Fox News
Comments
-
Am I missing something? This is about the Keystone XL....which was under construction and NOT flowingRemember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
QUESTION: Would President Biden ever undo his executive order that stopped the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline?
JEN PSAKI: Are you suggesting that would solve the gas prices issue?
QUESTION: Well, do you think that that would maybe affect prices faster than getting the whole country off of fossil fuels?
JEN PSAKI: I actually don't think it would. The Keystone was not an oil field, it's a pipeline.
QUESTION: Yeah.
JEN PSAKI: Also, the oil is continuing to flow in just through other means. So, it actually would have nothing to do with the current supply imbalance.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
she looked like she just had no answer, because her answer wasn’t even a correct response to his question. It’s even worse on paper, not as bad if you watched the clip. If you remove the glasses most on here look through, most of her answers are deflection or non truths. She plays a really good defense of Biden, she should get a raise. She’ll be quitting come June though anyway.mace1229 said:
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either.gimmesometruth27 said:
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.mace1229 said:
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2.Gern Blansten said:
So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either.
She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.I'm like an opening band for your mom.0 -
For folks paying attention, a more detailed response isn't necessary. What's next? She didn't bust out the maps, charts, graphs and picture-book to explain why Keystone won't impact gas prices? The fucking pipeline isn't even built, at least the extension, so no, its not a matter of turning it on.mace1229 said:
Because his question was are you considering reopening the pipeline, in other words, make it flow? Her answer was no because it’s not flowing. Obviously, if it was flowing he wouldn’t ask you to turn it on make it flow. There are so many better answers, like the pipeline wouldn’t hav e been completed until 2023 so it would t make a difference, or that it only accounts for something like 5% of our oil and we can make that up other ways. But when you just say “we’re not going to make it flow because it’s not flowing” sounds like you don’t know what the keystone pipeline is.Halifax2TheMax said:
How did her answer “make no sense?” And how did her response “make her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about?”mace1229 said:
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either.gimmesometruth27 said:
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.mace1229 said:
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2.Gern Blansten said:
So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either.
She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
Some people get it.
Douchey's sole role at these press conferences is to get sound bites. There's absolutely no interest nor intent of Faux news to accurately portray this Administration's policies on anything. Her response was anything other than "making no sense" or "make her look like she didn't know what she was talking about."09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
That’s a better answer. But that exchange wasn’t in the clip that was shared that was being commented on. I was just commenting on what was shared and the responses to it.Gern Blansten said:QUESTION: Would President Biden ever undo his executive order that stopped the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline?
JEN PSAKI: Are you suggesting that would solve the gas prices issue?
QUESTION: Well, do you think that that would maybe affect prices faster than getting the whole country off of fossil fuels?
JEN PSAKI: I actually don't think it would. The Keystone was not an oil field, it's a pipeline.
QUESTION: Yeah.
JEN PSAKI: Also, the oil is continuing to flow in just through other means. So, it actually would have nothing to do with the current supply imbalance.0 -
disagree on this completely. I think she's incredibly articulate and answers in full. unlike Lying Barbie of the last admin.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
she looked like she just had no answer, because her answer wasn’t even a correct response to his question. It’s even worse on paper, not as bad if you watched the clip. If you remove the glasses most on here look through, most of her answers are deflection or non truths. She plays a really good defense of Biden, she should get a raise. She’ll be quitting come June though anyway.mace1229 said:
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either.gimmesometruth27 said:
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.mace1229 said:
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2.Gern Blansten said:
So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either.
She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Reopen something not constructed? Makes perfect sense.mace1229 said:
Because his question was are you considering reopening the pipeline, in other words, make it flow? Her answer was no because it’s not flowing. Obviously, if it was flowing he wouldn’t ask you to turn it on make it flow. There are so many better answers, like the pipeline wouldn’t hav e been completed until 2023 so it would t make a difference, or that it only accounts for something like 5% of our oil and we can make that up other ways. But when you just say “we’re not going to make it flow because it’s not flowing” sounds like you don’t know what the keystone pipeline is.Halifax2TheMax said:
How did her answer “make no sense?” And how did her response “make her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about?”mace1229 said:
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either.gimmesometruth27 said:
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.mace1229 said:
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2.Gern Blansten said:
So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either.
