Post your stereo system!

1141517192082

Comments

  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,883

    dudeman said:

    Do you have enough room to spread those speakers out and toe them in a little?

    You have great equipment that could be made to sound better by rearranging your listening space.

    Love that vintage Pioneer gear!

    Small room so not really. I do spread them out a wee bit more and angle them when I listen in my chair.
    Everything is mono for you...
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,692
    edited April 2017

    I use a Klipsch system for my surround sound, tv setup and they sound excellent. It's reference series all around with center channel and with these speakers the SP12 inch subwoofer(BTW these powered subs sound huge for the money, do not buy anything more unless you have a huge theatre room, I can barely turn it up before my house is shaking, great for $200-300) is really needed if you want to feel and hear everything (meaning frequencies) from low to high. With the sub off it's very clear, but there is a substantial difference. I used to listen to audio/music thru this system, which cost around $2000 total. I got into vinyl and after a lot of research I saved a ton of money and have a much better listening experience going all vintage. I got a Pioneer PL530 70's turntable (cost me $400 on Craigslist serviced/with warranty and puts the newer toy feeling (no offense because they sound great too to be honest) Orbit, etc for the same price or more to shame) and after listening/using with a Grado elite cartridge setup running into a Cambridge preamp ($150) (and not needed after I switched to all vintage which is my next point.

    GO ALL VINTAGE!!! So far I put in $400 on the TT, the I got a Pioneer SA8500II serviced/with warranty for $350 which was a steal because holy God does that thing sound awesome and the phono preamp is excellent too. I got a few pairs of speakers after this, which at first I ran a pair of KLH Model 6's on top of Advent Large speakers and the fidelity was amazing. Each pair of speakers cost $150. I found a pair of Pioneer HPM100 for $300 and that did it. I'm working on recapping my Model 6's now and run the HPM100's on top of the Advents and the fidelity, bass, and entire listening experience went to a whole other level. This was how music was meant to be heard, especially vinyl. I hear things on albums (and I'm a musician and consider myself to have a good/great ear for listening, tuning, and building systems.
    Long story short is that the Klipsch are great for surround and general listening, but if you are going to truly want to listen to vinyl then save a ton of money and get way more bang for your buck by hitting Craigslist and yardsales. It's amazing what people are getting rid of from right now from the golden age of listening pleasure. Do yourself a favor and you could probably spend around $1000-1200 total and have an excellent listening experience.
    "If I would have known now, what I'd known then...."

    Oh and don't be scared of good quality vintage gear, this stuff is built like tanks. And get a buckskin slipmat, all static gone and even better tone for bout $40.

    PM me if anyone has questions...




    This is EXACTLY how I've been listening @earthquakes making waves !!!
    Right on my friend, the all Pioneer setup from the late 70's sounds so amazing. The only thing I would/may ever look at is a tube pre, but it's surely not needed and the HPM's sound sooooo good. I love mine and for the price the vintage all pioneer setup is cheaper, built like a tank, and sounds better then anything I've heard in the price range. You just have to be patient and do some looking, but it is out there to find.
    I used to have a vintage system, and it was great, BUT... once I wanted to upgrade anything at all it all stopped working properly. Also, I needed a repair on my beloved vintage TT, and that wasn't happening for anything close to a reasonable price. So those who go vintage should be duly warned about such issues. Vintage can be cheaper and sound great, but it poses problems too, and those problems will only become more pronounced as time marches on.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,883
    PJ_Soul said:

    I use a Klipsch system for my surround sound, tv setup and they sound excellent. It's reference series all around with center channel and with these speakers the SP12 inch subwoofer(BTW these powered subs sound huge for the money, do not buy anything more unless you have a huge theatre room, I can barely turn it up before my house is shaking, great for $200-300) is really needed if you want to feel and hear everything (meaning frequencies) from low to high. With the sub off it's very clear, but there is a substantial difference. I used to listen to audio/music thru this system, which cost around $2000 total. I got into vinyl and after a lot of research I saved a ton of money and have a much better listening experience going all vintage. I got a Pioneer PL530 70's turntable (cost me $400 on Craigslist serviced/with warranty and puts the newer toy feeling (no offense because they sound great too to be honest) Orbit, etc for the same price or more to shame) and after listening/using with a Grado elite cartridge setup running into a Cambridge preamp ($150) (and not needed after I switched to all vintage which is my next point.

