Petition To Have Eddie Vedder on The Joe Rogan Experience
Comments
-
True, this article is more than 5 months old, but do we really need to know anything more than the following about Joe Rogan or waste anymore talking about him? OR has he turned around again?Ya know, I don't care if he did. He said it once, so the hell with him. Waste of air time.Joe Rogan would 'rather vote for Trump than Biden' after endorsing Sanders
Podcast host says former vice-president, 77, is too old despite having endorsed Sanders, 78, for the Democratic nomination
Post edited by brianlux on"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
Agree...Gern Blansten said:I can't imagine that Eddie would have any interest talking to Rogan.Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Lol, that’s the ‘intellectual dark web’ for you.brianlux said:True, this article is more than 5 months old, but do we really need to know anything more than the following about Joe Rogan or waste anymore talking about him? OR has he turned around again?Ya know, I don't care if he did. He said it once, so the hell with him. Waste of air time.Joe Rogan would 'rather vote for Trump than Biden' after endorsing SandersPodcast host says former vice-president, 77, is too old despite having endorsed Sanders, 78, for the Democratic nomination
0 -
he also clarified he's' not a trump supporter; he said "that's not an endorsement of trump, i'd rather vote for a monkey over biden". it's not the age. he's also convinced that biden is in total mental decline.brianlux said:True, this article is more than 5 months old, but do we really need to know anything more than the following about Joe Rogan or waste anymore talking about him? OR has he turned around again?Ya know, I don't care if he did. He said it once, so the hell with him. Waste of air time.Joe Rogan would 'rather vote for Trump than Biden' after endorsing SandersPodcast host says former vice-president, 77, is too old despite having endorsed Sanders, 78, for the Democratic nomination
Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
I had no idea Joe Rogan is a Russian bot *sarcasm*HughFreakingDillon said:
he also clarified he's' not a trump supporter; he said "that's not an endorsement of trump, i'd rather vote for a monkey over biden". it's not the age. he's also convinced that biden is in total mental decline.brianlux said:True, this article is more than 5 months old, but do we really need to know anything more than the following about Joe Rogan or waste anymore talking about him? OR has he turned around again?Ya know, I don't care if he did. He said it once, so the hell with him. Waste of air time.Joe Rogan would 'rather vote for Trump than Biden' after endorsing SandersPodcast host says former vice-president, 77, is too old despite having endorsed Sanders, 78, for the Democratic nomination
Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -

"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Exactly....he's just fucking stupidbrianlux said:True, this article is more than 5 months old, but do we really need to know anything more than the following about Joe Rogan or waste anymore talking about him? OR has he turned around again?Ya know, I don't care if he did. He said it once, so the hell with him. Waste of air time.Joe Rogan would 'rather vote for Trump than Biden' after endorsing SandersPodcast host says former vice-president, 77, is too old despite having endorsed Sanders, 78, for the Democratic nomination
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
HughFreakingDillon said:
he also clarified he's' not a trump supporter; he said "that's not an endorsement of trump, i'd rather vote for a monkey over biden". it's not the age. he's also convinced that biden is in total mental decline.brianlux said:True, this article is more than 5 months old, but do we really need to know anything more than the following about Joe Rogan or waste anymore talking about him? OR has he turned around again?Ya know, I don't care if he did. He said it once, so the hell with him. Waste of air time.Joe Rogan would 'rather vote for Trump than Biden' after endorsing SandersPodcast host says former vice-president, 77, is too old despite having endorsed Sanders, 78, for the Democratic nomination
Which is beyond silly considering the same can be said about Trump.
0 -
Isnt there already a thread about this guy mod?
May I suggest a merger?Post edited by Kat on0 -
his argument is trump is stupid but biden is declining. he thinks both are terrible candidates. but he somehow finds trump funny. i think rogan simultaneously gets a kick out of and gets annoyed by the left constantly freaking out about everything.Merkin Baller said:HughFreakingDillon said:
he also clarified he's' not a trump supporter; he said "that's not an endorsement of trump, i'd rather vote for a monkey over biden". it's not the age. he's also convinced that biden is in total mental decline.brianlux said:True, this article is more than 5 months old, but do we really need to know anything more than the following about Joe Rogan or waste anymore talking about him? OR has he turned around again?Ya know, I don't care if he did. He said it once, so the hell with him. Waste of air time.Joe Rogan would 'rather vote for Trump than Biden' after endorsing SandersPodcast host says former vice-president, 77, is too old despite having endorsed Sanders, 78, for the Democratic nomination
Which is beyond silly considering the same can be said about Trump.
Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
he's not "fucking stupid". he just holds some different opinions than yours.Gern Blansten said:
Exactly....he's just fucking stupidbrianlux said:True, this article is more than 5 months old, but do we really need to know anything more than the following about Joe Rogan or waste anymore talking about him? OR has he turned around again?Ya know, I don't care if he did. He said it once, so the hell with him. Waste of air time.Joe Rogan would 'rather vote for Trump than Biden' after endorsing SandersPodcast host says former vice-president, 77, is too old despite having endorsed Sanders, 78, for the Democratic nomination
Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:
his argument is trump is stupid but biden is declining. he thinks both are terrible candidates. but he somehow finds trump funny. i think rogan simultaneously gets a kick out of and gets annoyed by the left constantly freaking out about everything.Merkin Baller said:HughFreakingDillon said:
he also clarified he's' not a trump supporter; he said "that's not an endorsement of trump, i'd rather vote for a monkey over biden". it's not the age. he's also convinced that biden is in total mental decline.brianlux said:True, this article is more than 5 months old, but do we really need to know anything more than the following about Joe Rogan or waste anymore talking about him? OR has he turned around again?Ya know, I don't care if he did. He said it once, so the hell with him. Waste of air time.Joe Rogan would 'rather vote for Trump than Biden' after endorsing SandersPodcast host says former vice-president, 77, is too old despite having endorsed Sanders, 78, for the Democratic nomination
Which is beyond silly considering the same can be said about Trump.
Sounds pretty fucking stupid to me.
I'm already on record as saying he isn't as bad as his critics make him out to be, but the guy is fucking dim. And yes, I have listened to several of his podcasts.
0 -
wow. i don't get that from him at all. he has a lot of ideas i don't agree with, but i find him to be quite intelligent.Merkin Baller said:HughFreakingDillon said:
his argument is trump is stupid but biden is declining. he thinks both are terrible candidates. but he somehow finds trump funny. i think rogan simultaneously gets a kick out of and gets annoyed by the left constantly freaking out about everything.Merkin Baller said:HughFreakingDillon said:
he also clarified he's' not a trump supporter; he said "that's not an endorsement of trump, i'd rather vote for a monkey over biden". it's not the age. he's also convinced that biden is in total mental decline.brianlux said:True, this article is more than 5 months old, but do we really need to know anything more than the following about Joe Rogan or waste anymore talking about him? OR has he turned around again?Ya know, I don't care if he did. He said it once, so the hell with him. Waste of air time.Joe Rogan would 'rather vote for Trump than Biden' after endorsing SandersPodcast host says former vice-president, 77, is too old despite having endorsed Sanders, 78, for the Democratic nomination
Which is beyond silly considering the same can be said about Trump.
Sounds pretty fucking stupid to me.
I'm already on record as saying he isn't as bad as his critics make him out to be, but the guy is fucking dim. And yes, I have listened to several of his podcasts.
Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Some are spending time on this thread yet he’s not deemed “worthy”?

Personally, I simply don’t care what others think of him, or of my opinion of him. I just find it amusing at this point, and fairly close-minded.0 -
Fair enough. From what I've heard I do not have interest. To each their own. I enjoy Howard Stern interviews.HughFreakingDillon said:
for reasons stated previously, i don't necessarily listen to him. this isn't a podcast of just a guy blathering on by himself for 2 hours. if i listened to him i'd watch his podcasts where it's just him and his buffoon buddies getting stoned and talking shit. i don't watch those. i'm sure some do. i watch for the guests he has on, if they happen to interest me. he's obviously not a journalist, so he isn't beholden to any type of standard when it comes to asking questions. so it's more of a conversation than an interview. believe it or not, i've learned a lot from certain guests on his show. he has a lot of respected intellectuals, and he does a good job of asking them good questions.cincybearcat said:
A conspiracy nut etc isn’t worth listening to in my opinion. He’s just an entertainer. Always has been.HughFreakingDillon said:
why not? he's well read, very well researched, does his homework on his guests and knows the basics on the topics that he knows are going to come up. he has some questionable theories sometimes, but i find it interesting, and when it's not interesting, it's amusing.cincybearcat said:I can’t believe anyone has interest in what Joe Rogan has to say about anything.And my opinion would be other than for shits and giggles, why would someone listen to him? It’s just my opinion.
he's also had a lot of morons that I couldn't watch for longer than 10 minutes before i shut it off.
and sometimes i like to listen to a conversation with someone who has opposing viewpoints from myself (Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro), where the person is allowed to make their point without left wing media just waiting for that gotcha moment. and honestly, it helps humanize the "other side", which makes me more empathetic when dealing with people like that. yeah, he gets criticized for not asking tough questions of some of his guests, and sometimes i've also been disappointed with that, but i also know I can't have it both ways.
of course he's an entertainer. i don't think anyone ever claimed otherwise. i certainly haven't.
I'm honestly not trying to convince anyone to listen to the guy. I couldn't give two shits if people do. These are just my reasons and I think people have misconceptions because of what they hear about him and haven't watched themselves.hippiemom = goodness0 -
I really don't get your line of posting in this thread. Are you only supposed to comment if you just agree that Joe's a great guy and great interviewer?hedonist said:Some are spending time on this thread yet he’s not deemed “worthy”?
Personally, I simply don’t care what others think of him, or of my opinion of him. I just find it amusing at this point, and fairly close-minded.
