Official 2023 Ticket Lottery Results Thread

100 Pacer said:

3days said:

There's an easy way to see how platinum seats have impacted our seat locations: Indiana.

As opposed to all other shows on this tour, the seats project from the stage in a more straight forward manner. There's much less room for argument about which seats are actually best. Start closest to the stage, and move backward. Whereas, in an arena you could argue that floor seats are best, or that seats on the sides are best. You could argue that balcony seats are better than lower level seats if the balcony section is closer to the stage. Noblesville simplifies the matter. Start front and work back. 

Take membership numbers into consideration, and divide the seats into quarters or thirds. There will always be variables and unknowns, but I think it paints a picture.

Not an accurate representation due to smaller sample size: only 7,000 reserved seats with up to 10% allocated for Premium leaves 6,300 reserved seats up for grabs in a lottery where you have how many tens of thousands entering?

3days said:

100 Pacer said:

3days said:

There's an easy way to see how platinum seats have impacted our seat locations: Indiana.

As opposed to all other shows on this tour, the seats project from the stage in a more straight forward manner. There's much less room for argument about which seats are actually best. Start closest to the stage, and move backward. Whereas, in an arena you could argue that floor seats are best, or that seats on the sides are best. You could argue that balcony seats are better than lower level seats if the balcony section is closer to the stage. Noblesville simplifies the matter. Start front and work back. 

Take membership numbers into consideration, and divide the seats into quarters or thirds. There will always be variables and unknowns, but I think it paints a picture.

Not an accurate representation due to smaller sample size: only 7,000 reserved seats with up to 10% allocated for Premium leaves 6,300 reserved seats up for grabs in a lottery where you have how many tens of thousands entering?

Respectfully I disagree. Small sample? Sure, but it's still a sample that should be filled with a variety of 10c numbers.

Tens of thousands? Not likely. The last credible information I heard was 60 - 70k active 10c members. A third of ALL active members put in for Indiana seats? Not likely. I'd be surprised if 10k did.

It stands to reason that lots of folks with high membership numbers woul've put in for GA/Res. Therefore, lots of people who are 300xxx and higher should have also won seating. Old-timers and newbies alike should have representation in the Ruoff seats.  

100 Pacer said:

3days said:

100 Pacer said:

3days said:

There's an easy way to see how platinum seats have impacted our seat locations: Indiana.

As opposed to all other shows on this tour, the seats project from the stage in a more straight forward manner. There's much less room for argument about which seats are actually best. Start closest to the stage, and move backward. Whereas, in an arena you could argue that floor seats are best, or that seats on the sides are best. You could argue that balcony seats are better than lower level seats if the balcony section is closer to the stage. Noblesville simplifies the matter. Start front and work back. 

Take membership numbers into consideration, and divide the seats into quarters or thirds. There will always be variables and unknowns, but I think it paints a picture.

Not an accurate representation due to smaller sample size: only 7,000 reserved seats with up to 10% allocated for Premium leaves 6,300 reserved seats up for grabs in a lottery where you have how many tens of thousands entering?

Respectfully I disagree. Small sample? Sure, but it's still a sample that should be filled with a variety of 10c numbers.

Tens of thousands? Not likely. The last credible information I heard was 60 - 70k active 10c members. A third of ALL active members put in for Indiana seats? Not likely. I'd be surprised if 10k did.

It stands to reason that lots of folks with high membership numbers woul've put in for GA/Res. Therefore, lots of people who are 300xxx and higher should have also won seating. Old-timers and newbies alike should have representation in the Ruoff seats.  

Was it a decade ago (or longer?) that Tim went on the record to confirm 250,000 active 10C members (which was understood to be consistent renewals). That number is, rough estimate here, at least 350,000 active 10C members renewing year in year out. How did you arrive at your figure? 

Noblesville will be filled with a variety of 10C numbers but with fewer seats overall your representation is skewed. More accurate sample size would be comparing arenas at play with priors where Premium was also a factor.

3days said:

100 Pacer said:

3days said:

100 Pacer said:

3days said:

There's an easy way to see how platinum seats have impacted our seat locations: Indiana.

As opposed to all other shows on this tour, the seats project from the stage in a more straight forward manner. There's much less room for argument about which seats are actually best. Start closest to the stage, and move backward. Whereas, in an arena you could argue that floor seats are best, or that seats on the sides are best. You could argue that balcony seats are better than lower level seats if the balcony section is closer to the stage. Noblesville simplifies the matter. Start front and work back. 

Take membership numbers into consideration, and divide the seats into quarters or thirds. There will always be variables and unknowns, but I think it paints a picture.

Not an accurate representation due to smaller sample size: only 7,000 reserved seats with up to 10% allocated for Premium leaves 6,300 reserved seats up for grabs in a lottery where you have how many tens of thousands entering?

Respectfully I disagree. Small sample? Sure, but it's still a sample that should be filled with a variety of 10c numbers.

Tens of thousands? Not likely. The last credible information I heard was 60 - 70k active 10c members. A third of ALL active members put in for Indiana seats? Not likely. I'd be surprised if 10k did.

It stands to reason that lots of folks with high membership numbers woul've put in for GA/Res. Therefore, lots of people who are 300xxx and higher should have also won seating. Old-timers and newbies alike should have representation in the Ruoff seats.  

Was it a decade ago (or longer?) that Tim went on the record to confirm 250,000 active 10C members (which was understood to be consistent renewals). That number is, rough estimate here, at least 350,000 active 10C members renewing year in year out. How did you arrive at your figure? 

Noblesville will be filled with a variety of 10C numbers but with fewer seats overall your representation is skewed. More accurate sample size would be comparing arenas at play with priors where Premium was also a factor.

You're probably right on active memberships. I may have heard it wrong, or remembered the number wrong.

That being said, I still doubt that tens of thousands of 10c members submitted for Indiana seats. If the number requesting was 30,000, that would mean that less than 1/3 of us won Indiana seats... which doesn't look congruent to the anecdotal stuff. Awful lot of people claiming victory with such poor odds.

Skewed? Who's to say. The seats could be an almost perfectly varied representation. The problem with arenas is that it's much harder to determine which seats are better. 

SHZA said:

pjalli said:

SHZA said:

pjalli said:

marcPJfan said:

I’d email the 10c.  No way they don’t make this right.

I did, look at this response. I replied to ask them to look into my member number, no further response...

Who defines which seats are the "best"? It's all subjective. Think of the VIP section at some festivals. VIP bleachers are about a mile from the stage and supposedly have "premium sightlines", whereas standard tickets have free access to the areas closer to the stage. If 10C decided that the best seats are farther away because it's a nice view of the whole stage and the sound is better than being up close, then a 200-section seat in Austin for a senior member is indeed an "accurate seniority-based seating assignment." 

You are seriously telling me that the back of the section the absolute farthest from the stage would be where the seniority should start? Come on. This has to be sarcasm right?

I'm not saying should. I'm saying it's possible because there's a lack of transparency and clear guidelines. All we know is that seniority gets priority. How they decide to rank each seat in the arena from best to worst is a complete mystery and could be very subjective. Meaning your assignment could be accurate based on the "best-seat" rankings of whoever came up with them, even if most people would disagree with that person's subjective ranking system. 

given2fly23 said:

mookieb14 said:

flanosmasseur said:

100 Pacer said:

3days said:

There's an easy way to see how platinum seats have impacted our seat locations: Indiana.

As opposed to all other shows on this tour, the seats project from the stage in a more straight forward manner. There's much less room for argument about which seats are actually best. Start closest to the stage, and move backward. Whereas, in an arena you could argue that floor seats are best, or that seats on the sides are best. You could argue that balcony seats are better than lower level seats if the balcony section is closer to the stage. Noblesville simplifies the matter. Start front and work back. 

Take membership numbers into consideration, and divide the seats into quarters or thirds. There will always be variables and unknowns, but I think it paints a picture.

Not an accurate representation due to smaller sample size: only 7,000 reserved seats with up to 10% allocated for Premium leaves 6,300 reserved seats up for grabs in a lottery where you have how many tens of thousands entering?

Thank you for the comment @100 Pacer I've been sitting here fuming since Friday:

(Indy Priority 1, only show requested)

First draw - Sec H, Row S, Seats 15&16

Second draw - Sec H, Row W, Seats 46&47...about as far right as you can get

532XXX

I knew with my high number I wasn't going to get A/B/C or even F for that matter...so I felt good about the first draw. But now, more than likely, I won't be able to see Stone or Boom. I've seen DMB there several times in A/B/C but have been in their FC for 20+ years. Your comment just reiterated the fact that I should be happy I got anything at all.

Out of curiosity, buddy requested noblesville priority one ga/res.  Does anyone know of another member with that ranking getting nothing?  More than 3000ish people got selected over him? Did the 20 something all have priority one?

Yes, my friend had IND GA/Reserved and Reserved as her #1 priority and got nothing. It wasn’t an entry or credit card issue because she did get her 2nd and 3rd shows. TM fucked this up royally. 

pjl44 said:

SHZA said:

pjalli said:

SHZA said:

pjalli said:

marcPJfan said:

I’d email the 10c.  No way they don’t make this right.

I did, look at this response. I replied to ask them to look into my member number, no further response...

Who defines which seats are the "best"? It's all subjective. Think of the VIP section at some festivals. VIP bleachers are about a mile from the stage and supposedly have "premium sightlines", whereas standard tickets have free access to the areas closer to the stage. If 10C decided that the best seats are farther away because it's a nice view of the whole stage and the sound is better than being up close, then a 200-section seat in Austin for a senior member is indeed an "accurate seniority-based seating assignment." 

You are seriously telling me that the back of the section the absolute farthest from the stage would be where the seniority should start? Come on. This has to be sarcasm right?

I'm not saying should. I'm saying it's possible because there's a lack of transparency and clear guidelines. All we know is that seniority gets priority. How they decide to rank each seat in the arena from best to worst is a complete mystery and could be very subjective. Meaning your assignment could be accurate based on the "best-seat" rankings of whoever came up with them, even if most people would disagree with that person's subjective ranking system. 

You're too sharp for this not to just be piling on someone who is already severely bummed out. In 25-30 years of seniority seating this is not how it's worked. If they were testing this delightful new theory there would be waves of people reporting this. But you know all that.