Hunter Biden Laptop Controversy
Comments
-
I do see the irony in it. But I think the reaction from the left is a bigger irony.mrussel1 said:
It's the irony Mace... that's what sticks out about this. The same gun registration law that is being used to prosecute Biden has been struck down by a right wing court. You don't see the irony in that? I am for more gun laws, but I can still laugh at the hilarity of the 4 year investigation (started under Trump) turning up 2 charges, one of which will likely be dismissed now.mace1229 said:
It’s not showing up anymore, not sure why, but the tweet that was shared and many of the comments on it were celebrating it as a blow to the GOP. Some of the comments that followed on here were similar.josevolution said:
If Hunter is guilty of all these crimes he should be held accountable! I don’t think too many here want to overlook anything that is a crime.mace1229 said:Here’s what I don’t get. There’s pages and pages on the gun thread of why don’t we have more gun les. Then you come here and those same people laugh at the idea the gun charges against Hunter likely won’t stick.
If someone illegally purchased a gun, even if it’s because they lied, why is that something we should be proud of to overlook?
Yet, read the guns thread and it’s all about we have too many guns, we need to restrict sales, etc.
Im a gun owner, I’m for more restrictions. I think restricting guns from an illegal substance abuser is a good idea. Sounded like pretty much everyone would agree with that, unless it’s Hunter and can be used as a win against the GOP I guess?
I dont think Hunter needs to be put away in jail for this. But the comments from supposed anti gun crowd and the way they are reacting to laws restricting drug addicts from possessing a gun seems very odd to me. Seems like an easy win for gun control if they wanted it.
If you talk to the average gun owner, they are for reasonable restrictions and would not want a drug addict having possession of a gun. Irresponsible gun owners make responsible ones look bad. People should be upset that this law was shot down and allows addicts to possess a gun rather than celebrating the failure of a law that can mock the GOP.
I also don't know what reason was used. All I've heard is it was a 5th circuit court deemed it unconstitutional, who doesn't have jurisdiction over Hunter's case, but expect his lawyers to cite it as precedent. I don't know the details of what this guy was charged with and how similiar they are to Hunter.
Is the court saying drug addicts still have a 2A right to guns?0 -
yeah because if Garland had selected someone else you guys would think that was just great...no coverup, nothingRoleModelsinBlood31 said:Wait. Is Weiss not a US attorney? God damn Garland, you really are a partisan hack. Just follow the rules, they’re not that hard. You could have appointed anyone of a few million attorneys to be the special council but you had to make it even dumber.§ 600.3 Qualifications of the Special Counsel.(a) An individual named as Special Counsel shall be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decisionmaking, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly, and that investigative and prosecutorial decisions will be supported by an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies. The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government. Special Counsels shall agree that their responsibilities as Special Counsel shall take first precedence in their professional lives, and that it may be necessary to devote their full time to the investigation, depending on its complexity and the stage of the investigation.
His best bet was to select the tRump appointee.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Most people are on board w/ Hunter Biden getting charged with & prosecuted for crimes he's committed. Having said that a lot of people are also burnt out on GOP fuckery, and the Hunter Biden witch hunt is peak GOP fuckery, so yeah... people can't help but laugh at the irony.mace1229 said:
I do see the irony in it. But I think the reaction from the left is a bigger irony.mrussel1 said:
It's the irony Mace... that's what sticks out about this. The same gun registration law that is being used to prosecute Biden has been struck down by a right wing court. You don't see the irony in that? I am for more gun laws, but I can still laugh at the hilarity of the 4 year investigation (started under Trump) turning up 2 charges, one of which will likely be dismissed now.mace1229 said:
It’s not showing up anymore, not sure why, but the tweet that was shared and many of the comments on it were celebrating it as a blow to the GOP. Some of the comments that followed on here were similar.josevolution said:
If Hunter is guilty of all these crimes he should be held accountable! I don’t think too many here want to overlook anything that is a crime.mace1229 said:Here’s what I don’t get. There’s pages and pages on the gun thread of why don’t we have more gun les. Then you come here and those same people laugh at the idea the gun charges against Hunter likely won’t stick.
If someone illegally purchased a gun, even if it’s because they lied, why is that something we should be proud of to overlook?
