Repub Party

1171820222387

Comments

  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,918
    JC29856 said:
    I would love to see Trump attempt to explain this bill in an interview with an actual reporter..........oh wait, he hasn't done one of those since he couldn't handle John Dickerson's questions and walked away from him 7 months ago:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqt164_Je00
    Lindorff does a good job.
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/12/20/the-big-lie-about-the-tax-bill-why-bosses-will-never-raise-wages/

    And yet, I challenge anyone to find a serious discussion of this in the corporate media, where nobody is pointing out the reality that at no time in history have capitalists willingly parted with any of their profits to raise worker compensation unless forced to by worker demands, and nobody is pointing out that the claim that “tax cuts pay for themselves” was already tried and exposed as a fraud during the Reagan administration when it was known as “supply-side theory.”

    There is going to be no gain in wages as a result of passage of this outrage of a tax “reform” bill. And that means it’s really all just a big wet-kiss transfer of public funds to the rich and one which, far from “paying for itself through new economic growth” as the Trump claim goes, will just end up adding another $1.5 trillion to the federal deficit, while further widening the nation’s unprecedented income chasm.

    Savannah Guthrie accepted your challenge this morning, before you made it.  All you had to do was look at the Huffington Post's blaring lead.  https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/paul-ryan-asked-if-hes-living-in-a-fantasy-world-amid-his-defense-of-tax-bill_us_5a3a69b1e4b0b0e5a79ea50d?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    JC29856 said:
    I would love to see Trump attempt to explain this bill in an interview with an actual reporter..........oh wait, he hasn't done one of those since he couldn't handle John Dickerson's questions and walked away from him 7 months ago:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqt164_Je00
    Lindorff does a good job.
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/12/20/the-big-lie-about-the-tax-bill-why-bosses-will-never-raise-wages/

    And yet, I challenge anyone to find a serious discussion of this in the corporate media, where nobody is pointing out the reality that at no time in history have capitalists willingly parted with any of their profits to raise worker compensation unless forced to by worker demands, and nobody is pointing out that the claim that “tax cuts pay for themselves” was already tried and exposed as a fraud during the Reagan administration when it was known as “supply-side theory.”

    There is going to be no gain in wages as a result of passage of this outrage of a tax “reform” bill. And that means it’s really all just a big wet-kiss transfer of public funds to the rich and one which, far from “paying for itself through new economic growth” as the Trump claim goes, will just end up adding another $1.5 trillion to the federal deficit, while further widening the nation’s unprecedented income chasm.

    holy shit!

    with the exception of your jab at corporate media, you actually said something sensible and reasonable

    I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day
  • JC29856 said:
    I would love to see Trump attempt to explain this bill in an interview with an actual reporter..........oh wait, he hasn't done one of those since he couldn't handle John Dickerson's questions and walked away from him 7 months ago:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqt164_Je00
    Lindorff does a good job.
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/12/20/the-big-lie-about-the-tax-bill-why-bosses-will-never-raise-wages/

    And yet, I challenge anyone to find a serious discussion of this in the corporate media, where nobody is pointing out the reality that at no time in history have capitalists willingly parted with any of their profits to raise worker compensation unless forced to by worker demands, and nobody is pointing out that the claim that “tax cuts pay for themselves” was already tried and exposed as a fraud during the Reagan administration when it was known as “supply-side theory.”

    There is going to be no gain in wages as a result of passage of this outrage of a tax “reform” bill. And that means it’s really all just a big wet-kiss transfer of public funds to the rich and one which, far from “paying for itself through new economic growth” as the Trump claim goes, will just end up adding another $1.5 trillion to the federal deficit, while further widening the nation’s unprecedented income chasm.

    Maybe if you pulled your head out of the right wing hate machine media echo chamber’s ass, you might of heard some of those talking points being discussed. So now you’re back to being a butt hurt Bernie bro? And you referenced Comet Pizza again today to boot. How cute!
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • I would love to see Trump attempt to explain this bill in an interview with an actual journalist..........oh wait, he hasn't done one of those since he couldn't handle John Dickerson's questions and walked away from him 7 months ago:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqt164_Je00
    He’s just stand there and continuously claim how the bill will make him pay and pay dearly. 
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • RunIntoTheRain
    RunIntoTheRain Texas Posts: 1,033
    CM189191 said:
    JC29856 said:
    I would love to see Trump attempt to explain this bill in an interview with an actual reporter..........oh wait, he hasn't done one of those since he couldn't handle John Dickerson's questions and walked away from him 7 months ago:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqt164_Je00
    Lindorff does a good job.
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/12/20/the-big-lie-about-the-tax-bill-why-bosses-will-never-raise-wages/

    And yet, I challenge anyone to find a serious discussion of this in the corporate media, where nobody is pointing out the reality that at no time in history have capitalists willingly parted with any of their profits to raise worker compensation unless forced to by worker demands, and nobody is pointing out that the claim that “tax cuts pay for themselves” was already tried and exposed as a fraud during the Reagan administration when it was known as “supply-side theory.”

