---President Elect Musk and Convicted Felon Donald J Trump---

18586889091427

Comments

  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,769
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    JB16057 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    POOTWH’s ego won’t allow him to drop out. The only thing I can think of that might be palatable would be a plea bargain whereas he pleads guilty, agrees he drops out and doesn’t run in exchange for no jail time. And the plea agreement would be under seal so POOTWH could grift off the made up unfairness of it all, have a podcast or some other stupid media outlet that his deluded base could access. He’s the biggest carnival barker the world has ever seen, had the pleasure of knowing and proving PT Barnum was right.
    I don't see how the DOJ could or would make a deal that includes him dropping out.  That would be a mistake and feed the right wing narrative that the charges were only made to damage him and make him leave the race.  
    POOTWH is a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States. Similar to how Michael Milken was a clear and present danger to Wall Street and was denied securities training on Wall Street for life, I believe. But he also served jail time.
    How is he a clear and present danger to national security? 
    Showing reporters battle plans for Iran.  
    Do you have proof that happened? Can you show me the video, not audio, where he does this? You are assuming you this is true by what you heard. That's not proof.
    Good lord man. There is audio and eyewitness accounts and they have the actual document.

    Video? Are you nuts?
    Eyewitness accounts? Where are they?
    Read the indictment. It’s good to know the details. 
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    2023
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    JB16057 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    POOTWH’s ego won’t allow him to drop out. The only thing I can think of that might be palatable would be a plea bargain whereas he pleads guilty, agrees he drops out and doesn’t run in exchange for no jail time. And the plea agreement would be under seal so POOTWH could grift off the made up unfairness of it all, have a podcast or some other stupid media outlet that his deluded base could access. He’s the biggest carnival barker the world has ever seen, had the pleasure of knowing and proving PT Barnum was right.
    I don't see how the DOJ could or would make a deal that includes him dropping out.  That would be a mistake and feed the right wing narrative that the charges were only made to damage him and make him leave the race.  
    POOTWH is a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States. Similar to how Michael Milken was a clear and present danger to Wall Street and was denied securities training on Wall Street for life, I believe. But he also served jail time.
    How is he a clear and present danger to national security? 
    Showing reporters battle plans for Iran.  
    Do you have proof that happened? Can you show me the video, not audio, where he does this? You are assuming you this is true by what you heard. That's not proof.
    Good lord man. There is audio and eyewitness accounts and they have the actual document.

    Video? Are you nuts?
    Eyewitness accounts? Where are they?
    IN
    THE
    INDICTMENT

    Is this a joke?

    I'm sorry but the new message board standard is that you have to prove what you are saying by providing a link to a reputable source.
    The source is the indictment. You know you can read that for yourself right? But since I'm such a nice guy, here's a handy pdf:

    https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.85.0_2.pdf
    www.myspace.com
  • JB16057
    JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited August 2023
    2023
    JB16057 said:
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
    If one has not read the indictment, does one have any idea what he's talking about?

    And we both gave you a  link to the same pdf. lol what?
    www.myspace.com
  • JB16057
    JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    JB16057 said:
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
    I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions? 
  • JB16057
    JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    JB16057 said:
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
    If one has not read the indictment, does one have any idea what he's talking about?

    And we both gave you a  link to the same pdf. lol what?
    Why does one have 49 pages and the other have 60 pages if it is the same indictment?
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,367
    JB16057 said:
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?

    well, given the feds have a conviction rate at or near 99% , I'd  say , yeah. Yeah it is indisputible.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited August 2023
    2023
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
    I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions? 
    I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry.  You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man. 

    Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it. 
    Post edited by Kat on
    www.myspace.com
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,367
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
    I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions? 

    you would be well served by reading or listening to them being read for sure.

    so you have the print versions, you could also lok for annotated versions.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited August 2023
    2023
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
    If one has not read the indictment, does one have any idea what he's talking about?

