***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

1392393395397398511

Comments

  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,664
    This is hugely helpful:


    Evangelical Magazine Christianity Today Calls for Trump’s Removal



    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    2019
    brianlux said:
    This is hugely helpful:


    Evangelical Magazine Christianity Today Calls for Trump’s Removal



    Yeah but according to the president this publication is a far left radical democrat rag....
    www.myspace.com
  • Those evangelicals need to take a stroll through here to gain a wee bit of perspective.


    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,963
    "THE FIELD"
    benjs said:
    benjs said:
    mrussel1 said:

    Again I'll ask because apparently I am "ignorant"...

    No where do yo mention that Trump wanted other countries to interfere with an election.  

    That is what I am missing and you did too, but I'm ignorant?

    Come now...

    No I don't support Trump but the reach here is just that.  Reaching.  

    I'm still waiting for someone to show me the evidence of where Trump asked for the election interference?
    You don't understand how asking a foreign gov't to launch a sham investigation into his most likely 2020 rival, and demanding it be done on television, while tying it to aid isn't attempting to interfere and corrupt the election? You don't see how he is using the power of the presidency to give himself an unfair advantage and leveraging OUR tax dollars to do it?
    He would have multiple rivals in the upcoming election, is he going to have them all investigated?  Having it tied to aid is not interfering with the upcoming election...  It can be assumed or implied, that is it.  It isn't cut and dry. So no.

    Not seeing how he used his presidency to "leverage" an advantage.  No on that too.

    Just not seeing it the way you all do which is interesting, if you dislike Trump, he's guilty.  You like Trump, he's innocent.

    I don't care for Trump but I think he is innocent.

    I guess I'm in the center then...

    He has multiple rivals in the election - what BS. Biden has been the front runner with the strongest name recognition since this campaign started. To claim that this is innocent betrays all prior knowledge of Trump and how he conducts himself. 

    Your conclusion that your opinion on Trump is purely related to whether you ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ him is fucking dumb, and fucking baseless, and fucking insulting. Some of us follow logic, not the bullshit rhetoric thrust at us on a regular basis. 

    I can’t believe that intelligent humans who can string a sentence together can’t see the egregious behaviours at play. 
    You want logic then?  Look at who voted for impeachment, all democrats.  You see who voted no?  All republicans and 3 dems.

    Last I checked the democrats didn't like him.

    I'd love to ask what side of the aisle everyone is that is for the impeachment.  My guess would all be along party lines.



    You’re once again making an assumption that this is extreme partisanship instead of logic. Your claim is also ridiculous when the Republicans voted in party lines exclusively as well - why does your bias assume that every single Republican is right and every single Democrat is corrupt, and what is it that leads you in this one case (fuck the BS about wanting it from the start - Pelosi owns this and was against for months and months) to assume this to be the case when the facts speak so incredibly loudly? Could it not, dare I say, be the opposite? You’ve not given a single valid argument against impeachment, nor have I seen one posted here. May I have one? Otherwise, all due respect, those who are arguing on the merit of the facts instead of the merit of the process, are deserving of the faith when the facts need not even be interpreted to be obviously troubling.
    3 dems went over and voted no so it didn't exactly go down party lines but I will agree for the most part it did.

    Look.  I don't think this is impeachable.  That's it.  If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.  

    And Justin Amash, who was a republican, until earlier this year voted for it. 

    He abused the power of his office for his own personal gain. This is a pretty open and shut case if folks are being reasonable and honest with themselves. 


    Amash is proof republicans were not allowed to vote against trump.

    their choice was vote no or leave the party 

    its crazy if anyone thinks since  all republicans voted no that was a sign Trump is even 1% less guilty 
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,963
    "THE FIELD"
    ikiT said:
    Don Trump has no vinyl. 
    His favorite song is Sharp Dressed Man by ZZ Top.  It's playing in the background.




    Sooooo sexy.

    call me King Donny. I love you. 212-867-5309.
  • OnWis97
    OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,610
    "THE FIELD"
    benjs said:
    benjs said:
    mrussel1 said:

    Again I'll ask because apparently I am "ignorant"...

