GOP
Comments
-
tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.www.myspace.com0 -
mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.
0 -
tempo_n_groove said:Vitalogensia said:Merkin Baller said:Vitalogensia said:Rapinoe also didn't drop a flag.
If Rapinoe dropped the flag, it's news to me.
In googling the incident, there were were also questions "Did Rapinoe stomp on the American flag?" so I'm thinking people took that Allie Long incident and tried to make it appear way worse than it actually was. (unless I'm missing a whole other incident... I'm open to being corrected here)
Based on what I've read and heard, I'm inclined to think Rapinoe's been built up as another RW boogey man (boogey woman / boogey person?) by Fox News because lets face it... hating women like Rapinoe resonates w/ Fox's audience.0 -
mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said: it's cookie so do I understand you to mean that demanding equal pay for equal work includingHalifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.Do I understand you to mean that standing up for or kneeling with marginalized communities, demanding equal pay or Equitable pay for equal work standing up for lgbtq folks of what she is a lesbian. That these are in fact far left extremist points of view basic human fucking decency is a far left extremist point of view?Alrighty then.
Move on.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.www.myspace.com0 -
tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.0 -
mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.
Never in the history of this forum have I been against the LBGT community yet I get these questions. It started with what I thought was something so simple as trying to point out which side of the aisle someone is on. It was just that simple but just like anything on here that doesn't go with the flow, everyone piles on one part of a comment and it snowballs.
To answer your question No, it should be a standard right. Where on earth would you ever pull that from anyways?0 -
tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.
Never in the history of this forum have I been against the LBGT community yet I get these questions. It started with what I thought was something so simple as trying to point out which side of the aisle someone is on. It was just that simple but just like anything on here that doesn't go with the flow, everyone piles on one part of a comment and it snowballs.
To answer your question No, it should be a standard right. Where on earth would you ever pull that from anyways?
I say this respectfully, as I don't want to do the piling on thing.... it was a bad comparison / analogy.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:Merkin Baller said:Vitalogensia said:Rapinoe also didn't drop a flag.
If Rapinoe dropped the flag, it's news to me.
In googling the incident, there were were also questions "Did Rapinoe stomp on the American flag?" so I'm thinking people took that Allie Long incident and tried to make it appear way worse than it actually was. (unless I'm missing a whole other incident... I'm open to being corrected here)
Based on what I've read and heard, I'm inclined to think Rapinoe's been built up as another RW boogey man (boogey woman / boogey person?) by Fox News because lets face it... hating women like Rapinoe resonates w/ Fox's audience.
My takeaway from this world cup appearance is the extent to which the WNT has been vilified by RW media, They were criticized this summer for not singing along w/ the anthem... when did that become a thing? (spoiler: it's not a thing and has never been a thing, but this summer it was made into a thing in order to criticize them for being anti-American... it's bullshit propaganda to what end? Stoking Americans' hatred of the other end of the spectrum, which is what Fox does... they have to keep their audience angry)
Rapinoe specifically... she didn't drop the flag, but the impression is out there that she did, and worse... if google prompts the question of her stomping on the flag it tells me people have searched that... that tells me the rumor exists.
I remember at the time a co-worker being pissed that the WNT threw the flag to the ground, and after watching the video, that's not what I saw... this co-worker was angry about it because Fox news told him he should be angry about it.
It's fucked up just how much Fox & others are twisting things to keep people mad & coming back.
0 -
Merkin Baller said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.
Never in the history of this forum have I been against the LBGT community yet I get these questions. It started with what I thought was something so simple as trying to point out which side of the aisle someone is on. It was just that simple but just like anything on here that doesn't go with the flow, everyone piles on one part of a comment and it snowballs.
To answer your question No, it should be a standard right. Where on earth would you ever pull that from anyways?
I say this respectfully, as I don't want to do the piling on thing.... it was a bad comparison / analogy.0 -
care to guess what the demographic polling said?
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
tempo_n_groove said:Merkin Baller said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.
Never in the history of this forum have I been against the LBGT community yet I get these questions. It started with what I thought was something so simple as trying to point out which side of the aisle someone is on. It was just that simple but just like anything on here that doesn't go with the flow, everyone piles on one part of a comment and it snowballs.
To answer your question No, it should be a standard right. Where on earth would you ever pull that from anyways?
I say this respectfully, as I don't want to do the piling on thing.... it was a bad comparison / analogy.folks agree mtg is far right. it ends there.so since it was you that made the comparison, please explain your reasoning for slapping a far left label on rapinoe. I thought I covered the basics of what her stances are. did I miss something? all of those listed in that post are variations of equality, no?_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
tempo_n_groove said:Merkin Baller said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.
Never in the history of this forum have I been against the LBGT community yet I get these questions. It started with what I thought was something so simple as trying to point out which side of the aisle someone is on. It was just that simple but just like anything on here that doesn't go with the flow, everyone piles on one part of a comment and it snowballs.
To answer your question No, it should be a standard right. Where on earth would you ever pull that from anyways?
I say this respectfully, as I don't want to do the piling on thing.... it was a bad comparison / analogy.
You may be right about that, but that doesn't mean you still didn't make a bad analogy. Both things can be true.
0 -
Merkin Baller said:tempo_n_groove said:Merkin Baller said:Vitalogensia said:Rapinoe also didn't drop a flag.
If Rapinoe dropped the flag, it's news to me.
