Dem Party

1…3233353738…68

Comments

  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    now what?

    “The truth is, the Democrats have a pretty poor history on Civil Rights, including Nancy Pelosi’s own father who was the Mayor of Baltimore — and was one of the people who dedicated statues to Robert E. Lee and ‘Stonewall’ Jackson, and in his speech said that they defended ‘sacred institutions.’ What are those ‘sacred institutions’? One of them is slavery.”

    I’ve been asked to share the details of Minority Leader Pelosi’s father and his involvement with these Confederate statues. Pelosi’s father, Baltimore Mayor Thomas D’Alesandro, Jr., spoke as the mayor at the dedication of a monument to Confederate Generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson in 1948.


    Read more at http://redalertpolitics.com/2017/08/22/yes-nancy-pelosis-dad-helped-dedicate-statue-robert-e-lee-stonewall-jackson/#bIQh5RqujT1A4lG9.99
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,235
    JC29856 said:
    now what?

    “The truth is, the Democrats have a pretty poor history on Civil Rights, including Nancy Pelosi’s own father who was the Mayor of Baltimore — and was one of the people who dedicated statues to Robert E. Lee and ‘Stonewall’ Jackson, and in his speech said that they defended ‘sacred institutions.’ What are those ‘sacred institutions’? One of them is slavery.”

    I’ve been asked to share the details of Minority Leader Pelosi’s father and his involvement with these Confederate statues. Pelosi’s father, Baltimore Mayor Thomas D’Alesandro, Jr., spoke as the mayor at the dedication of a monument to Confederate Generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson in 1948.


    Read more at http://redalertpolitics.com/2017/08/22/yes-nancy-pelosis-dad-helped-dedicate-statue-robert-e-lee-stonewall-jackson/#bIQh5RqujT1A4lG9.99
    Bahahahahahaha.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,559
    Someone dug really deep for today's example of 'Democrats do it, too'.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    JC29856 said:
    now what?

    “The truth is, the Democrats have a pretty poor history on Civil Rights, including Nancy Pelosi’s own father who was the Mayor of Baltimore — and was one of the people who dedicated statues to Robert E. Lee and ‘Stonewall’ Jackson, and in his speech said that they defended ‘sacred institutions.’ What are those ‘sacred institutions’? One of them is slavery.”

    I’ve been asked to share the details of Minority Leader Pelosi’s father and his involvement with these Confederate statues. Pelosi’s father, Baltimore Mayor Thomas D’Alesandro, Jr., spoke as the mayor at the dedication of a monument to Confederate Generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson in 1948.


    Read more at http://redalertpolitics.com/2017/08/22/yes-nancy-pelosis-dad-helped-dedicate-statue-robert-e-lee-stonewall-jackson/#bIQh5RqujT1A4lG9.99
    Wow, so now we hold children responsible for their parents' mistakes.  I guess we should bring back feudalism too while we're at it.  Last time I checked, one of the important differences of our Republic is that we expressly did NOT hold children responsible for the sins of their fathers.  
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,235
    Go Beavers said:
    Someone dug really deep for today's example of 'Democrats do it, too'.
    Or that because Nancy pelosi's dad was a misguided racist in 1948, the Democratic Party has a poor track record on civil rights, forgetting to mention LBJ signing civil rights legislation sent to him be a democratic controlled congress. There must be some bombshell Trump/Russia collusion news ready to break.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    JC29856 said:
    now what?

    “The truth is, the Democrats have a pretty poor history on Civil Rights, including Nancy Pelosi’s own father who was the Mayor of Baltimore — and was one of the people who dedicated statues to Robert E. Lee and ‘Stonewall’ Jackson, and in his speech said that they defended ‘sacred institutions.’ What are those ‘sacred institutions’? One of them is slavery.”

    I’ve been asked to share the details of Minority Leader Pelosi’s father and his involvement with these Confederate statues. Pelosi’s father, Baltimore Mayor Thomas D’Alesandro, Jr., spoke as the mayor at the dedication of a monument to Confederate Generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson in 1948.


    Read more at http://redalertpolitics.com/2017/08/22/yes-nancy-pelosis-dad-helped-dedicate-statue-robert-e-lee-stonewall-jackson/#bIQh5RqujT1A4lG9.99

    Breaking news - someone did something racist in 1948!

    i wonder how many of us could confidently claim that none of their ancestors did something racist?