    GO ALL VINTAGE!!! So far I put in $400 on the TT, the I got a Pioneer SA8500II serviced/with warranty for $350 which was a steal because holy God does that thing sound awesome and the phono preamp is excellent too. I got a few pairs of speakers after this, which at first I ran a pair of KLH Model 6's on top of Advent Large speakers and the fidelity was amazing. Each pair of speakers cost $150. I found a pair of Pioneer HPM100 for $300 and that did it. I'm working on recapping my Model 6's now and run the HPM100's on top of the Advents and the fidelity, bass, and entire listening experience went to a whole other level. This was how music was meant to be heard, especially vinyl. I hear things on albums (and I'm a musician and consider myself to have a good/great ear for listening, tuning, and building systems.
    Long story short is that the Klipsch are great for surround and general listening, but if you are going to truly want to listen to vinyl then save a ton of money and get way more bang for your buck by hitting Craigslist and yardsales. It's amazing what people are getting rid of from right now from the golden age of listening pleasure. Do yourself a favor and you could probably spend around $1000-1200 total and have an excellent listening experience.
    "If I would have known now, what I'd known then...."

    Oh and don't be scared of good quality vintage gear, this stuff is built like tanks. And get a buckskin slipmat, all static gone and even better tone for bout $40.

    PM me if anyone has questions...




    This is EXACTLY how I've been listening @earthquakes making waves !!!
    Right on my friend, the all Pioneer setup from the late 70's sounds so amazing. The only thing I would/may ever look at is a tube pre, but it's surely not needed and the HPM's sound sooooo good. I love mine and for the price the vintage all pioneer setup is cheaper, built like a tank, and sounds better then anything I've heard in the price range. You just have to be patient and do some looking, but it is out there to find.
    I used to have a vintage system, and it was great, BUT... once I wanted to upgrade anything at all it all stopped working properly. Also, I needed a repair on my beloved vintage TT, and that wasn't happening for anything close to a reasonable price. So those who go vintage should be duly warned about such issues. Vintage can be cheaper and sound great, but it poses problems too, and those problems will only become more pronounced as time marches on.
    Completely agree.. I think Vintage looks better (modern Mac's aside...because they look the same as always which is gorgeous), but I too would worry about repair costs with transistors, capacitors and the like. I would think they would be hard to get, but maybe not. I'm not sure I buy that they sound better. When you are talking about solid state amps, good quality ones, I'm not sure I can really hear a difference. Several months ago I bought an Outlaw 5 channel amp which is very powerful and turned my Yamaha into a pre/pro. Although it drives better sound at reference volumes, since it's stronger on a bench, I really can't hear the difference at a moderate/low level. They are both clean and detailed.
  • Caps and transistors are so easy to test and replace. All of my gear has run like a tank and I've actually had more problems with modern hifi gear and it's overly massed production, you definitely have to pay for quality now. But if you knowhow to use a screwdriver, a voltmeter, and a soldering iron that is what they charge you the most for when it's usually a wire that jostled off a soldering point when it get rattled at some point. As long as you check to make sure it sounds as though it should and parts are original just have fun with the journey and learning about how speakers really work.
  • dudeman
    dudeman Posts: 3,161
    The problem with new consumer grade electronics is that just about everything is built using printed circuit boards with surface mount components. Generally speaking, the only way to service them is to replace entire boards and assemblies. That gets expensive quickly and we find ourselves replacing instead of repairing.

    A lot of vintage gear is point to point wired and was built to a high quality standard as opposed to being built for ease of manufacture and sale at a specific price point.

    Component failures happen with vintage gear but parts are readily available for reasonable prices.

    If one was looking at point to point, discrete component amps, just about any newly manufactured amp will cost way more than a vintage equal.

    For full disclosure, I repaired, serviced and maintained high end electronics professionally for a number of years.
    If hope can grow from dirt like me, it can be done. - EV
  • dudeman said:

    The problem with new consumer grade electronics is that just about everything is built using printed circuit boards with surface mount components. Generally speaking, the only way to service them is to replace entire boards and assemblies. That gets expensive quickly and we find ourselves replacing instead of repairing.

    A lot of vintage gear is point to point wired and was built to a high quality standard as opposed to being built for ease of manufacture and sale at a specific price point.

    Component failures happen with vintage gear but parts are readily available for reasonable prices.

    If one was looking at point to point, discrete component amps, just about any newly manufactured amp will cost way more than a vintage equal.

    For full disclosure, I repaired, serviced and maintained high end electronics professionally for a number of years.

    Ditto, and it's not hard to learn the basics which you'll rarely use but be happy you save a cpl thousand dollars. Go Vintage!!!!
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,451
    mrussel1 said:

    dudeman said:

    Do you have enough room to spread those speakers out and toe them in a little?