Yet, read the guns thread and it’s all about we have too many guns, we need to restrict sales, etc.
Im a gun owner, I’m for more restrictions. I think restricting guns from an illegal substance abuser is a good idea. Sounded like pretty much everyone would agree with that, unless it’s Hunter and can be used as a win against the GOP I guess?
I dont think Hunter needs to be put away in jail for this. But the comments from supposed anti gun crowd and the way they are reacting to laws restricting drug addicts from possessing a gun seems very odd to me. Seems like an easy win for gun control if they wanted it.
If you talk to the average gun owner, they are for reasonable restrictions and would not want a drug addict having possession of a gun. Irresponsible gun owners make responsible ones look bad. People should be upset that this law was shot down and allows addicts to possess a gun rather than celebrating the failure of a law that can mock the GOP.
I also don't know what reason was used. All I've heard is it was a 5th circuit court deemed it unconstitutional, who doesn't have jurisdiction over Hunter's case, but expect his lawyers to cite it as precedent. I don't know the details of what this guy was charged with and how similiar they are to Hunter.
Is the court saying drug addicts still have a 2A right to guns?
It's not that complicated.0 -
I don't see the irony on the left that you mention.mace1229 said:
I do see the irony in it. But I think the reaction from the left is a bigger irony.mrussel1 said:
It's the irony Mace... that's what sticks out about this. The same gun registration law that is being used to prosecute Biden has been struck down by a right wing court. You don't see the irony in that? I am for more gun laws, but I can still laugh at the hilarity of the 4 year investigation (started under Trump) turning up 2 charges, one of which will likely be dismissed now.mace1229 said:
It’s not showing up anymore, not sure why, but the tweet that was shared and many of the comments on it were celebrating it as a blow to the GOP. Some of the comments that followed on here were similar.josevolution said:
If Hunter is guilty of all these crimes he should be held accountable! I don’t think too many here want to overlook anything that is a crime.mace1229 said:Here’s what I don’t get. There’s pages and pages on the gun thread of why don’t we have more gun les. Then you come here and those same people laugh at the idea the gun charges against Hunter likely won’t stick.
If someone illegally purchased a gun, even if it’s because they lied, why is that something we should be proud of to overlook?
Yet, read the guns thread and it’s all about we have too many guns, we need to restrict sales, etc.
Im a gun owner, I’m for more restrictions. I think restricting guns from an illegal substance abuser is a good idea. Sounded like pretty much everyone would agree with that, unless it’s Hunter and can be used as a win against the GOP I guess?
I dont think Hunter needs to be put away in jail for this. But the comments from supposed anti gun crowd and the way they are reacting to laws restricting drug addicts from possessing a gun seems very odd to me. Seems like an easy win for gun control if they wanted it.
If you talk to the average gun owner, they are for reasonable restrictions and would not want a drug addict having possession of a gun. Irresponsible gun owners make responsible ones look bad. People should be upset that this law was shot down and allows addicts to possess a gun rather than celebrating the failure of a law that can mock the GOP.
I also don't know what reason was used. All I've heard is it was a 5th circuit court deemed it unconstitutional, who doesn't have jurisdiction over Hunter's case, but expect his lawyers to cite it as precedent. I don't know the details of what this guy was charged with and how similiar they are to Hunter.
Is the court saying drug addicts still have a 2A right to guns?
The gun thread is mainly about people that legally buy assault weapons and use them to murder children. Hunter's gun issue was that he owned a handgun and falsely answered a question that he wasn't on drugs or something.
No connection to make here.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
I hope this is the right thread for this....