    No where do yo mention that Trump wanted other countries to interfere with an election.  

    That is what I am missing and you did too, but I'm ignorant?

    Come now...

    No I don't support Trump but the reach here is just that.  Reaching.  

    I'm still waiting for someone to show me the evidence of where Trump asked for the election interference?
    You don't understand how asking a foreign gov't to launch a sham investigation into his most likely 2020 rival, and demanding it be done on television, while tying it to aid isn't attempting to interfere and corrupt the election? You don't see how he is using the power of the presidency to give himself an unfair advantage and leveraging OUR tax dollars to do it?
    He would have multiple rivals in the upcoming election, is he going to have them all investigated?  Having it tied to aid is not interfering with the upcoming election...  It can be assumed or implied, that is it.  It isn't cut and dry. So no.

    Not seeing how he used his presidency to "leverage" an advantage.  No on that too.

    Just not seeing it the way you all do which is interesting, if you dislike Trump, he's guilty.  You like Trump, he's innocent.

    I don't care for Trump but I think he is innocent.

    I guess I'm in the center then...

    He has multiple rivals in the election - what BS. Biden has been the front runner with the strongest name recognition since this campaign started. To claim that this is innocent betrays all prior knowledge of Trump and how he conducts himself. 

    Your conclusion that your opinion on Trump is purely related to whether you ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ him is fucking dumb, and fucking baseless, and fucking insulting. Some of us follow logic, not the bullshit rhetoric thrust at us on a regular basis. 

    I can’t believe that intelligent humans who can string a sentence together can’t see the egregious behaviours at play. 
    You want logic then?  Look at who voted for impeachment, all democrats.  You see who voted no?  All republicans and 3 dems.

    Last I checked the democrats didn't like him.

    I'd love to ask what side of the aisle everyone is that is for the impeachment.  My guess would all be along party lines.



    You’re once again making an assumption that this is extreme partisanship instead of logic. Your claim is also ridiculous when the Republicans voted in party lines exclusively as well - why does your bias assume that every single Republican is right and every single Democrat is corrupt, and what is it that leads you in this one case (fuck the BS about wanting it from the start - Pelosi owns this and was against for months and months) to assume this to be the case when the facts speak so incredibly loudly? Could it not, dare I say, be the opposite? You’ve not given a single valid argument against impeachment, nor have I seen one posted here. May I have one? Otherwise, all due respect, those who are arguing on the merit of the facts instead of the merit of the process, are deserving of the faith when the facts need not even be interpreted to be obviously troubling.
    3 dems went over and voted no so it didn't exactly go down party lines but I will agree for the most part it did.

    Look.  I don't think this is impeachable.  That's it.  If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.  

    And Justin Amash, who was a republican, until earlier this year voted for it. 

    He abused the power of his office for his own personal gain. This is a pretty open and shut case if folks are being reasonable and honest with themselves. 


    Amash is proof republicans were not allowed to vote against trump.

    their choice was vote no or leave the party 

    its crazy if anyone thinks since  all republicans voted no that was a sign Trump is even 1% less guilty 
    Yep...just a sign that the GOP is 100% monster.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
    2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,664
    brianlux said:
    This is hugely helpful:


    Evangelical Magazine Christianity Today Calls for Trump’s Removal



    Yeah but according to the president this publication is a far left radical democrat rag....

    Once again, then man hasn't a clue.  Christianity Today has been called "evangelicalism's flagship magazine", and describe as "mainstream evangelical magazine", and was founded by Billy Graham, Mr. Born Again himself. 

    Though I did briefly at one point in my life, I no longer subscribe to evangelical Christianities spiritual predilections, but many who lean moderate to conservative do and these are the exact people who need to understand that our currant POTUS is a spiritually vacant and morally corrupt man.  It is absolutely wonderful to hear Christianity Today call for his removal. 
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,399
    edited December 2019
    Dimitri Firtash. Remember him? Get to know him. Big, close ties to Team Trump Treason and particularly Ruddy Ghouliani. Another quid pro quo? You don’t say!