    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    what is the generally accepted cutoff year for "someone doing something racist"? 
    curious, from what I gather it is some year after 1949. 
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    edited August 2017
    JC29856 said:
    what is the generally accepted cutoff year for "someone doing something racist"? 
    curious, from what I gather it is some year after 1949. 
    Nice to see you holding yourself to such a high standard there, taking responsibility for all the things your ancestors did. 

    And it seems to me these threads have already included a nuanced discussion, by those who can do so, about the place of events and responses in history as representarive of their time and how we can have a different response now. 


    Post edited by oftenreading on
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    classified info? didn't that go out with grunge


  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    But they failed to understand the reason why Sanders got so much small donor cash. The reason is trust.

    If Democrats want small donors to join up en masse (let alone vote or volunteer for campaigns), they must earn their trust. The Democratic leadership is among the all-time greatest political failures in American history, and the Democratic Party brand remains in the toilet. Recognizing that toxic association with the despised status quo, and giving American citizens the dignity of an honest argument about how they will fix it — instead of treating them like sheep to be sheared — is a good place to begin.
    http://theweek.com/articles/720424/democrats-unexpected-money-problem

  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,559
    JC29856 said:
    But they failed to understand the reason why Sanders got so much small donor cash. The reason is trust.

    If Democrats want small donors to join up en masse (let alone vote or volunteer for campaigns), they must earn their trust. The Democratic leadership is among the all-time greatest political failures in American history, and the Democratic Party brand remains in the toilet. Recognizing that toxic association with the despised status quo, and giving American citizens the dignity of an honest argument about how they will fix it — instead of treating them like sheep to be sheared — is a good place to begin.
    http://theweek.com/articles/720424/democrats-unexpected-money-problem

    What's the Republican party brand and isn't it in the toilet, too?
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    " Good luck."
    www.myspace.com
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,559
    The Juggler said:
    " Good luck."
    "Maybe if you were responsible enough to pick the right numbers, you'd win the Powerball" 
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,559
    edited August 2017
    Go Beavers said:
    The Juggler said:
    " Good luck."
    "Maybe if you were responsible enough to pick the right numbers, you'd win the Powerball" 
    Holy shit I didn't realize that was trump's message to Texas. 
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    http://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/amp/

    Judge Zloch = Captain Obvious

    “The Court thus assumes that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz preferred Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president over Bernie Sanders or any other Democratic candidate. It assumes that they stockpiled information useful to the Clinton campaign. It assumes that they devoted their resources to assist Clinton in securing the party’s nomination and opposing other Democratic candidates. And it assumes that they engaged in these surreptitious acts while publically proclaiming they were completely neutral, fair, and impartial. This Order therefore concerns only technical matters of pleading and subject-matter jurisdiction.”
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,235
    JC29856 said:
    http://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/amp/

    Judge Zloch = Captain Obvious

    “The Court thus assumes that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz preferred Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president over Bernie Sanders or any other Democratic candidate. It assumes that they stockpiled information useful to the Clinton campaign. It assumes that they devoted their resources to assist Clinton in securing the party’s nomination and opposing other Democratic candidates. And it assumes that they engaged in these surreptitious acts while publically proclaiming they were completely neutral, fair, and impartial. This Order therefore concerns only technical matters of pleading and subject-matter jurisdiction.”
    Assumes? Fucking assumes? Like you I assume you were a regular connoisseur of Comet Pizza. Assumes, but I know the Bro feels the Bern.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    JC29856 said:
    http://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/amp/

    Judge Zloch = Captain Obvious

    “The Court thus assumes that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz preferred Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president over Bernie Sanders or any other Democratic candidate. It assumes that they stockpiled information useful to the Clinton campaign. It assumes that they devoted their resources to assist Clinton in securing the party’s nomination and opposing other Democratic candidates. And it assumes that they engaged in these surreptitious acts while publically proclaiming they were completely neutral, fair, and impartial. This Order therefore concerns only technical matters of pleading and subject-matter jurisdiction.”
    Assumes? Fucking assumes? Like you I assume you were a regular connoisseur of Comet Pizza. Assumes, but I know the Bro feels the Bern.
    case dismissed! 
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,235
    JC29856 said:
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    JC29856 said:
    http://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/amp/

    Judge Zloch = Captain Obvious

    “The Court thus assumes that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz preferred Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president over Bernie Sanders or any other Democratic candidate. It assumes that they stockpiled information useful to the Clinton campaign. It assumes that they devoted their resources to assist Clinton in securing the party’s nomination and opposing other Democratic candidates. And it assumes that they engaged in these surreptitious acts while publically proclaiming they were completely neutral, fair, and impartial. This Order therefore concerns only technical matters of pleading and subject-matter jurisdiction.”
    Assumes? Fucking assumes? Like you I assume you were a regular connoisseur of Comet Pizza. Assumes, but I know the Bro feels the Bern.
    case dismissed! 
    Yea, Bernie lost. But the bern shall never die.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,367
    JC29856 said:
    http://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/amp/

