***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

1…6667697172…523

Comments

  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    unsung said:
    cincybearcat said:
    unsung said:
    The Juggler said:
    SO......... you met with an influential Russian lawyer..... with ties to the Kremlin...in Trump Tower....in the middle of the campaign...in secret... to talk about......adoption?


    Got it.





    So you are under FBI investigation and your husband, who happens to be a former President, speaks to the current Attorney General in a plane on a tarmac, in secret, about grandkids and a golf game?

    Got it.
    Do you all live in some bizzaro world where both of these things could be very bad?  I mean, just cause you contradict someone with something bad the other side did, doesn't mean the bad stuff your side does is no big deal?
    I just don't recall anyone here being as upset when Clinton met Lynch.
    Clinton and Lynch were co-workers for many years. And it was an impromptu meeting when they realized they happened to be at the same airport. There's nothing to indicate they talked about the election. Fredo met with a Russian lawyer, who was a complete stranger, under the pretext of receiving damaging information about Hillary. Explain to me how these two are equivalent.
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    2019
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    cincybearcat said:
    unsung said:
    The Juggler said:
    SO......... you met with an influential Russian lawyer..... with ties to the Kremlin...in Trump Tower....in the middle of the campaign...in secret... to talk about......adoption?


    Got it.





    So you are under FBI investigation and your husband, who happens to be a former President, speaks to the current Attorney General in a plane on a tarmac, in secret, about grandkids and a golf game?

    Got it.
    Do you all live in some bizzaro world where both of these things could be very bad?  I mean, just cause you contradict someone with something bad the other side did, doesn't mean the bad stuff your side does is no big deal?
    I just don't recall anyone here being as upset when Clinton met Lynch.
    Clinton and Lynch were co-workers for many years. And it was an impromptu meeting when they realized they happened to be at the same airport. There's nothing to indicate they talked about the election. Fredo met with a Russian lawyer, who was a complete stranger, under the pretext of receiving damaging information about Hillary. Explain to me how these two are equivalent.
    He can't. 
    www.myspace.com
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,962
    2018
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    cincybearcat said:
    unsung said:
    The Juggler said:
    SO......... you met with an influential Russian lawyer..... with ties to the Kremlin...in Trump Tower....in the middle of the campaign...in secret... to talk about......adoption?


    Got it.





    So you are under FBI investigation and your husband, who happens to be a former President, speaks to the current Attorney General in a plane on a tarmac, in secret, about grandkids and a golf game?

    Got it.
    Do you all live in some bizzaro world where both of these things could be very bad?  I mean, just cause you contradict someone with something bad the other side did, doesn't mean the bad stuff your side does is no big deal?
    I just don't recall anyone here being as upset when Clinton met Lynch.
    Clinton and Lynch were co-workers for many years. And it was an impromptu meeting when they realized they happened to be at the same airport. There's nothing to indicate they talked about the election. Fredo met with a Russian lawyer, who was a complete stranger, under the pretext of receiving damaging information about Hillary. Explain to me how these two are equivalent.
    Oh please.....an "impromptu meeting" ... "happened to be at the same airport"... c'mon
    hippiemom = goodness
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    cincybearcat said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    cincybearcat said:
    unsung said:
    The Juggler said:
    SO......... you met with an influential Russian lawyer..... with ties to the Kremlin...in Trump Tower....in the middle of the campaign...in secret... to talk about......adoption?


    Got it.





    So you are under FBI investigation and your husband, who happens to be a former President, speaks to the current Attorney General in a plane on a tarmac, in secret, about grandkids and a golf game?

    Got it.
    Do you all live in some bizzaro world where both of these things could be very bad?  I mean, just cause you contradict someone with something bad the other side did, doesn't mean the bad stuff your side does is no big deal?
    I just don't recall anyone here being as upset when Clinton met Lynch.
    Clinton and Lynch were co-workers for many years. And it was an impromptu meeting when they realized they happened to be at the same airport. There's nothing to indicate they talked about the election. Fredo met with a Russian lawyer, who was a complete stranger, under the pretext of receiving damaging information about Hillary. Explain to me how these two are equivalent.
    Oh please.....an "impromptu meeting" ... "happened to be at the same airport"... c'mon
    ...well....show me otherwise...

    Are you suggesting it was a scheduled meeting?  That Clinton and Lynch had planned to meet on the PHX tarmac?
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,670
    edited July 2017
    cincybearcat said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    cincybearcat said:
    unsung said:
    The Juggler said:
    SO......... you met with an influential Russian lawyer..... with ties to the Kremlin...in Trump Tower....in the middle of the campaign...in secret... to talk about......adoption?


    Got it.





    So you are under FBI investigation and your husband, who happens to be a former President, speaks to the current Attorney General in a plane on a tarmac, in secret, about grandkids and a golf game?

    Got it.
    Do you all live in some bizzaro world where both of these things could be very bad?  I mean, just cause you contradict someone with something bad the other side did, doesn't mean the bad stuff your side does is no big deal?
    I just don't recall anyone here being as upset when Clinton met Lynch.
    Clinton and Lynch were co-workers for many years. And it was an impromptu meeting when they realized they happened to be at the same airport. There's nothing to indicate they talked about the election. Fredo met with a Russian lawyer, who was a complete stranger, under the pretext of receiving damaging information about Hillary. Explain to me how these two are equivalent.
    Oh please.....an "impromptu meeting" ... "happened to be at the same airport"... c'mon
    Dang. I thought we were done with the Clinton/Obama did it to rebuttal.  

  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,962
    2018
    Go Beavers said:
    cincybearcat said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    cincybearcat said:
    unsung said:
    The Juggler said:
    SO......... you met with an influential Russian lawyer..... with ties to the Kremlin...in Trump Tower....in the middle of the campaign...in secret... to talk about......adoption?


    Got it.





    So you are under FBI investigation and your husband, who happens to be a former President, speaks to the current Attorney General in a plane on a tarmac, in secret, about grandkids and a golf game?

    Got it.
    Do you all live in some bizzaro world where both of these things could be very bad?  I mean, just cause you contradict someone with something bad the other side did, doesn't mean the bad stuff your side does is no big deal?
    I just don't recall anyone here being as upset when Clinton met Lynch.
    Clinton and Lynch were co-workers for many years. And it was an impromptu meeting when they realized they happened to be at the same airport. There's nothing to indicate they talked about the election. Fredo met with a Russian lawyer, who was a complete stranger, under the pretext of receiving damaging information about Hillary. Explain to me how these two are equivalent.
    Oh please.....an "impromptu meeting" ... "happened to be at the same airport"... c'mon
    Dang. I thought we were done with the Clinton/Obama did it to rebuttal.  

    Ummm...I've been pretty clear that Trump/Russia thing is awful and looks like is heading in the direction of bad news for him.  I just think that anyone that thinks the Lynch/Clinton talk was just pure luck....is not really thinking very hard.  I've never used 1 to dispute the other, but good try.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,670
    cincybearcat said:
    Go Beavers said:
    cincybearcat said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    cincybearcat said:
    unsung said:
    The Juggler said:
    SO......... you met with an influential Russian lawyer..... with ties to the Kremlin...in Trump Tower....in the middle of the campaign...in secret... to talk about......adoption?


    Got it.





    So you are under FBI investigation and your husband, who happens to be a former President, speaks to the current Attorney General in a plane on a tarmac, in secret, about grandkids and a golf game?

    Got it.
    Do you all live in some bizzaro world where both of these things could be very bad?  I mean, just cause you contradict someone with something bad the other side did, doesn't mean the bad stuff your side does is no big deal?
    I just don't recall anyone here being as upset when Clinton met Lynch.
    Clinton and Lynch were co-workers for many years. And it was an impromptu meeting when they realized they happened to be at the same airport. There's nothing to indicate they talked about the election. Fredo met with a Russian lawyer, who was a complete stranger, under the pretext of receiving damaging information about Hillary. Explain to me how these two are equivalent.
    Oh please.....an "impromptu meeting" ... "happened to be at the same airport"... c'mon
    Dang. I thought we were done with the Clinton/Obama did it to rebuttal.  

    Ummm...I've been pretty clear that Trump/Russia thing is awful and looks like is heading in the direction of bad news for him.  I just think that anyone that thinks the Lynch/Clinton talk was just pure luck....is not really thinking very hard.  I've never used 1 to dispute the other, but good try.
    I supose I'm commenting more on the fact that the issue surfaced in here rather than your response alone. 
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,962
    2018
    Go Beavers said:
    cincybearcat said:
    Go Beavers said:
    cincybearcat said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    cincybearcat said:
    unsung said:
    The Juggler said:
    SO......... you met with an influential Russian lawyer..... with ties to the Kremlin...in Trump Tower....in the middle of the campaign...in secret... to talk about......adoption?


    Got it.





    So you are under FBI investigation and your husband, who happens to be a former President, speaks to the current Attorney General in a plane on a tarmac, in secret, about grandkids and a golf game?

    Got it.
    Do you all live in some bizzaro world where both of these things could be very bad?  I mean, just cause you contradict someone with something bad the other side did, doesn't mean the bad stuff your side does is no big deal?
    I just don't recall anyone here being as upset when Clinton met Lynch.
    Clinton and Lynch were co-workers for many years. And it was an impromptu meeting when they realized they happened to be at the same airport. There's nothing to indicate they talked about the election. Fredo met with a Russian lawyer, who was a complete stranger, under the pretext of receiving damaging information about Hillary. Explain to me how these two are equivalent.
    Oh please.....an "impromptu meeting" ... "happened to be at the same airport"... c'mon
    Dang. I thought we were done with the Clinton/Obama did it to rebuttal.  

    Ummm...I've been pretty clear that Trump/Russia thing is awful and looks like is heading in the direction of bad news for him.  I just think that anyone that thinks the Lynch/Clinton talk was just pure luck....is not really thinking very hard.  I've never used 1 to dispute the other, but good try.
    I supose I'm commenting more on the fact that the issue surfaced in here rather than your response alone. 
    Ah....my bad.  Then I actually agree with you. ;)
    hippiemom = goodness
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    2019

    So the email appears to show that collusion was offered and happily accepted. At best, unethical. At worst--violation of campaign finance laws? I would think all other campaigns would alert the fbi if they were told that the Russian government wanted to assist their campaign...no?


    And if nothing nefarious happened afterwards......why oh why would Don Jr and EVERYONE else associated with the campaign lie about never having any contacts with the Russians?


    Long and winding road to impeachment/resignation, folks. Keep those seat belts buckled...

    www.myspace.com
  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,895
    The Juggler said:

    So the email appears to show that collusion was offered and happily accepted. At best, unethical. At worst--violation of campaign finance laws? I would think all other campaigns would alert the fbi if they were told that the Russian government wanted to assist their campaign...no?


    And if nothing nefarious happened afterwards......why oh why would Don Jr and EVERYONE else associated with the campaign lie about never having any contacts with the Russians?


    Long and winding road to impeachment/resignation, folks. Keep those seat belts buckled...

    There is just so much smoke there....  Manafart, Flynn, etc...  Its hard to imagine everything was/is on the up and up
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,067
    Is it possible a human being is as dumb as Fredo appears to be?  
  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,895
    Cliffy6745 said:
    Is it possible a human being is as dumb as Fredo appears to be?  
    Apparently, the NYT were publishing the emails at any moment, so he scrambled to release it on his own for "full transparency" as he says
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,067
    MayDay10 said:
    Cliffy6745 said:
    Is it possible a human being is as dumb as Fredo appears to be?  
    Apparently, the NYT were publishing the emails at any moment, so he scrambled to release it on his own for "full transparency" as he says
    Full transparency as in "I was told that the Russian government wanted in and I said I love it."  Amazing.

  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 43,133
    Cliffy6745 said:
    MayDay10 said:
    Cliffy6745 said:
    Is it possible a human being is as dumb as Fredo appears to be?  
    Apparently, the NYT were publishing the emails at any moment, so he scrambled to release it on his own for "full transparency" as he says
    Full transparency as in "I was told that the Russian government wanted in and I said I love it."  Amazing.

    Love it! Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTAPE, all the way to impeachment.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    2019
    Cliffy6745 said:
    MayDay10 said:
    Cliffy6745 said:
    Is it possible a human being is as dumb as Fredo appears to be?  
    Apparently, the NYT were publishing the emails at any moment, so he scrambled to release it on his own for "full transparency" as he says
    Full transparency as in "I was told that the Russian government wanted in and I said I love it."  Amazing.


    The fact that this story is now focusing on Trump's son's EMAILS is just dripping with irony.
    www.myspace.com
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,249
    2019
    The Juggler said:
    Cliffy6745 said:
    MayDay10 said:
    Cliffy6745 said:
    Is it possible a human being is as dumb as Fredo appears to be?  
    Apparently, the NYT were publishing the emails at any moment, so he scrambled to release it on his own for "full transparency" as he says
    Full transparency as in "I was told that the Russian government wanted in and I said I love it."  Amazing.


    The fact that this story is now focusing on Trump's son's EMAILS is just dripping with irony.
    However, you know Trump will fire back that at least Jr released his emails. I mean if the NYT can  get to the just released emails imagine what Mueller and his team is finding out in secrecy.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,895
    edited July 2017
    they sold us out



    firing squad


    edit for clarity: state execution, not armed citizens
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    MayDay10 said:
    they sold us out



    firing squad


    edit for clarity: state execution, not armed citizens
    So you aren't against guns, got it.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    MayDay10 said:
    Cliffy6745 said:
    Is it possible a human being is as dumb as Fredo appears to be?  
    Apparently, the NYT were publishing the emails at any moment, so he scrambled to release it on his own for "full transparency" as he says

    Who said he was scrambling?  If anything he was putting it out as fast as the NYT scrambled to put it out.
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    2019
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
    MayDay10 said:
    Cliffy6745 said:
    Is it possible a human being is as dumb as Fredo appears to be?  
    Apparently, the NYT were publishing the emails at any moment, so he scrambled to release it on his own for "full transparency" as he says

    Who said he was scrambling?  If anything he was putting it out as fast as the NYT scrambled to put it out.
    He called the Times right as they were about to release them to ask for more time so he could comment on it...then he just preemptively released them himself to claim "transparency."
    www.myspace.com

Categories