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
This is true. My personal position is that I don't think handguns should be outlawed, full stop. I do think things like speed bullets and clip capacity should be regulated. Assault type weapons should be outlawed. So yes, I find the irony in Hunter having a charge dismissed based on a registration issue, thanks to a conservative court.Gern Blansten said:
I don't see the irony on the left that you mention.mace1229 said:
I do see the irony in it. But I think the reaction from the left is a bigger irony.mrussel1 said:
It's the irony Mace... that's what sticks out about this. The same gun registration law that is being used to prosecute Biden has been struck down by a right wing court. You don't see the irony in that? I am for more gun laws, but I can still laugh at the hilarity of the 4 year investigation (started under Trump) turning up 2 charges, one of which will likely be dismissed now.mace1229 said:
It’s not showing up anymore, not sure why, but the tweet that was shared and many of the comments on it were celebrating it as a blow to the GOP. Some of the comments that followed on here were similar.josevolution said:
If Hunter is guilty of all these crimes he should be held accountable! I don’t think too many here want to overlook anything that is a crime.mace1229 said:Here’s what I don’t get. There’s pages and pages on the gun thread of why don’t we have more gun les. Then you come here and those same people laugh at the idea the gun charges against Hunter likely won’t stick.
If someone illegally purchased a gun, even if it’s because they lied, why is that something we should be proud of to overlook?
Yet, read the guns thread and it’s all about we have too many guns, we need to restrict sales, etc.
Im a gun owner, I’m for more restrictions. I think restricting guns from an illegal substance abuser is a good idea. Sounded like pretty much everyone would agree with that, unless it’s Hunter and can be used as a win against the GOP I guess?
I dont think Hunter needs to be put away in jail for this. But the comments from supposed anti gun crowd and the way they are reacting to laws restricting drug addicts from possessing a gun seems very odd to me. Seems like an easy win for gun control if they wanted it.
If you talk to the average gun owner, they are for reasonable restrictions and would not want a drug addict having possession of a gun. Irresponsible gun owners make responsible ones look bad. People should be upset that this law was shot down and allows addicts to possess a gun rather than celebrating the failure of a law that can mock the GOP.
I also don't know what reason was used. All I've heard is it was a 5th circuit court deemed it unconstitutional, who doesn't have jurisdiction over Hunter's case, but expect his lawyers to cite it as precedent. I don't know the details of what this guy was charged with and how similiar they are to Hunter.
Is the court saying drug addicts still have a 2A right to guns?
The gun thread is mainly about people that legally buy assault weapons and use them to murder children. Hunter's gun issue was that he owned a handgun and falsely answered a question that he wasn't on drugs or something.
No connection to make here.
Although we don't know what's going to happen as I'm sure the DOJ will be appealing.0 -
Kinda sorta puts things in perspective.mickeyrat said:I hope this is the right thread for this....www.myspace.com0 -
But have you heard about Hunter’s laptop?The Juggler said:
Kinda sorta puts things in perspective.mickeyrat said:I hope this is the right thread for this....09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Unless it's found that Joe Biden has somehow been directly involved or abuses his power to protect his son legally, I couldn't care less about Hunter Biden and whatever shenanigans or fraud he gets up to. He doesn't work in the White House or anything. He should get whatever he deserves under the law. I do feel bad for Joe though, kinda, assuming he hasn't done anything wrong.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
strange aint it?_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
huhmickeyrat said:0 -
They don't seem the same to me.
Stone had already filed taxes taxes and was working towards paying off what he owed. The IRS definitely offers payment plans, whether he had one or not I don't know. He stopped paying them when he was arrested and charged with the crimes in 2019 because, supposedly, he couldn't;t afford it with all his legal troubles. The suit isn't for failing to claim income or hide it, its running out of money to pay it. The IRS sued him for the remainder plus penalties and fees.
Hunter didn't claim several hundred thousand dollars of income. Seems like a big difference to me.Only thing in common is its about taxes, but aside from that, seem very different.
People have been arrested for failing to claim that much in income before.
Maybe Stone got a good deal, I don't know. I don't know what the usual outcome of that situation is.
Post edited by mace1229 on0 -
Knowing what everyone knows about Stone and Hunter I’ll put my $$$ that Stoney is way more shady than Hunter! Both should pay for their crimes but as we saw Trumpolinni pardon Stone so there’s that!mace1229 said:They don't seem the same to me.
Stone had already filed taxes taxes and was working towards paying off what he owed. The IRS definitely offers payment plans, whether he had one or not I don't know. He stopped paying them when he was arrested and charged with the crimes in 2019 because, supposedly, he couldn't;t afford it with all his legal troubles. The suit isn't for failing to claim income or hide it, its running out of money to pay it. The IRS sued him for the remainder plus penalties and fees.