    There is going to be no gain in wages as a result of passage of this outrage of a tax “reform” bill. And that means it’s really all just a big wet-kiss transfer of public funds to the rich and one which, far from “paying for itself through new economic growth” as the Trump claim goes, will just end up adding another $1.5 trillion to the federal deficit, while further widening the nation’s unprecedented income chasm.

    holy shit!

    with the exception of your jab at corporate media, you actually said something sensible and reasonable

    I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day
    Those aren't @JC29856 's words. That's a quote from the article he linked. 
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    CM189191 said:
    JC29856 said:
    I would love to see Trump attempt to explain this bill in an interview with an actual reporter..........oh wait, he hasn't done one of those since he couldn't handle John Dickerson's questions and walked away from him 7 months ago:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqt164_Je00
    Lindorff does a good job.
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/12/20/the-big-lie-about-the-tax-bill-why-bosses-will-never-raise-wages/

    And yet, I challenge anyone to find a serious discussion of this in the corporate media, where nobody is pointing out the reality that at no time in history have capitalists willingly parted with any of their profits to raise worker compensation unless forced to by worker demands, and nobody is pointing out that the claim that “tax cuts pay for themselves” was already tried and exposed as a fraud during the Reagan administration when it was known as “supply-side theory.”

    There is going to be no gain in wages as a result of passage of this outrage of a tax “reform” bill. And that means it’s really all just a big wet-kiss transfer of public funds to the rich and one which, far from “paying for itself through new economic growth” as the Trump claim goes, will just end up adding another $1.5 trillion to the federal deficit, while further widening the nation’s unprecedented income chasm.

    holy shit!

    with the exception of your jab at corporate media, you actually said something sensible and reasonable

    I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day
    Those aren't @JC29856 's words. That's a quote from the article he linked. 
    Should have known.

    dnrtfa - closed it as soon as I noticed the formatting was the same as every other conspiracy theory website out there asking for donations
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,517
    edited December 2017
    If President Barack Obama had even thought about ANY legislation that would have added one dollar and fifty cents to the deficit the Republicans would have lost their shit.
    But a trickle down tax plan that rewards the wealthy and corporate interests that adds 1.5 TRILLION DOLLARS  to the deficit is okay.

    Ignorant self serving jackasses
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,398
    the republican party has lost all high ground and credibility when it comes to being the party of fiscal responsibility. they pledge to not add to the debt or the deficit. every one of them can go fuck themselves. they have no credibility left. adding 1.5 trillion to the debt is exact opposite of what they always preach.

    debt and deficits only matter when black democrats are in power i suppose.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,918
    the republican party has lost all high ground and credibility when it comes to being the party of fiscal responsibility. they pledge to not add to the debt or the deficit. every one of them can go fuck themselves. they have no credibility left. adding 1.5 trillion to the debt is exact opposite of what they always preach.

    debt and deficits only matter when black democrats are in power i suppose.
    And don't forget that morality is now a fungible asset. 
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,784
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,784
    edited December 2017
    https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2017/12/20/house-republicans-quietly-investigate-doj-fbi-310121

    These crooks wanna let orange bafoon off the hook I hope they get him to fire Muller let Washington burn down , GOP is afraid of him ...
    Post edited by josevolution on
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,880
    the republican party has lost all high ground and credibility when it comes to being the party of fiscal responsibility. they pledge to not add to the debt or the deficit. every one of them can go fuck themselves. they have no credibility left. adding 1.5 trillion to the debt is exact opposite of what they always preach.

    debt and deficits only matter when black democrats are in power i suppose.
    Ummmm not black democrats, only democrats.  Oh...or it matters to democrats when a republican is in the white house.  That's the thing, it matters to everyone at different times...but only when they don't have the power to fix it.  Once they have the power, they no longer care.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    the republican party has lost all high ground and credibility when it comes to being the party of fiscal responsibility. they pledge to not add to the debt or the deficit. every one of them can go fuck themselves. they have no credibility left. adding 1.5 trillion to the debt is exact opposite of what they always preach.

    debt and deficits only matter when black democrats are in power i suppose.
    Ummmm not black democrats, only democrats.  Oh...or it matters to democrats when a republican is in the white house.  That's the thing, it matters to everyone at different times...but only when they don't have the power to fix it.  Once they have the power, they no longer care.
    Race played a huge part in the backlash that got Trump elected. It's not just a R vs. D issue.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:

    Shocking!


    http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/19/investing/tax-plan-jobs-trump-ceo-yale-survey/index.html

    CEOs may like the idea of a big tax cut for businesses, but that doesn't mean they'll use the savings to create American jobs.