In googling the incident, there were were also questions "Did Rapinoe stomp on the American flag?" so I'm thinking people took that Allie Long incident and tried to make it appear way worse than it actually was. (unless I'm missing a whole other incident... I'm open to being corrected here)
Based on what I've read and heard, I'm inclined to think Rapinoe's been built up as another RW boogey man (boogey woman / boogey person?) by Fox News because lets face it... hating women like Rapinoe resonates w/ Fox's audience.
My takeaway from this world cup appearance is the extent to which the WNT has been vilified by RW media, They were criticized this summer for not singing along w/ the anthem... when did that become a thing? (spoiler: it's not a thing and has never been a thing, but this summer it was made into a thing in order to criticize them for being anti-American... it's bullshit propaganda to what end? Stoking Americans' hatred of the other end of the spectrum, which is what Fox does... they have to keep their audience angry)
Rapinoe specifically... she didn't drop the flag, but the impression is out there that she did, and worse... if google prompts the question of her stomping on the flag it tells me people have searched that... that tells me the rumor exists.
I remember at the time a co-worker being pissed that the WNT threw the flag to the ground, and after watching the video, that's not what I saw... this co-worker was angry about it because Fox news told him he should be angry about it.
It's fucked up just how much Fox & others are twisting things to keep people mad & coming back.www.myspace.com0 -
The Juggler said:Merkin Baller said:tempo_n_groove said:Merkin Baller said:Vitalogensia said:Rapinoe also didn't drop a flag.
If Rapinoe dropped the flag, it's news to me.
In googling the incident, there were were also questions "Did Rapinoe stomp on the American flag?" so I'm thinking people took that Allie Long incident and tried to make it appear way worse than it actually was. (unless I'm missing a whole other incident... I'm open to being corrected here)
Based on what I've read and heard, I'm inclined to think Rapinoe's been built up as another RW boogey man (boogey woman / boogey person?) by Fox News because lets face it... hating women like Rapinoe resonates w/ Fox's audience.
My takeaway from this world cup appearance is the extent to which the WNT has been vilified by RW media, They were criticized this summer for not singing along w/ the anthem... when did that become a thing? (spoiler: it's not a thing and has never been a thing, but this summer it was made into a thing in order to criticize them for being anti-American... it's bullshit propaganda to what end? Stoking Americans' hatred of the other end of the spectrum, which is what Fox does... they have to keep their audience angry)
Rapinoe specifically... she didn't drop the flag, but the impression is out there that she did, and worse... if google prompts the question of her stomping on the flag it tells me people have searched that... that tells me the rumor exists.
I remember at the time a co-worker being pissed that the WNT threw the flag to the ground, and after watching the video, that's not what I saw... this co-worker was angry about it because Fox news told him he should be angry about it.
It's fucked up just how much Fox & others are twisting things to keep people mad & coming back.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.
Never in the history of this forum have I been against the LBGT community yet I get these questions. It started with what I thought was something so simple as trying to point out which side of the aisle someone is on. It was just that simple but just like anything on here that doesn't go with the flow, everyone piles on one part of a comment and it snowballs.
To answer your question No, it should be a standard right. Where on earth would you ever pull that from anyways?
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
0 -
Merkin Baller said:tempo_n_groove said:Merkin Baller said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.
Never in the history of this forum have I been against the LBGT community yet I get these questions. It started with what I thought was something so simple as trying to point out which side of the aisle someone is on. It was just that simple but just like anything on here that doesn't go with the flow, everyone piles on one part of a comment and it snowballs.
To answer your question No, it should be a standard right. Where on earth would you ever pull that from anyways?
I say this respectfully, as I don't want to do the piling on thing.... it was a bad comparison / analogy.
You may be right about that, but that doesn't mean you still didn't make a bad analogy. Both things can be true.0 -
mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.
Never in the history of this forum have I been against the LBGT community yet I get these questions. It started with what I thought was something so simple as trying to point out which side of the aisle someone is on. It was just that simple but just like anything on here that doesn't go with the flow, everyone piles on one part of a comment and it snowballs.
To answer your question No, it should be a standard right. Where on earth would you ever pull that from anyways?
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:josevolution said:The Juggler said:I really don't like people comparing Marge Greene with someone on the other side of the political spectrum and simply saying something like "well one is far right and the other is far left." No. One is a racist, wackjob bigot. The other believes in rights for people MGT discriminates against. It's not the same thing.
If both sides were the same, Al Franken would still be in the senate and even if he were, it’d be a huge stretch to compare the two parties’ extremes as being the “same.”
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.
It's called a political spectrum.
Being for someone's right's is one thing, and shouldn't be labeled extreme, by the way.
Being against those same people's rights is simply unamerican and not, in any way, equivalent to the other side of the spectrum.
We won't come to any common ground on this so let's just move on.
Never in the history of this forum have I been against the LBGT community yet I get these questions. It started with what I thought was something so simple as trying to point out which side of the aisle someone is on. It was just that simple but just like anything on here that doesn't go with the flow, everyone piles on one part of a comment and it snowballs.
To answer your question No, it should be a standard right. Where on earth would you ever pull that from anyways?
You have far left and far right, yes? So you can compare them on a scale. One is far left and one is far right. On different points of a political scale which I tried to convey in that one is for LBGT rights and the other enjoys Gazpacho police. It's not that hard of a concept to grasp.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help