Donald Trump
Comments
-
ikiT said:mmm, financials. So many lies.
Wells Fargo, TD Bank have already given Trump-related financial documents to Congress
http://a.msn.com/01/en-us/AABKyq1?ocid=se“There was no collusion.”“I have nothing to hide.”“I don’t know any Russians.”“I’ll sit down and talk with anyone.”“We do everything by the book.”“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”“Very legal, very cool.”“Fully exonerated.”“Essentially no collusion.”Follow the money from Russia with love and a PTape all the way to impeachment.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Maybe Vegas should start posting a daily over/under for the number of lies the LIAR-IN-CHIEF will say everyday.josevolution said:Man what a complete incompetent Baffoon he is , but you all know that better than anyone ! lol why does he always say that when spewing one of his lies ?
0 -
tbergs said:
You know what I find funny about that graphic, the only 2 presidents not to be re-elected had the least amount of resistance. That doesn't exactly boost confidence that the higher numbers mean as much as we'd like to think.The Juggler said:
That is true. To me the poll speaks to how divided the US is in recent years. Second on the list is Obama.
This Polling suggests trump's high water mark is 46%, exactly what he received in 2016.
I am very interested in how many will "probably" vote against trump
Definitely + probably = interesting0 -
PJ_Soul said:
The SCOTUS is broken. Too many of the judges are completely partisan, which is a situation created by the nomination and affirmation process, and it's now weighted towards a party that has completely abandoned any kind of respect for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. That entire process desperately needs to be separated from government for America to have any hope going forward of a non-partisan, aka fair, SCOTUS.mrussel1 said:
That would be very distressing. The other branches need to take their power back. This is the time.josevolution said:SCOTUS will protect the Baffoon !
What happens if SCOTUS rules against trump and orders everything related to Mueller and his tax returns be released to Congress and trump refuses?
What could Congress possibly do, send the Sergeant at Arms alone to the White House? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.0 -
Is Trump the only one with access to his tax returns? No. The IRS has his returns, why would they refuse a court order? The Mueller report might be a different scenario because it is in the hands of the justice department...Lerxst1992 said:PJ_Soul said:
The SCOTUS is broken. Too many of the judges are completely partisan, which is a situation created by the nomination and affirmation process, and it's now weighted towards a party that has completely abandoned any kind of respect for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. That entire process desperately needs to be separated from government for America to have any hope going forward of a non-partisan, aka fair, SCOTUS.mrussel1 said:
That would be very distressing. The other branches need to take their power back. This is the time.josevolution said:SCOTUS will protect the Baffoon !
What happens if SCOTUS rules against trump and orders everything related to Mueller and his tax returns be released to Congress and trump refuses?
What could Congress possibly do, send the Sergeant at Arms alone to the White House? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.
Give Peas A Chance…0 -
because the irs is a department of the Executive branch.......Meltdown99 said:
Is Trump the only one with access to his tax returns? No. The IRS has his returns, why would they refuse a court order? The Mueller report might be a different scenario because it is in the hands of the justice department...Lerxst1992 said:PJ_Soul said:
The SCOTUS is broken. Too many of the judges are completely partisan, which is a situation created by the nomination and affirmation process, and it's now weighted towards a party that has completely abandoned any kind of respect for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. That entire process desperately needs to be separated from government for America to have any hope going forward of a non-partisan, aka fair, SCOTUS.mrussel1 said:
That would be very distressing. The other branches need to take their power back. This is the time.josevolution said:SCOTUS will protect the Baffoon !
What happens if SCOTUS rules against trump and orders everything related to Mueller and his tax returns be released to Congress and trump refuses?
What could Congress possibly do, send the Sergeant at Arms alone to the White House? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Maybe that would be the thing that would sway republicans toward impeachment. Gotta be.Lerxst1992 said:PJ_Soul said:
The SCOTUS is broken. Too many of the judges are completely partisan, which is a situation created by the nomination and affirmation process, and it's now weighted towards a party that has completely abandoned any kind of respect for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. That entire process desperately needs to be separated from government for America to have any hope going forward of a non-partisan, aka fair, SCOTUS.mrussel1 said:
That would be very distressing. The other branches need to take their power back. This is the time.josevolution said:SCOTUS will protect the Baffoon !
What happens if SCOTUS rules against trump and orders everything related to Mueller and his tax returns be released to Congress and trump refuses?