    Just 14% of CEOs surveyed by Yale University said their companies plan to make large, immediate capital investments in the United States if the tax overhaul passes. Capital investments, like building plants and upgrading equipment, can lead to hiring.

    Only a slim majority of the CEOs, 55%, said the Republican tax package should be signed into law. The Yale CEO Summit surveyed 110 prominent business leaders of Fortune 500 and Fortune 50 companies last week.

    Powered by SmartAsset.com

    The findings, along with other surveys, suggest that the tax plan may not have the dramatic impact on jobs that President Trump and Republicans in Congress have promised.

    Trump tweeted over the weekend that "TAX CUTS" will lead to "higher growth, higher wages, and more JOBS!" The GOP tax overhaul would slash the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and offer incentives for companies to bring foreign profits back home.

    Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who leads the Yale CEO Summit, said in an interview that it's "astounding" how few companies plan to reinvest their tax savings.

    He called the idea of a jobs boom from the tax plan "a lot of smoke and mirrors," especially because the unemployment rate is just 4.1% and companies already have plenty of cash to make investments.

    Sonnenfeld declined to name the CEOs who participated in the poll. He said it included "Trump supporters" and former members of the president's now-defunct advisory councils of business leaders.

    Related: Why Wells Fargo could be one of tax plan's big winners

    There are other signs that tax cuts may not spark a hiring boom. Just 43% of CEOs polled in November by the Business Roundtable, a powerful business lobby that has spent millions on ads championing tax reform, said they plan to ramp up hiring over the next six months. That was despite rising confidence that the Republican tax plan would be enacted.

    And at The Wall Street Journal's CEO Council in November, only a few business leaders raised their hands when they were asked whether the tax plan would lead them to increase investment in the United States. Gary Cohn, Trump's top economic adviser, was surprised.

    "Why aren't the other hands up?" he asked from on stage.

    Wall Street expects companies will use a big chunk of the tax savings to reward shareholders with fatter dividends and stock buybacks, which makes stocks more attractive. That's one reason stocks have surged all year, putting the Dow in sight of 25,000.

    "Markets just love it," Michael Block, chief market strategist at Rhino Trading Partners, wrote in a note on Tuesday.

    He said it's "malarkey" to think that cutting corporate taxes will boost spending and wages.

    "As we've seen in history, this doesn't raise wages," he wrote. "What it does lead to is richer shareholders."

    In 2004, when Congress offered tax breaks for companies to bring foreign profits back home, businesses used much of their cash on share buybacks.

    The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities later concluded that the 2004 tax holiday "did not produce the promised economic benefits" because companies mostly bought back stock instead of investing to grow their businesses.

    Related: How much you will pay under GOP tax plan depends on a lot

    Trump tweeted on Tuesday that "stocks and the economy have a long way to go after the Tax Cut Bill is totally understood and appreciated." Specifically, he said "immediate expensing will have a big impact."

    Trump was referring to an element of the legislation that would allow businesses to immediately and fully expense most new capital investments. The provision, which would end after five years, should encourage companies to shell out money on new plants and equipment.

    JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, who chairs the Business Roundtable, recently predicted that tax reform will "lead to capital expenditures, productivity and wages," though he cautioned it may take time for workers to benefit.

    One concern among the CEOs polled by Yale: the price of the GOP tax overhaul. The Joint Committee on Taxation, a nonpartisan scorekeeper for tax bills, estimates the legislation would add about $1 trillion to deficits even after accounting for projected additional economic growth.

    Seventy-two percent of CEOs said it's "wrong" for the tax package to sizably add to America's mountain of debt.

    AT&T excluded

    Once tax reform is signed into law, AT&T* plans to invest an additional $1 billion in the United States in 2018 and pay a special $1,000 bonus to more than 200,000 AT&T U.S. employees — all union-represented, non-management and front-line managers. If the President signs the bill before Christmas, employees will receive the bonus over the holidays.

