The Democratic Candidates
Comments
-
mrussel1 said:F Me In The Brain said:I think a solid and well rounded 30 year old would make a much more appealing candidate, to me, than a 78 year old.However, one of those people is not allowed to run. The other needs to re-take their driver's license to make sure they are not a risk to the world driving an automobile.You can reasonably count on them being able to tie their own shoes at 38, though.And, I get your point. It is an exceptional 30 year old I would consider -- just as it would be an exceptional 78 year old.The love he receives is the love that is saved0
-
Lerxst1992 said:F Me In The Brain said:Lerxst1992 said:F Me In The Brain said:Need someone who doesn't have one foot in the grave.Sorry, but this is a lazy and relatively brainless statement.We covered this previously - but there are lots of posts so we can do it again, if you would like.How about the fact that if I am 34 I cannot be POTUS? Where is the Ageism cry against that?Age should be a viable consideration. Would you elect someone who was 102? 12?
Is it fair to openly say a woman is unqualified, or a black or a hispanic?
Some 55 yo's have trouble with memory. I'd say Bernies mind is probably sharper than yours. Definitely mine (I'm about Stone's age FWIW )
How can age possibly factor into these examples?
....
"As directed by the Constitution, apresidential candidate must be a natural born citizen of the United States, a resident for 14 years, and 35 years of age or older."'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
mrussel1 said:OnWis97 said:Bringing some discussion from the "impending impeachment" thread over here...it was suggested, correctly, that the "cooler" candidate wins.
So, who's "cooler" than Trump...well, just like with Bush, I don't get why people thought he was so cool. But they do. So...
I don't see any of the democratic candidates as appreciably cooler with the exception of Beto. Maybe Mayor Pete. Joe? No. In 2016, I wanted Joe to run (not that the party would have allowed Hillary to lose). He kinda had a sharp tongue and I think would have run up the score in the debates. Now? Now, we're embedded in the idea that we need someone "different." And he's super-old. He's not going to score any "cool" points.
It doesn't look good. I say run Kamala and Booker and hope he drops an n-bomb.
No one here ever discusses the African American vote in the Democratic party, but it's impossible to underestimate how critical that is, and the fact that right Biden is dominating that vote. He has real credibility in that demographic and the SC primary is very early in the process.
Someone here has discussed it quite a bit0 -
my2hands said:mrussel1 said:OnWis97 said:Bringing some discussion from the "impending impeachment" thread over here...it was suggested, correctly, that the "cooler" candidate wins.
So, who's "cooler" than Trump...well, just like with Bush, I don't get why people thought he was so cool. But they do. So...
I don't see any of the democratic candidates as appreciably cooler with the exception of Beto. Maybe Mayor Pete. Joe? No. In 2016, I wanted Joe to run (not that the party would have allowed Hillary to lose). He kinda had a sharp tongue and I think would have run up the score in the debates. Now? Now, we're embedded in the idea that we need someone "different." And he's super-old. He's not going to score any "cool" points.
It doesn't look good. I say run Kamala and Booker and hope he drops an n-bomb.
No one here ever discusses the African American vote in the Democratic party, but it's impossible to underestimate how critical that is, and the fact that right Biden is dominating that vote. He has real credibility in that demographic and the SC primary is very early in the process.
Someone here has discussed it quite a bit0 -
mrussel1 said:my2hands said:mrussel1 said:OnWis97 said:Bringing some discussion from the "impending impeachment" thread over here...it was suggested, correctly, that the "cooler" candidate wins.
So, who's "cooler" than Trump...well, just like with Bush, I don't get why people thought he was so cool. But they do. So...
I don't see any of the democratic candidates as appreciably cooler with the exception of Beto. Maybe Mayor Pete. Joe? No. In 2016, I wanted Joe to run (not that the party would have allowed Hillary to lose). He kinda had a sharp tongue and I think would have run up the score in the debates. Now? Now, we're embedded in the idea that we need someone "different." And he's super-old. He's not going to score any "cool" points.
It doesn't look good. I say run Kamala and Booker and hope he drops an n-bomb.
No one here ever discusses the African American vote in the Democratic party, but it's impossible to underestimate how critical that is, and the fact that right Biden is dominating that vote. He has real credibility in that demographic and the SC primary is very early in the process.
Someone here has discussed it quite a bitBy The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
mrussel1 said:my2hands said:mrussel1 said:OnWis97 said:Bringing some discussion from the "impending impeachment" thread over here...it was suggested, correctly, that the "cooler" candidate wins.
So, who's "cooler" than Trump...well, just like with Bush, I don't get why people thought he was so cool. But they do. So...
I don't see any of the democratic candidates as appreciably cooler with the exception of Beto. Maybe Mayor Pete. Joe? No. In 2016, I wanted Joe to run (not that the party would have allowed Hillary to lose). He kinda had a sharp tongue and I think would have run up the score in the debates. Now? Now, we're embedded in the idea that we need someone "different." And he's super-old. He's not going to score any "cool" points.
It doesn't look good. I say run Kamala and Booker and hope he drops an n-bomb.
No one here ever discusses the African American vote in the Democratic party, but it's impossible to underestimate how critical that is, and the fact that right Biden is dominating that vote. He has real credibility in that demographic and the SC primary is very early in the process.
Someone here has discussed it quite a bit
I'm happy your white collar job exposed you to minorities and homosexuals.
