Dem Party

12627293132

Comments

  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 9,987
    JC29856 said:
    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/328794-house-dems-campaign-arm-raises-31m-in-first-quarter

    The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) raised $13.2 million in March, closing out the first fundraising quarter with a record $31 million in donations.

    Bank of America made the largest single donation to date, $5,000,000 on 3/31/17! Wonder how they can afford those amounts?
    Corporations are people my friend. Reap what you sow and stop schniveling. It's unbecoming.
    09/15/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/29/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield, MA; 08/18/08, O2 London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL;

    "If you're looking down on someone, it better be to extend them a hand to lift them up."

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    mrussel1 said:
    JC29856 said:
    An IT staffer getting arrested on bank fraud vindicates your vote for Trump.  Good to see a liberal like you make the right call. 
    The IT staffer and bank fraud

    @RepScottPerry now discussing the extensive possible breach into House server by the #AwanBrothers believes “much more to be discovered”

    Imran Awan’s younger brother was making $160,000 tax payer dollars at 20 years old with little or no IT experience @lukerosiak says
    “Why was a 20 year old with little skills making $160,000 in Congress?” @RepDeSantis asks @lukerosiak about his investigation.

    https://www.circa.com/story/2017/10/10/politics/house-reps-host-capitol-hill-caucus-on-Awan-brothers-IT-scandal
    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 7,810
    JC29856 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    JC29856 said:
    An IT staffer getting arrested on bank fraud vindicates your vote for Trump.  Good to see a liberal like you make the right call. 
    The IT staffer and bank fraud

    @RepScottPerry now discussing the extensive possible breach into House server by the #AwanBrothers believes “much more to be discovered”

    Imran Awan’s younger brother was making $160,000 tax payer dollars at 20 years old with little or no IT experience @lukerosiak says
    “Why was a 20 year old with little skills making $160,000 in Congress?” @RepDeSantis asks @lukerosiak about his investigation.

    https://www.circa.com/story/2017/10/10/politics/house-reps-host-capitol-hill-caucus-on-Awan-brothers-IT-scandal
    And somehow, if any of this is true, it vindicates your vote for Trump... Non-sequitur....  
    Got it.  I'm so glad all of the EPA regulations to protect our environment are being rolled back.   That was a good trade off because of...you know...Debbie Wasserman and all..
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    remember when Donna Brazile:
    said the podesta emails were fake
    gave Hillary debate questions
    lied about giving the debates questions
    then finally admitted she cheated and gave Hillary debate questions
    praised Weinstein
    ....her reward? at large delegate for Dems!
     
    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/355954-dnc-chairman-aims-for-diversity-with-delegate-nominations

    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 9,519
    JC29856 said:
    remember when Donna Brazile:
    said the podesta emails were fake
    gave Hillary debate questions
    lied about giving the debates questions
    then finally admitted she cheated and gave Hillary debate questions
    praised Weinstein
    ....her reward? at large delegate for Dems!
     
    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/355954-dnc-chairman-aims-for-diversity-with-delegate-nominations

    Better vote for Richard Spencer next time, that'll show 'em!
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    rgambs said:
    JC29856 said:
    remember when Donna Brazile:
    said the podesta emails were fake
    gave Hillary debate questions
    lied about giving the debates questions
    then finally admitted she cheated and gave Hillary debate questions
    praised Weinstein
    ....her reward? at large delegate for Dems!
     
    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/355954-dnc-chairman-aims-for-diversity-with-delegate-nominations

    Better vote for Richard Spencer next time, that'll show 'em!
    Spencer, the media darling! he has stolen some of david dukes TV time.
    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 9,987
    JC29856 said:
    remember when Donna Brazile:
    said the podesta emails were fake
    gave Hillary debate questions
    lied about giving the debates questions
    then finally admitted she cheated and gave Hillary debate questions
    praised Weinstein
    ....her reward? at large delegate for Dems!
     
    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/355954-dnc-chairman-aims-for-diversity-with-delegate-nominations

    Remember when Trump inquired about the trump campaign’s ties to Russia investigation and wanted it stopped 7 times? His reward? Denigrating a gold star wife!
    09/15/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/29/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield, MA; 08/18/08, O2 London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL;

    "If you're looking down on someone, it better be to extend them a hand to lift them up."

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 7,810
    Your concern is noted. 
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    edited October 30
    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 7,810
    Awesome.  Post some more tweets that I'm not reading.  Maybe throw in a You Tube video as a cherry.
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Behind that bush over there.Posts: 28,988
    mrussel1 said:
    Awesome.  Post some more tweets that I'm not reading.  Maybe throw in a You Tube video as a cherry.

    At least they're tweets and not a link to some virus infected conspiracy website.
    chinese-happy.jpg
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • IndifferenceIndifference Posts: 2,233
    Interesting article by Donna Brazile on the Dem party https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774
    (112) 1990's=3, 2000's=53, 2010's=55, US=82, CAN=13, Europe=11 ,New Zealand=2, Australia=2
    Mexico=1, Colombia=1
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    edited November 2
    Interesting: I think this is an excerpt from Braziles book
    Donna still referring to Russian hacks
    She talks about Hillarys money raising scam which I detailed on a post or two in here
    I may actually by this book!

    Under FEC law, an individual can contribute a maximum of $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign. But the limits are much higher for contributions to state parties and a party’s national committee.

    Individuals who had maxed out their $2,700 contribution limit to the campaign could write an additional check for $353,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund—that figure represented $10,000 to each of the thirty-two states’ parties who were part of the Victory Fund agreement—$320,000—and $33,400 to the DNC. The money would be deposited in the states first, and transferred to the DNC shortly after that. Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to Brooklyn.

    “Wait,” I said. “That victory fund was supposed to be for whoever was the nominee, and the state party races. You’re telling me that Hillary has been controlling it since before she got the nomination?”

    Gary said the campaign had to do it or the party would collapse.


    Post edited by JC29856 on
    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    edited November 2
    closed thread since I cant quote I copied from 10/16

    The $353,400 individual donation explained.

    Voter donation limits to individual campaigns are $2,700

    Limit Donation to a state Democratic Party is: $10,000 per state

    Max donation to the DNC is: $33,400 to the dollar.

    32 states have a "stake" in her victory fund, meaning they are looking for a return on their investment.

    What Hillary is doing currently is having people donating $10,000 to each state through this victory fund, and $33,400 to the DNC. But the issue is, that most of the money is going into this fund for her campaign, but she promises these states and the DNC a senate majority. That is why superdelegates pledged so early on. This is where the problem is. It is laundering money through this fund into her campaign.

    Let's calculate this: $10,000 x 32 states = $320,000

    $320,000 + $33,400 max donation to the DNC = $353,400.

    Given that the Hillary Clinton Victory Fund has specifically disclosed that approximately 28.27% of the funds went to Hillary Clinton (9.5/33.6m) while only 16.37% went down ticket (5.5/33.6m)....

    353,400 * 0.2827 = 99,906.18 directly to Hillary Clinton.

    $3,330.21 for SOME of the state parties. Not individual candidates, "the party".

    Now, the individual campaign contributions limit is $2,700.

    $99,906.18 / $2,700 = 37.002288...

    Thirty seven times the individual contributions amount. GENIUS!

    Hillary Victory Fund is spread out between Hillary's campaign, the DNC and then state parties. The state parties simply send the money back to the DNC (legal loop hole) where it can be used to help Hillary. The down ticket Democrats, the individuals think they are getting help from Hilliary and the DNC. It's a beautiful thing.
    Post edited by JC29856 on
    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

    Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

    A few questions:
    Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
    Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
    What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?


    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • benjsbenjs Toronto, ONPosts: 6,935
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

    Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

    A few questions:
    Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
    Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
    What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?


    Honestly, are you high?

    You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one. 

    The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

    Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

    A few questions:
    Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
    Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
    What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?


    Honestly, are you high?

    You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one. 

    The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
    Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157
    Date: 2015-09-04 10:07
    We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.




    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    anyone remember nate silver?

    May 26, 2016 at 1:36 PM

    The System Isn’t ‘Rigged’ Against Sanders

    Clinton’s winning because more Democrats want her to be the nominee.


    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-system-isnt-rigged-against-sanders/

    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • benjsbenjs Toronto, ONPosts: 6,935
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

    Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

    A few questions:
    Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
    Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
    What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?


    Honestly, are you high?

    You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one. 

    The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
    Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157
    Date: 2015-09-04 10:07
    We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.




    Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 3,260
    JC29856 said:
    closed thread since I cant quote I copied from 10/16

    The $353,400 individual donation explained.

    Voter donation limits to individual campaigns are $2,700

    Limit Donation to a state Democratic Party is: $10,000 per state

    Max donation to the DNC is: $33,400 to the dollar.

    32 states have a "stake" in her victory fund, meaning they are looking for a return on their investment.

    What Hillary is doing currently is having people donating $10,000 to each state through this victory fund, and $33,400 to the DNC. But the issue is, that most of the money is going into this fund for her campaign, but she promises these states and the DNC a senate majority. That is why superdelegates pledged so early on. This is where the problem is. It is laundering money through this fund into her campaign.

    Let's calculate this: $10,000 x 32 states = $320,000

    $320,000 + $33,400 max donation to the DNC = $353,400.

    Given that the Hillary Clinton Victory Fund has specifically disclosed that approximately 28.27% of the funds went to Hillary Clinton (9.5/33.6m) while only 16.37% went down ticket (5.5/33.6m)....