    “Congress, working closely with the President, took a monumental step to bring taxes paid by U.S. businesses in line with the rest of the industrialized world,” said Randall Stephenson, AT&T chairman and CEO. “This tax reform will drive economic growth and create good-paying jobs. In fact, we will increase our U.S. investment and pay a special bonus to our U.S. employees.”


    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20171220005943/en/Tax-Reform-ATT-Plans-Increase-U.S.-Capital


    Also exclude Wells Fargo, Boeing, Comcast, Fifth 3rd Bank, Fed_ex
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,880
    dignin said:
    the republican party has lost all high ground and credibility when it comes to being the party of fiscal responsibility. they pledge to not add to the debt or the deficit. every one of them can go fuck themselves. they have no credibility left. adding 1.5 trillion to the debt is exact opposite of what they always preach.

    debt and deficits only matter when black democrats are in power i suppose.
    Ummmm not black democrats, only democrats.  Oh...or it matters to democrats when a republican is in the white house.  That's the thing, it matters to everyone at different times...but only when they don't have the power to fix it.  Once they have the power, they no longer care.
    Race played a huge part in the backlash that got Trump elected. It's not just a R vs. D issue.
    Ummm...but we aren't talking election.  Heck race played a huge part as to why Obama got the D nomination and won the election too.

    We are talking about the deficit.  And when it comes to the deficit, each side pretends to care when they aren't in power and then do nothing when they are.  The 1 time I remember different, D's has the presidency and R's had congress.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,918
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:

    Shocking!


    http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/19/investing/tax-plan-jobs-trump-ceo-yale-survey/index.html

    CEOs may like the idea of a big tax cut for businesses, but that doesn't mean they'll use the savings to create American jobs.

    Just 14% of CEOs surveyed by Yale University said their companies plan to make large, immediate capital investments in the United States if the tax overhaul passes. Capital investments, like building plants and upgrading equipment, can lead to hiring.

    Only a slim majority of the CEOs, 55%, said the Republican tax package should be signed into law. The Yale CEO Summit surveyed 110 prominent business leaders of Fortune 500 and Fortune 50 companies last week.

    Powered by SmartAsset.com

    The findings, along with other surveys, suggest that the tax plan may not have the dramatic impact on jobs that President Trump and Republicans in Congress have promised.

    Trump tweeted over the weekend that "TAX CUTS" will lead to "higher growth, higher wages, and more JOBS!" The GOP tax overhaul would slash the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and offer incentives for companies to bring foreign profits back home.

    Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who leads the Yale CEO Summit, said in an interview that it's "astounding" how few companies plan to reinvest their tax savings.

    He called the idea of a jobs boom from the tax plan "a lot of smoke and mirrors," especially because the unemployment rate is just 4.1% and companies already have plenty of cash to make investments.

    Sonnenfeld declined to name the CEOs who participated in the poll. He said it included "Trump supporters" and former members of the president's now-defunct advisory councils of business leaders.

    Related: Why Wells Fargo could be one of tax plan's big winners

    There are other signs that tax cuts may not spark a hiring boom. Just 43% of CEOs polled in November by the Business Roundtable, a powerful business lobby that has spent millions on ads championing tax reform, said they plan to ramp up hiring over the next six months. That was despite rising confidence that the Republican tax plan would be enacted.

    And at The Wall Street Journal's CEO Council in November, only a few business leaders raised their hands when they were asked whether the tax plan would lead them to increase investment in the United States. Gary Cohn, Trump's top economic adviser, was surprised.

    "Why aren't the other hands up?" he asked from on stage.

    Wall Street expects companies will use a big chunk of the tax savings to reward shareholders with fatter dividends and stock buybacks, which makes stocks more attractive. That's one reason stocks have surged all year, putting the Dow in sight of 25,000.

    "Markets just love it," Michael Block, chief market strategist at Rhino Trading Partners, wrote in a note on Tuesday.

    He said it's "malarkey" to think that cutting corporate taxes will boost spending and wages.

    "As we've seen in history, this doesn't raise wages," he wrote. "What it does lead to is richer shareholders."

    In 2004, when Congress offered tax breaks for companies to bring foreign profits back home, businesses used much of their cash on share buybacks.

    The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities later concluded that the 2004 tax holiday "did not produce the promised economic benefits" because companies mostly bought back stock instead of investing to grow their businesses.

