2019 Eddie Vedder Euro Merchandise
Options
Comments
-
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.0 -
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.1996: Randall's Island 2 1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2 2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel 2005: Atlantic City 1 2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 (#25) | Newark (EV) 2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4 2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2 2011: Toronto 1 2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore 2015: Central Park 2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD) 2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF) 2020: MSG | Asbury Park 2021: Asbury Park 2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville 2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore 2025: Raleigh0 -
aaaaaand the Rome was created by Emek so there ya go!on2legs said:
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.0 -
I'm not disagreeing with anyone, merely saying this is a case of perception.on2legs said:
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.2000 = Montreal2003 = Montreal2005 = Halifax, St. John's Night 1
2008 = NYC Night 1,
2010 = Boston2011 = EV - Boston, PJ20 Night 1&2, Toronto
2012 = EV - Orlando Night 1&2
2013 = Chicago, Worcester Night 1
2016 = Boston '160 -
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!on2legs said:
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.Pittsburgh 2013
Cincinnati 2014
Greenville 2016
(Raleigh 2016)
Columbia 20160 -
My perception, like others, is that the print is nice but it's not made by the big artists nor does it say PJ or EV. All these perceptions add up to the fact of why it took so long to sell out.StevieG73 said:
I'm not disagreeing with anyone, merely saying this is a case of perception.on2legs said:
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
So in this case perception is actually factual.0 -
Agreed.drakeheuer14 said:
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!on2legs said:
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.0 -
Sold out!0
-
Why is Emek so special? Is there a special history with PJ?drakeheuer14 said:
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!on2legs said:
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.0 -
You could apply that to any item for sale... I think that’s the point.drakeheuer14 said:
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!on2legs said:
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.1996: Randall's Island 2 1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2 2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel 2005: Atlantic City 1 2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 (#25) | Newark (EV) 2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4 2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2 2011: Toronto 1 2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore 2015: Central Park 2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD) 2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF) 2020: MSG | Asbury Park 2021: Asbury Park 2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville 2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore 2025: Raleigh0 -
Emek is one of the best if not the best, poster artist in the business.JPPJ84 said:
Why is Emek so special? Is there a special history with PJ?drakeheuer14 said:
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!on2legs said:
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
Sperry, Masthay, Welker, Pollock and Spusta all have rabid followings and are quite celebrated here in the states.0 -
Ok, cool. Thanks!tempo_n_groove said:
Emek is one of the best if not the best, poster artist in the business.JPPJ84 said:
Why is Emek so special? Is there a special history with PJ?drakeheuer14 said:
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!on2legs said:
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.
Sperry, Masthay, Welker, Pollock and Spusta all have rabid followings and are quite celebrated here in the states.0 -
On sale for 49 Euros https://www.paihemestudio.com/product/eddie-vedder-poster/0
-
I’m saying the same exact print with different artist.on2legs said:
You could apply that to any item for sale... I think that’s the point.drakeheuer14 said:
If Rome wasn’t emek, nobody would care. Great place to be as an artist!on2legs said:
Going to agree with Chris. It’s a nice print but not a special print in and of itself like the Rome.tempo_n_groove said:
PJ20 is a PJ event. That is a little different than this.StevieG73 said:
I agree that what you're saying is the reality of the situation, however I still think it's unbelievably shortsighted. Take that exact Solo Show poster and, without any prior notice of this print, make available for purchase with the PJ posters at the convention in San Fransisco....it would sell out in minutes. I recall at PJ20 that many artists were selling prints that didn't have EV/PJ on them...still sold a substantial amount of them.ryanphishes said:
Of course there is appeal. It is a beautiful print as a gig print and as an art print, but the point that it is less desirable because it doesn't say Pearl Jam or Eddie Vedder (and costs $100) is correct.StevieG73 said:
That’s incredibly shortsighted. Can you not see the appeal to someone that has an appreciation for the Lisbon print?tempo_n_groove said:
I'd guess that most Pearl Jam fans who want the Lisbon print would rather pay $125 on ebay than just have the art print.
The fact that these were sold in person at a gallery show, online to facebook groups, and then posted to the public 7 hours ago seems to support that.
I follow enough art and posters to get the pulse of what is going on. It is a nice print but it's not by any of the big names or it would sell out instantly.Pittsburgh 2013
Cincinnati 2014
Greenville 2016
(Raleigh 2016)
Columbia 20160 -
0
-
0 -
This might be the first time an AP ever went on sale...demetrios said:0 -
I think Taz's Pearl Jam Berlin AP poster went on sale. Not that much though.tempo_n_groove said:
This might be the first time an AP ever went on sale...demetrios said:0 -
-
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help