I mean...why does the Trump thread have so many posts?hippiemom = goodness0 -
i haven't watched a ton of stern, but from what i have seen, i'm not a fan. he seems to tend to fanboy over bands and pander, but at the same time not really know a lot about the bands beyond what is common knowledge.cincybearcat said:
Fair enough. From what I've heard I do not have interest. To each their own. I enjoy Howard Stern interviews.HughFreakingDillon said:
for reasons stated previously, i don't necessarily listen to him. this isn't a podcast of just a guy blathering on by himself for 2 hours. if i listened to him i'd watch his podcasts where it's just him and his buffoon buddies getting stoned and talking shit. i don't watch those. i'm sure some do. i watch for the guests he has on, if they happen to interest me. he's obviously not a journalist, so he isn't beholden to any type of standard when it comes to asking questions. so it's more of a conversation than an interview. believe it or not, i've learned a lot from certain guests on his show. he has a lot of respected intellectuals, and he does a good job of asking them good questions.cincybearcat said:
A conspiracy nut etc isn’t worth listening to in my opinion. He’s just an entertainer. Always has been.HughFreakingDillon said:
why not? he's well read, very well researched, does his homework on his guests and knows the basics on the topics that he knows are going to come up. he has some questionable theories sometimes, but i find it interesting, and when it's not interesting, it's amusing.cincybearcat said:I can’t believe anyone has interest in what Joe Rogan has to say about anything.And my opinion would be other than for shits and giggles, why would someone listen to him? It’s just my opinion.
he's also had a lot of morons that I couldn't watch for longer than 10 minutes before i shut it off.
and sometimes i like to listen to a conversation with someone who has opposing viewpoints from myself (Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro), where the person is allowed to make their point without left wing media just waiting for that gotcha moment. and honestly, it helps humanize the "other side", which makes me more empathetic when dealing with people like that. yeah, he gets criticized for not asking tough questions of some of his guests, and sometimes i've also been disappointed with that, but i also know I can't have it both ways.
of course he's an entertainer. i don't think anyone ever claimed otherwise. i certainly haven't.
I'm honestly not trying to convince anyone to listen to the guy. I couldn't give two shits if people do. These are just my reasons and I think people have misconceptions because of what they hear about him and haven't watched themselves.
i could be wrong, of course, as I haven't seen that many.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Since this is a Joe Rogan thread I won't go on too long. But he does his research and mostly is very interested in bands/people. There are a few that come off weird cause he just seems to have some peripheral knowledge...Like Machine Gun Kelly this week. But mostly, very knowledgeable and great interviewer....again IMO. And I listed some to his radio show for some time just about 5 days a week.HughFreakingDillon said:
i haven't watched a ton of stern, but from what i have seen, i'm not a fan. he seems to tend to fanboy over bands and pander, but at the same time not really know a lot about the bands beyond what is common knowledge.cincybearcat said:
Fair enough. From what I've heard I do not have interest. To each their own. I enjoy Howard Stern interviews.HughFreakingDillon said:
for reasons stated previously, i don't necessarily listen to him. this isn't a podcast of just a guy blathering on by himself for 2 hours. if i listened to him i'd watch his podcasts where it's just him and his buffoon buddies getting stoned and talking shit. i don't watch those. i'm sure some do. i watch for the guests he has on, if they happen to interest me. he's obviously not a journalist, so he isn't beholden to any type of standard when it comes to asking questions. so it's more of a conversation than an interview. believe it or not, i've learned a lot from certain guests on his show. he has a lot of respected intellectuals, and he does a good job of asking them good questions.cincybearcat said:
A conspiracy nut etc isn’t worth listening to in my opinion. He’s just an entertainer. Always has been.HughFreakingDillon said:
why not? he's well read, very well researched, does his homework on his guests and knows the basics on the topics that he knows are going to come up. he has some questionable theories sometimes, but i find it interesting, and when it's not interesting, it's amusing.cincybearcat said:I can’t believe anyone has interest in what Joe Rogan has to say about anything.And my opinion would be other than for shits and giggles, why would someone listen to him? It’s just my opinion.
he's also had a lot of morons that I couldn't watch for longer than 10 minutes before i shut it off.
and sometimes i like to listen to a conversation with someone who has opposing viewpoints from myself (Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro), where the person is allowed to make their point without left wing media just waiting for that gotcha moment. and honestly, it helps humanize the "other side", which makes me more empathetic when dealing with people like that. yeah, he gets criticized for not asking tough questions of some of his guests, and sometimes i've also been disappointed with that, but i also know I can't have it both ways.
of course he's an entertainer. i don't think anyone ever claimed otherwise. i certainly haven't.
I'm honestly not trying to convince anyone to listen to the guy. I couldn't give two shits if people do. These are just my reasons and I think people have misconceptions because of what they hear about him and haven't watched themselves.
i could be wrong, of course, as I haven't seen that many.
Maybe with more exposure to Joe I'd see more to him.hippiemom = goodness0 -
I liked Joe on Fear Factor

Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -

"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help