    Judge Zloch = Captain Obvious

    “The Court thus assumes that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz preferred Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president over Bernie Sanders or any other Democratic candidate. It assumes that they stockpiled information useful to the Clinton campaign. It assumes that they devoted their resources to assist Clinton in securing the party’s nomination and opposing other Democratic candidates. And it assumes that they engaged in these surreptitious acts while publically proclaiming they were completely neutral, fair, and impartial. This Order therefore concerns only technical matters of pleading and subject-matter jurisdiction.”
    Thank you for quoting Captain Obvious. Does this make you Colonel Superfluous?

    It was also kind of you to post the paragraph best fitting your agenda (which, best as I can understand, is simply one of setting such a high bar of acceptable political ethical behaviors as to be completely ungrounded in reality). Strangely absent was the actual reason for that article - that the class-action lawsuit claiming that the favoritism was unlawful, was dismissed as it is unprovable that the DNC's Charter is legally binding. 

    Finally, you mentioned Sanders' small donor cash, and trust being the fundamental factor. That's all well and good, if money raised had direct causality with electability. The fact that Trump won with just over 50% of Clinton's money raised disproves that notion. Once again - if the DNC were to look at what wins elections today, they would see that it's simpler to understand lies, akin to what the Republican Party delivers, rather than treating the issues seriously and a Party's base of supporters seriously, which would represent an untested direction likely to alienate a good subset of the DNC's supporters and politicians. 
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    benjs said:
    JC29856 said:
    http://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/amp/

    Judge Zloch = Captain Obvious

    “The Court thus assumes that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz preferred Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president over Bernie Sanders or any other Democratic candidate. It assumes that they stockpiled information useful to the Clinton campaign. It assumes that they devoted their resources to assist Clinton in securing the party’s nomination and opposing other Democratic candidates. And it assumes that they engaged in these surreptitious acts while publically proclaiming they were completely neutral, fair, and impartial. This Order therefore concerns only technical matters of pleading and subject-matter jurisdiction.”
    Thank you for quoting Captain Obvious. Does this make you Colonel Superfluous?

    It was also kind of you to post the paragraph best fitting your agenda (which, best as I can understand, is simply one of setting such a high bar of acceptable political ethical behaviors as to be completely ungrounded in reality). Strangely absent was the actual reason for that article - that the class-action lawsuit claiming that the favoritism was unlawful, was dismissed as it is unprovable that the DNC's Charter is legally binding. 

    Finally, you mentioned Sanders' small donor cash, and trust being the fundamental factor. That's all well and good, if money raised had direct causality with electability. The fact that Trump won with just over 50% of Clinton's money raised disproves that notion. Once again - if the DNC were to look at what wins elections today, they would see that it's simpler to understand lies, akin to what the Republican Party delivers, rather than treating the issues seriously and a Party's base of supporters seriously, which would represent an untested direction likely to alienate a good subset of the DNC's supporters and politicians. 
    This case was brought to the courts (2 attorney Sanders supportors) to further expose the DNC as frauds, something everybody already knew last summer. Any suspicions were were put to rest by discovery and the responding motions.

    Remember when Sanders supportors made claim after claim that the primary was rigged, only to be called a conspiracy theorist? They knew they were being cheated, I knew they were being cheated, and you knew they were cheated. DNC, DWS Hilliary and you apparently are okay with cheating, others, not so much.
    Talk about alienating supportors, cheat them and paint them conspiracy theorists!

    Anyway, I think your looking too deeply into things, it's much simpler. A judge can make whatever ruling he or she wishes in interpreting the expressed or implied warranties in the DNC charter. You're correct the case was about donations to the DNC by Sanders supportors and whether or not a contract was entered into, was legally binding, whether the DNC acted fair and impartial, who suffered and damages etc etc. Unfortunately the essence of the case (did the DNC cheat the voters in the primary) was on trial on election day, the court of public opinion rendered their verdict.
    At some point democrats and their supportors need to accept the results of that election/verdict and be accountable for "what really happened".
    "you cheated, were caught, you lost...hahaha hahaha"

    one more thing....small donations and trust, not money raised and electability

Categories