She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
Some people get it.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
LOL...you're playing off a false narrative. Educate yourself please for the love of god.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
she looked like she just had no answer, because her answer wasn’t even a correct response to his question. It’s even worse on paper, not as bad if you watched the clip. If you remove the glasses most on here look through, most of her answers are deflection or non truths. She plays a really good defense of Biden, she should get a raise. She’ll be quitting come June though anyway.mace1229 said:
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either.gimmesometruth27 said:
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.mace1229 said:
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2.Gern Blansten said:
So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either.
She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
mace1229 said:
Because his question was are you considering reopening the pipeline, in other words, make it flow? Her answer was no because it’s not flowing. Obviously, if it was flowing he wouldn’t ask you to turn it on make it flow. There are so many better answers, like the pipeline wouldn’t hav e been completed until 2023 so it would t make a difference, or that it only accounts for something like 5% of our oil and we can make that up other ways. But when you just say “we’re not going to make it flow because it’s not flowing” sounds like you don’t know what the keystone pipeline is.Halifax2TheMax said:
How did her answer “make no sense?” And how did her response “make her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about?”mace1229 said:
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either.gimmesometruth27 said:
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.mace1229 said:
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2.Gern Blansten said:
So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either.
She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
Some people get it.
Sounds to me like she knew exactly what she was talking about and this was the perfect answer to his nonsensical question. Not sure why you don't get it, but the rest of us do.
24 years old, mid-life crisis
nowadays hits you when you're young0 -
RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
she looked like she just had no answer, because her answer wasn’t even a correct response to his question. It’s even worse on paper, not as bad if you watched the clip. If you remove the glasses most on here look through, most of her answers are deflection or non truths. She plays a really good defense of Biden, she should get a raise. She’ll be quitting come June though anyway.mace1229 said:
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either.gimmesometruth27 said:
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.mace1229 said:
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2.Gern Blansten said:
So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either.
She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
she looked like she just had no answer, because her answer wasn’t even a correct response to his question. It’s even worse on paper, not as bad if you watched the clip. If you remove the glasses most on here look through, most of her answers are deflection or non truths. She plays a really good defense of Biden, she should get a raise. She’ll be quitting come June though anyway.mace1229 said:
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either.gimmesometruth27 said:
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.mace1229 said:
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2.Gern Blansten said:
So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either.
She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
Wrong on every point. Her answer was CORRECT given the situation with the XL pipeline and gas supply/prices, and the way she responded was PERFECT, give the troll question that was thrown at her. Psaki is killing it in her role as Press Secretary.24 years old, mid-life crisis
nowadays hits you when you're young0 -
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
i don't think he is saying anything different than what a lot of us say on a daily basis.Spiritual_Chaos said:"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
Speaking of Tucker--
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/03/exclusive-kremlin-putin-russia-ukraine-war-memo-tucker-carlson-fox/Leaked Kremlin Memo to Russian Media: It Is “Essential” to Feature Tucker Carlson
The Russian government has pressed outlets to highlight the Fox host’s Putin-helping broadcasts.
On March 3, as Russian military forces bombed Ukrainian cities as part of Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of his neighbor, the Kremlin sent out talking points to state-friendly media outlets with a request: Use more Tucker Carlson.
“It is essential to use as much as possible fragments of broadcasts of the popular Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who sharply criticizes the actions of the United States [and] NATO, their negative role in unleashing the conflict in Ukraine, [and] the defiantly provocative behavior from the leadership of the Western countries and NATO towards the Russian Federation and towards President Putin, personally,” advises the 12-page document written in Russian. It sums up Carlson’s position: “Russia is only protecting its interests and security.” The memo includes a quote from Carlson: “And how would the US behave if such a situation developed in neighboring Mexico or Canada?”
The document—titled “For Media and Commentators (recommendations for coverage of events as of 03.03)”—was produced, according to its metadata, at a Russian government agency called the Department of Information and Telecommunications Support, which is part of the Russian security apparatus. It was provided to Mother Jones by a contributor to a national Russian media outlet who asked not to be identified. The source said memos like this one have been regularly sent by Putin’s administration to media organizations during the war. Independent media outlets in Russia have been forced to shut down since the start of the conflict.
