45/47 DoJ v2.0
Comments
-
First, the FBI “directed” New York law enforcement to cease their Epstein investigations in 2019. Now, it has been revealed the state of New Mexico was also investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s ranch in 2019, but the DOJ intervened and closed the case. https://trib.al/pG84WFV_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Kash Patel baselessly fired an elite team of agents specializing in foreign threats from the Middle East just days before Donald Trump launched an illegal military campaign in Iran. https://trib.al/P46UGeh_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
mickeyrat said:Meidastouch adbook post....BREAKING: The Trump administration is expected to abandon its defense of executive orders targeting major law firms — with the DOJ set to drop appeals as soon as Monday in cases involving Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, Perkins Coie, and Susman Godfrey.
After Trump tried to punish firms by stripping security clearances, cutting off federal access, and pressuring agencies to cancel contracts, several firms caved — pledging nearly $1 billion in pro bono work aligned with his agenda out of fear.
Now the legal attack is collapsing in court.
Those firms that folded did so for nothing.
Well it serves them right.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
maybe we can all go back to hating lawyers again.PJ_Soul said:mickeyrat said:Meidastouch adbook post....BREAKING: The Trump administration is expected to abandon its defense of executive orders targeting major law firms — with the DOJ set to drop appeals as soon as Monday in cases involving Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, Perkins Coie, and Susman Godfrey.
After Trump tried to punish firms by stripping security clearances, cutting off federal access, and pressuring agencies to cancel contracts, several firms caved — pledging nearly $1 billion in pro bono work aligned with his agenda out of fear.
Now the legal attack is collapsing in court.
Those firms that folded did so for nothing.
Well it serves them right."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
altnatparkservice adbook post....Well, if this isn’t corruption in plain sight. If you don’t want consequences for breaking the law, then don’t break the law.
The Justice Department is now attempting to step into disciplinary cases being handled by state bar associations against its own attorneys. The move reflects growing concern inside the administration that lawyers carrying out government directives could face ethics violations and potentially lose their licenses to practice law.
A notice published in the Federal Register proposes giving the Justice Department the first opportunity to investigate allegations of misconduct involving its attorneys.
However, the department does not have authority over state bar disciplinary boards. The proposal instead asks state bar associations to pause their own investigations until the Justice Department completes its internal review._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
being its in rule making process there is a comment period...Let me tell you what Todd Blanche actually said out loud, at a microphone, in front of an audience, at a Federalist Society conference in November: "We're going to do everything we can to take these activist bars out of the picture."
That's the Deputy Attorney General of the United States announcing, in advance, that he planned to gut the system that can pull his law license. And then four months later, they did it.
Yesterday, Pam Bondi signed a proposed rule - now sitting in the Federal Register - that says before any state bar can investigate a DOJ attorney for ethics violations, the Attorney General gets to review the complaint first and can ask the state to pause its investigation indefinitely. No timeline. No deadline. Just: wait until we're done, and we'll let you know when that is. If the state bar says no thanks, the rule says DOJ will take "appropriate action." Appropriate action is not defined.
Here's the part that should make your eye twitch: Bondi herself has an active ethics complaint against her, filed by over 70 lawyers and former judges, including two Florida Supreme Court justices, who say she pushed DOJ attorneys to violate their professional obligations while defending Trump's agenda. The Florida Bar declined to investigate her - she's a sitting constitutional officer, so they won't touch her while she's in office. But she wrote the rule anyway. She gave herself veto power over a complaint process that already wasn't touching her, just in case anyone else got any ideas.
Blanche is in a similar situation. The Legal Accountability Center filed a complaint against him with the New York Attorney Grievance Committee for multiple alleged ethics violations. Blanche, who before this job was Trump's personal criminal defense attorney - yes, the same guy who sat at Trump's defense table during the hush money trial - is now the number two at the Justice Department and apparently also in the business of regulating who gets to investigate him professionally.
The rule justifies itself by claiming bar complaints have been "weaponized" by political activists to harass brave DOJ lawyers for doing their jobs. This is the same DOJ that fired the head of its own internal ethics office earlier this year and then gutted the office. So: internal ethics oversight, gone. Now external ethics oversight, neutralized. The only thing left at this point is the honor system, and I think we've established where that's at.
What state bars actually police is pretty basic stuff. Lying to courts. Hiding evidence. Conflicts of interest. That's the existential threat Blanche declared war on. The fact that eliminating accountability for those things is the priority tells you something about what they're planning to do that requires that kind of cover.
Former U.S. attorney Barb McQuade said the rule would give DOJ lawyers "carte blanche" - and yes, that's genuinely her last name - to violate ethics rules. Former U.S. attorney Joyce Vance pointed out that the DOJ doesn't actually have the legal authority to suspend state bar proceedings, which is the kind of detail you'd think would come up before publishing something in the Federal Register, but here we are. The rule is proposed, not final. There's a public comment period through April 6th. Legal experts expect it to get challenged immediately if finalized.
But whether it survives court or not almost doesn't matter. Bar investigations are already slow. Throw in an indefinite federal hold with no required timeline and you've buried most complaints long enough for everyone involved to run out the clock, which is - per every watchdog group that looked at this - exactly the strategy. Lawyers Defending American Democracy said it plainly: the rule "offers no timelines under which a state could follow up," and this is an administration that is very good at running out the clock.
The public comment period is open until April 6th at regulations(dot)gov - docket number OAG199. Anyone can submit a comment, and they go into the official federal record.
#ratcclips_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
Categories
- All Categories
- 149.2K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.3K The Porch
- 288 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.4K Flea Market
- 39.4K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help


