Medicare for all

Gern Blansten
Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,409
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/399625-sanders-thanks-koch-brothers-for-accidentally-making-argument-for-medicare
Hilarious....I started seeing articles pop up yesterday about how Bernie's proposal would cost 36T over 10 years, yet the articles didn't mention what we are currently paying. Those aren't additional costs. They replace what we are currently spending and there is absolutely no way it wouldn't save money.
And the Koch's study agrees.
Hilarious....I started seeing articles pop up yesterday about how Bernie's proposal would cost 36T over 10 years, yet the articles didn't mention what we are currently paying. Those aren't additional costs. They replace what we are currently spending and there is absolutely no way it wouldn't save money.
And the Koch's study agrees.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
0
Comments
-
Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50Give Peas A Chance…0
-
Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50Give Peas A Chance…0
-
Meltdown99 said:PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0
-
Yeah, that's true.... It just defies logic though. How can any person with an IQ over 80 actually think the best healthcare system is for private, for-profit insurance companies to run the show?? When their healthcare is a money-making scheme for corporations (and for politicians - those medical insurance lobbyists know their stuff)? How can they possibly accept a system where their healthcare is determined by people sitting in offices whose only job is to figure out how to spend as little money as possible when deciding how to fund (or not) your medical needs? And where hospitals are busy figuring out how much they can get away with charging for every single tiny little thing, down to each Tylenol tablet and Q-Tip? It's just so fucking dumb...... But besides me I guess sort of brow beating this mindset that baffles me so, this issue also just really really concerns and upsets me. It is such a violation against humanity.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:Yeah, that's true.... It just defies logic though. How can any person with an IQ over 80 actually think the best healthcare system is for private, for-profit insurance companies to run the show?? When their healthcare is a money-making scheme for corporations (and for politicians - those medical insurance lobbyists know their stuff)? How can they possibly accept a system where their healthcare is determined by people sitting in offices whose only job is to figure out how to spend as little money as possible when deciding how to fund (or not) your medical needs? And where hospitals are busy figuring out how much they can get away with charging for every single tiny little thing, down to each Tylenol tablet and Q-Tip? It's just so fucking dumb.It's a hopeless situation...0
-
My brother just got his first baby. I think he and his girlfriend paid 12 dollars for each day they were at the hospital, including food."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
Spiritual_Chaos said:My brother just got his first baby. I think he and his girlfriend paid 12 dollars for each day they were at the hospital, including food.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Meltdown99 said:PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50
If you have had a new hospital built in your area the last 20 years just look in amazement on the wasted cost. Why do hospitals advertise? How much does that cost? Why does each hospital in the county have its own state of the art equipment? Why don't they share that shit?
There is absolutely no good reason why we put this system on ourselves.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
PJ_Soul said:Spiritual_Chaos said:My brother just got his first baby. I think he and his girlfriend paid 12 dollars for each day they were at the hospital, including food.
"If you are hospitalised, you will be charged a daily fee that by law cannot exceed SEK 100."
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Meltdown99 said:PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0
-
It is a travesty that people die in this country due to lack of medical care. That lack of care may be a result of being uninsured. It may be a result of being insured, but not being able to afford the co-pay, co-insurance, deductible, etc... People go bankrupt due to unforeseen medical expenses. People lose their homes due to medical costs. It is a totally broken system. The Dems and Reps need to get on board. We now are starting to see momentum with Dems forming a caucus in congress, but they won't be able to get anything passed without a majority, so this single-payer system is a non-starter while the current party is in power.
I know I used to be one of those who thought our system was fine. I have no idea how or why I thought that. As PJ_Soul said, we pay more per capita for health care than any other nation. And yet we lag behind every other developed, democratic nation when it comes to health care outcomes. Look at our infant mortality rate compared with other countries in 2010. I can only imagine nearly a decade later, we're even further down the list.
And here's a new story in Newsweek:U.S. THE MOST DANGEROUS DEVELOPED COUNTRY TO GIVE BIRTH IN: REPORT
This is a result of for-profit insurance companies deciding the fate of someone's medical care. It isn't working. Obamacare, ACA, whatever else, are just derivatives of a completely corrupt and broken system that is not providing adequate care, and costs way too much. It is time that the US get smart about this, and look at how the countries above us are able to do so much better while spending less money. The cry about socialism is tired and boring. A single-payer solution is as socialistic as public roads, public services like fire and police, public education, etc... Why not public healthcare? We could have a world-class system without people spending any more than they currently are - we'd just be paying taxes rather than premiums for our healthcare. Drug prices would come down. Doctor visits would come down. That ridiculous itemized hospital bill would become something displayed in the Smithsonian as a relic of a medieval past."I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080 -
rgambs said:Meltdown99 said:PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50Give Peas A Chance…0
-
Meltdown99 said:rgambs said:Meltdown99 said:PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50
But anyway, yes, we pay for certain things (often covered largely by extended healthcare coverage offered by employers), but we never EVER have to pay for any life-saving treatment, emergency treatment, non-selective surgeries, child birth, abortions, check ups, visits to the family doctor, referred visits to specialists, non-elective scans, all cancer treatment, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc. SO much of our healthcare is covered so that nobody is losing their house when they get sick, and so that poor people are put at a disadvantage when it comes to necessary healthcare. My main complaint about what isn't covered is eye care. While any eye injuries or diseases are completely covered, and referrals to optometrists makes the visit free too, adults between 18 and 65 (or is it 13 - 65??) still have to pay for regular eye exams. It's like $80 - $90 usually, and that isn't normally covered by extended coverage either (though eyeglasses prescriptions are, just like most other prescriptions) .... But if that eye doctor finds any issues that require follow-up or additional tests or procedures, all that's free too. Still, eye health is really important, and most eye problems are discovered during an annual visit to the optometrist, and making us pay for that check-up is likely keeping some adults from going regularly.