As The Mick would say: "continues..."
www.myspace.com0 -
The Juggler said:Speaking of Tucker--
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/03/exclusive-kremlin-putin-russia-ukraine-war-memo-tucker-carlson-fox/Leaked Kremlin Memo to Russian Media: It Is “Essential” to Feature Tucker Carlson
The Russian government has pressed outlets to highlight the Fox host’s Putin-helping broadcasts.
On March 3, as Russian military forces bombed Ukrainian cities as part of Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of his neighbor, the Kremlin sent out talking points to state-friendly media outlets with a request: Use more Tucker Carlson.
“It is essential to use as much as possible fragments of broadcasts of the popular Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who sharply criticizes the actions of the United States [and] NATO, their negative role in unleashing the conflict in Ukraine, [and] the defiantly provocative behavior from the leadership of the Western countries and NATO towards the Russian Federation and towards President Putin, personally,” advises the 12-page document written in Russian. It sums up Carlson’s position: “Russia is only protecting its interests and security.” The memo includes a quote from Carlson: “And how would the US behave if such a situation developed in neighboring Mexico or Canada?”
The document—titled “For Media and Commentators (recommendations for coverage of events as of 03.03)”—was produced, according to its metadata, at a Russian government agency called the Department of Information and Telecommunications Support, which is part of the Russian security apparatus. It was provided to Mother Jones by a contributor to a national Russian media outlet who asked not to be identified. The source said memos like this one have been regularly sent by Putin’s administration to media organizations during the war. Independent media outlets in Russia have been forced to shut down since the start of the conflict.
As The Mick would say: "continues..."
as a nameless mod ordered the mick to say.......
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
I like it!mickeyrat said:The Juggler said:Speaking of Tucker--
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/03/exclusive-kremlin-putin-russia-ukraine-war-memo-tucker-carlson-fox/Leaked Kremlin Memo to Russian Media: It Is “Essential” to Feature Tucker Carlson
The Russian government has pressed outlets to highlight the Fox host’s Putin-helping broadcasts.
On March 3, as Russian military forces bombed Ukrainian cities as part of Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of his neighbor, the Kremlin sent out talking points to state-friendly media outlets with a request: Use more Tucker Carlson.
“It is essential to use as much as possible fragments of broadcasts of the popular Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who sharply criticizes the actions of the United States [and] NATO, their negative role in unleashing the conflict in Ukraine, [and] the defiantly provocative behavior from the leadership of the Western countries and NATO towards the Russian Federation and towards President Putin, personally,” advises the 12-page document written in Russian. It sums up Carlson’s position: “Russia is only protecting its interests and security.” The memo includes a quote from Carlson: “And how would the US behave if such a situation developed in neighboring Mexico or Canada?”
The document—titled “For Media and Commentators (recommendations for coverage of events as of 03.03)”—was produced, according to its metadata, at a Russian government agency called the Department of Information and Telecommunications Support, which is part of the Russian security apparatus. It was provided to Mother Jones by a contributor to a national Russian media outlet who asked not to be identified. The source said memos like this one have been regularly sent by Putin’s administration to media organizations during the war. Independent media outlets in Russia have been forced to shut down since the start of the conflict.
As The Mick would say: "continues..."
as a nameless mod ordered the mick to say.......www.myspace.com0 -
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
Breaking news.....there is a lot of stupidity and ignorance over at focksnooze.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Now imagine the people who watch, listen, and believe their bullshit.0 -
at first when he said "lost their stooge in an election" I nearly spat out my water as I thought he meant trump. lolYour boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
-
Come on man, they get their pundits from the finest places, Rachel is an alum of MTV's "Real World". What more qualifications does one need to discuss global affairs?Bentleyspop said:
Breaking news.....there is a lot of stupidity and ignorance over at focksnooze.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Now imagine the people who watch, listen, and believe their bullshit.This weekend we rock Portland0 -
are you serious? LOLPoncier said:
Come on man, they get their pundits from the finest places, Rachel is an alum of MTV's "Real World". What more qualifications does one need to discuss global affairs?Bentleyspop said:
Breaking news.....there is a lot of stupidity and ignorance over at focksnooze.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Now imagine the people who watch, listen, and believe their bullshit.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help