Capitalism, The Fed and Economic Policy
Comments
-
My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.
They want to see a return on their investment so hiking up the pricing is the best thing to do.
It is no longer cheaper to rent than own. I am in a somewhat good place for rent so far.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.
They want to see a return on their investment so hiking up the pricing is the best thing to do.
It is no longer cheaper to rent than own. I am in a somewhat good place for rent so far.Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.
They want to see a return on their investment so hiking up the pricing is the best thing to do.
It is no longer cheaper to rent than own. I am in a somewhat good place for rent so far.0 -
mrussel1 said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.
They want to see a return on their investment so hiking up the pricing is the best thing to do.
It is no longer cheaper to rent than own. I am in a somewhat good place for rent so far.0 -
mrussel1 said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.
They want to see a return on their investment so hiking up the pricing is the best thing to do.
It is no longer cheaper to rent than own. I am in a somewhat good place for rent so far.Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
static111 said:mrussel1 said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.
They want to see a return on their investment so hiking up the pricing is the best thing to do.
It is no longer cheaper to rent than own. I am in a somewhat good place for rent so far.
It plays right into the republicans playbook. Interesting how they come to these things huh?0 -
How does this play into the R's hands? If anything this would dilute the idea of R/D-majority areas. If anything it would make Republican-majorities shrink in those areas.
Regardless, people have been leaving the boonies for major metro/dense/urban areas for a while now. More than 80% of the country lives in what would be considered an urban environment. By 2050 it is projected to be 90%.0 -
Jearlpam0925 said:How does this play into the R's hands? If anything this would dilute the idea of R/D-majority areas. If anything it would make Republican-majorities shrink in those areas.
Regardless, people have been leaving the boonies for major metro/dense/urban areas for a while now. More than 80% of the country lives in what would be considered an urban environment. By 2050 it is projected to be 90%.
Richmond though Dem I would consider a far cry from what we have here in NY and their outlying cities are more conservative. Prices are much much cheaper than here too.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:mrussel1 said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.
They want to see a return on their investment so hiking up the pricing is the best thing to do.
It is no longer cheaper to rent than own. I am in a somewhat good place for rent so far.
It plays right into the republicans playbook. Interesting how they come to these things huh?Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:mrussel1 said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.
They want to see a return on their investment so hiking up the pricing is the best thing to do.
It is no longer cheaper to rent than own. I am in a somewhat good place for rent so far.
It plays right into the republicans playbook. Interesting how they come to these things huh?0 -
"It plays right into the republicans playbook."
And it's not like this kind of migration is a bad thing. I also personally think it's short-term. Big Cities, and their draw as a major economic center, will always be there. And looking even further down the road imo the Sun Belt migration has been great but the sheer temp increases, - and ensuing lack of resources due to climate change - will drive people out of those areas again. I feel like Minnesota will be a nice sweet spot come another 50 years from now. And I remember Tulsa was incentivizing people to move there. But there's no fucking way I'd move to Tulsa.
At the end of the day there's only one (two, ok actually three) answer(s) to the housing crisis - which is by far been the greatest economic concern even pre-Covid: 1) there just needs to be a new New Deal-type home building program put into place to drastically increase supply 2) unfuck the idea of zoning laws in this country 3) demographics - unfortunately, if 1 & 2 aren't done then 3 will be waiting for Boomers to die.0 -
mrussel1 said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:mrussel1 said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:static111 said:tempo_n_groove said:My place I rent would be DOUBLE what it is if I were to look for a new place.
Vehicle prices still remain high because the companies know people are still buying.
Housing sales have been stalling because unless you have cash or a huge down payment you can't afford one.
My grocery bills are 50% more.
My raises have not kept up with these trends.
So yeah, the economy is doing something but not for me.
They want to see a return on their investment so hiking up the pricing is the best thing to do.
It is no longer cheaper to rent than own. I am in a somewhat good place for rent so far.
It plays right into the republicans playbook. Interesting how they come to these things huh?Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
Jearlpam0925 said:"It plays right into the republicans playbook."
And it's not like this kind of migration is a bad thing. I also personally think it's short-term. Big Cities, and their draw as a major economic center, will always be there. And looking even further down the road imo the Sun Belt migration has been great but the sheer temp increases, - and ensuing lack of resources due to climate change - will drive people out of those areas again. I feel like Minnesota will be a nice sweet spot come another 50 years from now. And I remember Tulsa was incentivizing people to move there. But there's no fucking way I'd move to Tulsa.
At the end of the day there's only one (two, ok actually three) answer(s) to the housing crisis - which is by far been the greatest economic concern even pre-Covid: 1) there just needs to be a new New Deal-type home building program put into place to drastically increase supply 2) unfuck the idea of zoning laws in this country 3) demographics - unfortunately, if 1 & 2 aren't done then 3 will be waiting for Boomers to die.
4. bar invetors groups from this sector.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
mickeyrat said:Jearlpam0925 said:"It plays right into the republicans playbook."
And it's not like this kind of migration is a bad thing. I also personally think it's short-term. Big Cities, and their draw as a major economic center, will always be there. And looking even further down the road imo the Sun Belt migration has been great but the sheer temp increases, - and ensuing lack of resources due to climate change - will drive people out of those areas again. I feel like Minnesota will be a nice sweet spot come another 50 years from now. And I remember Tulsa was incentivizing people to move there. But there's no fucking way I'd move to Tulsa.
At the end of the day there's only one (two, ok actually three) answer(s) to the housing crisis - which is by far been the greatest economic concern even pre-Covid: 1) there just needs to be a new New Deal-type home building program put into place to drastically increase supply 2) unfuck the idea of zoning laws in this country 3) demographics - unfortunately, if 1 & 2 aren't done then 3 will be waiting for Boomers to die.
