Capitol Riots 2
Comments
-
In case anyone doesn't know who Officer Fanone is:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/new-video-shows-brutal-beating-d-c-metropolitan-police-officer-n1267210
0 -
You said "I think you meant prosecute". That is assuming...mrussel1 said:
I don't make assumptions. Otherwise I would assume you knew you can only be charged under the criminal code.tempo_n_groove said:
I know, I know, but you both knew what I meant, I didn't proof read, bad habit...Halifax2TheMax said:
Words matter. Words matter.tempo_n_groove said:Halifax2TheMax said:
I think you meant "prosecute?" Those two words are not interchangeable.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Since you both get that I wrote the wrong word and "prosecute" is it. Do you understand it now?Halifax2TheMax said:
I think you meant "prosecute?" Those two words are not interchangeable.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
And you were right.0 -
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".0 -
just despicable.Merkin Baller said:In case anyone doesn't know who Officer Fanone is:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/new-video-shows-brutal-beating-d-c-metropolitan-police-officer-n1267210Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.0 -
I knew what you meant. An odd thing to keep going back and forth on, I agree.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
I have a suggestion. guess what it is.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
I agree with you so not sure why you're getting snarky?mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
I have a suggestion. guess what it is.0 -
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I don't understand what you are trying to get at, I really don't...Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.
I understand the difference of the words. I wrote the wrong one and you and another picked up on it and both admitted I was wrong yet we are still going around with this?
0 -
You then asked, depending on which word was used, “what difference does it make?” and tried to equate that to a misspelled word. The difference, if you really don’t know, is quite large and substantial in their meaning and consequences, particularly in the context of your original post. The events of January 6th are not a laughing matter, nor one to be so easily misrepresented or glib about. January 6th wasn’t the end but the beginning.tempo_n_groove said:
I don't understand what you are trying to get at, I really don't...Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.
I understand the difference of the words. I wrote the wrong one and you and another picked up on it and both admitted I was wrong yet we are still going around with this?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I said you were right.Halifax2TheMax said:
You then asked, depending on which word was used, “what difference does it make?” and tried to equate that to a misspelled word. The difference, if you really don’t know, is quite large and substantial in their meaning and consequences, particularly in the context of your original post. The events of January 6th are not a laughing matter, nor one to be so easily misrepresented or glib about. January 6th wasn’t the end but the beginning.tempo_n_groove said:
I don't understand what you are trying to get at, I really don't...Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.
I understand the difference of the words. I wrote the wrong one and you and another picked up on it and both admitted I was wrong yet we are still going around with this?
I misspelled the word.
I admitted to the above.
I know the difference.
Nobody is laughing.
Move on.
You just argue to the point of arguing.0 -
No, I’m making my point AFTER you claimed “not to understand what I was getting at.” Do yourself a favor and proof read your posts if you don’t want to be misunderstood. Really.tempo_n_groove said:
I said you were right.Halifax2TheMax said:
You then asked, depending on which word was used, “what difference does it make?” and tried to equate that to a misspelled word. The difference, if you really don’t know, is quite large and substantial in their meaning and consequences, particularly in the context of your original post. The events of January 6th are not a laughing matter, nor one to be so easily misrepresented or glib about. January 6th wasn’t the end but the beginning.tempo_n_groove said:
I don't understand what you are trying to get at, I really don't...Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.
I understand the difference of the words. I wrote the wrong one and you and another picked up on it and both admitted I was wrong yet we are still going around with this?
I misspelled the word.
I admitted to the above.
I know the difference.
Nobody is laughing.
Move on.
You just argue to the point of arguing.
Have a great day!09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
ToolHalifax2TheMax said:
No, I’m making my point AFTER you claimed “not to understand what I was getting at.” Do yourself a favor and proof read your posts if you don’t want to be misunderstood. Really.tempo_n_groove said:
I said you were right.Halifax2TheMax said:
You then asked, depending on which word was used, “what difference does it make?” and tried to equate that to a misspelled word. The difference, if you really don’t know, is quite large and substantial in their meaning and consequences, particularly in the context of your original post. The events of January 6th are not a laughing matter, nor one to be so easily misrepresented or glib about. January 6th wasn’t the end but the beginning.tempo_n_groove said:
I don't understand what you are trying to get at, I really don't...Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.
I understand the difference of the words. I wrote the wrong one and you and another picked up on it and both admitted I was wrong yet we are still going around with this?
I misspelled the word.
I admitted to the above.
I know the difference.
Nobody is laughing.
Move on.
You just argue to the point of arguing.
Have a great day!0 -
Stinkfisttempo_n_groove said:
ToolHalifax2TheMax said:
No, I’m making my point AFTER you claimed “not to understand what I was getting at.” Do yourself a favor and proof read your posts if you don’t want to be misunderstood. Really.tempo_n_groove said:
I said you were right.Halifax2TheMax said:
You then asked, depending on which word was used, “what difference does it make?” and tried to equate that to a misspelled word. The difference, if you really don’t know, is quite large and substantial in their meaning and consequences, particularly in the context of your original post. The events of January 6th are not a laughing matter, nor one to be so easily misrepresented or glib about. January 6th wasn’t the end but the beginning.tempo_n_groove said:
I don't understand what you are trying to get at, I really don't...Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.
I understand the difference of the words. I wrote the wrong one and you and another picked up on it and both admitted I was wrong yet we are still going around with this?
I misspelled the word.
I admitted to the above.
I know the difference.
Nobody is laughing.
Move on.
You just argue to the point of arguing.