    Related: How much you will pay under GOP tax plan depends on a lot

    Trump tweeted on Tuesday that "stocks and the economy have a long way to go after the Tax Cut Bill is totally understood and appreciated." Specifically, he said "immediate expensing will have a big impact."

    Trump was referring to an element of the legislation that would allow businesses to immediately and fully expense most new capital investments. The provision, which would end after five years, should encourage companies to shell out money on new plants and equipment.

    JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, who chairs the Business Roundtable, recently predicted that tax reform will "lead to capital expenditures, productivity and wages," though he cautioned it may take time for workers to benefit.

    One concern among the CEOs polled by Yale: the price of the GOP tax overhaul. The Joint Committee on Taxation, a nonpartisan scorekeeper for tax bills, estimates the legislation would add about $1 trillion to deficits even after accounting for projected additional economic growth.

    Seventy-two percent of CEOs said it's "wrong" for the tax package to sizably add to America's mountain of debt.

    AT&T excluded

    Once tax reform is signed into law, AT&T* plans to invest an additional $1 billion in the United States in 2018 and pay a special $1,000 bonus to more than 200,000 AT&T U.S. employees — all union-represented, non-management and front-line managers. If the President signs the bill before Christmas, employees will receive the bonus over the holidays.

    “Congress, working closely with the President, took a monumental step to bring taxes paid by U.S. businesses in line with the rest of the industrialized world,” said Randall Stephenson, AT&T chairman and CEO. “This tax reform will drive economic growth and create good-paying jobs. In fact, we will increase our U.S. investment and pay a special bonus to our U.S. employees.”


    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20171220005943/en/Tax-Reform-ATT-Plans-Increase-U.S.-Capital


    Also exclude Wells Fargo, Boeing, Comcast, Fifth 3rd Bank, Fed_ex
    Bonuses are great and no one dislikes getting a little pop in the paycheck, but understand that corporations view them as a win/win.  They are often used as a substitute for a merit type increase that has a long term positive effect on an employee.  So take a $1000 bonus.  Sounds great.  But think of it this way...  if the average salary for Comcast is $55,000 (lower middle class for a family), and you were given a $1000 raise, that's less than 2%.  It's a pittance.  And worse, the thousand dollars is one time.  At least that 2% will be with you next year, the year after and the year after that.  
    Over the past 15 years, increases have been on the order of less than 2.5% per year.  Until such time as corporations raise their merit targets from 2.5% to 4/5/6%, the actual effect on ordinary people is still the same... immaterial.  
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    mrussel1 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:

    Shocking!


    http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/19/investing/tax-plan-jobs-trump-ceo-yale-survey/index.html

    CEOs may like the idea of a big tax cut for businesses, but that doesn't mean they'll use the savings to create American jobs.

    Just 14% of CEOs surveyed by Yale University said their companies plan to make large, immediate capital investments in the United States if the tax overhaul passes. Capital investments, like building plants and upgrading equipment, can lead to hiring.

    Only a slim majority of the CEOs, 55%, said the Republican tax package should be signed into law. The Yale CEO Summit surveyed 110 prominent business leaders of Fortune 500 and Fortune 50 companies last week.

    Powered by SmartAsset.com

    The findings, along with other surveys, suggest that the tax plan may not have the dramatic impact on jobs that President Trump and Republicans in Congress have promised.

    Trump tweeted over the weekend that "TAX CUTS" will lead to "higher growth, higher wages, and more JOBS!" The GOP tax overhaul would slash the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and offer incentives for companies to bring foreign profits back home.

    Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who leads the Yale CEO Summit, said in an interview that it's "astounding" how few companies plan to reinvest their tax savings.

    He called the idea of a jobs boom from the tax plan "a lot of smoke and mirrors," especially because the unemployment rate is just 4.1% and companies already have plenty of cash to make investments.

    Sonnenfeld declined to name the CEOs who participated in the poll. He said it included "Trump supporters" and former members of the president's now-defunct advisory councils of business leaders.

    Related: Why Wells Fargo could be one of tax plan's big winners

    There are other signs that tax cuts may not spark a hiring boom. Just 43% of CEOs polled in November by the Business Roundtable, a powerful business lobby that has spent millions on ads championing tax reform, said they plan to ramp up hiring over the next six months. That was despite rising confidence that the Republican tax plan would be enacted.

    And at The Wall Street Journal's CEO Council in November, only a few business leaders raised their hands when they were asked whether the tax plan would lead them to increase investment in the United States. Gary Cohn, Trump's top economic adviser, was surprised.

    "Why aren't the other hands up?" he asked from on stage.