4. bar invetors groups from this sector.
Because the logic is either - can LLC's/commercial businesses own real estate? Because if so, then why can't investors?
What I'm getting at is investors will only put their money in what has value/scarcity. If you build more of it, then the interest in investing weakens.
And this to me speaks to a larger issue in this country that home ownership = wealth/equity. And as long as that is always the view then there's always going to be a problem.0 -
Jearlpam0925 said:"It plays right into the republicans playbook."
And it's not like this kind of migration is a bad thing. I also personally think it's short-term. Big Cities, and their draw as a major economic center, will always be there. And looking even further down the road imo the Sun Belt migration has been great but the sheer temp increases, - and ensuing lack of resources due to climate change - will drive people out of those areas again. I feel like Minnesota will be a nice sweet spot come another 50 years from now. And I remember Tulsa was incentivizing people to move there. But there's no fucking way I'd move to Tulsa.
At the end of the day there's only one (two, ok actually three) answer(s) to the housing crisis - which is by far been the greatest economic concern even pre-Covid: 1) there just needs to be a new New Deal-type home building program put into place to drastically increase supply 2) unfuck the idea of zoning laws in this country 3) demographics - unfortunately, if 1 & 2 aren't done then 3 will be waiting for Boomers to die.
Tulsa a destination? Not on your fucking life. I did Elk City for a few months... Nope.
Minnesota? 50 years? Yeah if climate change gets that bad...
For NY what needs to change is some serious government intervention. Make some sort of rule about corporations gobbling up real-estate.
We need to make new houses but all I see are housing complexes going up and renting not owning. Every new development is a multi level renter that is stupidly priced.
Taxes. We need cheaper taxes but need more people in the system to help get that cost down. See above...
Here in NYC the buildings are empty. No shit. Empty. Multiple floors in buildings. Hudson Yards project? Luxury apartments that won't fill. It was a great project for construction workers though. We need places for affordable housing not just for the rich that stay empty.
You mention zoning. That can be a blessing and a curse depending on what side of it you live on. There was a local bar here that thrived for years. They built a housing complex right next to it and killed it's nightlife. Great for the residents so they can sleep and relax with no noise but another business destroyed because they decided to change the land adjacent and rezone it.0 -
mickeyrat said:Jearlpam0925 said:"It plays right into the republicans playbook."
And it's not like this kind of migration is a bad thing. I also personally think it's short-term. Big Cities, and their draw as a major economic center, will always be there. And looking even further down the road imo the Sun Belt migration has been great but the sheer temp increases, - and ensuing lack of resources due to climate change - will drive people out of those areas again. I feel like Minnesota will be a nice sweet spot come another 50 years from now. And I remember Tulsa was incentivizing people to move there. But there's no fucking way I'd move to Tulsa.
At the end of the day there's only one (two, ok actually three) answer(s) to the housing crisis - which is by far been the greatest economic concern even pre-Covid: 1) there just needs to be a new New Deal-type home building program put into place to drastically increase supply 2) unfuck the idea of zoning laws in this country 3) demographics - unfortunately, if 1 & 2 aren't done then 3 will be waiting for Boomers to die.
4. bar invetors groups from this sector.Jearlpam0925 said:mickeyrat said:Jearlpam0925 said:"It plays right into the republicans playbook."
And it's not like this kind of migration is a bad thing. I also personally think it's short-term. Big Cities, and their draw as a major economic center, will always be there. And looking even further down the road imo the Sun Belt migration has been great but the sheer temp increases, - and ensuing lack of resources due to climate change - will drive people out of those areas again. I feel like Minnesota will be a nice sweet spot come another 50 years from now. And I remember Tulsa was incentivizing people to move there. But there's no fucking way I'd move to Tulsa.
At the end of the day there's only one (two, ok actually three) answer(s) to the housing crisis - which is by far been the greatest economic concern even pre-Covid: 1) there just needs to be a new New Deal-type home building program put into place to drastically increase supply 2) unfuck the idea of zoning laws in this country 3) demographics - unfortunately, if 1 & 2 aren't done then 3 will be waiting for Boomers to die.
4. bar invetors groups from this sector.
Because the logic is either - can LLC's/commercial businesses own real estate? Because if so, then why can't investors?
What I'm getting at is investors will only put their money in what has value/scarcity. If you build more of it, then the interest in investing weakens.
And this to me speaks to a larger issue in this country that home ownership = wealth/equity. And as long as that is always the view then there's always going to be a problem.0 -
Roughly 60-70% of rentals are owned by individual investors, and roughly the remaining 30-40% is owned by institutional investors. Which has been increasing for sure. But again, I can't stress enough in the order of the 4 things we listed above it's not at the top of the list imo.
#1 by a distant margin is increasing supply. But the elephant in the room no one wants to talk about is increasing supply will drop housing prices. Which a lot of homeowners clutch their pearls over.
Post edited by Jearlpam0925 on0 -
Jearlpam0925 said:Roughly 60-70% of rentals are owned by individual investors, and roughly the remaining 30-40% is owned by institutional investors. Which has been increasing for sure. But again, I can't stress enough in the order of the 4 things we listed above it's not at the top of the list imo.
#1 by a distant margin is increasing supply. But the elephant in the room no one wants to talk about is increasing supply will drop housing prices. Which a lot of homeowners clutch their pearls over.
Hell if homes get cheaper so will taxes but then no equity means no home equity loans.
More houses do need to be built and we need some of these older homes to be realistically priced. A house that was lived in for 50 years by someone many times has had NOTHING done to it.
Big problem here. You buy a house at market price then have to dump another 1-200K into it for it to be modern or livable.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help