Hunter didn't claim several hundred thousand dollars of income. Seems like a big difference to me.Only thing in common is its about taxes, but aside from that, seem very different.
People have been arrested for failing to claim that much in income before.
Maybe Stone got a good deal, I don't know. I don't know what the usual outcome of that situation is.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
I believe Hunter also filed but didn't pay....same as Stone. He wasn't charged for tax evasion or fraudulent reporting.
I read that they were reviewing some of his business deductions but everything I see says that he just didn't pay.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
https://www.justice.gov/usao-de/pr/tax-and-firearm-charges-filed-against-robert-hunter-bidenWILMINGTON, Del. – The United States Attorney for the District of Delaware filed charges today against Robert Hunter Biden (“Hunter Biden”) of Los Angeles. Hunter Biden has been charged with two misdemeanor tax offenses and a felony firearm offense and has agreed to enter a plea of guilty to the tax offenses and enter into a pre-trial diversion agreement with regard to the firearm charge at a proceeding to be scheduled by the assigned United States District Court judge.
According to the tax Information, Hunter Biden received taxable income in excess of $1,500,000 annually in calendar years 2017 and 2018. Despite owing in excess of $100,000 in federal income taxes each year, he did not pay the income tax due for either year.
According to the firearm Information, from on or about October 12, 2018 through October 23, 2018, Hunter Biden possessed a firearm despite knowing he was an unlawful user of and addicted to a controlled substance.
Hunter Biden is charged with two violations of failure to pay income tax and one violation of unlawful possession of a firearm by a person prohibited. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of 12 months in prison on each of the tax charges and a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison on the firearm charge. Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after taking into account the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.
David C. Weiss, U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware, made the announcement. The investigation is ongoing.That would make sense that the charges were misdemeanors rather than felonies.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
From what I remember he filed, but failed to claim several hundred thousand dollars worth of income.Gern Blansten said:I believe Hunter also filed but didn't pay....same as Stone. He wasn't charged for tax evasion or fraudulent reporting.
I read that they were reviewing some of his business deductions but everything I see says that he just didn't pay.
I might forget to add a $500 Christmas bonus when I'm doing taxes, but I'm not going to forget about $500,000 and leave it off by mistake.
He did start paying it after he was caught. But that's like saying its not shoplifting because you returned the stolen merchandise when you were caught.
* I just looked it up, looks like you were right, he just didn't file.
Still isn't the same as Stone. Stone filed, payed for a few years, then claimed to have run out of money. That is different than not filing and not paying. Not saying Stone is innocent or not shady, just saying this seems like apples and oranges to me.Post edited by mace1229 on0 -
I thought all along he filed and intentionally hid or withheld several hundred thousand dollars each year from his tax return. I don't know why I thought that was the case. But if he just didn't file for a year or two instead of hiding income, it does seem less intentional and meets the criteria of a fine more than jail time.0
-
Right but Hunter filed for sure...he just didn't pay.mace1229 said:
From what I remember he filed, but failed to claim several hundred thousand dollars worth of income.Gern Blansten said:I believe Hunter also filed but didn't pay....same as Stone. He wasn't charged for tax evasion or fraudulent reporting.
I read that they were reviewing some of his business deductions but everything I see says that he just didn't pay.
I might forget to add a $500 Christmas bonus when I'm doing taxes, but I'm not going to forget about $500,000 and leave it off by mistake.
He did start paying it after he was caught. But that's like saying its not shoplifting because you returned the stolen merchandise when you were caught.
* I just looked it up, looks like you were right, he just didn't file.
Still isn't the same as Stone. Stone filed, payed for a few years, then claimed to have run out of money. That is different than not filing and not paying. Not saying Stone is innocent or not shady, just saying this seems like apples and oranges to me.
The IRS just doesn't forget about that stuff. He wasn't going to get away with it regardless.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
The odd part is that he did file, didn't pay, but the charges only hit him for two of the years that he owed...not all of them. Strange.mace1229 said:I thought all along he filed and intentionally hid or withheld several hundred thousand dollars each year from his tax return. I don't know why I thought that was the case. But if he just didn't file for a year or two instead of hiding income, it does seem less intentional and meets the criteria of a fine more than jail time.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help