    Wall Street expects companies will use a big chunk of the tax savings to reward shareholders with fatter dividends and stock buybacks, which makes stocks more attractive. That's one reason stocks have surged all year, putting the Dow in sight of 25,000.

    "Markets just love it," Michael Block, chief market strategist at Rhino Trading Partners, wrote in a note on Tuesday.

    He said it's "malarkey" to think that cutting corporate taxes will boost spending and wages.

    "As we've seen in history, this doesn't raise wages," he wrote. "What it does lead to is richer shareholders."

    In 2004, when Congress offered tax breaks for companies to bring foreign profits back home, businesses used much of their cash on share buybacks.

    The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities later concluded that the 2004 tax holiday "did not produce the promised economic benefits" because companies mostly bought back stock instead of investing to grow their businesses.

    Related: How much you will pay under GOP tax plan depends on a lot

    Trump tweeted on Tuesday that "stocks and the economy have a long way to go after the Tax Cut Bill is totally understood and appreciated." Specifically, he said "immediate expensing will have a big impact."

    Trump was referring to an element of the legislation that would allow businesses to immediately and fully expense most new capital investments. The provision, which would end after five years, should encourage companies to shell out money on new plants and equipment.

    JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, who chairs the Business Roundtable, recently predicted that tax reform will "lead to capital expenditures, productivity and wages," though he cautioned it may take time for workers to benefit.

    One concern among the CEOs polled by Yale: the price of the GOP tax overhaul. The Joint Committee on Taxation, a nonpartisan scorekeeper for tax bills, estimates the legislation would add about $1 trillion to deficits even after accounting for projected additional economic growth.

    Seventy-two percent of CEOs said it's "wrong" for the tax package to sizably add to America's mountain of debt.

    AT&T excluded

    Once tax reform is signed into law, AT&T* plans to invest an additional $1 billion in the United States in 2018 and pay a special $1,000 bonus to more than 200,000 AT&T U.S. employees — all union-represented, non-management and front-line managers. If the President signs the bill before Christmas, employees will receive the bonus over the holidays.

    “Congress, working closely with the President, took a monumental step to bring taxes paid by U.S. businesses in line with the rest of the industrialized world,” said Randall Stephenson, AT&T chairman and CEO. “This tax reform will drive economic growth and create good-paying jobs. In fact, we will increase our U.S. investment and pay a special bonus to our U.S. employees.”


    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20171220005943/en/Tax-Reform-ATT-Plans-Increase-U.S.-Capital


    Also exclude Wells Fargo, Boeing, Comcast, Fifth 3rd Bank, Fed_ex
    Bonuses are great and no one dislikes getting a little pop in the paycheck, but understand that corporations view them as a win/win.  They are often used as a substitute for a merit type increase that has a long term positive effect on an employee.  So take a $1000 bonus.  Sounds great.  But think of it this way...  if the average salary for Comcast is $55,000 (lower middle class for a family), and you were given a $1000 raise, that's less than 2%.  It's a pittance.  And worse, the thousand dollars is one time.  At least that 2% will be with you next year, the year after and the year after that.  
    Over the past 15 years, increases have been on the order of less than 2.5% per year.  Until such time as corporations raise their merit targets from 2.5% to 4/5/6%, the actual effect on ordinary people is still the same... immaterial.  
    Anyone offering an immaterial amount of money please advise, I know some families that really really need it.
    Anyway, that covers the "bonuses" what about the re-investments?
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,918
    You think that less than 2% pre tax on a one time basis is material?  You must be a sucker too.  

    What's a reinvestment?  Is it updating a plant with better technology and robotics that will eventually bring in higher paid engineers and reduce the total workforce on a 1:5 ratio?  Reinvestment is ambiguous.  What does it mean?
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    mrussel1 said:
    You think that less than 2% pre tax on a one time basis is material?  You must be a sucker too.  

    What's a reinvestment?  Is it updating a plant with better technology and robotics that will eventually bring in higher paid engineers and reduce the total workforce on a 1:5 ratio?  Reinvestment is ambiguous.  What does it mean?
    Stock buy backs
  • CM189191 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    You think that less than 2% pre tax on a one time basis is material?  You must be a sucker too.  

    What's a reinvestment?  Is it updating a plant with better technology and robotics that will eventually bring in higher paid engineers and reduce the total workforce on a 1:5 ratio?  Reinvestment is ambiguous.  What does it mean?
    Stock buy backs
    Bingo
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
This discussion has been closed.