That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
Dallas 2013 Wrigley 2016 Night 1 Wrigley 2016 Night 2 MSG 2020 OKC 2020
0
Options
StevieG73
Dublin, Ireland and New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 440
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.
2000 = Montreal
2003 = Montreal
2005 = Halifax, St. John's Night 1 2008 = NYC Night 1, 2010 = Boston
2011 = EV - Boston, PJ20 Night 1&2, Toronto 2012 = EV - Orlando Night 1&2 2013 = Chicago, Worcester Night 1 2016 = Boston '16
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
0
Options
on2legs
Standing in the Jersey rain… Posts: 14,419
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.
1996: Randall's Island 2 1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2 2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel 2005: Atlantic City 1 2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Newark (EV) 2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4 2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2 2011: Toronto 1 2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore 2015: Central Park 2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD) 2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF) 2020: MSG | Asbury Park2021: Asbury Park 2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville 2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.
aaaaaand the Rome was created by Emek so there ya go!
0
Options
StevieG73
Dublin, Ireland and New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 440
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.
I'm not disagreeing with anyone, merely saying this is a case of perception.
2000 = Montreal
2003 = Montreal
2005 = Halifax, St. John's Night 1 2008 = NYC Night 1, 2010 = Boston
2011 = EV - Boston, PJ20 Night 1&2, Toronto 2012 = EV - Orlando Night 1&2 2013 = Chicago, Worcester Night 1 2016 = Boston '16
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!
Pittsburgh 2013 Cincinnati 2014 Greenville 2016 (Raleigh 2016) Columbia 2016
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.
I'm not disagreeing with anyone, merely saying this is a case of perception.
My perception, like others, is that the print is nice but it's not made by the big artists nor does it say PJ or EV. All these perceptions add up to the fact of why it took so long to sell out.
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!
Why is Emek so special? Is there a special history with PJ?
0
Options
on2legs
Standing in the Jersey rain… Posts: 14,419
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!
You could apply that to any item for sale... I think that’s the point.
1996: Randall's Island 2 1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2 2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel 2005: Atlantic City 1 2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Newark (EV) 2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4 2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2 2011: Toronto 1 2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore 2015: Central Park 2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD) 2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF) 2020: MSG | Asbury Park2021: Asbury Park 2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville 2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore
Comments
https://pearljam.com/shop/posters/2019-eddie-vedder-ohana-festival-poster
Luke Martin “Solo Show”
seven color screen print on french paper
24 x 18 inches
Edition of 100, signed and numbered
$100
Available in our PRINTS SHOP Thu Oct 17 @ 9am PT
https://www.paihemestudio.com/product/phish-poster-japon-vintage/
Usually, both would be quick sellouts.
Wrigley 2016 Night 1
Wrigley 2016 Night 2
MSG 2020
OKC 2020
2008 = NYC Night 1,
2010 = Boston
2012 = EV - Orlando Night 1&2
2013 = Chicago, Worcester Night 1
2016 = Boston '16
Case solved...
2008 = NYC Night 1,
2010 = Boston
2012 = EV - Orlando Night 1&2
2013 = Chicago, Worcester Night 1
2016 = Boston '16
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
Wrigley 2016 Night 1
Wrigley 2016 Night 2
MSG 2020
OKC 2020
2008 = NYC Night 1,
2010 = Boston
2012 = EV - Orlando Night 1&2
2013 = Chicago, Worcester Night 1
2016 = Boston '16
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
2008 = NYC Night 1,
2010 = Boston
2012 = EV - Orlando Night 1&2
2013 = Chicago, Worcester Night 1
2016 = Boston '16
Cincinnati 2014
Greenville 2016
(Raleigh 2016)
Columbia 2016
So in this case perception is actually factual.