    “There was no collusion.”
    “I have nothing to hide.”
    “I don’t know any Russians.”
    “I’ll sit down and talk with anyone.”
    “We do everything by the book.”
    “Only the guilty plea the fifth.”
    “Very legal, very cool.”
    “Fully exonerated.”
    “Essentially no obstruction.”
    “Very friendly and totally appropriate.”
    “No quid pro quo.”

    Follow the damn money, from Russia with love and a PTape all the way to impeachment.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,567
    as seen on facebook......

    I hope these people do not breed.


    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Thoughts_Arrive
    Thoughts_Arrive Melbourne, Australia Posts: 15,165
    2018
    ikiT said:
    Don Trump has no vinyl. 
    His favorite song is Sharp Dressed Man by ZZ Top.  It's playing in the background.


    My next Facebook cover photo
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    2019
    mickeyrat said:
    as seen on facebook......

    I hope these people do not breed.


    Did the Epoch Times post this?

    Jeez
    www.myspace.com
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    2019
    benjs said:
    benjs said:
    mrussel1 said:

    Again I'll ask because apparently I am "ignorant"...

    No where do yo mention that Trump wanted other countries to interfere with an election.  

    That is what I am missing and you did too, but I'm ignorant?

    Come now...

    No I don't support Trump but the reach here is just that.  Reaching.  

    I'm still waiting for someone to show me the evidence of where Trump asked for the election interference?
    You don't understand how asking a foreign gov't to launch a sham investigation into his most likely 2020 rival, and demanding it be done on television, while tying it to aid isn't attempting to interfere and corrupt the election? You don't see how he is using the power of the presidency to give himself an unfair advantage and leveraging OUR tax dollars to do it?
    He would have multiple rivals in the upcoming election, is he going to have them all investigated?  Having it tied to aid is not interfering with the upcoming election...  It can be assumed or implied, that is it.  It isn't cut and dry. So no.

    Not seeing how he used his presidency to "leverage" an advantage.  No on that too.

    Just not seeing it the way you all do which is interesting, if you dislike Trump, he's guilty.  You like Trump, he's innocent.

    I don't care for Trump but I think he is innocent.

    I guess I'm in the center then...

    He has multiple rivals in the election - what BS. Biden has been the front runner with the strongest name recognition since this campaign started. To claim that this is innocent betrays all prior knowledge of Trump and how he conducts himself. 

    Your conclusion that your opinion on Trump is purely related to whether you ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ him is fucking dumb, and fucking baseless, and fucking insulting. Some of us follow logic, not the bullshit rhetoric thrust at us on a regular basis. 

    I can’t believe that intelligent humans who can string a sentence together can’t see the egregious behaviours at play. 
    You want logic then?  Look at who voted for impeachment, all democrats.  You see who voted no?  All republicans and 3 dems.

    Last I checked the democrats didn't like him.

    I'd love to ask what side of the aisle everyone is that is for the impeachment.  My guess would all be along party lines.



    You’re once again making an assumption that this is extreme partisanship instead of logic. Your claim is also ridiculous when the Republicans voted in party lines exclusively as well - why does your bias assume that every single Republican is right and every single Democrat is corrupt, and what is it that leads you in this one case (fuck the BS about wanting it from the start - Pelosi owns this and was against for months and months) to assume this to be the case when the facts speak so incredibly loudly? Could it not, dare I say, be the opposite? You’ve not given a single valid argument against impeachment, nor have I seen one posted here. May I have one? Otherwise, all due respect, those who are arguing on the merit of the facts instead of the merit of the process, are deserving of the faith when the facts need not even be interpreted to be obviously troubling.
    3 dems went over and voted no so it didn't exactly go down party lines but I will agree for the most part it did.

    Look.  I don't think this is impeachable.  That's it.  If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.  

    And Justin Amash, who was a republican, until earlier this year voted for it. 

    He abused the power of his office for his own personal gain. This is a pretty open and shut case if folks are being reasonable and honest with themselves. 


    Amash is proof republicans were not allowed to vote against trump.

    their choice was vote no or leave the party 

    its crazy if anyone thinks since  all republicans voted no that was a sign Trump is even 1% less guilty 
    They gotta name him one of the managers. 
    www.myspace.com
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    edited December 2019
    2019
    https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2019/12/20/poll-trump-impeachment-088812?__twitter_impression=true

    52% support impeach/removal. 54% support having witnesses called. 