What could Congress possibly do, send the Sergeant at Arms alone to the White House? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.www.myspace.com0 -
Impeachment articles is the remedy by the Constitution. At that point we would need enough Senate Republicans that recognize that separation of powers is important. There are a handful that I know would go along, but we shall see.Lerxst1992 said:PJ_Soul said:
The SCOTUS is broken. Too many of the judges are completely partisan, which is a situation created by the nomination and affirmation process, and it's now weighted towards a party that has completely abandoned any kind of respect for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. That entire process desperately needs to be separated from government for America to have any hope going forward of a non-partisan, aka fair, SCOTUS.mrussel1 said:
That would be very distressing. The other branches need to take their power back. This is the time.josevolution said:SCOTUS will protect the Baffoon !
What happens if SCOTUS rules against trump and orders everything related to Mueller and his tax returns be released to Congress and trump refuses?
What could Congress possibly do, send the Sergeant at Arms alone to the White House? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.0 -
Here's what Trump does when he's lying
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/05/23/kth-trump-pelosi-schumer-meeting-impeachment-ac360-vpx.cnn
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
I doubt it.The Juggler said:
Maybe that would be the thing that would sway republicans toward impeachment. Gotta be.Lerxst1992 said:PJ_Soul said:
The SCOTUS is broken. Too many of the judges are completely partisan, which is a situation created by the nomination and affirmation process, and it's now weighted towards a party that has completely abandoned any kind of respect for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. That entire process desperately needs to be separated from government for America to have any hope going forward of a non-partisan, aka fair, SCOTUS.mrussel1 said:
That would be very distressing. The other branches need to take their power back. This is the time.josevolution said:SCOTUS will protect the Baffoon !
What happens if SCOTUS rules against trump and orders everything related to Mueller and his tax returns be released to Congress and trump refuses?
What could Congress possibly do, send the Sergeant at Arms alone to the White House? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.
I can't see this Republican Senate impeaching this president. They're all in.
I still think the Congress should hold impeachment hearings to get the truth out there in time for the next election. But it will be purely for politics.0 -
There's a pretty big difference between the Russia stuff and refusing to honor oversight that is further sanctioned by the courts. Maybe I'm being naive but the Constitution is clear on the co-equal nature of the branches and if two bodies vote on something, the third cannot refuse without creating a full blown crisis.dignin said:
I doubt it.The Juggler said:
Maybe that would be the thing that would sway republicans toward impeachment. Gotta be.Lerxst1992 said:PJ_Soul said:
The SCOTUS is broken. Too many of the judges are completely partisan, which is a situation created by the nomination and affirmation process, and it's now weighted towards a party that has completely abandoned any kind of respect for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. That entire process desperately needs to be separated from government for America to have any hope going forward of a non-partisan, aka fair, SCOTUS.mrussel1 said:
That would be very distressing. The other branches need to take their power back. This is the time.josevolution said:SCOTUS will protect the Baffoon !
What happens if SCOTUS rules against trump and orders everything related to Mueller and his tax returns be released to Congress and trump refuses?
What could Congress possibly do, send the Sergeant at Arms alone to the White House? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.
I can't see this Republican Senate impeaching this president. They're all in.
I still think the Congress should hold impeachment hearings to get the truth out there in time for the next election. But it will be purely for politics.0 -
And you believe the IRS would ignore a court order?mickeyrat said:
because the irs is a department of the Executive branch.......Meltdown99 said:
Is Trump the only one with access to his tax returns? No. The IRS has his returns, why would they refuse a court order? The Mueller report might be a different scenario because it is in the hands of the justice department...Lerxst1992 said:PJ_Soul said:
The SCOTUS is broken. Too many of the judges are completely partisan, which is a situation created by the nomination and affirmation process, and it's now weighted towards a party that has completely abandoned any kind of respect for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. That entire process desperately needs to be separated from government for America to have any hope going forward of a non-partisan, aka fair, SCOTUS.mrussel1 said:
That would be very distressing. The other branches need to take their power back. This is the time.josevolution said:SCOTUS will protect the Baffoon !
What happens if SCOTUS rules against trump and orders everything related to Mueller and his tax returns be released to Congress and trump refuses?
What could Congress possibly do, send the Sergeant at Arms alone to the White House? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Mnuchin, Sec of treasury has already ignored Congress on this.Meltdown99 said:
And you believe the IRS would ignore a court order?mickeyrat said:
because the irs is a department of the Executive branch.......Meltdown99 said:
Is Trump the only one with access to his tax returns? No. The IRS has his returns, why would they refuse a court order? The Mueller report might be a different scenario because it is in the hands of the justice department...Lerxst1992 said:PJ_Soul said:
The SCOTUS is broken. Too many of the judges are completely partisan, which is a situation created by the nomination and affirmation process, and it's now weighted towards a party that has completely abandoned any kind of respect for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. That entire process desperately needs to be separated from government for America to have any hope going forward of a non-partisan, aka fair, SCOTUS.mrussel1 said:
That would be very distressing. The other branches need to take their power back. This is the time.josevolution said:SCOTUS will protect the Baffoon !