    And we both gave you a  link to the same pdf. lol what?
    Why does one have 49 pages and the other have 60 pages if it is the same indictment?
    Sorry. I believe superseding indictments are the reason. They added 4 counts, including confirming they have the Iran War Plan he was showing to those reporters...the same war plan he claimed he did not have multiple times recently. 
    www.myspace.com
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,367
    latest indicment..

    Bonus Episode: Listen to the Third Indictment. Episode: https://www.podcastrepublic.net/episode/94815268369 . Media: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/8G441/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO5981343532.mp3?updated=1690938621 . <p>A federal grand jury indicted Donald Trump on Tuesday with a series of crimes related to his effo... -- Sent from Podcast Republic.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,367
    superseding indictment from last week...
    Bonus Episode: Listen to the Superseding Indictment. Episode: https://www.podcastrepublic.net/episode/94808828998 . Media: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/8G441/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO1677839935.mp3?updated=1690581535 . <p>Federal prosecutors have added new charges against Trump in the classified documents case, includ... -- Sent from Podcast Republic.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,769
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
    If one has not read the indictment, does one have any idea what he's talking about?

    And we both gave you a  link to the same pdf. lol what?
    Why does one have 49 pages and the other have 60 pages if it is the same indictment?
    Don’t be afraid to read the case # for each and the respective dates of entry. 

    The 60 page indictment was update of the original. It’s the same case. You should read up on it, there’s witnesses! 




  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,367
    initial indictment from the docs case, not in full but confined to trumps charges, omitting Nauta's part of it.

    Listen to the Indictment. Episode: https://www.podcastrepublic.net/episode/94729989371 . Media: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/8G441/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO7227105109.mp3?updated=1686588137 . <p>This is a reading of the classified documents indictment against former President Trump that was ... -- Sent from Podcast Republic.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • JB16057
    JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    edited August 2023
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
    I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions? 
    I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry.  You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man. 

    Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it. 
    Why the personal attack? You call me foolish yet I'm asking legitimate questions. Do you want this thread to get locked? I've broken the rules and have had my account blocked on this message board before but I don't see the same treatment for people like you(left, democrat). The thread gets locked and everyone moves on with no consequence and then the cycle just repeats itself. 
    Post edited by Kat on
  • JB16057
    JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    mickeyrat said:
    initial indictment from the docs case, not in full but confined to trumps charges, omitting Nauta's part of it.

    Listen to the Indictment. Episode: https://www.podcastrepublic.net/episode/94729989371 . Media: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/8G441/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO7227105109.mp3?updated=1686588137 . <p>This is a reading of the classified documents indictment against former President Trump that was ... -- Sent from Podcast Republic.
    I appreciate you sending this. I'll read the indictment because I'd probably lose track trying to listen to it. 
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,367
    JB16057 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    initial indictment from the docs case, not in full but confined to trumps charges, omitting Nauta's part of it.

    Listen to the Indictment. Episode: https://www.podcastrepublic.net/episode/94729989371 . Media: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/8G441/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO7227105109.mp3?updated=1686588137 . <p>This is a reading of the classified documents indictment against former President Trump that was ... -- Sent from Podcast Republic.
    I appreciate you sending this. I'll read the indictment because I'd probably lose track trying to listen to it. 

    I found it compelling listening. and you can always rewind....
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,367
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited August 2023
    2023
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.

    If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
    I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions? 
    I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry. You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man. 

    Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it. 
    Why the personal attack? You call me foolish yet I'm asking legitimate questions. Do you want this thread to get locked? I've broken the rules and have had my account blocked on this message board before but I don't see the same treatment for people like you(left, democrat). The thread gets locked and everyone moves on with no consequence and then the cycle just repeats itself. 
    You consider "foolish" a personal attack?

    Sorry but your posts on the prior page about being absolutely certain Biden stole documents (with no proof) while doubting what's in an actual indictment on Trump, while admitting you did not read the indictment, appear foolish to me. I am sorry but that behavior just seems foolish. We're all adults here, I never thought "foolish" is a word someone would get so worked up over. 

    Please read up on this stuff. It's important.

    Also, I am not a democrat.
    Post edited by The Juggler on
    www.myspace.com
This discussion has been closed.