The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) raised $13.2
million in March, closing out the first fundraising quarter with a
record $31 million in donations.
Bank of America made the largest single donation to date, $5,000,000 on 3/31/17! Wonder how they can afford those amounts?
Corporations are people my friend. Reap what you sow and stop schniveling. It's unbecoming.
An IT staffer getting arrested on bank fraud vindicates your vote for Trump. Good to see a liberal like you make the right call.
The IT staffer and bank fraud
@RepScottPerry now discussing the extensive possible breach into House server by the #AwanBrothers believes “much more to be discovered”
Imran Awan’s younger brother was making $160,000 tax payer dollars at 20 years old with little or no IT experience @lukerosiak says “Why was a 20 year old with little skills making $160,000 in Congress?” @RepDeSantis asks @lukerosiak about his investigation.
An IT staffer getting arrested on bank fraud vindicates your vote for Trump. Good to see a liberal like you make the right call.
The IT staffer and bank fraud
@RepScottPerry now discussing the extensive possible breach into House server by the #AwanBrothers believes “much more to be discovered”
Imran Awan’s younger brother was making $160,000 tax payer dollars at 20 years old with little or no IT experience @lukerosiak says “Why was a 20 year old with little skills making $160,000 in Congress?” @RepDeSantis asks @lukerosiak about his investigation.
And somehow, if any of this is true, it vindicates your vote for Trump... Non-sequitur.... Got it. I'm so glad all of the EPA regulations to protect our environment are being rolled back. That was a good trade off because of...you know...Debbie Wasserman and all..
remember when Donna Brazile: said the podesta emails were fake gave Hillary debate questions lied about giving the debates questions then finally admitted she cheated and gave Hillary debate questions praised Weinstein ....her reward? at large delegate for Dems!
remember when Donna Brazile: said the podesta emails were fake gave Hillary debate questions lied about giving the debates questions then finally admitted she cheated and gave Hillary debate questions praised Weinstein ....her reward? at large delegate for Dems!
remember when Donna Brazile: said the podesta emails were fake gave Hillary debate questions lied about giving the debates questions then finally admitted she cheated and gave Hillary debate questions praised Weinstein ....her reward? at large delegate for Dems!
remember when Donna Brazile: said the podesta emails were fake gave Hillary debate questions lied about giving the debates questions then finally admitted she cheated and gave Hillary debate questions praised Weinstein ....her reward? at large delegate for Dems!
Remember when Trump inquired about the trump campaign’s ties to Russia investigation and wanted it stopped 7 times? His reward? Denigrating a gold star wife!
Interesting: I think this is an excerpt from Braziles book Donna still referring to Russian hacks She talks about Hillarys money raising scam which I detailed on a post or two in here I may actually by this book!
Under FEC law, an individual can contribute a maximum of $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign. But the limits are much higher for contributions to state parties and a party’s national committee.
Individuals who had maxed out their $2,700 contribution limit to the campaign could write an additional check for $353,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund—that figure represented $10,000 to each of the thirty-two states’ parties who were part of the Victory Fund agreement—$320,000—and $33,400 to the DNC. The money would be deposited in the states first, and transferred to the DNC shortly after that. Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to Brooklyn.
“Wait,” I said. “That victory fund was supposed to be for whoever was the nominee, and the state party races. You’re telling me that Hillary has been controlling it since before she got the nomination?”
Gary said the campaign had to do it or the party would collapse.
closed thread since I cant quote I copied from 10/16
The $353,400 individual donation explained.
Voter donation limits to individual campaigns are $2,700
Limit Donation to a state Democratic Party is: $10,000 per state
Max donation to the DNC is: $33,400 to the dollar.
32 states have a "stake" in her victory fund, meaning they are looking for a return on their investment.
What
Hillary is doing currently is having people donating $10,000 to each
state through this victory fund, and $33,400 to the DNC. But the issue
is, that most of the money is going into this fund for her campaign, but
she promises these states and the DNC a senate majority. That is why
superdelegates pledged so early on. This is where the problem is. It is
laundering money through this fund into her campaign.
Let's calculate this: $10,000 x 32 states = $320,000
$320,000 + $33,400 max donation to the DNC = $353,400.
Given
that the Hillary Clinton Victory Fund has specifically disclosed that
approximately 28.27% of the funds went to Hillary Clinton (9.5/33.6m)
while only 16.37% went down ticket (5.5/33.6m)....
353,400 * 0.2827 = 99,906.18 directly to Hillary Clinton.
$3,330.21 for SOME of the state parties. Not individual candidates, "the party".
Now, the individual campaign contributions limit is $2,700.
$99,906.18 / $2,700 = 37.002288...
Thirty seven times the individual contributions amount. GENIUS!
Hillary
Victory Fund is spread out between Hillary's campaign, the DNC and then
state parties. The state parties simply send the money back to the DNC
(legal loop hole) where it can be used to help Hillary. The down ticket
Democrats, the individuals think they are getting help from Hilliary and
the DNC. It's a beautiful thing.
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions: Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian? Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian? What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions: Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian? Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian? What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
Honestly, are you high?
You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one.
The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions: Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian? Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian? What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
Honestly, are you high?
You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one.
The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157 Date: 2015-09-04 10:07 We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already
understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all
move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions: Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian? Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian? What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
Honestly, are you high?
You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one.
The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157 Date: 2015-09-04 10:07 We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already
understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all
move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.
Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
closed thread since I cant quote I copied from 10/16
The $353,400 individual donation explained.
Voter donation limits to individual campaigns are $2,700
Limit Donation to a state Democratic Party is: $10,000 per state
Max donation to the DNC is: $33,400 to the dollar.
32 states have a "stake" in her victory fund, meaning they are looking for a return on their investment.
What
Hillary is doing currently is having people donating $10,000 to each
state through this victory fund, and $33,400 to the DNC. But the issue
is, that most of the money is going into this fund for her campaign, but
she promises these states and the DNC a senate majority. That is why
superdelegates pledged so early on. This is where the problem is. It is
laundering money through this fund into her campaign.
Let's calculate this: $10,000 x 32 states = $320,000
$320,000 + $33,400 max donation to the DNC = $353,400.
Given
that the Hillary Clinton Victory Fund has specifically disclosed that
approximately 28.27% of the funds went to Hillary Clinton (9.5/33.6m)
while only 16.37% went down ticket (5.5/33.6m)....
353,400 * 0.2827 = 99,906.18 directly to Hillary Clinton.
$3,330.21 for SOME of the state parties. Not individual candidates, "the party".
Now, the individual campaign contributions limit is $2,700.
$99,906.18 / $2,700 = 37.002288...
Thirty seven times the individual contributions amount. GENIUS!
Hillary
Victory Fund is spread out between Hillary's campaign, the DNC and then
state parties. The state parties simply send the money back to the DNC
(legal loop hole) where it can be used to help Hillary. The down ticket
Democrats, the individuals think they are getting help from Hilliary and
the DNC. It's a beautiful thing.
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions: Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian? Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian? What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
Honestly, are you high?
You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one.
The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157 Date: 2015-09-04 10:07 We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already
understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all
move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.
Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump. currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine.
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions: Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian? Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian? What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
Honestly, are you high?
You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one.
The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157 Date: 2015-09-04 10:07 We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already
understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all
move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.
Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump. currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine.
Man, I'm a Democrat.. am I corrupt cheater? Did I disenfranchise anyone? I don't remember doing this, but hey..maybe I"m like Jeff Sessions and can't remember things I say and do.
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions: Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian? Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian? What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
Honestly, are you high?
You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one.
The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157 Date: 2015-09-04 10:07 We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already
understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all
move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.
Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump. currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine.
What are you going to claim when it’s revealed the republicans colluded with Russia to throw an election? There would have been 3MM more votes for trump if Bernie were the nominee.
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions: Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian? Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian? What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
Honestly, are you high?
You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one.
The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157 Date: 2015-09-04 10:07 We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already
understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all
move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.
Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump. currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine.
Man, I'm a Democrat.. am I corrupt cheater? Did I disenfranchise anyone? I don't remember doing this, but hey..maybe I"m like Jeff Sessions and can't remember things I say and do.
mruss, you will like this, you and Jimmy share a favorite word!
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions: Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian? Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian? What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
Honestly, are you high?
You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one.
The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157 Date: 2015-09-04 10:07 We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already
understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all
move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.
Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump. currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine.
What are you going to claim when it’s revealed the republicans colluded with Russia to throw an election? There would have been 3MM more votes for trump if Bernie were the nominee.
How do people seem to forget Bernie was an independent until he decided to run as a democrat, even then it was as a 'social' democrat? He never had a shot at the dnc nomination, much less the presidency. Bernie was just intended to be a sacrificial lamb to play nice with Hillary through the nomination process anyways. If he was ever serious about running, he would have been better off as an independent or with the socialist party. You won't find me complimenting Gary Johnson too often, but at least he knows his place in the world. I would have enjoyed watching Gary and Bernie debate each other.
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions: Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian? Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian? What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
Honestly, are you high?
You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one.
The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
Brazile knew four months after Hilliary announced and a year before the nomination, why is she suddenly speaking out now? Book sales?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157 Date: 2015-09-04 10:07 We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already
understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all
move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.
Do you care to come down from your mountain and enlighten us on your actual hypothesis, rather than making us guess? If I read all of your damn links, I'd have no time to do my job.
no hypothesis: the dnc and the democrats are corrupt cheaters. they disenfranchised voters and handed the nomination to the only living person on the planet that could lose to Trump. currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine.
Man, I'm a Democrat.. am I corrupt cheater? Did I disenfranchise anyone? I don't remember doing this, but hey..maybe I"m like Jeff Sessions and can't remember things I say and do.
mruss, you will like this, you and Jimmy share a favorite word!