What happens if SCOTUS rules against trump and orders everything related to Mueller and his tax returns be released to Congress and trump refuses?
What could Congress possibly do, send the Sergeant at Arms alone to the White House? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Yeah, he's totally normal. LOL.ikiT said:Here's what Trump does when he's lying
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/05/23/kth-trump-pelosi-schumer-meeting-impeachment-ac360-vpx.cnnI LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0 -
Pelosi’s "cover-up" remark is just “part of her now-daily act of political cognitive dissonance in which she accuses Mr. Trump of committing impeachable offenses to appease her anti-Trump ultras while opposing impeachment lest it jeopardize swing-district Democrats in 2020,” The Wall Street Journal editorial board writes. President Trump “has decided to call her bluff and offer a choice—impeachment or bipartisan progress.”
How many calories in one of those?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
It's funny, but it seems win/win to me politically. If there is no progress, that means Trump can't run on infrastructure or whatever. What's the near term downside? Trump didn't call her bluff, he doubled down on the negative.Halifax2TheMax said:Pelosi’s "cover-up" remark is just “part of her now-daily act of political cognitive dissonance in which she accuses Mr. Trump of committing impeachable offenses to appease her anti-Trump ultras while opposing impeachment lest it jeopardize swing-district Democrats in 2020,” The Wall Street Journal editorial board writes. President Trump “has decided to call her bluff and offer a choice—impeachment or bipartisan progress.”
How many calories in one of those?0 -
Well they are completely ignoring one branch, to me that should already qualify as a constitutional crisis. I could see them fighting over some things but the administration is fighting everything. There are giving a huge middle finger to the role of oversight.mrussel1 said:
There's a pretty big difference between the Russia stuff and refusing to honor oversight that is further sanctioned by the courts. Maybe I'm being naive but the Constitution is clear on the co-equal nature of the branches and if two bodies vote on something, the third cannot refuse without creating a full blown crisis.dignin said:
I doubt it.The Juggler said:
Maybe that would be the thing that would sway republicans toward impeachment. Gotta be.Lerxst1992 said:PJ_Soul said:
The SCOTUS is broken. Too many of the judges are completely partisan, which is a situation created by the nomination and affirmation process, and it's now weighted towards a party that has completely abandoned any kind of respect for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. That entire process desperately needs to be separated from government for America to have any hope going forward of a non-partisan, aka fair, SCOTUS.mrussel1 said:
That would be very distressing. The other branches need to take their power back. This is the time.josevolution said:SCOTUS will protect the Baffoon !
What happens if SCOTUS rules against trump and orders everything related to Mueller and his tax returns be released to Congress and trump refuses?
What could Congress possibly do, send the Sergeant at Arms alone to the White House? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.
I can't see this Republican Senate impeaching this president. They're all in.
I still think the Congress should hold impeachment hearings to get the truth out there in time for the next election. But it will be purely for politics.
It does look like the judicial branch is holding their own so far, but that process is slow and that's what Trump's people are counting on. It's the courts strength but it's also a weakness when it comes to politics. And im not confident that the highly partisan supreme Court will do the right thing in the end regardless.
This has all been coming to a head for years with the supreme Court becoming so politicised.0 -
Just saw this on Facebook:
"You don’t have to be a saint for God to love you or for you to love God. I didn't vote for Trump because he's been married three times, I didn’t vote for him because he may have cheated on any of his wives, and I certainly didn’t vote for him because he had lost money in a business venture and filed for bankruptcy. I DID vote for him because our border should have a wall to help stop all the illegals, I voted for him because he promised to cut unemployment and create jobs, I voted for him because he loves America and will fight for our republic and our rights, I voted for him because he believes in our Constitution and above all else I felt he would deliver on every promise if there was any way possible. He isn’t a perfect man, but he is the perfect man for the job of President of the great republic the United States of America. After the anti-American, corrupt Obama, Trump is a breath of fresh air! #MAGA #KAG"
0 -
^^
That is a third of the country. The idea that he loves America and the Constitution is bordering on comical. And I'm convinced you would not hear about it so much if we'd not had a black president for the previous eight years.1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
Unfortunately, I think you're right.OnWis97 said:^^
That is a third of the country. The idea that he loves America and the Constitution is bordering on comical. And I'm convinced you would not hear about it so much if we'd not had a black president for the previous eight years.I LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help