Blank Discussion Topic
Comments
-
I believe that. Tucker is the best of the opinion people. I would like to see him have his own channel or broadcast independent of a networks agenda. I feel like he tries to fill a role or play a part on the given network he's on. Him being independent could be something I'd tune into.unsung said:
I only like Tucker.ledvedderman said:I honestly watched Fox News for a solid six months last year. I wanted to hear a different perspective, like maybe I wasn't getting it with the other news sources. It was truly terrible. The Five, Bill, and Hannity are just terrible. They don't even try to have credibility or journalistic integrity. I think the same can be said for the MSNBC prime time but it's to a whole other level on Fox. I can honestly say that the time I spent watching Fox, my level of personal paranoia on things increased. They're very good at that. Thankfully I'm aware of things like that, whereas their vast majority of the elderly market does not.
0 -
On twitter he seems to have a better grasp on reality than some of the other Fox folks.0
-
Tucker's face when his guests are talking is just intolerable, how has he not fixed that yet??
It's truly intolerable.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg
Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
I can't state it any more clear.josevolution said:In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg
Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...
I don't give a flying fuck if this story is true or not. It in no way affects me personally at all and I don't think it affects you either.
As you pro-impeach people say "give it time"
If the story ends up being true the media will be ashamed.
edit - removed notPost edited by PJfanwillneverleave1 on0 -
Plus you're not even a Trump supporter, so Jose shouldn't have asked you in the first place.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I can't state it any more clear.josevolution said:In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg
Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...
I don't give a flying fuck if this story is true or not. It in no way affects me personally at all and I don't think it affects you either.
As you pro-impeach people say "give it time"
If the story ends up not being true the media will be ashamed.
Why do you think the media will be ashamed though? I think the media has mostly treated this under the assumption that it isn't true, and have mostly been talking about what that fact means. And I doubt the alt-right fake news folks will care one way or the other. They'll just say it's true, and there is a cover-up going on, lol.Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Not sure how the word not ended up in my post, I was typing too fast.PJ_Soul said:
Plus you're not even a Trump supporter, so Jose shouldn't have asked you in the first place.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I can't state it any more clear.josevolution said:In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg
Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...
I don't give a flying fuck if this story is true or not. It in no way affects me personally at all and I don't think it affects you either.
As you pro-impeach people say "give it time"
If the story ends up not being true the media will be ashamed.
Why do you think the media will be ashamed though? I think the media has mostly treated this under the assumption that it isn't true, and have mostly been talking about what that fact means. And I doubt the alt-right fake news folks will care one way or the other. They'll just say it's true, and there is a cover-up going on, lol.
I meant being true.
0 -
Huh? Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Not sure how the word not ended up in my post, I was typing too fast.PJ_Soul said:
Plus you're not even a Trump supporter, so Jose shouldn't have asked you in the first place.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I can't state it any more clear.josevolution said:In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg
Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...
I don't give a flying fuck if this story is true or not. It in no way affects me personally at all and I don't think it affects you either.
As you pro-impeach people say "give it time"
If the story ends up not being true the media will be ashamed.
Why do you think the media will be ashamed though? I think the media has mostly treated this under the assumption that it isn't true, and have mostly been talking about what that fact means. And I doubt the alt-right fake news folks will care one way or the other. They'll just say it's true, and there is a cover-up going on, lol.
I meant being true.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
^^^
My first post said If the story ends up not being true the media will be ashamed.
0 -
Are you saying you don't give a fuck if eitherPJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I can't state it any more clear.josevolution said:In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg
Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...
I don't give a flying fuck if this story is true or not. It in no way affects me personally at all and I don't think it affects you either.
As you pro-impeach people say "give it time"
If the story ends up being true the media will be ashamed.
edit - removed not
A. the former president was illegally spying on a candidate or
B. the current president lied to the nation and accused the president of committing a crime
The only way you shouldn't care about this if you don't care about American politics. Considering your time spent here, I don't think that's the case. So please explain how you can care about American politics but not care about A or B? Both have extreme ramifications as to the trustworthiness and truthfullness of the chief executive.0 -
^^^
The interview tonight with Tucker will address this issue so let's wait and see. http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/wiretap-claim-trump-tower-fbi-1.4026603
In an excerpt from a Fox News interview, which will be broadcast in full Wednesday night, Trump suggested that there's more information about the wiretaps.
"I think you're going to find some very interesting items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks," Trump said.
He also said that "wiretap covers a lot of different things."
A. If Presidents spy on people who are coming after them I see no reason why that should be of concern to the public.
B. The current President hasn't been proved a liar yet about the wiretap.
The American media is out of control sensationalizing everything. Politics are dirty and your President won.0 -
I can't wait for all the info to come out about Obama's birth certificate, too.0
-
He's kicking the can down the road and giving it legs for a couple of weeks while his scaling back of environmental regulations goes under the radar in the press.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
The interview tonight with Tucker will address this issue so let's wait and see. http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/wiretap-claim-trump-tower-fbi-1.4026603
In an excerpt from a Fox News interview, which will be broadcast in full Wednesday night, Trump suggested that there's more information about the wiretaps.
"I think you're going to find some very interesting items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks," Trump said.
He also said that "wiretap covers a lot of different things."
A. If Presidents spy on people who are coming after them I see no reason why that should be of concern to the public.
B. The current President hasn't been proved a liar yet about the wiretap.
The American media is out of control sensationalizing everything. Politics are dirty and your President won.0 -
Or a 1,000 US troops get deployed to Syria.ledvedderman said:
He's kicking the can down the road and giving it legs for a couple of weeks while his scaling back of environmental regulations goes under the radar in the press.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
The interview tonight with Tucker will address this issue so let's wait and see. http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/wiretap-claim-trump-tower-fbi-1.4026603
In an excerpt from a Fox News interview, which will be broadcast in full Wednesday night, Trump suggested that there's more information about the wiretaps.
"I think you're going to find some very interesting items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks," Trump said.
He also said that "wiretap covers a lot of different things."
A. If Presidents spy on people who are coming after them I see no reason why that should be of concern to the public.
B. The current President hasn't been proved a liar yet about the wiretap.
The American media is out of control sensationalizing everything. Politics are dirty and your President won.
Yes, Donald, the congressional investigations will reveal some very interesting things. Namely, evidence for your impeachment.
Follow the money, from Russia with love, all the way to impeachment.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/trump-travel-ban.amp.html
How will he respond to this news ..jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
My guess is not well.josevolution said:https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/trump-travel-ban.amp.html
How will he respond to this news ..I LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0 -
It's such BS that judges won't let him violate the constitution.
They must not recognize his brilliance.0 -
This guy is a crook that's as simple as you can label him , he has a total dishonest demeanor...jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
-
jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
-
you guy's act like President Trump is the only President to enact a travel ban, sometimes hard action needs to be taken, before everybody starts screaming racism take a look back at the past Presidents who've done this same thing, even the donkey had a hand in this right ?josevolution said:https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/trump-travel-ban.amp.html
How will he respond to this news ..
if it were up to me the travel ban would be much stricter, there are other countries that have stricter travel bans than the US but I don't see you all complaining about them and some of those specifically block anybody of the muslim faith and the funny thing about those countries...they don't have muslim related problems to deal with like the US and other sanctuary countries/cities.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help