The National Football League

15205215235255261171

Comments

  • pjsteelerfan
    pjsteelerfan Maryland Posts: 9,905
    edited December 2017
    By the letter of the law, it is not a catch. That being said, the Steelers had blown chances that it never should never have gotten there. Don't drop interceptions late in the game. Be ready to kick the field goal.  Don't play conservative in the 4th quarter. Losing AB for 3/4's of the game hurt as well. I'd like to see the rule cleared up for the whole league. But it is what it is now. 

    Also, I don't see Pats fans complain when Cooks "caught" the game winning "catch" against the Texans a few weeks ago, and did not keep control of the ball all the way to the ground. Ruled a catch in that game. Other games it may not have been. 

    Ole Patriots fans. Huge football fans. Since 2002. 
    Post edited by pjsteelerfan on
    ...got a mind full of questions and a teacher in my soul...
  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,853
    Belichick and Brady have definitely made a deal with the devil or some kind of malignant demon or something.  
  • ed243421
    ed243421 Posts: 7,730
    The whole world will be different soon... - EV
    RED ROCKS 6-19-95
    AUGUSTA 9-26-96
    MANSFIELD 9-15-98
    BOSTON 9-29-04
    BOSTON 5-25-06
    MANSFIELD 6-30-08
    EV SOLO BOSTON 8-01-08
    BOSTON 5-17-10
    EV SOLO BOSTON 6-16-11
    PJ20 9-3-11
    PJ20 9-4-11
    WRIGLEY 7-19-13
    WORCESTER 10-15-13
    WORCESTER 10-16-13
    HARTFORD 10-25-13









  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,885
    So one thing we learned from the Eagles/Giants game yesterday is that Carson Wentz is nothing but a system QB. You can plug anyone into that system and they can throw 4 TDs.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,026
    Poncier said:
    So one thing we learned from the Eagles/Giants game yesterday is that Carson Wentz is nothing but a system QB. You can plug anyone into that system and they can throw 4 TDs.
    Wrong. I thought that offense looked a lot more stale and predictable than it has with Wentz.  The Giants D just blows donkey balls.
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,885
    Brady lobs up a flutter ball and Pitt defender can't catch it- he shits his pants salivating at the opportunity to catch the easiest interception of all time. 

    Then NE wastes no time and scores a TD w a 2 point conversion to tie the game.

    "Lobs up a flutter ball" LOL. The ball was tipped by a Steelers D Lineman.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Poncier said:
    Brady lobs up a flutter ball and Pitt defender can't catch it- he shits his pants salivating at the opportunity to catch the easiest interception of all time. 

    Then NE wastes no time and scores a TD w a 2 point conversion to tie the game.

    "Lobs up a flutter ball" LOL. The ball was tipped by a Steelers D Lineman.
    Don't be so sensitive. The guy is best friends with the POTUS. He lives a charmed life!
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • igotid88
    igotid88 Posts: 28,630
    Poncier said:
    So one thing we learned from the Eagles/Giants game yesterday is that Carson Wentz is nothing but a system QB. You can plug anyone into that system and they can throw 4 TDs.
    Wrong. I thought that offense looked a lot more stale and predictable than it has with Wentz.  The Giants D just blows donkey balls.
    this. That said. It is the same system
    I miss igotid88
  • Poncier said:
    So one thing we learned from the Eagles/Giants game yesterday is that Carson Wentz is nothing but a system QB. You can plug anyone into that system and they can throw 4 TDs.
    Haha! Exactly. :lol:
    Worcester1 13, Worcester2 13, Hartford 13, San Diego 13, Los Angeles1 13, Los Angeles2 13
    Trieste 14, Vienna 14, Gdynia 14, Leeds 14, Milton Keynes 14, Denver 14
    Central Park 15
    Fort Lauderdale 16, Miami 16, Tampa 16, Jacksonville 16, Greenville 16, Hampton 16, Columbia 16, Lexington 16, Philly1 16, Philly2 16, NYC1 16, NYC2 16, Quebec City 16, Ottawa 16, Toronto1 16, Toronto2 16, Fenway1 16, Fenway2 16, Wrigley1 16, Wrigley2 16


  • F Me In The Brain
    F Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,809
    ed243421 said:
    :lol:
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    Poncier said:
    So one thing we learned from the Eagles/Giants game yesterday is that Carson Wentz is nothing but a system QB. You can plug anyone into that system and they can throw 4 TDs.

    haha...couldn't help but think of this thread watching that game yesterday.
    www.myspace.com
  • Poncier said:
    So one thing we learned from the Eagles/Giants game yesterday is that Carson Wentz is nothing but a system QB. You can plug anyone into that system and they can throw 4 TDs.
    Kind of like Garoppolo filling in for Brady?
  • Stupid rule that makes the game less fun.

    2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1

    Pearl Jam bootlegs:
    http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    Poncier said:
    So one thing we learned from the Eagles/Giants game yesterday is that Carson Wentz is nothing but a system QB. You can plug anyone into that system and they can throw 4 TDs.
    Kind of like Garoppolo filling in for Brady?

    Garoppolo's a pretty damn good qb. Niner's are in good shape at that position moving forward.
    www.myspace.com
  • Poncier said:
    So one thing we learned from the Eagles/Giants game yesterday is that Carson Wentz is nothing but a system QB. You can plug anyone into that system and they can throw 4 TDs.
    Kind of like Garoppolo filling in for Brady?

    Garoppolo's a pretty damn good qb. Niner's are in good shape at that position moving forward.
    If the niners build a team around Jimmy, he’ll take them places.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • It is a stupid rule.

    A receiver catches the ball... takes a few steps... makes a football move... crosses the goal line... goes to the ground... and the ball 'moves'. Ruling? Incomplete.

    What about the receiver taking a slant... running 30 yards... gets tackled... goes to the ground... and doesn't 'survive the ground' (the ball moves a bit as they hit the turf)? Ultimately... it's the same thing.

    If anything... they should have reviewed the play to see if it was a fumble. It was obviously a catch.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,026
    It is a stupid rule.

    A receiver catches the ball... takes a few steps... makes a football move... crosses the goal line... goes to the ground... and the ball 'moves'. Ruling? Incomplete.

    What about the receiver taking a slant... running 30 yards... gets tackled... goes to the ground... and doesn't 'survive the ground' (the ball moves a bit as they hit the turf)? Ultimately... it's the same thing.

    If anything... they should have reviewed the play to see if it was a fumble. It was obviously a catch.
    Yep. It's not complicated.
  • It is a stupid rule.

    A receiver catches the ball... takes a few steps... makes a football move... crosses the goal line... goes to the ground... and the ball 'moves'. Ruling? Incomplete.

    What about the receiver taking a slant... running 30 yards... gets tackled... goes to the ground... and doesn't 'survive the ground' (the ball moves a bit as they hit the turf)? Ultimately... it's the same thing.

    If anything... they should have reviewed the play to see if it was a fumble. It was obviously a catch.
    Thing is he never completed the "process" of the catch via the rule book.

    It's a dumb rule but the rule none the less.  

    Remember Calvin Johnson like 7 years ago did something like this and that is when it all started.


  • Poncier said:
    So one thing we learned from the Eagles/Giants game yesterday is that Carson Wentz is nothing but a system QB. You can plug anyone into that system and they can throw 4 TDs.
    Kind of like Garoppolo filling in for Brady?

    Garoppolo's a pretty damn good qb. Niner's are in good shape at that position moving forward.
    I agree with you from what I've seen so far.
  • HesCalledDyer
    HesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,491
    It is a stupid rule.

    A receiver catches the ball... takes a few steps... makes a football move... crosses the goal line... goes to the ground... and the ball 'moves'. Ruling? Incomplete.

    What about the receiver taking a slant... running 30 yards... gets tackled... goes to the ground... and doesn't 'survive the ground' (the ball moves a bit as they hit the turf)? Ultimately... it's the same thing.

    If anything... they should have reviewed the play to see if it was a fumble. It was obviously a catch.
    Thing is he never completed the "process" of the catch via the rule book.

    It's a dumb rule but the rule none the less.  

    Remember Calvin Johnson like 7 years ago did something like this and that is when it all started.


    Exactly.  The current rule negates the old "ground can't cause a fumble" part of a catch that we all grew up with and knew so well.  It's dumb, and it goes against everything that was ingrained in us for so long, but it's the rule.