And yeah, of course, ALL healthcare systems always have room for improvement (waitlists for non-emergent surgeries like knee replacements can get long, for example, and provinces should do better with that (BC is making a good move there thank goodness)). But we're talking about how the US system is specifically heinous for people because it is so far away from those other systems and relies on the free market, which is terrible. That is undeniable.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I'm not going respond to that unnecessary overly long reply ...
My point being is it seem with every government they are allowing the system to deteriorating because of inefficiencies and poor funding.
You know what, you know that ... you just need to argue for no fucking reason ... now heres a plan go fucking argue with yourself. Im done discussing fuck all with you...
Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Meltdown99 said:I'm not going respond to that unnecessary overly long reply ...
My point being is it seem with every government they are allowing the system to deteriorating because of inefficiencies and poor funding.
You know what, you know that ... you just need to argue for no fucking reason ... now heres a plan go fucking argue with yourself. Im done discussing fuck all with you...
Monthly insurance premiums are 700$ and the deductible is 6,000$ per person.
I understand that no system works with perfect efficiency, but try to imagine the impact that cost has on a family ON TOP of the taxation rate that could easily supply universal coverage if the stodgy old Reaganomics folks like yourself (again, not your fault) didn't stand in the way on crusted old ideologies that were never practical to begin with.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:rgambs said:Meltdown99 said:PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50
But anyway, yes, we pay for certain things (often covered largely by extended healthcare coverage offered by employers), but we never EVER have to pay for any life-saving treatment, emergency treatment, non-selective surgeries, child birth, abortions, check ups, visits to the family doctor, referred visits to specialists, non-elective scans, all cancer treatment, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc. SO much of our healthcare is covered so that nobody is losing their house when they get sick, and so that poor people are put at a disadvantage when it comes to necessary healthcare. My main complaint about what isn't covered is eye care. While any eye injuries or diseases are completely covered, and referrals to optometrists makes the visit free too, adults between 18 and 65 still have to pay for regular eye exams. It's like $80 - $90 usually, and that isn't normally covered by extended coverage either (though eyeglasses prescriptions are, just like most other prescriptions) .... But if that eye doctor finds any issues that require follow-up or additional tests or procedures, all that's free too. Still, eye health is really important, and most eye problems are discovered during an annual visit to the optometrist, and making us pay for that check-up is likely keeping some adults from going regularly.
And yeah, of course, ALL healthcare systems always have room for improvement (waitlists for non-emergent surgeries like knee replacements can get long, for example, and provinces should do better with that (BC is making a good move there thank goodness)). But we're talking about how the US system is specifically heinous for people because it is so far away from those other systems and relies on the free market, which is terrible. That is undeniable.Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Meltdown99 said:PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:rgambs said:Meltdown99 said:PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:brianlux said:Medical cost would go down for the consumer if hospital stay items (just some examples) were adjusted down to a reasonable level:Tylenol, one pill, $15Plastic bag, $8Box of tissues, $8Gloves, $53Cup for medicine, $10Marking pen, $18Swab, each, $23Cost of use for overhead light during operations, $93.50
But anyway, yes, we pay for certain things (often covered largely by extended healthcare coverage offered by employers), but we never EVER have to pay for any life-saving treatment, emergency treatment, non-selective surgeries, child birth, abortions, check ups, visits to the family doctor, referred visits to specialists, non-elective scans, all cancer treatment, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc. SO much of our healthcare is covered so that nobody is losing their house when they get sick, and so that poor people are put at a disadvantage when it comes to necessary healthcare. My main complaint about what isn't covered is eye care. While any eye injuries or diseases are completely covered, and referrals to optometrists makes the visit free too, adults between 18 and 65 still have to pay for regular eye exams. It's like $80 - $90 usually, and that isn't normally covered by extended coverage either (though eyeglasses prescriptions are, just like most other prescriptions) .... But if that eye doctor finds any issues that require follow-up or additional tests or procedures, all that's free too. Still, eye health is really important, and most eye problems are discovered during an annual visit to the optometrist, and making us pay for that check-up is likely keeping some adults from going regularly.
And yeah, of course, ALL healthcare systems always have room for improvement (waitlists for non-emergent surgeries like knee replacements can get long, for example, and provinces should do better with that (BC is making a good move there thank goodness)). But we're talking about how the US system is specifically heinous for people because it is so far away from those other systems and relies on the free market, which is terrible. That is undeniable.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help