    You have great equipment that could be made to sound better by rearranging your listening space.

    Love that vintage Pioneer gear!

    Small room so not really. I do spread them out a wee bit more and angle them when I listen in my chair.
    Everything is mono for you...
    I don't have one MONO record yet so the sound still comes out of both speakers.

    I'm not sure what all the fuss is about Mono.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,883

    mrussel1 said:

    dudeman said:

    Do you have enough room to spread those speakers out and toe them in a little?

    You have great equipment that could be made to sound better by rearranging your listening space.

    Love that vintage Pioneer gear!

    Small room so not really. I do spread them out a wee bit more and angle them when I listen in my chair.
    Everything is mono for you...
    I don't have one MONO record yet so the sound still comes out of both speakers.

    I'm not sure what all the fuss is about Mono.
    It was a joke... I'm saying becuase the speakers are so close, it would be harder to hear left and right... ergo mono.
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,451
    mrussel1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    dudeman said:

    Do you have enough room to spread those speakers out and toe them in a little?

    You have great equipment that could be made to sound better by rearranging your listening space.

    Love that vintage Pioneer gear!

    Small room so not really. I do spread them out a wee bit more and angle them when I listen in my chair.
    Everything is mono for you...
    I don't have one MONO record yet so the sound still comes out of both speakers.

    I'm not sure what all the fuss is about Mono.
    It was a joke... I'm saying becuase the speakers are so close, it would be harder to hear left and right... ergo mono.
    Believe it or not I don't have a problem hearing it. My ears are pretty good so I can hear where the music comes from.

    I am curious about the mono thing though.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,883
    I have several mono albums. I thought I wouldn't liek them as much, but I find I like them but no more than stereo and no less. If something is mono, I definitely wouldn't avoid it. But for example Axis: Bold as Love is available as both, and I got the mono becuase it was Orange.. and I'm a sucker for colored vinyl..

    Which brings up the fact that newbury has Singles soundtrack in marbled blue available. It's more expensive, but I got it anyway.. I'm a sucker for it.
  • mrussel1 said:

    dudeman said:

    Do you have enough room to spread those speakers out and toe them in a little?

    You have great equipment that could be made to sound better by rearranging your listening space.

    Love that vintage Pioneer gear!

    Small room so not really. I do spread them out a wee bit more and angle them when I listen in my chair.
    Everything is mono for you...
    I don't have one MONO record yet so the sound still comes out of both speakers.

    I'm not sure what all the fuss is about Mono.
    Mono means that both speakers play the entire track without any panning left or right that the engineer/band wanted you to hear. On early records recorded in mono this is fine. For PJ records, and most modern music, you want to run your system in stereo so you get the full left/right ear experience of the mix. Makes a huge difference on records such as Binaural especially, but I can't stand listening in mono if it's recorded in stereo. Just my opinion.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,883

    mrussel1 said:

    dudeman said:

    Do you have enough room to spread those speakers out and toe them in a little?

    You have great equipment that could be made to sound better by rearranging your listening space.

    Love that vintage Pioneer gear!

    Small room so not really. I do spread them out a wee bit more and angle them when I listen in my chair.
    Everything is mono for you...
    I don't have one MONO record yet so the sound still comes out of both speakers.

    I'm not sure what all the fuss is about Mono.
    Mono means that both speakers play the entire track without any panning left or right that the engineer/band wanted you to hear. On early records recorded in mono this is fine. For PJ records, and most modern music, you want to run your system in stereo so you get the full left/right ear experience of the mix. Makes a huge difference on records such as Binaural especially, but I can't stand listening in mono if it's recorded in stereo. Just my opinion.
    Right you wouldn't listen to a stereo record in mono. But for example, I have John Coltrane's Blue Train in mono and it is spectacular and exactly how the engineers intended. It's in the top 5% of my owned records. Icky Thump mono is excellent as is Axis as I mentioned earlier. When you listen to a mono record, intended to be mono, I think they sound great. In fact, some 50's and 60's jazz records, I would argue, over emphasize the stereo piece.
  • dudeman
    dudeman Posts: 3,161
    Beatles records in stereo sound pretty crappy to me. It's worse with headphones.
    If hope can grow from dirt like me, it can be done. - EV
  • lolobugg
    lolobugg BLUE RDGE MTNS Posts: 8,195
    dudeman said:

    Beatles records in stereo sound pretty crappy to me. It's worse with headphones.