The groundwork is set for republicans to compartmentalize trump and make this disaster digestible for them. For several months we had the Obama did it too theme. It’s always been ‘Crooked Hillary is just as bad’. And since then it’s the exaggeration of scandals that we already knew about or aren’t really scandals, e.g. Obama spying on political rivals, uranium deal, and now DNC corruption. And don’t forget Bill Clinton’s sexual harassment!
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
@RepScottPerry now discussing the extensive possible breach into House server by the #AwanBrothers believes “much more to be discovered”
Imran Awan’s younger brother was making $160,000 tax payer dollars at 20 years old with little or no IT experience @lukerosiak says
“Why was a 20 year old with little skills making $160,000 in Congress?” @RepDeSantis asks @lukerosiak about his investigation.
https://www.circa.com/story/2017/10/10/politics/house-reps-host-capitol-hill-caucus-on-Awan-brothers-IT-scandal
Got it. I'm so glad all of the EPA regulations to protect our environment are being rolled back. That was a good trade off because of...you know...Debbie Wasserman and all..
said the podesta emails were fake
gave Hillary debate questions
lied about giving the debates questions
then finally admitted she cheated and gave Hillary debate questions
praised Weinstein
....her reward? at large delegate for Dems!
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/355954-dnc-chairman-aims-for-diversity-with-delegate-nominations
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
At least they're tweets and not a link to some virus infected conspiracy website.
https://theintercept.com/2017/10/31/yemen-war-us-military-house-resolution/
SHOW COUNT: (159) 1990's=3, 2000's=53, 2010/20's=103, US=118, CAN=15, Europe=20 ,New Zealand=2, Australia=2
Mexico=1, Colombia=1
Upcoming: Aucklandx2, Gold Coast, Melbournex2
Donna still referring to Russian hacks
She talks about Hillarys money raising scam which I detailed on a post or two in here
I may actually by this book!
Under FEC law, an individual can contribute a maximum of $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign. But the limits are much higher for contributions to state parties and a party’s national committee.
Individuals who had maxed out their $2,700 contribution limit to the campaign could write an additional check for $353,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund—that figure represented $10,000 to each of the thirty-two states’ parties who were part of the Victory Fund agreement—$320,000—and $33,400 to the DNC. The money would be deposited in the states first, and transferred to the DNC shortly after that. Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to Brooklyn.
“Wait,” I said. “That victory fund was supposed to be for whoever was the nominee, and the state party races. You’re telling me that Hillary has been controlling it since before she got the nomination?”
Gary said the campaign had to do it or the party would collapse.
The $353,400 individual donation explained.
Voter donation limits to individual campaigns are $2,700
Limit Donation to a state Democratic Party is: $10,000 per state
Max donation to the DNC is: $33,400 to the dollar.
32 states have a "stake" in her victory fund, meaning they are looking for a return on their investment.
What Hillary is doing currently is having people donating $10,000 to each state through this victory fund, and $33,400 to the DNC. But the issue is, that most of the money is going into this fund for her campaign, but she promises these states and the DNC a senate majority. That is why superdelegates pledged so early on. This is where the problem is. It is laundering money through this fund into her campaign.
Let's calculate this: $10,000 x 32 states = $320,000
$320,000 + $33,400 max donation to the DNC = $353,400.
Given that the Hillary Clinton Victory Fund has specifically disclosed that approximately 28.27% of the funds went to Hillary Clinton (9.5/33.6m) while only 16.37% went down ticket (5.5/33.6m)....
353,400 * 0.2827 = 99,906.18 directly to Hillary Clinton.
$3,330.21 for SOME of the state parties. Not individual candidates, "the party".
Now, the individual campaign contributions limit is $2,700.
$99,906.18 / $2,700 = 37.002288...
Thirty seven times the individual contributions amount. GENIUS!
Hillary Victory Fund is spread out between Hillary's campaign, the DNC and then state parties. The state parties simply send the money back to the DNC (legal loop hole) where it can be used to help Hillary. The down ticket Democrats, the individuals think they are getting help from Hilliary and the DNC. It's a beautiful thing.
Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
A few questions:Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?
You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one.
The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24157
Date: 2015-09-04 10:07
We are already performing in the finance , which the Secretary already understands . Come to a compromised future understanding and we all move forward for super Tuesday while raising the millions $.
May 26, 2016 at 1:36 PM
The System Isn’t ‘Rigged’ Against Sanders
Clinton’s winning because more Democrats want her to be the nominee.
By Harry Enten and Nate Silver
Filed under 2016 Election
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-system-isnt-rigged-against-sanders/
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4fe8jy/bernie_sanders_team_just_accused_hillary_clinton/
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
currently, I'm looking into how the russians could have implemented the super delegate system in the dnc nomination process where a designees vote counts twice as much as mine.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
How do people seem to forget Bernie was an independent until he decided to run as a democrat, even then it was as a 'social' democrat? He never had a shot at the dnc nomination, much less the presidency. Bernie was just intended to be a sacrificial lamb to play nice with Hillary through the nomination process anyways. If he was ever serious about running, he would have been better off as an independent or with the socialist party. You won't find me complimenting Gary Johnson too often, but at least he knows his place in the world. I would have enjoyed watching Gary and Bernie debate each other.