Have a great day!0 -
mrussel1 said:
Stinkfisttempo_n_groove said:
ToolHalifax2TheMax said:
No, I’m making my point AFTER you claimed “not to understand what I was getting at.” Do yourself a favor and proof read your posts if you don’t want to be misunderstood. Really.tempo_n_groove said:
I said you were right.Halifax2TheMax said:
You then asked, depending on which word was used, “what difference does it make?” and tried to equate that to a misspelled word. The difference, if you really don’t know, is quite large and substantial in their meaning and consequences, particularly in the context of your original post. The events of January 6th are not a laughing matter, nor one to be so easily misrepresented or glib about. January 6th wasn’t the end but the beginning.tempo_n_groove said:
I don't understand what you are trying to get at, I really don't...Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.
I understand the difference of the words. I wrote the wrong one and you and another picked up on it and both admitted I was wrong yet we are still going around with this?
I misspelled the word.
I admitted to the above.
I know the difference.
Nobody is laughing.
Move on.
You just argue to the point of arguing.
Have a great day!
message to harry manback
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Aeinimamrussel1 said:
Stinkfisttempo_n_groove said:
ToolHalifax2TheMax said:
No, I’m making my point AFTER you claimed “not to understand what I was getting at.” Do yourself a favor and proof read your posts if you don’t want to be misunderstood. Really.tempo_n_groove said:
I said you were right.Halifax2TheMax said:
You then asked, depending on which word was used, “what difference does it make?” and tried to equate that to a misspelled word. The difference, if you really don’t know, is quite large and substantial in their meaning and consequences, particularly in the context of your original post. The events of January 6th are not a laughing matter, nor one to be so easily misrepresented or glib about. January 6th wasn’t the end but the beginning.tempo_n_groove said:
I don't understand what you are trying to get at, I really don't...Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.
I understand the difference of the words. I wrote the wrong one and you and another picked up on it and both admitted I was wrong yet we are still going around with this?
I misspelled the word.
I admitted to the above.
I know the difference.
Nobody is laughing.
Move on.
You just argue to the point of arguing.
Have a great day!0 -
Pezzo di merda.mickeyrat said:mrussel1 said:
Stinkfisttempo_n_groove said:
ToolHalifax2TheMax said:
No, I’m making my point AFTER you claimed “not to understand what I was getting at.” Do yourself a favor and proof read your posts if you don’t want to be misunderstood. Really.tempo_n_groove said:
I said you were right.Halifax2TheMax said:
You then asked, depending on which word was used, “what difference does it make?” and tried to equate that to a misspelled word. The difference, if you really don’t know, is quite large and substantial in their meaning and consequences, particularly in the context of your original post. The events of January 6th are not a laughing matter, nor one to be so easily misrepresented or glib about. January 6th wasn’t the end but the beginning.tempo_n_groove said:
I don't understand what you are trying to get at, I really don't...Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.
I understand the difference of the words. I wrote the wrong one and you and another picked up on it and both admitted I was wrong yet we are still going around with this?
I misspelled the word.
I admitted to the above.
I know the difference.
Nobody is laughing.
Move on.
You just argue to the point of arguing.
Have a great day!
message to harry manback0 -
Haha. I think that's part of their trilogy..mickeyrat said:mrussel1 said:
Stinkfisttempo_n_groove said:
ToolHalifax2TheMax said:
No, I’m making my point AFTER you claimed “not to understand what I was getting at.” Do yourself a favor and proof read your posts if you don’t want to be misunderstood. Really.tempo_n_groove said:
I said you were right.Halifax2TheMax said:
You then asked, depending on which word was used, “what difference does it make?” and tried to equate that to a misspelled word. The difference, if you really don’t know, is quite large and substantial in their meaning and consequences, particularly in the context of your original post. The events of January 6th are not a laughing matter, nor one to be so easily misrepresented or glib about. January 6th wasn’t the end but the beginning.tempo_n_groove said:
I don't understand what you are trying to get at, I really don't...Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you missed the question mark in my reply? What does it matter? Good god there's not enough patience in a lifetime to explain the difference between "persecute" and "prosecute" in the context that you used the word "persecute." Sure am glad you cleared that up.tempo_n_groove said:
The quote I used says "prosecutors". The word was quoted even. I just messed up the word. Even if I had meant to use "persecute" what does it matter?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'm not convinced that your use of the word "persecute" in the context that you used it was accidental or due to a lack of proof reading. Very Fucker Carlson of you. Whereas in Mickey's context, it could be chalked up to misspelling.tempo_n_groove said:
Correct but 12 people whom voted for it do not.mickeyrat said:
this bill is simply to award a congressional gold medal to captial police on duty that day.tempo_n_groove said:
I shortcut when I write instead of explaining it all sometimes...mrussel1 said:
Politically is on the other end of the spectrum from "prosecutors". I don't understand what you mean.tempo_n_groove said:
Why would they not back this? The language used in the bill they say...Bentleyspop said:
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he disagreed with the description of the Capitol and worried that the “insurrection” label could be used by prosecutors.
If this gets used politically, the wording in the bill, then we really are in bad shape.
The reasoning for some NOT to back it was because of the language used in the bill.
I find it preposterous to look at the bill that way.
If, and only if the language in this bill gets used down the road to legally persecute people, we as a country are in really bad shape.
It boils down to if you make a bill to honor people then cherry pick statements from it to use in court cases to me, is bad.
I do take time to hear the counterpoints and put them in reason.
Capitol? I know what you meant but everyone says "words matter".
Words matter. Words matter.
I understand the difference of the words. I wrote the wrong one and you and another picked up on it and both admitted I was wrong yet we are still going around with this?
I misspelled the word.
I admitted to the above.
I know the difference.
Nobody is laughing.
Move on.
You just argue to the point of arguing.
Have a great day!
message to harry manback
Message > prison sex> stinkfist0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help