    yes they do. never intended to be listened to that way.
    MONO is the way to go up until their later records

    livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=446

    1995- New Orleans, LA  : New Orleans, LA

    1996- Charleston, SC

    1998- Atlanta, GA: Birmingham, AL: Greenville, SC: Knoxville, TN

    2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN

    2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA

    2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)

    2006- Cincinnati, OH

    2008- Columbia, SC

    2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2

    2010- Bristow, VA

    2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL

    2012- Atlanta, GA

    2013- Charlotte, NC

    2014- Cincinnati, OH

    2015- New York, NY

    2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA

    2017- ED VED- Louisville, KY

    2018- Chicago, IL x2, Boston, MA x2

    2020- Nashville, TN 

    2022- Smashville 

    2023- Austin, TX x2

    2024- Baltimore

  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,883
    dudeman said:

    Beatles records in stereo sound pretty crappy to me. It's worse with headphones.

    originals or remasters?
  • dudeman
    dudeman Posts: 3,161
    Original. I have a copy of Sgt. Pepper that has all of the vocals on one side of the stereo mix. It's not too bad if you're moving around the house while listening but headphones make it unlistenable. I hit the Mono button on my receiver for that one.
    If hope can grow from dirt like me, it can be done. - EV
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,692

    dudeman said:

    The problem with new consumer grade electronics is that just about everything is built using printed circuit boards with surface mount components. Generally speaking, the only way to service them is to replace entire boards and assemblies. That gets expensive quickly and we find ourselves replacing instead of repairing.

    A lot of vintage gear is point to point wired and was built to a high quality standard as opposed to being built for ease of manufacture and sale at a specific price point.

    Component failures happen with vintage gear but parts are readily available for reasonable prices.

    If one was looking at point to point, discrete component amps, just about any newly manufactured amp will cost way more than a vintage equal.

    For full disclosure, I repaired, serviced and maintained high end electronics professionally for a number of years.

    Ditto, and it's not hard to learn the basics which you'll rarely use but be happy you save a cpl thousand dollars. Go Vintage!!!!
    I guess that all comes down to the particular person. Not everyone is handy, and not everyone is interested in actual equipment repair and maintenance as part of this hobby. If you're into fixing electronics or investing your time in figuring out how and where to get parts and whatnot, yeah, sure, buying vintage actually becomes another component of the pleasure of collecting vinyl, and I would think such folks would want to actually avoid new equipment no matter what, because going new would take away from the pleasure. But probably the majority of people aren't actually into that aspect of it at all. For those folks, I wouldn't say they should necessarily avoid vintage, especially not if they want to keep it cheap, but they should definitely consider the possible consequences of buying vintage. Having tried both, and not being someone who is interested in fucking around with the equipment and who doesn't want to spend time discussing issues with the few experts in the city who could help me with all that (when I had vintage and needed technical advice or repairs I had to make a 90 minute trip to the vintage stereo equipment store, along with my equipment, as I wasn't comfortable just doing it myself with the help of the internet, and I'm not a technophobe at all), new is a much better option for me just on a logistical level.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,883
    PJ_Soul said:

    dudeman said:

    The problem with new consumer grade electronics is that just about everything is built using printed circuit boards with surface mount components. Generally speaking, the only way to service them is to replace entire boards and assemblies. That gets expensive quickly and we find ourselves replacing instead of repairing.

    A lot of vintage gear is point to point wired and was built to a high quality standard as opposed to being built for ease of manufacture and sale at a specific price point.

    Component failures happen with vintage gear but parts are readily available for reasonable prices.

    If one was looking at point to point, discrete component amps, just about any newly manufactured amp will cost way more than a vintage equal.

    For full disclosure, I repaired, serviced and maintained high end electronics professionally for a number of years.

    Ditto, and it's not hard to learn the basics which you'll rarely use but be happy you save a cpl thousand dollars. Go Vintage!!!!
    I guess that all comes down to the particular person. Not everyone is handy, and not everyone is interested in actual equipment repair and maintenance as part of this hobby. If you're into fixing electronics or investing your time in figuring out how and where to get parts and whatnot, yeah, sure, buying vintage actually becomes another component of the pleasure of collecting vinyl, and I would think such folks would want to actually avoid new equipment no matter what, because going new would take away from the pleasure. But probably the majority of people aren't actually into that aspect of it at all. For those folks, I wouldn't say they should necessarily avoid vintage, especially not if they want to keep it cheap, but they should definitely consider the possible consequences of buying vintage. Having tried both, and not being someone who is interested in fucking around with the equipment and who doesn't want to spend time discussing issues with the few experts in the city who could help me with all that (when I had vintage and needed technical advice or repairs I had to make a 90 minute trip to the vintage stereo equipment store, along with my equipment, as I wasn't comfortable just doing it myself with the help of the internet, and I'm not a technophobe at all), new is a much better option for me just on a logistical level.
    And at the end of the day, good solid state amps should not sound any different, whether they are 40 years old or 1 year old. They should not color the music.
  • dudeman
    dudeman Posts: 3,161
    mrussel1 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    dudeman said:

    The problem with new consumer grade electronics is that just about everything is built using printed circuit boards with surface mount components. Generally speaking, the only way to service them is to replace entire boards and assemblies. That gets expensive quickly and we find ourselves replacing instead of repairing.

