*** Philadelphia, PA 1 Fanviews Here 9.7.24 ***

1…457910

Comments

  • 1101PJ
    1101PJ Posts: 14
    Signs were there. What an amazing show. Thank you Pearl Jam. Thank you Philly.
    PJ
    2012 Amsterdam 1 & 2
    2014 Amsterdam 1 & 2, Milan, Trieste, Berlin
    2015 Mexico City
    2018 Amsterdam 1 & 2, Pinkpop, Prague, Werchter, London 2
    2022 Oakland 1 & 2, Pinkpop, Berlin, Zurich, London 1 & 2, Budapest, Krakow, Paris, Amsterdam, Camden
    2024 Barcelona 1 & 2, Lisbon, Wrigley 2, Philadelphia 1
    EV
    2017 Amsterdam 1 & 3 
    2019 Amsterdam 1, Firenze Rocks
    SG
    2013 Amsterdam
  • bigbiggzy
    bigbiggzy Posts: 840
    Ha - that’s awesome.
  • SELiggett
    SELiggett Posts: 3
    edited September 2024
    I've only been to 5 PJ shows so far, but this one was *easily* my favorite.
    Highlights for me were Long Road (it was the first time I've gotten it live, and I have the same last name as the guy the song was written for, so it's always felt extra special), Brain of J, Red Mosquito, and Baba (I always get Rockin in the Free World, plus like HailHail mentioned, that 5 seconds of a capella after the interruption were amaaaazing).
    I've also met some really incredible people. This community is nothing but generous, concerned, kind human beings and it always gives me a little more faith in people.
    Post edited by SELiggett on
    May 13, 2010 - Bristow, VA  I  September 14, 2022 - Camden, NJ  I  August 31, 2023 - St. Paul, MN  I  September 2, 2023 - St. Paul, MN  I  September 7, 2024 - Philadelphia, PA  I  September 9, 2024 - Philadelphia, PA 


  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,460
    You all got to hear Dark Matter songs live. Lucky fuckers. 
    www.cluthelee.com
  • gems_n_rhinestones
    gems_n_rhinestones Harrisburg, PA Posts: 382

    Thanks McGruff for requesting Long Road! If there was an opener I would place at #1 for this show that was it! 

    The double vibrant rainbow while I was waiting in line for the porta-potty was fabulous. LOL I just knew that was a sign of what was to come. 

    Amazing show! Enjoyed Glen Hansard a lot. I don’t usually watch the entire opening act, but glad we did this time. 

    Starting the show with Long Road was really special for me. I knew right away the band had great energy and so did the crowd. We listened to the Missoula show on our drive to Philly and this is not a criticism of the band at all, but I didn’t have any expectations for the show. Maybe I’m a bad PJ fan but I haven’t listened to the new album much. I knew there would be a stretch of new songs in the middle of the first set that maybe I wouldn’t be into. But hearing them live was so much better! They kept the energy going the whole time. Why Go and Given to Fly are always great to see live. We are like a cult knowing when to raise our hands and belt out the lyrics. Red Mosquito was awesome!! A highlight for me. 

    The encores were amazing! Couldn’t have asked for anything better, really. Won’t back down was perfect. It was a show packed with so many all time favorites of mine. RVM, Daughter, Black, SOLAT. 

    I was so happy for whoever had the Chloe/Crown sign that they played that for you! I have a picture that isn’t great but if you’re in here and don’t have 1, I thought you might like it. 

    I have been to 4 shows in Philly (10/30/09, 10/31/09, the 10 show, and this one) and I would have to rate this one second behind 10/30/09. But they have all been sooooo good! 

    Thanks for another amazing show Pearl Jam! ❤️❤️

  • gems_n_rhinestones
    gems_n_rhinestones Harrisburg, PA Posts: 382
    This is the not great picture of them singing Chloe with your sign! 

  • Demps
    Demps Posts: 102
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    I suggest you step out on your porch...run away my son...see it all...oh see the world // I wait on the porch...hoping someday I'll be let in

    Springfield, MA 4/6/94 -- Boston, MA 4/11/94 -- Hartford, CT 10/2/96 -- Hartford, CT 9/13/98 -- Mansfield, MA 7/2/03 -- Reading, PA 10/1/04 -- Albany, NY 5/12/06 -- Milwaukee, WI 6/29/06 -- Mansfield, MA 6/30/08 -- Toronto, ON 9/21/09 -- Philadelphia, PA 10/31/09 -- Worcester, MA 10/16/13 -- Hartford, CT 10/25/13 -- New York, NY 9/26/15 -- New York, NY 5/2/16 -- Boston, MA 8/5/16 -- Boston, MA 8/7/16 -- Boston, MA 9/2/18 -- Boston, MA 9/4/18 -- London, UK 7/8/22 -- Hamilton, ON 9/6/22 -- Toronto, ON 9/8/22 -- New York, NY 9/11/22 -- Chicago, IL 9/5/23 -- Chicago, IL 9/7/23 -- New York, NY 9/3/24 -- Philadelphia, PA 9/7/24 -- Philadelphia, PA 9/9/24
  • PJNB
    PJNB Posts: 13,890
    Demps said:
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    You can’t use this show as the reason to make this statement though when the rest of the tour has not been anywheres close to this shows level. 

    If you did a top 5 shows of each tour since 2013 the shows on other tours would win head to head with ease against 2024. 

  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,773
    edited September 2024
    Demps said:
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    '24 songs are better than 34 songs' is a hard argument to take seriously. 
  • mshnayder
    mshnayder Posts: 106
    Merkin Baller said:
    Demps said:
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    '24 songs are better than 34 songs' is a hard argument to take seriously. 
    It’s really not though when they were playing a lot of those 34 songs at 2x speed and the longer the show went the more Ed got loose on wine and flubbed lyrics. I’m not necessarily saying one is better than the other because the 2013-2016 run of shows are memories I’ll have forever but I don’t think it’s crazy to say that as a whole the quality is better now. There’s a reason that “quality over quantity “ is a saying.
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,773
    edited September 2024
    mshnayder said:
    Merkin Baller said:
    Demps said:
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    '24 songs are better than 34 songs' is a hard argument to take seriously. 
    It’s really not though when they were playing a lot of those 34 songs at 2x speed and the longer the show went the more Ed got loose on wine and flubbed lyrics. I’m not necessarily saying one is better than the other because the 2013-2016 run of shows are memories I’ll have forever but I don’t think it’s crazy to say that as a whole the quality is better now. There’s a reason that “quality over quantity “ is a saying.
    Yeah, 'less is more' is also a saying, but that contradicts my real life experiences in this argument just as much as "quality over quantity". 

    Saturday was the 5th show I've seen post covid, and only the 1st one that compares to what I saw between 2013 - 2016. 

    For my money, there's no comparing these last 3 years over the "A Night w/ Pearl Jam" era. 
  • mshnayder
    mshnayder Posts: 106
    Merkin Baller said:
    mshnayder said:
    Merkin Baller said:
    Demps said:
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    '24 songs are better than 34 songs' is a hard argument to take seriously. 
    It’s really not though when they were playing a lot of those 34 songs at 2x speed and the longer the show went the more Ed got loose on wine and flubbed lyrics. I’m not necessarily saying one is better than the other because the 2013-2016 run of shows are memories I’ll have forever but I don’t think it’s crazy to say that as a whole the quality is better now. There’s a reason that “quality over quantity “ is a saying.
    Yeah, 'less is more' is also a saying, but that contradicts my real life experiences in this argument just as much as "quality over quantity". 

    Saturday was the 5th show I've seen post covid, and only the 1st one that compares to what I saw between 2013 - 2016. 

    For my money, there's no comparing these last 3 years over the "A Night w/ Pearl Jam" era. 
    Okay but that’s YOUR experience. I just think it’s weird to tell somebody else that it is “a hard argument to take seriously.” Because it’s not and it’s not an argument. Different experiences for different folks and for me both Philly shows and night 2 at Wrigley the other week were all up there with the run of 2013-2016 shows. Not as good as some but better than others as well.
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,773
    mshnayder said:
    Merkin Baller said:
    mshnayder said:
    Merkin Baller said:
    Demps said:
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    '24 songs are better than 34 songs' is a hard argument to take seriously. 
    It’s really not though when they were playing a lot of those 34 songs at 2x speed and the longer the show went the more Ed got loose on wine and flubbed lyrics. I’m not necessarily saying one is better than the other because the 2013-2016 run of shows are memories I’ll have forever but I don’t think it’s crazy to say that as a whole the quality is better now. There’s a reason that “quality over quantity “ is a saying.
    Yeah, 'less is more' is also a saying, but that contradicts my real life experiences in this argument just as much as "quality over quantity". 

    Saturday was the 5th show I've seen post covid, and only the 1st one that compares to what I saw between 2013 - 2016. 

    For my money, there's no comparing these last 3 years over the "A Night w/ Pearl Jam" era. 
    Okay but that’s YOUR experience. I just think it’s weird to tell somebody else that it is “a hard argument to take seriously.” Because it’s not and it’s not an argument. Different experiences for different folks and for me both Philly shows and night 2 at Wrigley the other week were all up there with the run of 2013-2016 shows. Not as good as some but better than others as well.
    Weirder than suggesting that it's "pretty hard to deny..." another subjective opinion? 

    Ok
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,911
    edited September 2024
    Merkin Baller said:
    Demps said:
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    '24 songs are better than 34 songs' is a hard argument to take seriously. 
    Went to Springsteen a few weeks ago. Awesome 3.5 hour show BUT he could have taken out about 5-7 songs in the middle that slowed the set down and still would have been an incredible 2.5 hour show.   If the songs are filler do they really need to be there?

    Also as  I get older standing for 3.5 hours ain't so easy anymore.

    I think the length of these PJ shows is good for this point in time. I'd rather have them kill 25 songs then flub some songs to get to 32.  Listening to a lot of the shows and now having been at 3 on this tour I think there are a lot less flubs than there was during the 30+ song sets. 
    Post edited by pjhawks on
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,773
    pjhawks said:
    Merkin Baller said:
    Demps said:
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    '24 songs are better than 34 songs' is a hard argument to take seriously. 
    Went to Springsteen a few weeks ago. Awesome 3.5 hour show BUT he could have taken out about 5-7 songs in the middle that slowed the set down and still would have been an incredible 2.5 hour show.   If the songs are filler do they really need to be there?

    Also as  I get older standing for 3.5 hours ain't so easy anymore.
    No argument there, but I'm going to have to see a lot more shows like Saturday night to be convinced that post Covid Pearl Jam is better than 2013 - 2016 Pearl Jam. 

    I get it, "Father time is undefeated" as Charles Barkley said, and I'm grateful PJ is still around and can still deliver like they did these last two shows. 

    Bring on Fenway.  
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,773
    pjhawks said:

    I think the length of these PJ shows is good for this point in time. I'd rather have them kill 25 songs then flub some songs to get to 32.  Listening to a lot of the shows and now having been at 3 on this tour I think there are a lot less flubs than there was during the 30+ song sets. 
    Fair points as well. 
  • reedrothchild
    reedrothchild Posts: 635
    PJNB said:
    Demps said:
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    You can’t use this show as the reason to make this statement though when the rest of the tour has not been anywheres close to this shows level. 

    If you did a top 5 shows of each tour since 2013 the shows on other tours would win head to head with ease against 2024. 

    Sure if you use the 2013 as an example for length equaling quality then you’re right. But the tours from 98-2010 mostly had shows just over 2 hours and they are all better than any tours since (with the exception of 2008 which I didn’t love at the time). 
    "What can you expect when you're on top? You know? It's like Napoleon. When he was the king, you know, people were just constantly trying to conquer him, you know, in the Roman Empire. So, it's history repeating itself all over again."
  • PJNB
    PJNB Posts: 13,890
    reedrothchild said:
    PJNB said:
    Demps said:
    HailHailVitalogy said:
    We’re all talking about how that might have been one of the best shows they’ve ever played…and we’re not complaining that it was 2 hours 20 minutes, nor are we complaining about ticket prices. All about what they do with that time and the atmosphere. 
    Pretty hard to deny that the shorter shows are just higher quality at this point. Glad they made the switch. 
    You can’t use this show as the reason to make this statement though when the rest of the tour has not been anywheres close to this shows level. 

    If you did a top 5 shows of each tour since 2013 the shows on other tours would win head to head with ease against 2024. 

    Sure if you use the 2013 as an example for length equaling quality then you’re right. But the tours from 98-2010 mostly had shows just over 2 hours and they are all better than any tours since (with the exception of 2008 which I didn’t love at the time). 
    There is a reason that N1 was loved by so many people. Count how many songs were after 1998 not including the new album. 

    The years you are mentioning all had those style of sets. 
  • PureandEasy
    PureandEasy Posts: 5,818
    mcgruff10 said:
    Tonight was perfection.  The set was perfect, the crowd was sooooo loud and the band was off the charts.  I’ve seen them 63 times live and this was one of the best shows I ve ever witnessed.  Thank you for Long Road!!!!! So many highlights.  Mosquito, brain of j, I won’t back down, rvm!!!! Wow. What an incredible night.  See you Monday night!  Do I go to Baltimore?!?!? 
    I too have to been to a lot of shows, never really kept track (but over 30).  This show will go down as a flip flop of number 1 and 2 all-time best for me (flip flop with Friday night Spectrum show in '09).  Right now, I'm leaning to Saturday as best ever.  The double rainbow coming out of subway station was a sign something momentous was going to happen and it certainly did.  We were in 200 level close to the stage and it provided a vantage point to see the crowd singing and rocking out the entire show.  The band brought it, the crowd brought it and together that makes for a phenomenal experience.  That show will stay with me for a LONG time.  
    Don't come closer or I'll have to go
  • on2legs
    on2legs Posts: 15,956
    If I was only seeing 1 show per tour I’d prefer an epic 34 song masterpiece.  When I’m seeing them 5 times I’m totally fine with the set lists we’ve gotten recently. 
    1996: Randall's Island 2  1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2  2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel  2005: Atlantic City 1  2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 (#25) | Newark (EV)  2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4  2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2  2011: Toronto 1  2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2015: Central Park  2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD)  2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF)  2020: MSG | Asbury Park  2021: Asbury Park  2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville  2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2025: Raleigh


Categories