.play.com/Music/CD/4-/1107243 ... oduct.html
    "I'll end up alone like I began..."

    "You need the patience of like a National Geographic photographer sitting underneath the bush in a tent, trying to get a picture of zebras fucking or something for the first time." -Eddie Vedder
  • DiRtyFranK38DiRtyFranK38 Posts: 3,131
    i swear .. people will always find something to complain about before they even hear the album. i still do not see a single problem with any one of the song titles. i actually really like them! who really cares!? we know the lyrics will be great and so will the music! come on now! tough crowd here .
    2006: Hartford
    2008: MSG 1, Hartford, Mansfield 2, Ed Solo NYC 1
    2009: London (O2), Philly 1, 2, 3, & 4
    2010: Hartford, Boston, MSG 1 & 2
    2011: Ed Solo Hartford
    2012: Philly (MIA Fest)
    2013: Worcester 2, Brooklyn 1 & 2, Hartford
  • OffHeGoes132OffHeGoes132 Posts: 594
    i swear .. people will always find something to complain about before they even hear the album. i still do not see a single problem with any one of the song titles. i actually really like them! who really cares!? we know the lyrics will be great and so will the music! come on now! tough crowd here .

    Agree. It's the same shit every time an album's released; something new for everyone to pick at. Quite frankly I don't give a shit about album covers, song titles, or band pictures (so long as they're all healthy) - all I care about is the quality of their music/live performances when it comes to new albums. Who would have ever thought the title, 'Dirty Frank' would be any good? That song fuckin' rocks.
  • drsluggodrsluggo Posts: 4,742
    The most interesting thing on Play.com is the separate listing for a "limited edition gatefold sleeve" version of the Backspacer CD.

    http://www.play.com/Music/CD/4-/1107243 ... oduct.html
    I think that's limited to Super Targets... regular ghetto targets get the standard release. ;)
  • SVRDhand13SVRDhand13 Posts: 26,522
    The song titles are pretty lame but I won't give a shit if the album sounds good.
    severed hand thirteen
    2006: Gorge 7/23 2008: Hartford 6/27 Beacon 7/1 2009: Spectrum 10/30-31
    2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
    2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
    2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
    2017: RRHoF 4/7   2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4   2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18 
    2022: MSG 9/11  2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
    2025: Pittsburgh 5/16+5/18
  • LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    I gotta agree that most of those song titles are terrible
    I'm trying to understand this, but how are song titles terrible? They are just words used as reference. Do you think single, common words like "Alive", "Black" "Down", "Porch" are more interesting?

    These new titles are pretty typical for the band.
  • LONGWAVELONGWAVE Posts: 153
    I just heard BACKSPACER and I must say it is pretty good! So i do think it will leak by mid august... FYI i do not have the record i just heard it so don't send me messages for links :)

    LW
    "Rock Over London, Rock On Chicago"
  • LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    LONGWAVE wrote:
    I just heard BACKSPACER and I must say it is pretty good! So i do think it will leak by mid august... FYI i do not have the record i just heard it so don't send me messages for links :)

    LW
    Where did you hear it? How does the O'Brien mix sound? What would you compare it to?
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    LONGWAVE wrote:
    I just heard BACKSPACER and I must say it is pretty good! So i do think it will leak by mid august... FYI i do not have the record i just heard it so don't send me messages for links :)

    LW

    Come again?
  • rriversrrivers Posts: 3,698
    bigbadbill wrote:
    Wow, they really are naming songs "Supersonic" and "Speed of Sound". Ouch. So cliche.

    I'm no scientist, but aren't they the same thing?

    I looked into this (ie went to wikipedia) when the German mag first leaked the titles because I thought the same thing. The other poster is right, "supersonic" means faster than the speed of sound. I like that because maybe there is a "Daughter"/"RVM" connection. ?
    "We're fixed good, lamp-wise."
  • bigbadbillbigbadbill Posts: 1,758
    Upon first seeing the titles, people might be shocked. But when you first see any Pearl Jam new album tracklist, it does take a little time to get used to. And if it's 36 minutes long, then that's the way it is. I'd rather have 36 minutes of 11 good songs, then 50-60 minutes of good songs and fillers.
    11/6/95, 11/18/97, 7/13/98, 7/14/98, 10/24/00, 10/25/00, 10/28/00, 6/2/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 7/6/06, 7/7/06, 7/9/06, 7/10/06, 7/13/06, 7/15/06, 7/16/06, 7/18/06, 10/21/06, 4/10/08, 4/13/08, 9/30/09, 10/1/09, 10/6/09, 10/7/09, 10/9/09
  • OffHeGoes132OffHeGoes132 Posts: 594
    LONGWAVE wrote:
    I just heard BACKSPACER and I must say it is pretty good! So i do think it will leak by mid august... FYI i do not have the record i just heard it so don't send me messages for links :)

    LW

    Que??????
  • LONGRDLONGRD Posts: 6,036
    bigbadbill wrote:
    Upon first seeing the titles, people might be shocked. But when you first see any Pearl Jam new album tracklist, it does take a little time to get used to. And if it's 36 minutes long, then that's the way it is. I'd rather have 36 minutes of 11 good songs, then 50-60 minutes of good songs and fillers.
    I just hope you're right!

    some of the greatest albums only have 8-11 songs on it.
    so Backspacer could be a classic?
    PJ- 04/29/2003.06/24,25,27,28,30/2008.10/27,28,30,31/2009
    EV- 08/09,10/2008.06/08,09/2009
  • rriversrrivers Posts: 3,698
    bigbadbill wrote:
    Upon first seeing the titles, people might be shocked. But when you first see any Pearl Jam new album tracklist, it does take a little time to get used to. And if it's 36 minutes long, then that's the way it is. I'd rather have 36 minutes of 11 good songs, then 50-60 minutes of good songs and fillers.

    Exactly. I always think of Led Zeppelin II when people talk about not enough songs or short albums. 9 songs, 41 minutes. I wonder if it would have been thought of as such a classic album, had it had 2-4 less quality songs on it.
    "We're fixed good, lamp-wise."
  • rriversrrivers Posts: 3,698
    bigbadbill wrote:
    Upon first seeing the titles, people might be shocked. But when you first see any Pearl Jam new album tracklist, it does take a little time to get used to. And if it's 36 minutes long, then that's the way it is. I'd rather have 36 minutes of 11 good songs, then 50-60 minutes of good songs and fillers.

    Binaural is one album that I remember really liking the song titles when the track list came out. Don't really have a point, but it's the one album I specifically remember thinking, "Cool song names!"
    "We're fixed good, lamp-wise."
Sign In or Register to comment.