    Reminder: Support for impeachment for Clinton never topped 29%. 

    First one I’ve seen since the vote. Good sign 
    www.myspace.com
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,963
    "THE FIELD"
    benjs said:
    benjs said:
    mrussel1 said:

    Again I'll ask because apparently I am "ignorant"...

    No where do yo mention that Trump wanted other countries to interfere with an election.  

    That is what I am missing and you did too, but I'm ignorant?

    Come now...

    No I don't support Trump but the reach here is just that.  Reaching.  

    I'm still waiting for someone to show me the evidence of where Trump asked for the election interference?
    You don't understand how asking a foreign gov't to launch a sham investigation into his most likely 2020 rival, and demanding it be done on television, while tying it to aid isn't attempting to interfere and corrupt the election? You don't see how he is using the power of the presidency to give himself an unfair advantage and leveraging OUR tax dollars to do it?
    He would have multiple rivals in the upcoming election, is he going to have them all investigated?  Having it tied to aid is not interfering with the upcoming election...  It can be assumed or implied, that is it.  It isn't cut and dry. So no.

    Not seeing how he used his presidency to "leverage" an advantage.  No on that too.

    Just not seeing it the way you all do which is interesting, if you dislike Trump, he's guilty.  You like Trump, he's innocent.

    I don't care for Trump but I think he is innocent.

    I guess I'm in the center then...

    He has multiple rivals in the election - what BS. Biden has been the front runner with the strongest name recognition since this campaign started. To claim that this is innocent betrays all prior knowledge of Trump and how he conducts himself. 

    Your conclusion that your opinion on Trump is purely related to whether you ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ him is fucking dumb, and fucking baseless, and fucking insulting. Some of us follow logic, not the bullshit rhetoric thrust at us on a regular basis. 

    I can’t believe that intelligent humans who can string a sentence together can’t see the egregious behaviours at play. 
    You want logic then?  Look at who voted for impeachment, all democrats.  You see who voted no?  All republicans and 3 dems.

    Last I checked the democrats didn't like him.

    I'd love to ask what side of the aisle everyone is that is for the impeachment.  My guess would all be along party lines.



    You’re once again making an assumption that this is extreme partisanship instead of logic. Your claim is also ridiculous when the Republicans voted in party lines exclusively as well - why does your bias assume that every single Republican is right and every single Democrat is corrupt, and what is it that leads you in this one case (fuck the BS about wanting it from the start - Pelosi owns this and was against for months and months) to assume this to be the case when the facts speak so incredibly loudly? Could it not, dare I say, be the opposite? You’ve not given a single valid argument against impeachment, nor have I seen one posted here. May I have one? Otherwise, all due respect, those who are arguing on the merit of the facts instead of the merit of the process, are deserving of the faith when the facts need not even be interpreted to be obviously troubling.
    3 dems went over and voted no so it didn't exactly go down party lines but I will agree for the most part it did.

    Look.  I don't think this is impeachable.  That's it.  If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.  

    And Justin Amash, who was a republican, until earlier this year voted for it. 

    He abused the power of his office for his own personal gain. This is a pretty open and shut case if folks are being reasonable and honest with themselves. 


    Amash is proof republicans were not allowed to vote against trump.

    their choice was vote no or leave the party 

    its crazy if anyone thinks since  all republicans voted no that was a sign Trump is even 1% less guilty 
    They gotta name him one of the managers. 


    Damn good idea.
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,963
    "THE FIELD"
    mickeyrat said:
    as seen on facebook......

    I hope these people do not breed.




    They didn’t happen to provide the section of which article of the constitution that’s from?

  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,131
    mickeyrat said:
    as seen on facebook......

    I hope these people do not breed.


    Unless I am missing something it is Two terms up to ten years as per the 22nd amemdnement.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,567

    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    2019
    mickeyrat said:

    HA

    This is funny
    www.myspace.com
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,698
    2018

    lol not even true Orange Baffoon got impeached for being a corrupt Russian asset man how misinformed are you damn..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....