    A lot of vintage gear is point to point wired and was built to a high quality standard as opposed to being built for ease of manufacture and sale at a specific price point.

    Component failures happen with vintage gear but parts are readily available for reasonable prices.

    If one was looking at point to point, discrete component amps, just about any newly manufactured amp will cost way more than a vintage equal.

    For full disclosure, I repaired, serviced and maintained high end electronics professionally for a number of years.

    Ditto, and it's not hard to learn the basics which you'll rarely use but be happy you save a cpl thousand dollars. Go Vintage!!!!
    I guess that all comes down to the particular person. Not everyone is handy, and not everyone is interested in actual equipment repair and maintenance as part of this hobby. If you're into fixing electronics or investing your time in figuring out how and where to get parts and whatnot, yeah, sure, buying vintage actually becomes another component of the pleasure of collecting vinyl, and I would think such folks would want to actually avoid new equipment no matter what, because going new would take away from the pleasure. But probably the majority of people aren't actually into that aspect of it at all. For those folks, I wouldn't say they should necessarily avoid vintage, especially not if they want to keep it cheap, but they should definitely consider the possible consequences of buying vintage. Having tried both, and not being someone who is interested in fucking around with the equipment and who doesn't want to spend time discussing issues with the few experts in the city who could help me with all that (when I had vintage and needed technical advice or repairs I had to make a 90 minute trip to the vintage stereo equipment store, along with my equipment, as I wasn't comfortable just doing it myself with the help of the internet, and I'm not a technophobe at all), new is a much better option for me just on a logistical level.
    And at the end of the day, good solid state amps should not sound any different, whether they are 40 years old or 1 year old. They should not color the music.
    That's true enough. The deciding factor for me is the cost to quality ratio. Lots of great modern equipment available but the good stuff is pretty expensive.
    If hope can grow from dirt like me, it can be done. - EV
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,692
    mrussel1 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    dudeman said:

    The problem with new consumer grade electronics is that just about everything is built using printed circuit boards with surface mount components. Generally speaking, the only way to service them is to replace entire boards and assemblies. That gets expensive quickly and we find ourselves replacing instead of repairing.

    A lot of vintage gear is point to point wired and was built to a high quality standard as opposed to being built for ease of manufacture and sale at a specific price point.

    Component failures happen with vintage gear but parts are readily available for reasonable prices.

    If one was looking at point to point, discrete component amps, just about any newly manufactured amp will cost way more than a vintage equal.

    For full disclosure, I repaired, serviced and maintained high end electronics professionally for a number of years.

    Ditto, and it's not hard to learn the basics which you'll rarely use but be happy you save a cpl thousand dollars. Go Vintage!!!!
    I guess that all comes down to the particular person. Not everyone is handy, and not everyone is interested in actual equipment repair and maintenance as part of this hobby. If you're into fixing electronics or investing your time in figuring out how and where to get parts and whatnot, yeah, sure, buying vintage actually becomes another component of the pleasure of collecting vinyl, and I would think such folks would want to actually avoid new equipment no matter what, because going new would take away from the pleasure. But probably the majority of people aren't actually into that aspect of it at all. For those folks, I wouldn't say they should necessarily avoid vintage, especially not if they want to keep it cheap, but they should definitely consider the possible consequences of buying vintage. Having tried both, and not being someone who is interested in fucking around with the equipment and who doesn't want to spend time discussing issues with the few experts in the city who could help me with all that (when I had vintage and needed technical advice or repairs I had to make a 90 minute trip to the vintage stereo equipment store, along with my equipment, as I wasn't comfortable just doing it myself with the help of the internet, and I'm not a technophobe at all), new is a much better option for me just on a logistical level.
    And at the end of the day, good solid state amps should not sound any different, whether they are 40 years old or 1 year old. They should not color the music.
    True. The problem is that they aren't necessarily going to be compatible with other newer equipment. That is the problem I ran into during my "transition", and why I'm not using half old and half new.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata