---President Elect Musk and Convicted Felon Donald J Trump---
Comments
- 
            
 Read the indictment. It’s good to know the details.JB16057 said:
 Eyewitness accounts? Where are they?The Juggler said:
 Good lord man. There is audio and eyewitness accounts and they have the actual document.JB16057 said:
 Do you have proof that happened? Can you show me the video, not audio, where he does this? You are assuming you this is true by what you heard. That's not proof.mrussel1 said:
 Showing reporters battle plans for Iran.JB16057 said:
 How is he a clear and present danger to national security?Halifax2TheMax said:
 POOTWH is a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States. Similar to how Michael Milken was a clear and present danger to Wall Street and was denied securities training on Wall Street for life, I believe. But he also served jail time.mrussel1 said:
 I don't see how the DOJ could or would make a deal that includes him dropping out. That would be a mistake and feed the right wing narrative that the charges were only made to damage him and make him leave the race.Halifax2TheMax said:POOTWH’s ego won’t allow him to drop out. The only thing I can think of that might be palatable would be a plea bargain whereas he pleads guilty, agrees he drops out and doesn’t run in exchange for no jail time. And the plea agreement would be under seal so POOTWH could grift off the made up unfairness of it all, have a podcast or some other stupid media outlet that his deluded base could access. He’s the biggest carnival barker the world has ever seen, had the pleasure of knowing and proving PT Barnum was right.
 Video? Are you nuts?0
- 
            Here’s a link, for posterity’s sake.0
- 
            2023
 The source is the indictment. You know you can read that for yourself right? But since I'm such a nice guy, here's a handy pdf:JB16057 said:
 I'm sorry but the new message board standard is that you have to prove what you are saying byThe Juggler said:
 INJB16057 said:
 Eyewitness accounts? Where are they?The Juggler said:
 Good lord man. There is audio and eyewitness accounts and they have the actual document.JB16057 said:
 Do you have proof that happened? Can you show me the video, not audio, where he does this? You are assuming you this is true by what you heard. That's not proof.mrussel1 said:
 Showing reporters battle plans for Iran.JB16057 said:
 How is he a clear and present danger to national security?Halifax2TheMax said:
 POOTWH is a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States. Similar to how Michael Milken was a clear and present danger to Wall Street and was denied securities training on Wall Street for life, I believe. But he also served jail time.mrussel1 said:
 I don't see how the DOJ could or would make a deal that includes him dropping out. That would be a mistake and feed the right wing narrative that the charges were only made to damage him and make him leave the race.Halifax2TheMax said:POOTWH’s ego won’t allow him to drop out. The only thing I can think of that might be palatable would be a plea bargain whereas he pleads guilty, agrees he drops out and doesn’t run in exchange for no jail time. And the plea agreement would be under seal so POOTWH could grift off the made up unfairness of it all, have a podcast or some other stupid media outlet that his deluded base could access. He’s the biggest carnival barker the world has ever seen, had the pleasure of knowing and proving PT Barnum was right.
 Video? Are you nuts?
 THE
 INDICTMENT
 Is this a joke?providing a link to a reputable source. 
 https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.85.0_2.pdf
 www.myspace.com0
- 
            You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?0
- 
            2023
 If one has not read the indictment, does one have any idea what he's talking about?JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
 And we both gave you a link to the same pdf. lol what?www.myspace.com0
- 
            
 I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?0
- 
            
 Why does one have 49 pages and the other have 60 pages if it is the same indictment?The Juggler said:
 If one has not read the indictment, does one have any idea what he's talking about?JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
 And we both gave you a link to the same pdf. lol what?0
- 
            JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
 well, given the feds have a conviction rate at or near 99% , I'd say , yeah. Yeah it is indisputible.
 _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
 Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
 you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
 memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
 another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
- 
            2023
 I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry. You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man.JB16057 said:
 I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
 Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it.Post edited by Kat onwww.myspace.com0
- 
            JB16057 said:
 I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?you would be well served by reading or listening to them being read for sure.so you have the print versions, you could also lok for annotated versions._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
 Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
 you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
 memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
 another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
- 
            2023
 Sorry. I believe superseding indictments are the reason. They added 4 counts, including confirming they have the Iran War Plan he was showing to those reporters...the same war plan he claimed he did not have multiple times recently.JB16057 said:
 Why does one have 49 pages and the other have 60 pages if it is the same indictment?The Juggler said:
 If one has not read the indictment, does one have any idea what he's talking about?JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
 And we both gave you a link to the same pdf. lol what?www.myspace.com0
- 
            latest indicment..Bonus Episode: Listen to the Third Indictment. Episode: https://www.podcastrepublic.net/episode/94815268369 . Media: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/8G441/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO5981343532.mp3?updated=1690938621 . <p>A federal grand jury indicted Donald Trump on Tuesday with a series of crimes related to his effo... -- Sent from Podcast Republic._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
 Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
 you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
 memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
 another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
- 
            superseding indictment from last week...Bonus Episode: Listen to the Superseding Indictment. Episode: https://www.podcastrepublic.net/episode/94808828998 . Media: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/8G441/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO1677839935.mp3?updated=1690581535 . <p>Federal prosecutors have added new charges against Trump in the classified documents case, includ... -- Sent from Podcast Republic._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
 Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
 you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
 memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
 another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
- 
            
 Don’t be afraid to read the case # for each and the respective dates of entry.JB16057 said:
 Why does one have 49 pages and the other have 60 pages if it is the same indictment?The Juggler said:
 If one has not read the indictment, does one have any idea what he's talking about?JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
 And we both gave you a link to the same pdf. lol what?The 60 page indictment was update of the original. It’s the same case. You should read up on it, there’s witnesses!  0 0
- 
            initial indictment from the docs case, not in full but confined to trumps charges, omitting Nauta's part of it.Listen to the Indictment. Episode: https://www.podcastrepublic.net/episode/94729989371 . Media: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/8G441/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO7227105109.mp3?updated=1686588137 . <p>This is a reading of the classified documents indictment against former President Trump that was ... -- Sent from Podcast Republic._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
 Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
 you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
 memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
 another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
- 
            
 Why the personal attack? You call me foolish yet I'm asking legitimate questions. Do you want this thread to get locked? I've broken the rules and have had my account blocked on this message board before but I don't see the same treatment for people like you(left, democrat). The thread gets locked and everyone moves on with no consequence and then the cycle just repeats itself.The Juggler said:
 I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry. You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man.JB16057 said:
 I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
 Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it.Post edited by Kat on0
- 
            
 I appreciate you sending this. I'll read the indictment because I'd probably lose track trying to listen to it.mickeyrat said:initial indictment from the docs case, not in full but confined to trumps charges, omitting Nauta's part of it.Listen to the Indictment. Episode: https://www.podcastrepublic.net/episode/94729989371 . Media: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/8G441/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO7227105109.mp3?updated=1686588137 . <p>This is a reading of the classified documents indictment against former President Trump that was ... -- Sent from Podcast Republic.0
- 
            JB16057 said:
 I appreciate you sending this. I'll read the indictment because I'd probably lose track trying to listen to it.mickeyrat said:initial indictment from the docs case, not in full but confined to trumps charges, omitting Nauta's part of it.Listen to the Indictment. Episode: https://www.podcastrepublic.net/episode/94729989371 . Media: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/8G441/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO7227105109.mp3?updated=1686588137 . <p>This is a reading of the classified documents indictment against former President Trump that was ... -- Sent from Podcast Republic.
 I found it compelling listening. and you can always rewind....
 _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
 Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
 you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
 memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
 another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
- 
            _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
 Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
 you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
 memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
 another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
- 
            2023
 You consider "foolish" a personal attack?JB16057 said:
 Why the personal attack? You call me foolish yet I'm asking legitimate questions. Do you want this thread to get locked? I've broken the rules and have had my account blocked on this message board before but I don't see the same treatment for people like you(left, democrat). The thread gets locked and everyone moves on with no consequence and then the cycle just repeats itself.The Juggler said:
 I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry. You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man.JB16057 said:
 I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
 If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
 Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it.
 Sorry but your posts on the prior page about being absolutely certain Biden stole documents (with no proof) while doubting what's in an actual indictment on Trump, while admitting you did not read the indictment, appear foolish to me. I am sorry but that behavior just seems foolish. We're all adults here, I never thought "foolish" is a word someone would get so worked up over.
 Please read up on this stuff. It's important.
 Also, I am not a democrat.Post edited by The Juggler onwww.myspace.com0
This discussion has been closed.
            Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help