I was talking about the black vote, and got ridiculed for it, WAY before our previous discussion my friend. It's why Kaine was a horrible VP choice, and its why Hillary lost, not because of the russian nerds as NBC wants us to believe
0 -
The whites in here get pretty riled up
The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
F Me In The Brain said:The whites in here get pretty riled upBe Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0
-
Jason P said:F Me In The Brain said:The whites in here get pretty riled up
The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
calmer than you are, dude
0 -
YEAH WAVING THE FUCKING GUN AROUND?!?!2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
F Me In The Brain said:Jason P said:F Me In The Brain said:The whites in here get pretty riled upIt's a hopeless situation...0
-
my2hands said:mrussel1 said:my2hands said:mrussel1 said:OnWis97 said:Bringing some discussion from the "impending impeachment" thread over here...it was suggested, correctly, that the "cooler" candidate wins.
So, who's "cooler" than Trump...well, just like with Bush, I don't get why people thought he was so cool. But they do. So...
I don't see any of the democratic candidates as appreciably cooler with the exception of Beto. Maybe Mayor Pete. Joe? No. In 2016, I wanted Joe to run (not that the party would have allowed Hillary to lose). He kinda had a sharp tongue and I think would have run up the score in the debates. Now? Now, we're embedded in the idea that we need someone "different." And he's super-old. He's not going to score any "cool" points.
It doesn't look good. I say run Kamala and Booker and hope he drops an n-bomb.
No one here ever discusses the African American vote in the Democratic party, but it's impossible to underestimate how critical that is, and the fact that right Biden is dominating that vote. He has real credibility in that demographic and the SC primary is very early in the process.
Someone here has discussed it quite a bit
I'm happy your white collar job exposed you to minorities and homosexuals.
I was talking about the black vote, and got ridiculed for it, WAY before our previous discussion my friend. It's why Kaine was a horrible VP choice, and its why Hillary lost, not because of the russian nerds as NBC wants us to believe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDcA9BIB_NQ
0 -
F Me In The Brain said:Jason P said:F Me In The Brain said:The whites in here get pretty riled up0
-
mrussel1 said:my2hands said:mrussel1 said:my2hands said:mrussel1 said:OnWis97 said:Bringing some discussion from the "impending impeachment" thread over here...it was suggested, correctly, that the "cooler" candidate wins.
So, who's "cooler" than Trump...well, just like with Bush, I don't get why people thought he was so cool. But they do. So...
I don't see any of the democratic candidates as appreciably cooler with the exception of Beto. Maybe Mayor Pete. Joe? No. In 2016, I wanted Joe to run (not that the party would have allowed Hillary to lose). He kinda had a sharp tongue and I think would have run up the score in the debates. Now? Now, we're embedded in the idea that we need someone "different." And he's super-old. He's not going to score any "cool" points.
It doesn't look good. I say run Kamala and Booker and hope he drops an n-bomb.
No one here ever discusses the African American vote in the Democratic party, but it's impossible to underestimate how critical that is, and the fact that right Biden is dominating that vote. He has real credibility in that demographic and the SC primary is very early in the process.
Someone here has discussed it quite a bit
I'm happy your white collar job exposed you to minorities and homosexuals.
I was talking about the black vote, and got ridiculed for it, WAY before our previous discussion my friend. It's why Kaine was a horrible VP choice, and its why Hillary lost, not because of the russian nerds as NBC wants us to believe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDcA9BIB_NQ0 -
mrussel1 said:my2hands said:mrussel1 said:my2hands said:mrussel1 said:OnWis97 said:Bringing some discussion from the "impending impeachment" thread over here...it was suggested, correctly, that the "cooler" candidate wins.
So, who's "cooler" than Trump...well, just like with Bush, I don't get why people thought he was so cool. But they do. So...
I don't see any of the democratic candidates as appreciably cooler with the exception of Beto. Maybe Mayor Pete. Joe? No. In 2016, I wanted Joe to run (not that the party would have allowed Hillary to lose). He kinda had a sharp tongue and I think would have run up the score in the debates. Now? Now, we're embedded in the idea that we need someone "different." And he's super-old. He's not going to score any "cool" points.
It doesn't look good. I say run Kamala and Booker and hope he drops an n-bomb.
No one here ever discusses the African American vote in the Democratic party, but it's impossible to underestimate how critical that is, and the fact that right Biden is dominating that vote. He has real credibility in that demographic and the SC primary is very early in the process.
Someone here has discussed it quite a bit
I'm happy your white collar job exposed you to minorities and homosexuals.
I was talking about the black vote, and got ridiculed for it, WAY before our previous discussion my friend. It's why Kaine was a horrible VP choice, and its why Hillary lost, not because of the russian nerds as NBC wants us to believe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDcA9BIB_NQ
Are you daft?0 -
That's a great skit by the way0
-
Hopefully, this means Dem candidates will have an honest chance in Ohio. That's all anyone needs.Court Strikes Down Ohio Congressional Map, Says Too Gerrymandered To Benefit GOPThe court blocked the state from using its current map in any future elections. It gave lawmakers until June 14 to come up with a new one.By Sam LevineToday
A panel of three federal judges struck down Ohio’s congressional map on Friday, ruling the districts were so severely drawn to benefit Republicans that they violated the U.S. Constitution.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ohio-gerrymandering-court-ruling_n_5ccc7638e4b0e4d757322294Falling down,...not staying down0 -
gerrymandergreat term"early 19th century: from the name of Governor Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts + salamander, from the supposed similarity between a salamander and the shape of a new voting district on a map drawn when he was in office (1812), the creation of which was felt to favor his party; the map (with claws, wings, and fangs added) was published in the Boston Weekly Messenger, with the title The Gerry-Mander ."
The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help