    353,400 * 0.2827 = 99,906.18 directly to Hillary Clinton.

    $3,330.21 for SOME of the state parties. Not individual candidates, "the party".

    Now, the individual campaign contributions limit is $2,700.

    $99,906.18 / $2,700 = 37.002288...

    Thirty seven times the individual contributions amount. GENIUS!

    Hillary Victory Fund is spread out between Hillary's campaign, the DNC and then state parties. The state parties simply send the money back to the DNC (legal loop hole) where it can be used to help Hillary. The down ticket Democrats, the individuals think they are getting help from Hilliary and the DNC. It's a beautiful thing.



    https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4fe8jy/bernie_sanders_team_just_accused_hillary_clinton/
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 9,987
    Hypothesis? Hahahahahahaha! Thanks for the laugh! 
    09/15/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/29/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield, MA; 08/18/08, O2 London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL;

    "If you're looking down on someone, it better be to extend them a hand to lift them up."

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

    Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

    A few questions:
    Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
    Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
    What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?


    Honestly, are you high?

    You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one. 

    The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
    Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157
    Date: 2015-09-04 10:07
    We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.




    Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
    no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump.
    currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine. 
    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 7,810
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

    Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

    A few questions:
    Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
    Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
    What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?


    Honestly, are you high?

    You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one. 

    The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
    Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157
    Date: 2015-09-04 10:07
    We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.




    Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
    no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump.
    currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine. 
    Man, I'm a Democrat.. am I corrupt cheater?  Did I disenfranchise anyone?  I don't remember doing this, but hey..maybe I"m like Jeff Sessions and can't remember things I say and do.  
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 9,987
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

    Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

    A few questions:
    Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
    Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
    What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?


    Honestly, are you high?

    You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one. 

    The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
    Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157
    Date: 2015-09-04 10:07
    We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.




    Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
    no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump.
    currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine. 
    What are you going to claim when it’s revealed the republicans colluded with Russia to throw an election? There would have been 3MM more votes for trump if Bernie were the nominee. 
    09/15/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/29/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield, MA; 08/18/08, O2 London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL;

    "If you're looking down on someone, it better be to extend them a hand to lift them up."

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 8,763
    mrussel1 said:
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

    Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

    A few questions:
    Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
    Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
    What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?


    Honestly, are you high?

    You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one. 

    The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
    Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157
    Date: 2015-09-04 10:07
    We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.




    Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
    no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump.
    currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine. 
    Man, I'm a Democrat.. am I corrupt cheater?  Did I disenfranchise anyone?  I don't remember doing this, but hey..maybe I"m like Jeff Sessions and can't remember things I say and do.  
    mruss, you will like this, you and Jimmy share a favorite word!



    (And these questions can be re-phrased and asked about 90% of what you asked)
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 3,260
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

    Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

    A few questions:
    Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
    Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
    What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?


    Honestly, are you high?

    You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one. 

    The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
    Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157
    Date: 2015-09-04 10:07
    We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.




    Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
    no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump.
    currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine. 
    What are you going to claim when it’s revealed the republicans colluded with Russia to throw an election? There would have been 3MM more votes for trump if Bernie were the nominee. 

    How do people seem to forget Bernie was an independent until he decided to run as a democrat, even then it was as a 'social' democrat?  He never had a shot at the dnc nomination, much less the presidency.  Bernie was just intended to be a sacrificial lamb to play nice with Hillary through the nomination process anyways.  If he was ever serious about running, he would have been better off as an independent or with the socialist party.  You won't find me complimenting Gary Johnson too often, but at least he knows his place in the world.  I would have enjoyed watching Gary and Bernie debate each other.  
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 7,810
    JC29856 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

    Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

    A few questions:
    Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
    Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
    What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?


    Honestly, are you high?

    You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one. 

    The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
    Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157
    Date: 2015-09-04 10:07
    We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.




    Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
    no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump.
    currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine. 
    Man, I'm a Democrat.. am I corrupt cheater?  Did I disenfranchise anyone?  I don't remember doing this, but hey..maybe I"m like Jeff Sessions and can't remember things I say and do.  
    mruss, you will like this, you and Jimmy share a favorite word!



    See?  Unanswered questions.  You lob bizarre accusations and statements, you get challenged, you change the subject.  That's how it goes.
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 6,095
    The groundwork is set for republicans to compartmentalize trump and make this disaster digestible for them. For several months we had the Obama did it too theme. It’s always been ‘Crooked Hillary is just as bad’. And since then it’s the exaggeration of scandals that we already knew about or aren’t really scandals, e.g. Obama spying on political rivals, uranium deal, and now DNC corruption. And don’t forget Bill Clinton’s sexual harassment!
Sign In or Register to comment.